Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.224
Filtrar
1.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 30(6): 423-429, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) is increasingly becoming the standard surgical treatment for prostate cancer. While some risk factors for postoperative complications of RARP have been identified, no scoring model that incorporates both preoperative physical status of the patient and intraoperative risk factors has been developed. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score was initially described to predict postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgical procedures. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the E-PASS score in predicting postoperative complications of RARP. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 204 patients who underwent RARP between 2019 and 2022. Demographic data, parameters indicating patients' preoperative physical condition, and intraoperative risk factors were analyzed. The E-PASS score and subscores were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Of the patients, 164 (80.4%) were discharged without any postoperative complications (Group 1), and 40 (19.6%) experienced various degrees of complications (Group 2). Patients in Group 2 had higher rates of previous abdominal surgery, elevated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores, longer surgical durations, and higher E-PASS scores. To assess the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Risk Score (CRS) as a predictive factor for postoperative complications, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a cut-off value was established. The cut-off value for CRS was determined to be -0.0345 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.783, CI: 0.713-0.853; p<0.001). Patients with a CRS higher than the cut-off value had a 16.4 times higher rate of postoperative complications after RARP (95% CI: 5.58-48.5). CONCLUSION: The E-PASS scoring model successfully predicts postoperative complications in patients undergoing RARP by using preoperative data about the physical status of the patient and surgical risk factors. The E-PASS score and its subscores could be utilized as objective criteria to determine the risk of postoperative complications before and immediately after surgery.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Medição de Risco/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(10): 3583-3589, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38856133

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The primary surgical techniques used to treat localized renal tumors are laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Obese patients have more intra-abdominal fat accumulation, which may make the localization and operation in minimally invasive surgery more complicated. Currently, limited research has been conducted on which method is more suitable for performing a partial nephrectomy on obese individuals. The aim of our investigation was to analyze and compare the perioperative results associated with both approaches to offer valuable information about the selection of LPN or RAPN as an optimal choice when performing a partial nephrectomy in obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data from 78 cases of obese individuals [Body mass index (BMI) > 28] who underwent RAPN, as well as 50 cases of obese individuals (BMI > 28) who underwent LPN. The analysis covered various aspects, including initial patient characteristics, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), warm ischemia time (WIT), operation time, volume of blood loss during the surgical procedure, time taken to recover bowel function, positive surgical margin rate, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: We observed that RAPNs exhibited shorter warm ischemia time and reduced intraoperative blood loss in obese patients, along with decreased postoperative duration of abdominal drainage and hospitalization periods compared to LPNs. CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients, RAPN demonstrates advantages over LPN in minimizing intraoperative blood loss, WIT, and facilitating postoperative recovery. These findings may serve as valuable evidence when considering the choice between LPN or RAPN for partial nephrectomy in obese individuals.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Nefrectomia , Obesidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Obesidade/complicações , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Tempo de Internação , Duração da Cirurgia
3.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 175, 2024 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842610

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to compare the operative time, intraoperative complications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, mortality, and cost associated with Robotic Surgery (RS) and Laparascopic Surgery (LS) in anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases. Studies comparing short-term outcomes and cost between RS and LS in patients with anti-reflux and hiatal hernia were included. Data on operative time, complications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, mortality, and cost were extracted. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the MINORS scale. RESULTS: Fourteen retrospective observational studies involving a total of 555,368 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed no statistically significant difference in operative time, intraoperative complications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, and mortality between RS and LS. However, LS was associated with lower costs compared to RS. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that RS has non-inferior short-term outcomes in anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery, compared to LS. LS is more cost-effective, but RS offers potential benefits such as improved visualization and enhanced surgical techniques. Further research, including randomized controlled trials and long-term outcome studies, is needed to validate and refine these findings.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Hérnia Hiatal , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Hérnia Hiatal/cirurgia , Hérnia Hiatal/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/economia , Duração da Cirurgia , Herniorrafia/economia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Tempo de Internação/economia , Fundoplicatura/economia , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia
4.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 329, 2024 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867224

RESUMO

Iatrogenic aortic regurgitation secondary to leaflet injury is a rare complication of mitral valve surgery. For the first time, we report a patient who had progressive aortic regurgitation due to non-coronary leaflet perforation after robotic mitral valve repair and required aortic valve repair 18 months after this initial surgery. As in our case, aortic regurgitation after mitral valve surgery may remain undiagnosed on intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography or undetected until the patient's discharge due to gradual enlargement of very small perforations over the postoperative course.


Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Doença Iatrogênica , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Valva Mitral , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/etiologia , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Feminino
5.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 249, 2024 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869689

RESUMO

Even though robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is superior to open surgery in reducing postoperative complications, 6-20% of patients still experience urinary incontinence (UI) after surgery. Therefore, many researchers have established predictive models for UI occurrence after RARP, but the predictive performance of these models is inconsistent. This study aims to systematically review and critically evaluate the published prediction models of UI risk for patients after RARP. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Literature published from inception to March 20, 2024, which reported the development and/or validation of clinical prediction models for the occurrence of UI after RARP. We identified seven studies with eight models that met our inclusion criteria. Most of the studies used logistic regression models to predict the occurrence of UI after RARP. The most common predictors included age, body mass index, and nerve sparing procedure. The model performance ranged from poor to good, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.64 to 0.98 in studies. All the studies have a high risk of bias. Despite their potential for predicting UI after RARP, clinical prediction models are restricted by their limited accuracy and high risk of bias. In the future, the study design should be improved, the potential predictors should be considered from larger and representative samples comprehensively, and high-quality risk prediction models should be established. And externally validating models performance to enhance their clinical accuracy and applicability.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prostatectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Masculino , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Curva ROC , Índice de Massa Corporal
6.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 241, 2024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833079

RESUMO

While partial nephrectomy offers oncologic efficacy and preserves renal function for T1 renal tumors, renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) remains a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. This study compared RAP incidence across robotic-assisted (RAPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and open (OPN) partial nephrectomies in a large tertiary oncological center. This retrospective study analyzed 785 patients undergoing partial nephrectomy between 2012 and 2022 (398 RAPN, 122 LPN, 265 OPN). Data included demographics, tumor size/location, surgical type, clinical presentation, treatment, and post-operative outcomes. The primary outcome was RAP incidence, with secondary outcomes including presentation, treatment efficacy, and renal function. Seventeen patients (2.1%) developed RAP, presenting with massive hematuria (100%), hemorrhagic shock (5.8%), and clot retention (23%). The median onset was 12 days postoperatively. RAP occurred in 4 (1%), 4 (3.3%), and 9 (3.4%) patients following RAPN, LPN, and OPN, respectively (p = 0.04). Only operative length and surgical approach were independently associated with RAP. Selective embolization achieved immediate bleeding control in 94%, with one patient requiring a second embolization. No additional surgery or nephrectomy was needed. Estimated GFR at one year was similar across both groups (p = 0.53). RAPN demonstrated a significantly lower RAP incidence compared to LPN and OPN (p = 0.04). Emergency angiographic embolization proved effective, with no long-term renal function impact. This retrospective study lacked randomization and long-term follow-up. Further research with larger datasets and longer follow-ups is warranted. This study suggests that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is associated with a significantly lower risk of RAP compared to traditional approaches. Emergency embolization effectively treats RAP without compromising long-term renal function.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma , Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Nefrectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Artéria Renal , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Falso Aneurisma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Idoso , Artéria Renal/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Incidência , Resultado do Tratamento , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos
7.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 242, 2024 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837047

RESUMO

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the established gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder diseases. However, robotic cholecystectomy is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in LC and robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in patients with nonmalignant gallbladder conditions. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing RAC to LC in patients with benign gallbladder disease. Only randomized trials and non-randomized studies with propensity score matching were included. Mean differences (MDs) were computed for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using Software R, version 4.2.3. A total of 13 studies comprising 22,440 patients were included, of whom 10,758 patients (47.94%) underwent RAC. The mean age was 48.5 years and 65.2% were female. Compared with LC, RAC significantly increased operative time (MD 12.59 min; 95% CI 5.62-19.55; p < 0.01; I2 = 79%). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in hospitalization time (MD -0.18 days; 95% CI - 0.43-0.07; p = 0.07; I2 = 89%), occurrence of intraoperative complications (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.38-1.15; p = 0.14; I2 = 35%) and bile duct injury (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.64, 1.55; p = 0.97; I2 = 0%). RAC was associated with an increase in operative time compared with LC without increasing hospitalization time or the incidence of intraoperative complications. These findings suggest that RAC is a safe approach to benign gallbladder disease.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar , Duração da Cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar/cirurgia , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
8.
Urol Pract ; 11(4): 753-759, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899673

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate the differences in perioperative outcomes, especially ureteroenteric strictures, between patients who underwent a stented ureteroenteric anastomosis at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and ileal conduit vs those who did not. METHODS: A retrospective review of our RARC database was performed (2009-2023). Patients were divided into those who received stented ureteroenteric anastomosis vs those who did not. Propensity score matching was performed in the ratio of 3 (stented ureteroenteric anastomosis) to 1 (stent-free) in terms of age, gender, BMI, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Charlson Comorbidity Index, prior radiation therapy, previous abdominal surgery history, clinical T3/clinical T4 stage, preoperative metastasis, and preoperative hydronephrosis. A cumulative incidence curve was used to depict ureteroenteric strictures and a Cox regression model was used to identify variables associated with ureteroenteric strictures. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-eight patients underwent RARC, 366 individuals underwent a stented ureteroenteric anastomosis, and 122 patients underwent a stent-free approach. There was no significant difference in 90-day overall complications, high-grade complications, readmissions, UTIs, leakage, and ileus (P > .05). Ureteroenteric strictures occurred at a rate of 13% and 18% at 1 and 2 years, respectively in the stented group, vs 7% and 10% in the stent-free group (P = .05). Stent placement was significantly associated with ureteroenteric strictures. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-free ureteroenteric anastomosis was associated with fewer strictures following RARC and ileal conduit.


Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica , Cistectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Stents , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Derivação Urinária , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Derivação Urinária/efeitos adversos , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Ureter/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Obstrução Ureteral/etiologia , Íleo/cirurgia
9.
Anesth Analg ; 139(1): 211-219, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885478

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) is a frequent complication after surgery. Various tools have been proposed to identify patients at high risk for AKI, including preoperative serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary cell cycle arrest, and tubular damage biomarkers; however, none of these can appropriately assess AKI risk before surgery. Renal functional reserve (RFR) screened by the Doppler-derived intraparenchymal renal resistive index variation (IRRIV) test has been proposed to identify patients at risk for AKI before a kidney insult. IRRIV test has been developed in healthy individuals and previously investigated in cardiac surgery patients. This study aims to evaluate the value of the IRRIV test in identifying PO-AKI among patients undergoing robotic abdominal surgery in the Trendelenburg position for pelvic oncological disease. METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blinded, observational study. Preoperative baseline renal function and RFR were assessed in 53 patients with baseline eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2, undergoing robotic surgery in the Trendelenburg position for pelvic oncological disease. The capability of Doppler-derived RFR in predicting PO-AKI was investigated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS: Approximately 15.1% of patients developed AKI within the first 3 postoperative days. Thirty-one (58.5%) patients had a physiologic delta-RRI (ie, ≥0.05), while 22 (41.5%) patients did not. The ROC-AUC for PO-AKI was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.97; P = .007) for serum creatinine, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96; P = .006) for eGFR, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91; P = .017) for delta-RRI. When combined with eGFR, the ROC-AUC for delta-RRI was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.9-1). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the preoperative assessment of Doppler-derived RFR combined with baseline renal function improves the capability of identifying patients at high risk for PO-AKI with eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 after robotic abdominal surgery in Trendelenburg position for pelvic oncological disease.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Rim , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Humanos , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Rim/fisiopatologia , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Risco , Decúbito Inclinado com Rebaixamento da Cabeça/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Curva ROC , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 379, 2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888747

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Indwelling catheterization following radical prostatectomy is used to aid healing and urinary drainage. While early removal is well investigated, prolonged catheterization has only been investigated in terms of urinary incontinence. Other complications such as anastomotic strictures are unexplored so far. This study aims to analyze the sequelae of catheterization lasting more than 14 days after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: A prospective database of 3087 patients undergoing RARP was analyzed, focusing on 180 patients with catheterization exceeding 14 days (Group A) and 88 matched controls (Group B). Outcome measures included subsequent surgeries, complications, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Prolonged catheterization did not significantly increase the need for subsequent surgeries (6% in Group A vs. 7% in Group B, p = .95). However, anastomotic strictures were more common in Group A (3%) compared to Group B (0%) after exclusion of risk factors. Incontinence rates were similar between groups, although a subgroup analysis revealed higher incontinence rates in patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days. No significant differences were observed in erectile function or quality of life between the groups. CONCLUSION: Prolonged catheterization after RARP does not independently increase the risk of anastomotic strictures in the general population. However, in patients without risk factors, prolonged catheter dwell time may elevate the risk of strictures and subsequent surgeries. Additionally, patients with catheterization exceeding 28 days may experience higher rates of long-term incontinence. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate the long-term implications of prolonged catheterization.


Assuntos
Cateteres de Demora , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prostatectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Cateterismo Urinário , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Idoso , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Estudos Prospectivos
11.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 476, 2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890631

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: At present, the core decompression (CD) has become the main surgical procedure for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH); however, the CD surgery requires high operator experience and repeated fluoroscopy increases the radiation damage to patients, and medical staff. This article compares the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted and freehand CD for ONFH by meta-analysis. METHODS: Computer searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, WanFang, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database were conducted from the time of database inception to November 15, 2023. The literature on the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted and freehand CD in the treatment of ONFH was collected. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and strictly evaluated the quality of the included literature. Outcome measures encompassed operative duration, intraoperative blood loss volume, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopies, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Harris hip score (HHS), complications, and radiographic progression. Data synthesis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. The quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grades of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) standards. RESULTS: Seven retrospective cohort studies involving 355 patients were included in the study. The results of meta-analysis showed that in the robot-assisted group, the operative duration (MD = -17.60, 95% CI: -23.41 to -11.78, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss volume (MD = -19.98, 95% CI: -28.84 to -11.11, P < 0.001), frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopies (MD = -6.60, 95% CI: -9.01 to -4.20, P < 0.001), and ΔVAS score (MD = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.22, P < 0.001) were significantly better than those in the freehand group. The GRADE evidence evaluation showed ΔVAS score as low quality and other indicators as very low quality. There was no significant difference in the terms of ΔHHS (MD = 0.51, 95% CI: -1.34 to 2.35, P = 0.59), complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.03 to 2.74, P = 0.29), and radiographic progression (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.02, P = 0.06) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence showing the benefit of robot-assisted therapy for treatment of ONFH patients, and much of it is of low quality. Therefore, caution should be exercised in interpreting these results. It is recommended that more high-quality studies be conducted to validate these findings in future studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ #recordDetails, CRD42023420593.


Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/cirurgia , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia
12.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 257, 2024 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896165

RESUMO

To assess the oncologic efficacy and safety of robot-assisted approach to radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU) in geriatric versus younger patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2009 to 2022 of 145 patients (two cohorts: < 75 and ≥ 75 years old) with non-metastatic UTUC who underwent RARNU. Primary endpoint was UTUC-related recurrence of disease during surveillance (bladder-specific and metastatic). Safety was assessed according to 30-day, modified Clavien-Dindo (CD) classifications (Major: C.D. III-V). Survival estimates were performed using Kaplan-Meier method. There were 89 patients < 75 years (median 65 years) and 56 patients ≥ 75 years (median 81 years). Comparing the young versus geriatric cohorts: median follow-up 38 vs 24 months (p = 0.03, respectively) with similar 3-year bladder-specific recurrence survival (60% vs 67%, HR 0.70, 95% CI [0.35, 1.40], p = 0.31) and metastasis-free survival (79% vs 70%, HR 0.71, 95% CI [0.30, 1.70], p = 0.44). Expectedly, the younger cohort had a significant deviation in overall survival compared to the geriatric cohort at 1-year (89% vs 76%) and 3-years (72% vs 41%; HR 3.29, 95% CI [1.88, 5.78], p < 0.01). The 30-day major (1% vs 0) and minor complications (8% vs 14%, p = 0.87). Limitations include retrospective study design of a high-volume, single-surgeon experience. Compared to younger patients with UTUC, geriatric patients undergoing RARNU have similar oncologic outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up with no increased risk of 30-day perioperative complications. Thus, age alone should not be used to disqualify patients from definitive surgical management of UTUC with RARNU.


Assuntos
Nefroureterectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Nefroureterectomia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores Etários , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidade
13.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 238, 2024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833096

RESUMO

The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the comparative efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in treating gastric cancer among patients characterized by a high visceral fat area (VFA). In April 2024, we conducted a comprehensive literature review using major international databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We restricted our selection to articles written in English, excluding reviews, protocols without published data, conference abstracts, and irrelevant content. Our analysis focused on continuous data using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and standard mean differences (SMDs), while dichotomous data were assessed with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. We set the threshold for statistical significance at P < 0.05. Data extraction included baseline characteristics, primary outcomes (such as operative time, major complications, lymph node yield, and anastomotic leakage), and secondary outcomes. The meta-analysis included three cohort studies totaling 970 patients. The robotic-assisted group demonstrated a significantly longer operative time compared to the laparoscopic group, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of - 55.76 min (95% CI - 74.03 to - 37.50; P < 0.00001). This group also showed a reduction in major complications, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.48 (95% CI 1.09-5.66; P = 0.03) and fewer occurrences of abdominal infections (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.41-7.14; P = 0.005), abdominal abscesses (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.53-9.57; P = 0.004), anastomotic leaks (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.73-9.65; P = 0.001), and pancreatic leaks (OR 8.93, 95% CI 2.33-34.13; P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups regarding length of hospital stay, overall complications, estimated blood loss, or lymph node yield. Based on our findings, robot-assisted gastric cancer surgery in obese patients with visceral fat appears to be correlated with fewer major complications compared to laparoscopic surgery, while maintaining similar outcomes in other surgical aspects. However, it is important to note that robot-assisted procedures do tend to have longer operative times.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Obesidade Abdominal , Duração da Cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Obesidade Abdominal/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Gastrectomia/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia
14.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 262, 2024 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907844

RESUMO

The purpose of the study was to compare the protective effects of robotic rectal cancer surgery (RRCS) and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (LRCS) on urinary and sexual function of patients. We conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies comparing the impact of RRCS and LRCS on urinary function and sexual function. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the Female Sexual Function Index(FSFI) were used to evaluate the urinary function and sexual function of patients. A total of 13 studies comprising 1964 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 3 randomized controlled trials, 5 retrospective cohort studies, 3 prospective cohort studies, and 2 propensity score-matched studies. Nine hundred and fifty-nine patients underwent RRCS and 1005 patients underwent LRCS. Statistical analysis of the IPSS scores indicated urinary function was significantly better in the RRCS group than in the LRCS group at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively [mean difference (MD), - 1.06, 95% CI - 1.85 to - 0.28; and MD, - 0.96, 95% CI - 1.60 to - 0.32; and MD, - 1.09, 95% CI - 1.72 to - 0.46]. Statistical analysis of the IIEF-5 scores indicated male sexual function was significantly better in the RRCS group than in the LRCS group at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (MD, 1.76, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.72; and MD, 1.83, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.33; and MD, 1.05, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.01). Statistical analysis of the FSFI scores indicated female sexual function was significantly better in the RRCS group than in the LRCS group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (MD, 2.86; 95% CI 1.38 to 4.35; and MD, 4.19; 95% CI 1.85 to 6.54). RRCS is more favorable than LRCS in preserving the urinary and sexual function of patients with rectal cancer.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/etiologia , Micção/fisiologia , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia
15.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 76(2): 241-246, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742557

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of dual-console telesurgery with the new KangDuo system in an animal experiment and clinical study. METHODS: Six canine models were performed radical prostatectomy with dual-console KanDuo surgical robot-1500 (KD-SR-1500-RARP). The perioperative outcomes, physical and mental workload of the surgeon were collected. Physical workload was evaluated with surface electromyography. Mental workload was evaluated with NASA-TLX. After conducting animal experiments to verify safety of dual-console KD-SR-1500-RARP, we conducted the clinical trial using 5G and wired networks. RESULTS: In the animal experiment, all surgeries were performed successfully. The operative time was 80.2±32.1 min. The docking time was 2.4±0.5 min. The console time was 49.7±25.3 min. There were no perioperative complications or equipment related adverse events. All dogs can micturate after catheter removal at one week postoperatively. The mental workload was at a low level (a scale ranging from 0 to 60), which scored 15.7±6.9. Among the eight recorded muscles, the fatigue degree of the right radial flexor and left biceps was the highest two (iEMG, resection, 299.8±344 uV, 109.9±16.9 uV; suture, 849.4±1252.5 uV, 423.1±621.3 uV, respectively). In the clinical study, the console time was 136 min. The mean latency time was ≤200 ms. The data pocket loss was <1%. The operation was successfully completed without malfunctions occurring throughout the entire process. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-console telesurgery with the KD-SR-1500 system was shown to be feasible and safe in radical prostatectomy using 5G and wired networks.


Assuntos
Estudos de Viabilidade , Prostatectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Animais , Cães , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Equipamento , Duração da Cirurgia , Idoso , Eletromiografia , Telemedicina/métodos
16.
Surgery ; 176(1): 11-23, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were conducted. Surface under cumulative ranking area values, mean difference, odds ratio, and 95% credible intervals were calculated for all outcomes. Cluster analysis was performed to determine the most cost-effective clustering approach. Costs-morbidity, costs-mortality, and costs-efficacy were the primary outcomes assessed, with postoperative overall morbidity, mortality, and length of stay associated with total costs for open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection. RESULTS: Laparoscopic liver resection incurred the lowest total costs (laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection: mean difference -2,529.84, 95% credible intervals -4,192.69 to -884.83; laparoscopic liver resection versus robotic liver resection: mean difference -3,363.37, 95% credible intervals -5,629.24 to -1,119.38). Open liver resection had the lowest procedural costs but incurred the highest hospitalization costs compared to laparoscopic liver resection and robotic liver resection. Conversely, robotic liver resection had the highest total and procedural costs but the lowest hospitalization costs. Robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection had a significantly reduced length of stay than open liver resection and showed less postoperative morbidity. Laparoscopic liver resection resulted in the lowest readmission and liver-specific complication rates. Laparoscopic liver resection and robotic liver resection demonstrated advantages in costs-morbidity efficiency. While robotic liver resection offered notable benefits in mortality and length of stay, these were balanced against its highest total costs, presenting a nuanced trade-off in the costs-mortality and costs-efficacy analyses. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection represents a more cost-effective option for hepatectomy with superior postoperative outcomes and shorter length of stay than open liver resection. Robotic liver resection, though costlier than laparoscopic liver resection, along with laparoscopic liver resection, consistently exceeds open liver resection in surgical performance.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatectomia , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Hepatectomia/economia , Hepatectomia/métodos , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Metanálise em Rede , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10550, 2024 05 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719836

RESUMO

To investigate the influence of preoperative smoking history on the survival outcomes and complications in a cohort from a large multicenter database. Many patients who undergo radical cystectomy (RC) have a history of smoking; however, the direct association between preoperative smoking history and survival outcomes and complications in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who undergo robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) remains unexplored. We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from 749 patients in the Korean Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Study Group (KORARC) database, with an average follow-up duration of 30.8 months. The cohort was divided into two groups: smokers (n = 351) and non-smokers (n = 398). Propensity score matching was employed to address differences in sample size and baseline demographics between the two groups (n = 274, each). Comparative analyses included assessments of oncological outcomes and complications. After matching, smoking did not significantly affect the overall complication rate (p = 0.121). Preoperative smoking did not significantly increase the occurrence of complications based on complication type (p = 0.322), nor did it increase the readmission rate (p = 0.076). There were no perioperative death in either group. Furthermore, preoperative smoking history showed no significant impact on overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, interquartile range (IQR): 0.54-1.42; p = 0.589] and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.12, IQR: 0.83-1.53; p = 0.458) following RARC for MIBC. The extent of preoperative smoking (≤ 10, 10-30, and ≥ 30 pack-years) had no significant influence on OS and RFS in any of the categories (all p > 0.05). Preoperative smoking history did not significantly affect OS, RFS, or complications in patients with MIBC undergoing RARC.


Assuntos
Cistectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Fumar , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Idoso , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Resultado do Tratamento , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Período Pré-Operatório
18.
J Urol ; 212(1): 32-40, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723593

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Limited high-quality studies have compared robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy. We sought to compare their postoperative outcomes in a randomized setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single center, 354 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were assessed for eligibility; 342 were randomized (1:1). The primary outcome was 90-day complication rates. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed over 18 months, and oncological outcomes, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and additional treatment over 36 months. RESULTS: From 2014 to 18, 327 patients underwent surgery (retropubic radical prostatectomy = 156, RALP = 171). Complications occurred in 27 (17.3%) vs 19 (11.1%; P = .107). Patients undergoing RALP experienced lower median bleeding (250.0 vs 719.5 mL; P < .001) and shorter hospitalization time. Urinary EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) median scores were better for RALP over 18 months, with higher continence rate at 3 months (80.5% vs 64.7%; P = .002), 6 months (90.1% vs 81.6%; P = .036) and 18 months (95.4% vs 78.8%; P < .001). Sexual EPIC and Sexual Health Inventory for Men median scores were higher with RALP up to 12 months, while the potency rate was superior at 3 months (23.9% vs 5.3%; P = .001) and 6 months (30.6% vs 6.9%; P < .001). Quality of life over the 18 months and oncological outcomes over 36 months were not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Complications at 90 days were similar. RALP showed superior sexual outcomes at 1 year, improved urinary outcomes at 18 months, and comparable oncological outcomes at 36 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery; NCT02292914. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914?cond=NCT02292914&draw=2&rank=1.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 210, 2024 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727869

RESUMO

Single-port laparoscopy has gained more attention, but inherent technical challenges hinder its wider use. To overcome the disadvantage of traditional single-port surgery, robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery system was designed and clinically utilized. This multi-center single-arm trial was aimed to present the clinical outcomes of the SHURUI robotic endoscopic single-site surgery system. 63 women with ovary cysts, myoma, cervical epithelial neoplasm, or endometrial carcinoma were recruited at 6 academic medical centers in different districts of China. The trial was registered on September 5, 2023, with the register number: ChiCTR2300075431, retrospectively registered. Patients underwent robotic LESS surgery with the SHURUI endoscopic surgical system from January 17 to May 26, 2023. Demographic information, perioperative parameters, complications, scar healing, and operator satisfaction scores were recorded. Patients were followed up for 30 ± 4 days. Average operative time and estimated blood loss were 157.03 ± 75.24 min and 63.86 ± 98.33 ml, respectively, for all surgeries. Average anal exhaust time and hospitalization stay were 30.99 ± 14.25 h and 3.63 ± 1.59 days, respectively. Patients' postoperative rehabilitation assessment showed satisfactory results on the day of discharge and 30 ± 4 days after surgery. The surgery achieved good cosmetic benefits and was surgeon friendly. There were no conversions to alternative surgical modalities, complications, or readmissions. The SHURUI endoscopic surgical system showed both the technical feasibility and safety of this surgical modality for gynecologic patients. Further randomized studies comparing this modality with traditional LESS surgery are suggested.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Idoso , Duração da Cirurgia , Endoscopia/métodos , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos
20.
Urology ; 188: 11-17, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692493

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes, total healthcare utilization, and cost savings for same-day discharge (SDD) vs inpatient robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN). METHODS: We compared 146 RAPNs and 65 RARNs consecutively performed as SDD (RAPN=21, RARN=9) vs inpatient (RAPN=125, RARN=56) from April 2015 to May 2023 at two academic medical centers. We collected baseline demographics, perioperative characteristics, and 30-day complications. We applied the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing analysis to compare total costs of RAPN and PARN throughout the cycle of care, including inpatient vs SDD. RESULTS: Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar between patients undergoing inpatient vs SDD RAPN and RARN. One Clavien-Dindo grade II complication (3.3%) requiring readmission due to wound infection for antibiotics occurred after SDD RAPN; no complications occurred after SDD RARN. Two unscheduled office or emergency department visits (6.7%) occurred after SDD RAPN for surgical-site infection and urinary retention. SDD vs inpatient RAPN and RARN demonstrated a $3091 (18%) and $4003 (25%) overall cost reduction, respectively. CONCLUSION: SDD RAPN and RARN result in cost savings of 18%-25% without a difference in complications, and thereby improves value-based care for appropriately selected patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais , Nefrectomia , Alta do Paciente , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Nefrectomia/economia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/economia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...