Comparison of Work Relative Value Units Assigned to Urological and Gynecological Surgical Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine if work relative value unit differences exist between analogous, sex-specific procedures. METHODS: Representatives from the AUA and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists independently reviewed the entire procedural code set and identified sex-specific procedures that had an analogous procedure in the opposite sex. These pairs were then evaluated and compared using current American Medical Association Relative Value Scale Update Committee methodology. Comparable code pair values were then examined to determine any systemic bias in the work relative value units assigned between the procedures. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine any differences in procedure or physician time values. The methodology used considered global period, intraservice time, total time, hospital days, postoperative office visits, and the date of the committee review. RESULTS: Of the 10 directly analogous code pairs reviewed, 7 of the female procedures had higher work relative value unit differences (range 0.29-6.47), and 3 of the male procedures had higher work relative value unit differences (range 1.23-2.34). There was no statistical difference between the code pair work relative value units. The work relative value unit per minute of intraservice time and total time were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we compared operative procedures performed in women with clinically comparable operative procedures performed in men that had similar surgical approaches, global periods, and valuation methodologies. Overall, no statistical differences in work relative value units were demonstrated.

Stone centers: a national survey on surgical techniques performed in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent and complex stone disease may be considered a challenging disease. In 2018, the Calculus group of the SIU (Italian Society of Urology) set itself the goal of establishing the minimum requirements for a center that could continuously manage urolithiasis pathology, named a Stone Center. In this study we present the results of a pilot survey carried out in 2019 with the aim of drawing a map of the situation of Italian urological centers dealing with urinary stones. METHODS: A total of 260 national urology departments dealing with urolithiasis surgery were contacted for this study. A survey was issued to each of the centers to determine the number of patients treated for urinary stones and the amount of procedures performed per year: 1) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy ESWL; 2) ureterorenoscopy URS; 3) retrograde intrarenal surgery RIRS; 4) percutaneous nephrolithotomy PCNL. RESULTS: Out of 260 centers contacted, 188 fulfilled the survey. Outcomes were quite variable, with approximately 37% of the centers lacking a lithotripter, and 46% of those that did have it performing fewer than 100 treatments per year. In terms of endoscopic procedures, more than 80% of the centers contacted performed URS or RIRS; however, when it came to percutaneous lithotripsy, these numbers dropped significantly; 33% of the centers contacted did not perform PCNL, and of those who did, 18% had less than 5 years of experience as a center. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey shows a very heterogeneous national picture about urolithiasis treatments. Our goal is to create national paradigms to be able to define stone centers where the patient suffering from complex urinary stones can find a network of professionals with an adequate armamentarium suitable for the management of their pathology.

Dynamism of andrological surgery in France: Evolution of procedures over 10 years.

INTRODUCTION: Andrology and urogenital reconstruction are emerging disciplines in French urology. The aim of our study was to evaluate the evolution of andrological surgical procedures over the period 2013-2022 using national data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected national common classification of medical acts (CCAM) coding data for all procedures involving andrological surgery from the Scansanté internet platform set up by the Technical Agency for Information on Hospitalisation, which collects prospectively from healthcare structures all procedures coded according to CCAM coding. All surgical procedures in andrology were selected. The inclusion period extended from 2013 to 2022. RESULTS: In 10 years, the number of vasectomies has increased tenfold, with 29,890 cases in 2022. Vaso-vasostomies remain marginal, with 80 cases per year. Trans-identity surgeries are rising sharply. Vaginoplasties have multiplied by 4 (333 in 2022) and masculinising surgeries have multiplied by 10 (234 in 2022). Penile prosthesis surgery has increased slightly over 10 years. The number of testicular biopsies has remained stable over time, as has the number of surgeries for curvature of the penis. CONCLUSION: Two andrological surgeries are showing very strong growth: vasectomy and transgender surgery. The emergence of these 2 activities is linked to societal aspirations. Urologists need to be trained to meet this demand. NIVEAU DE PREUVE: Grade 4.

Video-Urodynamic Characteristics and Predictors of Switching from Botulinum Neurotoxin a Injection to Augmentation Enterocystoplasty in Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injection and augmentation enterocystoplasty (AE) are alternative and effective management strategies for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) refractory to pharmacotherapy. A great majority of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) may, however, prefer BoNT-A injections to AE, due to the less invasive characteristics. In this study we evaluated the influence of various video-urodynamic study (VUDS) parameters in SCI patients who continuously received repeat BoNT-A detrusor injections or switched to AE to improve their bladder conditions. We compared the changes in the urodynamic parameters before and after each mode of treatment. In this retrospective study, all SCI patients with refractory NDO who had received at least one BoNT-A injection were enrolled. VUDS was performed before and after both BoNT-A injection and AE. All of the urodynamic parameters of the storage and micturition-including the bladder capacity of every sensation, maximal flow rate (Qmax), post-voiding residual volume, detrusor pressure at Qmax, and bladder contractility index-were recorded. A total of 126 patients, including 46 women and 80 men, with a mean age of 41.8 ± 13.1 years, were recruited for this study. All of the patients receiving either BoNT-A injection or AE had a statistically significant increase of bladder capacity at every time-point during filling and a decrease in detrusor pressure at Qmax during voiding. Patients who switched from BoNT-A to AE had greater improvements in their urodynamic parameters when compared with those who continued with BoNT-A injections. Accordingly, SCI patients receiving BoNT-A injections but experiencing few improvements in their urodynamic parameters should consider switching to AE to achieve a better storage function and bladder capacity.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on functional urology procedures in France: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on functional urology procedures in France. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted within 11 secondary and tertiary referral centers in France. Patients aged > 18 years who were diagnosed with a functional urology disease before the national lockdown (March 17th, 2020) and who required a surgery were included. Study period went from March 17th to September 30th 2020. The included interventions were listed according to the guidelines for functional urology enacted by the French Association of Urology and delay of reoperation was compared to the guidelines' delay. The primary outcome was the number of procedures left unscheduled at the end of the study period. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: From March 17th 2020 to September 3 rd 2020, 1246 patients with a previous diagnosis of a functional urological disease requiring a surgery were included. The mean follow-up was 140.4 days (± 53.4). Overall, 316 interventions (25.4%) were maintained whereas 74 (5.9%) were canceled, 848 (68.1%) postponed and 8 patients (0.6%) died. At the end of the follow-up, 184 patients (21.7%) were still not rescheduled. If the intervention was postponed, the mean delay between the initial and final date was 85.7 days (± 64.4). CONCLUSION: Overall, more than two thirds of interventions had to be postponed and the mean delay between the initial and final date was about three months.

Survey of COVID-19 impact on pediatric urology services.

INTRODUCTION: To better understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has forced rapid operational changes in the global healthcare industry, changes implemented on an individual, institutional basis must be considered. There currently is not adequate literature about the overall impact COVID-19 has had on pediatric urology services worldwide. We believe that they have dramatically decreased during the COVID-19 crisis, but have adapted to accommodate changes. We hypothesize that patient care was widely variant due to inadequate standardized recommendations or crisis planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was deployed to 377 pediatric urologists globally via email to analyze COVID-19's impact on various types of pediatric urology practices. Key categories included impacts on elective services, telemedicine use, finances, and recovery operations. A total of 114 responses were collected between April 29th - May 22nd, 2020. RESULTS: The widespread cancellation of elective surgical procedures caused significant disturbances in the field. There was a uniform, significant increase (75%) in telemedicine use across practices. The pandemic has created many changes in care provision for physicians, institutions, and patients themselves. Furthermore, the sudden economic burden on healthcare facilities could lead to cost-cutting measures, creating further strain within institutions. Though telemedicine has its limitations, it is a very viable option when traditional services are unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate steps should be taken to ensure that the recovery phases of pediatric urology practices are as efficient as possible. Institutions should develop task forces to develop critical workflow processes in the event of health crises, while still maintaining patient-centered care. This will be essential in maximizing appropriate care allocation.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urological Care Delivery in the United States.

PURPOSE: We examined changes in urological care delivery due to COVID-19 in the U.S. based on patient, practice, and local/regional demographic and pandemic response features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed real-world data from the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry collected from electronic health record systems. Data represented 157 outpatient urological practices and 3,165 providers across 48 U.S. states and territories, including 3,297,721 unique patients, 12,488,831 total outpatient visits and 2,194,456 procedures. The primary outcome measure was the number of outpatient visits and procedures performed (inpatient or outpatient) per practice per week, measured from January 2019 to February 2021. RESULTS: We found large (>50%) declines in outpatient visits from March 2020 to April 2020 across patient demographic groups and states, regardless of timing of state stay-at-home orders. Nonurgent outpatient visits decreased more across various nonurgent procedures (49%-59%) than for procedures performed for potentially urgent diagnoses (38%-52%); surgical procedures for nonurgent conditions also decreased more (43%-79%) than those for potentially urgent conditions (43%-53%). African American patients had similar decreases in outpatient visits compared with Asians and Caucasians, but also slower recoveries back to baseline. Medicare-insured patients had the steepest declines (55%), while those on Medicaid and government insurance had the lowest percentage of recovery to baseline (73% and 69%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides real-world evidence on the decline in urological care across demographic groups and practice settings, and demonstrates a differential impact on the utilization of urological health services by demographics and procedure type.

Risk of reoperation 10 years after surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a national population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is a debate about the safety and effectiveness of surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Controversy about the use of synthetic mesh sling insertion has led to an increased uptake of retropubic colposuspension and autologous sling procedures. Comparative evidence on the long-term outcomes from these procedures is needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of reoperation at 10 years after operation between women treated for stress urinary incontinence with retropubic colposuspension, mesh sling insertion, and autologous sling procedures. STUDY DESIGN: The records of admissions to National Health Service hosptials were used to identify women who had first-time stress incontinence surgery between 2006 and 2013 in England. The first incidence of the following outcomes was assessed: further stress incontinence surgery, surgery for a complication (either mesh removal, prolapse repair, or incisional hernia repair), and any reoperation (either further stress incontinence surgery, mesh removal, prolapse repair, or incisional hernia repair). The cumulative incidence of each of these outcomes up to 10 years after surgery was calculated, considering death as a competing event. Multivariable modeling was then used to estimate the reoperation hazard ratios for the different initial surgery types with adjustments for patient characteristics and concurrent prolapse surgery or hysterectomy. RESULTS: The analysis included 2262 women treated with retropubic colposuspension, 92,524 treated with mesh sling insertion, and 1234 treated with autologous sling. The cumulative incidence of any first reoperation at 10 years was 21.3% (95% confidence interval, 19.5-23.0) after retropubic colposuspension, 10.9% (10.7-11.1) after mesh sling insertion, and 12.0% (10.2-13.9) after autologous sling procedures. The women who had a retropubic colposuspension were significantly more likely to have a reoperation than women who had an autologous sling (adjusted hazard ratio for any reoperation: 1.79 [1.47-2.17]; for further stress incontinence surgery: 1.64 [1.19-2.26]; for surgery for complications: 1.89 [1.49-2.40]), whereas the women who had mesh slings had a similar hazard (for any reoperation: 0.90 [0.76-1.07]; for further stress incontinence surgery: 0.75 [0.57-0.99]; for surgery for complications: 1.11 [0.89-1.36]). A sensitivity analysis excluding the women who had concurrent prolapse surgery or hysterectomy produced similar results. CONCLUSION: Retropubic colposuspension is associated with higher risk of reoperation at 10 years after surgery than mesh sling insertion or autologous sling procedures, with 1 in 5 women requiring reoperation.

Persistent Opioid Usage After Urologic Intervention and the Impact of Tramadol.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients who receive tramadol are as likely to develop persistent usage compared to other opioids after urologic surgery and procedures. METHODS: We identified adults 18 to 64 years old who underwent a urologic procedure in the years 2014 to 2017 using the Truven MarketScan database and subsequently filled an opioid prescription within two weeks of discharge. Patients were excluded if they had any previous opioid prescriptions in the year before surgery. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to estimate influence of type of opioid on discharge and various comorbidities on persistent use to determine if persistent use was related to the choice of discharge opioid. We also compared these rates to a 1:3 comorbidities matched, non-surgical cohort of patients from the general population. RESULTS: Overall, 115,687 patients were included. After 1 year, 14.8% of the urologic surgery cohort had persistent opioid usage compared to 10.8% in the opioid naïve matched non-surgical cohort (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.35-1.39). Discharge with tramadol was associated with a higher odd of persistent usage compared to class II opioids controlling for type of urologic surgery, age, gender, and pain related comorbidities (OR = 1.23 95% CI 1.13-1.35). The odds of persistent usage varied slightly by type of urologic procedure, but all were higher than matched non-surgical cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients developed persistent opiate usage after urologic surgery compared to a comorbidity matched non-surgical cohort. In this model, tramadol specifically was associated with higher odds of novel persistent opioid usage compared to other opioids. Urologists should not consider tramadol to be a safer choice with regard to developing persistent usage and consider prospective validation of these results.

COVID-19 and the impact on urology service provision at Capital & Coast District Health Board.

AIM: To determine the impact on the Capital & Coast District Health Board (CCDHB) urology service of the implementation of nationwide healthcare restrictions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective study over a 21 working day period during the implementation of National Hospital Response Framework Alert (NHRFA) level 2. We obtained patient data during this period and a corresponding control period prior to the pandemic. The data was focussed on the volume of operating theatre cases, outpatient consultations, procedural clinic appointments and the estimated avoided outpatient travel. RESULTS: Total urology admissions decreased by 27% during the 21-day NHRFA level 2 period. However, acute surgical procedures increased by 30% whereas elective surgical procedures decreased by 32%. Outpatient consultations overall decreased by 32% during NHRFA level 2 despite virtual phone consultations increasing by 274%. Procedural clinic appointments decreased by 85%. The virtual platform also saved each patient an estimated 22.7km of average travel. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate the effects of restrictions in response to a crisis and set a precedent for future management in such scenarios. The data also show how service efficiency can be optimised while providing an environmentally friendly alternative for routine clinical practice.

The Impact of Surgical Center Volume on Reoperation Risk after Mid Urethral Sling.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether a center's surgical volume affects patient reoperation rates after mid urethral sling (MUS) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating a large managed care organization from 2005 to 2016. The primary outcome was the MUS reoperation rate. Perioperative factors and reoperation of patients were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratio and the 95% confidence interval of reoperation using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Within the managed care system, 13,404 primary MUSs were performed at 11 centers over the study period (19/105 center years were considered low volume). Higher-volume centers (>58 procedures/year based on concentration curve) performed 93% of surgeries in this cohort. Overall reoperation risk for patients of higher-volume centers was smaller than those of lower-volume centers, 4.9% vs 9.8% at 9 years (hazard ratio 0.45 [p <0.01]). Risk of reoperation for recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) for patients was lower in the higher-volume centers, 4% vs 9.1% at 9 years (p <0.01). Patient of higher-volume centers were less likely to have a reoperation for mesh exposure 0.2% vs 0.7% (p <0.01) or infection 0% vs 0.2% (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had their MUS surgery at a higher-volume medical center were less likely to have any reoperation including for recurrent SUI, mesh exposure or infection. These findings persisted even when controlling for potential covariates including patient demographics and surgeon volume and specialty.

Is Uro-oncological Surgery Safe During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Comparative Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Surgery 2019-2020.

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 infection has resulted in an unprecedented pandemic. Patients undergoing surgery are a group at risk of exposure. Also, patients with ongoing infection undergoing surgery may be more susceptible to developing complications. There is no significant data on surgical safety in the pandemic period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational study based in a prospective database of urological oncological surgery. Data were obtained during the 2020 mandatory confinement period compared to the same period in 2019. The records were reviewed 45 days post-surgery. The objective was to compare surgical morbidity and mortality during the pandemic versus an average year in urological cancer surgery. RESULTS: During confinement period (2020), 85 patients underwent uro-oncology surgery, while in 2019, during the same period, 165. The Clavien-Dindo morbidity ≥3 in 2020 was 2.3% (n=2), and in 2019, it reached 6% (n=10). In 2020, 9 patients were readmitted (10.5%). One patient (1.1%) was re-interfered, with a perioperative mortality of 1.1%. In 2019, 21 patients (12.7%) were readmitted. Seventeen patients (10.3%) were re-interfered, with a perioperative mortality of 1.8%. The median number of days hospitalized was 2 (IQR=2) in 2020 and 3 (IQR=3) in 2019. No significant differences were found in population or morbimortality, except for reoperation in a normal year. CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity and mortality reported are lower than those shown in the literature concerning COVID-19 and similar to that historically reported by our centers. This study suggests that it is safe to operate patients with urological cancer following the appropriate protocols during a pandemic.

Sample Size, Power, and Risk of Misclassification in Pediatric Urology Hospital Rankings.

PURPOSE: We investigated 2019 and 2020 U.S. News & World Report methodologies of assessing pediatric urology surgical revision rates for distal hypospadias, pyeloplasty, and ureteral reimplantation to evaluate statistical power and misclassification risks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Median annual volumes of distal hypospadias, pyeloplasty, and ureteral reimplantation procedures by hospital from 2016 to 2018 were calculated using the Pediatric Health Information System® database. U.S. News & World Report 2019 and 2020 methodologies were assessed to calculate power required to detect differences between hospitals and risk of hospital misclassifications. RESULTS: Median (IQR) annual hospital procedure volume was 72 (43-97) for distal hypospadias procedures, 19 (9-34) for pyeloplasties, and 35 (19-50) for ureteral reimplantations. Based on 2019 methodology, in order to achieve 80% power 764 cases/hospital are required to distinguish between a 1% vs 3% surgical revision rate, 1,500 cases/hospital are required to distinguish between a 3% vs 5% revision rate, and 282 cases/hospital are required to distinguish between a 1% vs 5% revision rate. Based on 2020 methodology, 98.0% of hospitals do not have adequate ureteral reimplantation volume to achieve full points even when reporting no revisions; similarly, 66.0% do not have adequate pyeloplasty volume, and 10.9% do not have adequate distal hypospadias volume. Risks of misclassification exceed 50% in several instances among hospitals reporting distal hypospadias and pyeloplasty revisions using both 2019 and 2020 methodology. CONCLUSIONS: Based on median-volume hospitals, current U.S. News & World Report methods for classifying revision rates for distal hypospadias, pyeloplasty, and ureteral reimplantation have insufficient power and are at high risk for misclassification.

Resilience and associated characteristics in adults with spina bifida.

AIM: To measure resilience and identify associated demographic and clinical factors in individuals with spina bifida. METHOD: An anonymous survey was distributed via Facebook advertising to individuals with congenital urological conditions. Respondents 18 years or older with spina bifida were included in this study. Resilience was measured with the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Mean resilience levels in the study population and a US general population sample were compared with Student's t-test. Multiple linear regression assessed demographic and clinical factors associated with resilience. RESULTS: The mean resilience score for participants (n=195; 49 males, 146 females; mean age 40y 2mo [SD 12y 7mo] range 18-74y) was 27.2 (SD 7.5), which differed from a mean of 31.8 (SD 5.4) for a US general population sample (p<0.01). Multiple linear regression demonstrated significant positive associations between resilience and older age (p=0.04), prior urological surgeries (p=0.03), higher household education (p<0.01), and higher physical function (p<0.01). INTERPRETATION: Resilience in individuals with spina bifida is moderately poor, relative to the general population, and is associated with certain demographic and clinical factors. As a modifiable construct with positive effects on quality of life, psychological well-being, and health-related behaviors, resilience is a promising target for intervention in individuals with spina bifida. What this paper adds Resilience in individuals with spina bifida is moderately poor. Resilience is lower in individuals with spina bifida than the general population. Resilience is associated with age, household education, physical function, and urological surgery.

Caracterización de pacientes con antecedente de colposuspensión de Burch que consultan en uroginecología / Characterization of patients with a background of Burch colposuspension consulting in urogynecology

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La incontinencia de orina de esfuerzo (IOE) es una patología muy frecuente. El tratamiento estándar corresponde al uso de cintas medio uretrales. Dentro de las técnicas quirúrgicas clásicas se encuentra la colposuspensión de Burch (CSB), poco frecuente en la actualidad. El objetivo de este estudio es describir las características de las pacientes con antecedentes de una CSB que consultan en la unidad de Uroginecología. MÉTODOS: Revisión tipo transversal de los datos ingresados a la unidad de Uroginecología del Hospital Dr. Sótero Del Río desde 2007 al 2019. Análisis descriptivo de los antecedentes de las pacientes con antecedente de CSB. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo analizado, 63 pacientes presentaban antecedentes de CSB. La edad promedio fue 68 años, 88% eran post menopáusicas, 60% fueron sometidas a histerectomía y 24% a cirugías por prolapso (POP). La paridad promedio fue 3 hijos, 15% tuvieron al menos un parto por fórceps. Un 51% consultó por IOE, 54% por vejiga hiperactiva (VH) y 56% por sensación de bulto o peso. El 38% consultó por incontinencia de orina mixta, 37% por IOE + POP y 41% por VH + POP. 22% fueron reoperadas, 16% por medio de TVT y 6% por TOT. CONCLUSIONES: El antecedente de CSB es infrecuente en nuestra población. Similar a lo descrito en la literatura, más de un 50% de las pacientes consultó por síntomas de recurrencia y por complicaciones como POP y VH. Próximos estudios deberían evaluar si el antecedente de CSB es un factor de riesgo de complicaciones quirúrgicas o recurrencia.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common pathology. The standard treatment corresponds to the mid urethral slings. Among the classic surgical techniques is Burch colposuspension (CSB), currently rare. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of the patients with a previous history of CSB who consult in the Urogynecology unit. METHODS: Cross sectional review of the data of all the patients admitted to the Urogynecology unit of the Dr. Sótero Del Río Hospital from 2007 to 2019. Descriptive analysis of the antecedents of the patients with a history of CSB. RESULTS: During the analyzed period, 63 patients had a history of CSB. The average age was 68 years. 88% were postmenopausal, 60% underwent hysterectomy, and 24% underwent prolapse (POP) surgery. The average parity was 3, 15% had at least one forceps delivery. 51% consulted for SUI, 54% for overactive bladder (OAB) and 56% for sensation of lump or weight. 38% consulted for mixed urine incontinence, 37% for SUI + POP and 41% for OAB + POP. 22% were reoperated, 16% through TVT and 6% through TOT. CONCLUSION: The history of CSB is infrequent in our population. Similar to that described in the literature, more than 50% of the patients consulted for recurrence symptoms and complications such as POP and OAB. Future studies should assess whether a history of CSB is a risk factor for surgical complications or recurrence.

Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on urology surgical waiting lists and waiting lists prioritization strategies in the Post-COVID-19 era. / Impacto del brote de COVID-19 en las listas de espera de cirugía urológica y estrategias de priorización en la era post-COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The suspension of most elective surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic caused the lengthening of urology surgical waiting lists. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urology surgical waiting list in a high-volume hospital. METHODS: An observational descriptive study was designed. All patients included in the urology surgical waiting list of our high-volume center on May 1st 2020 (46 days after the suspension of elective surgery) were analyzed. Baseline variables, priority on the waiting list, main urological disease, type of scheduled surgery, and waiting time were recorded. Other variables recorded were the presence of a urinary catheter, number of accesses to the emergency department, evidence of COVID-19 infection, number of deaths and their cause. The waiting time for each disease was compared with the time to surgery in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients were included. The mean (SD) time on the waiting list was 97.33 (55.47) days. Priority 1 patients, who normally should undergo surgery within 30 days, were on the waiting list for a mean (SD) time of 60.51 (20.14) days. They were mainly patients with ureteral lithiasis (25.6%), high-risk or muscle-invasive bladder cancer (20.9%) and high-risk prostate cancer (13.9%). The mean waiting time had already significantly exceeded the mean time to surgery in 2019 for radical cystectomy (p = 0.04) and URS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The suspension of most elective surgeries due to COVID-19 had a significant impact on urology surgical waiting list of our high-volume center, especially in priority 1 group.