Outcomes of dogs undergoing immediate or delayed surgical treatment for gastrointestinal foreign body obstruction: A retrospective study by the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gastrointestinal injury and outcomes between dogs treated with immediate surgical intervention vs those treated with delayed surgical intervention for gastrointestinal foreign body obstruction (GIFBO). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Client-owned dogs (n = 855) from five referral hospitals. METHODS: Medical records of dogs in which GIFBO had been diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed for preoperative management, timing of surgery, intraoperative findings, postoperative management, outcome, and survival. Surgical intervention was classified as immediate when it occurred within 6 hours of presentation and delayed when it occurred >6 hours after presentation. RESULTS: Outcomes did not differ between dogs treated immediately (n = 584) or over 6 hours after presentation (n = 210). Intestinal necrosis and perforations were more common when surgery was delayed (P = .008; P = .019) but became nonsignificant after controlling for preoperative differences. Risk factors for necrosis and perforations included duration of clinical signs, increased lactate, linear foreign material, and timing of surgery. Enterectomies (P = .004) as well as the duration of surgery (P = .004) and anesthesia (P = .001) were increased when surgery was delayed. Immediate surgery was associated with earlier return to feeding (P = .004) and discharge from the hospital (P < .001); (5%) dogs in each group (n = 33 immediate; n = 11 delayed) either had a negative explore or the foreign body was milked aborally into the colon at the time of surgery. CONCLUSION: Although outcomes were not associated with surgical timing, the unadjusted prevalence of gastrointestinal injury and, thus, the requirement for complex surgical procedures was higher in the delayed group. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Earlier surgical treatment of stabilized dogs with GIFBO may involve fewer complex procedures and accelerate recovery.

Survival analysis of local excision vs total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer in pT1/pT2 stage and intermediate pathological risk.

BACKGROUND: Local excision (LE) is a feasible treatment approach for rectal cancers in stage pT1 and presents low pathological risk, whereas total mesorectal excision (TME) is a reasonable treatment for more advanced cancers. On the basis of the pathology findings, surgeons may suggest TME for patients receiving LE. This study compared the survival outcomes between LE with/without chemoradiation and TME in mid and low rectal cancer patients in stage pT1/pT2, with highly selective intermediate pathological risk. METHODS: This retrospective study included 134 patients who received TME and 39 patients who underwent LE for the treatment of intermediate risk (pT1 with poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, relatively large tumor, or small-sized pT2 tumor) rectal cancer between 1998 and 2016. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative recurrence rate (CRR) were similar between the LE (3-year DFS 92%) and TME (3-year DFS 91%) groups. Following subgrouping into an LE with adjuvant therapy group and a TME without adjuvant therapy group, the compared survival outcomes (OS, DFS, and CRR) were found not to be statistically different. The temporary and permanent ostomy rates were higher in the TME group than in the LE group (p < 0.001). Rates of early and late morbidity following surgery were higher in the TME group (p = 0.005), and LE had similar survival compared with TME. CONCLUSION: For patients who had mid and low rectal cancer in stage pT1/pT2 and intermediate pathological risk, LE with chemoradiation presents an alternative treatment option for selected patients.

The NICE classification for 'Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery for advanced ovarian cancer' guidance does not meaningfully predict postoperative complications: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which descriptors of cytoreductive surgical extent in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) best predict postoperative morbidity. DESIGN: Retrospective notes review. SETTING: A gynaecological cancer centre in the UK. POPULATION: Six hundred and eight women operated on for AOC over a period of 114 months at a tertiary cancer centre, between 16 August 2007 and 16 February 2017. METHODS: Outcome data were analysed by six approaches to classify the extent of surgery: standard/ultra-radical surgery; standard/radical/supra-radical surgery; presence/absence of gastrointestinal resections; low/intermediate/high surgical complexity score (SCS); presence of bowel anastomoses and/or diaphragmatic surgery; and the presence/absence of multiple bowel resections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Major (grades 3-5) postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Forty-three (7.1%) patients experienced major complications. Grade-5 complications occurred in six patients (1.0%). Patients who underwent multiple bowel resections had a relative risk (RR) of 7.73 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 3.92-15.26), patients with a high SCS had an RR of 6.12 (95% CI 3.25-11.52), patients with diaphragmatic surgery and gastrointestinal anastomosis had an RR of 5.57 (95% CI 2.65-11.72), patients with 'any gastrointestinal resection' had an RR of 4.69 (95% CI 2.66-8.24), patients with ultra-radical surgery had an RR of 4.65 (95% CI 2.26-8.79), and patients with supra-radical surgery had an RR of 4.20 (95% CI 2.35-7.51) of grades 3-5 morbidity, compared with patients undergoing standard surgery as defined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK. No significant difference was seen in the rate of major morbidity between standard (6/59, 10.2%) and ultra-radical (9/81, 11.1%) surgery within the cohort who had intermediate complex surgery (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The numbers of procedures performed significantly correlate with major morbidity. The number of procedures performed better predicted major postoperative morbidity than the performance of certain 'high risk' procedures. We recommend using SCS to define a higher risk operation. NICE should re-evaluate the use of the term 'ultra-radical' surgery. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Multiple bowel resection is the best predictor of morbidity and is more predictive than 'ultra-radical surgery'.

[Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: surgical treatment and targeted therapy]. / Gastrointestinal'nye stromal'nye opukholi: khirurgicheskoe lechenie i targetnaia terapiia.

AIM: To improve surgical and complex treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our analysis included 97 GIST patients who were at Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery and Moscow City Oncological Hospital #62 from January 2006 to September 2016. RESULTS: Advisability of surgery for GIST patients was confirmed. We have assessed surgical outcomes, defined the indications for adjuvant targeted therapy depending on GIST prognostic risk and additional factors for unfavorable course of disease. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that surgical treatment is preferred for patients with resectable GISTs. Adjuvant therapy is indicated in patients with high risk of progression if mutations indicating tumor sensitivity to the drugs are revealed. Adjuvant targeted therapy is not indicated in patients with low and very low risk of progression.

Risk factors and preventive strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery: a comprehensive review.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas surgery has developed into a fairly safe procedure in terms of mortality, but is still hampered by considerable morbidity. Among the most frequent and dreaded complications are the development of a post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The prediction and prevention of POPF remains an area of debate with several questions yet to be firmly addressed with solid answers. METHODS: A systematic review of systematic reviews/meta-analyses and randomized trials in the English literature (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, EMBASE) covering January 2005 to December 2015 on risk factors and preventive strategies for POPF. RESULTS: A total of 49 systematic reviews and meta-analyses over the past decade discussed patient, surgeon, pancreatic disease and intraoperative related factors of POPF. Non-modifiable factors (age, BMI, comorbidity) and pathology (histotype, gland texture, duct size) that indicates surgery are associated with POPF risk. Consideration of anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly modify the risk of fistula. Sealant products appear to have no effect. Perioperative bleeding and transfusion enhance risk, but is modifiable by focus on technique and training. Drains may not prevent fistulae, but may help in early detection. Early drain-amylase may aid in detection. Predictive scores lack uniform validation, but may have a role in patient information if reliable pre-operative risk factors can be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Development of POPF occurs through several demonstrated risk factors. Anastomotic technique and use of somatostatin-analogs may slightly decrease risk. Drains may aid in early detection of leaks, but do not prevent POPF.

[COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SHUNTING AND RESTRICTIVE BARIATRIC OPERATION: EXPECTATIONS AND REALITY]

The data, concerning significance of indices, characterizing trophic peculiarities of the patients, were presented, basing on comparative analysis of two groups of these persons, in whom restrictive (in 41) and shunting (in 32) bariatric interventions were done for obesity. Conclusion, concerning comparable efficacy of both procedures and prognostic significance of the body mass index loss, was made.

Single port laparoscopy in gastroenterology and hepatology: a fine step forward.

Single incision laparoscopy (SIL) has become an emerging technology aiming at a further reduction of abdominal wall trauma in minimally invasive surgery. Available data is encouraging for the safe application of standardized SIL in a wide range of procedures in gastroenterology and hepatology. Compared to technically simple SIL procedures, the merit of SIL in advanced surgeries, such as liver or colorectal interventions, compared to conventional laparsocopy is self-evident without any doubt. SIL has already passed the learning curve and is routinely utilized in expert centers. This minimized approach has allowed to enter a new era of surgical management that can not be acceded without a fruitful combination of prudent training, consistent day-to-day work and enthusiastic motivation for technical innovations. Both, basic and novel technical specifics as well as particular procedures are described herein. The focus is on the most important surgical interventions in gastroenterology and aims at reviewing the current literature and shares our experience in a high volume center.

Proposal for a sub-classification of hepato-biliary-pancreatic operations for surgical site infection surveillance following assessment of results of prospective multicenter data.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance in Japan is based on the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system, which categorizes all hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgeries, except for cholecystectomy, into "BILI." We evaluated differences among BILI procedures to determine the optimal subdivision for SSI surveillance. METHODS: We conducted multicenter SSI surveillance at 20 hospitals. BILI was subdivided into choledochectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, hepatectomy, hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction, pancreatoduodenectomy with hepatectomy, distal pancreatectomy and total pancreatectomy to determine the optimal subdivision. The outcome of interest was SSI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive significance of variables in each type of surgery. RESULTS: 1,926 BILI cases were included in this study. SSI rates were 23.2 % for all BILI; for choledochectomy 23.6 %, pancreatoduodenectomy 39.3 %, hepatectomy 12.8 %, hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction 41.9 %, pancreatoduodenectomy with hepatectomy 27.3 %, distal pancreatectomy 31.8 %, and total pancreatectomy 20.0 %. SSI rates for hepatectomy were significantly lower than those for non-hepatectomy BILI. Risk factors for developing SSI with hepatectomy were drain placement and long operative duration, while for non-hepatectomy BILI, risk factors were use of intra-abdominal silk sutures, SSI risk index and long operative duration. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy and non-hepatectomy BILI differ with regard to the incidence of and risk factors for developing SSI. These surgeries should be assessed separately when conducting SSI surveillance.

Questionnaire survey regarding the current status and controversial issues concerning reconstruction after gastrectomy in Japan.

The Japanese Society for the Study of Postoperative Morbidity after Gastrectomy conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey to clarify the current status of reconstruction after gastrectomy. One hundred and forty-five institutions (66%) responded to the survey. The questionnaire dealt with the reconstruction after a distal gastrectomy, pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), total gastrectomy, and proximal gastrectomy. The most common method of reconstruction after distal gastrectomy was Billroth I in 112 institutions (74%), and Roux-en-Y (RY) in 30 (21%). Seventy-seven institutions (53%) responded to the PPG questions. The lengths of the antral cuff were widely distributed among the institutions. Segmental gastrectomy was performed by 23 institutions for limited cases. The most common method of reconstruction after total gastrectomy was RY in 138 institutions (95%). Reconstruction with a pouch after total gastrectomy was done in 26 institutions (18%). The most common reconstructions after proximal gastrectomy were esophagogastrostomy in 69 institutions (48%), jejunal interposition in 41 (28%), double tract in 19 (13%) and pouch reconstruction in 6 (7%). Although most Japanese surgeons are concerned about the revised methods of reconstruction and quality of life after gastrectomy, surgeons have not yet reached a full consensus on these issues.

Ventajas e inconvenientes de las diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas en el trasplante 'dominó' / No disponible

No disponible

Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in major abdominal surgery in high-risk neonates and infants.

BACKGROUND: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE-A) is reportedly safe and effective for the pediatric population in infraumbilical surgery. Our main purpose was to describe our experience of this technique in neonates and infants undergoing elective major upper abdominal surgery. METHODS: Spinal anesthesia was performed in 28 neonates and infants with isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%, 1 mg.kg(-1) followed by placement of a caudal epidural catheter to thoracic spinal segments. The catheter tip position was confirmed radiographically. Respiratory and hemodynamic data were collected before and after the CSE-A and throughout the operation, as a measure of anesthetic effectiveness. Complications related to the anesthesia technique were collected as a measure of the anesthetic technique safety. RESULTS: Satisfactory surgical anesthesia was achieved in 24 neonates and infants, four patients were converted to general anesthesia. Respiratory and hemodynamic variables did not change significantly during surgery, compared with baseline values: oxygen saturation (P = 0.07), systolic and diastolic blood pressures (P = 0.143, P = 0.198 respectively), heart rate (P = 0.080) and respiratory rate (P = 0.127). However, twenty infants were fussy during the surgical procedures and were calmed with intravenous midazolam; our patients required oxygen supplementation and transient manual ventilation intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia could be considered as an effective anesthetic technique for elective major upper abdominal surgery in awake or sedated neonates and infants, and could be used cautiously by a pediatric anesthesiologist as an alternate to general anesthesia in high-risk neonates and infants undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Clinical and economic outcomes of hospital acquired pneumonia in intra-abdominal surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the clinical and economic impact of postoperative hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and to identify risk factors for the development of HAP. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although postoperative HAP is recognized to be an major risk associated with surgery, little is known about the overall outcomes of patients whose hospital stay is complicated by HAP following surgery. METHODS: We studied 618,495 patients who underwent an intra-abdominal operation from the National Inpatient Sample database over a 1-year period (January 2000 to December 2000) using CPT codes and discharge diagnoses identified by the Clinical Classification Software. Data collected included demographic characteristics, type of operation, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, and hospital charges. RESULTS: Of the 13,292 patients with HAP following intra-abdominal surgery, 1421 died prior to discharge (mortality = 10.7%) compared with 7217 deaths in the control group of patients without HAP following intra-abdominal surgery (mortality = 1.2%) (P < 0.001). HAP was independently associated with a 4.13-fold (95% confidence interval = 3.94-4.34) increase in risk to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility. The mean length of hospital stay for intra-abdominal patients who developed HAP was significantly greater compared with intra-abdominal surgery patients who did not develop HAP (17.10 days versus 6.07 days, P < 0.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics, HAP was independently associated with a 75% (28,160.95 dollars; 95% confidence interval, 27,543.76 dollars - 28,778.13 dollars) mean increase in total hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high incidence and significant impact of HAP on patient outcomes, early preventive strategies and interventions to reduce HAP should be a priority.

Factors influencing survival following surgical treatment of obesity.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in the United States and the surgical treatment of obesity have increased since 1999. An important measure of outcome following surgical treatment is survival. METHODS: This study began with data prospectively collected from Jan 1, 1986 to Dec 31, 1999 by 55 data collection sites, representing 77 surgeons who used standardized data collection software developed by the International Bariatric Surgery Registry (IBSR). A subset of 18,972 subjects was submitted to the National Death Index (NDI) for search of death occurring from Jan 1, 1986 to Dec 31, 2001. The univariate survival analysis included Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Cox proportional-hazards (PH) frailty model was used to identify risk factors and estimate hazard ratios in a multi-factor survival analysis. Covariates included gender, operative age, body mass index, operation category (simple and complex), operation year, diabetes, smoking and hypertension as recorded prior to operation. RESULTS: Deaths were found for 3.45% of the patients (654/18,972). Average follow-up was 8.3 years. Age, gender, BMI, history of smoking, diabetes, and hypertension were significant predictors of survival. Operation category (P=0.13) and operation year (P=0.89) were not significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSION: Simple and complex operations were equally effective in keeping patients alive in this cohort of patients operated on for severe obesity from 1986 to 1999. Young, female, non-smoking patients with low BMI at operation and no history of diabetes or hypertension had the longest survival. Longer follow-up for death is needed before any recommendations can be made for operation category based on survival.

[Prognosis of outcomes and choice of surgical strategies in general purulent peritonitis]. / Prognozirovanie iskhoda i vybor khirurgicheskoi taktiki pri rasprostranennom gnoinom peritonite.

A comparative analysis of the results of surgical treatment of 233 patients with general peritonitis of different etiology was carried out. It is demonstrated that Manheim's index of peritonitis (MIP) may be used not only for prognosis of outcome, but also as one of main criteria for programmed revisions and sanations of the abdominal cavity, and appliance of laparostomy. Combination of MIP with clinical and laboratory evaluation of endotoxicosis severity permits one to define objectively indications for early preventive methods of enteral and extraorganic detoxication. Differential approach to choice of treatment policy reduced postoperative lethality in general peritonitis from 24.4 to 15.8%.

[Classification and principles of treatment of acute purulent peritonitis]. / Klassifikatsiia i printsipy lecheniia ostrogo gnoinogo peritonita.

State of immune-secretory system of intestinal mucosa, bacterial contamination of the small intestine, peritoneal exudate, portal and systemic venous blood, ultrastructural changes in the liver (electron microscopy) were studied in 167 patients with general acute purulent peritonitis (APP) and clinical-laboratory symptoms of endotoxicosis. It is demonstrated that the main links of APP pathogenesis are disorders of small intestine barrier function, massive bacterial translocation from intestinal lumen to abdominal cavity and portal circulation, damage of reticuloendothelial hepatic barrier manifested as fulminant macrophagal hepatic failure, "bursting" of infectious-toxic agents into systemic circulation with resultant toxico-septic shock and visceral insufficiency. This approach permits to classify three clinical stages of APP and to propose differential surgical policy and detoxication treatment for these patients.

Surgical methods for anorectal malformations from Rehbein to Peña--critical assessment of score systems and proposal for a new classification.

In this review article the surgical techniques of Rehbein, Romualdi, Kiesewetter, and Peña/De Vries are compared and corresponding surgical steps are pointed out. Peña/De Vries have adopted many surgical steps from Stephens and further standardized this technique. The results of recent postoperative examinations are presented with regard to the surgical methods of Stephens, Rehbein, Romualdi, Kiesewetter, and Peña. In that connection, the paper makes it clear that comparison of postoperative studies is not possible because the authors evaluate too small numbers of cases, use different scoring systems, do not indicate individual steps of their surgical techniques and do not consider the height of the atresias. The reference to the type of fistula that can be found in recent literature unfortunately does not provide a common basis for comparative studies either. Therefore, the paper suggests complete abandonment of scoring systems and classification of postoperative continence results instead according to the therapy that has to be applied. In addition, it again stresses the importance and necessity of adhering to the Wingspread classification.

Endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap: techniques for use and preventing perforation.

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is one of several local treatments that provide a specimen for histopathological analysis. The authors developed a technique of EMR using a transparent plastic cap (EMRC) in 1992. By using the EMRC procedure, any part of the gastrointestinal tract mucosa can be easily accessed. The technical details of EMRC are described. The authors have performed EMR in 380 cases of gastrointestinal lesions. The most serious complication may be perforation. Two perforations (one in the esophagus and one in the colon) have occurred. By evaluating recorded videotapes, it was determined that the lack of submucosal saline injection was the major cause. Therefore, large volume injection, which creates a large bleb and potentially reduces the risk of perforation, is recommended. Furthermore, target mucosa should be strangulated at the middle part of the created bleb (never strangulated at the base). Particularly in the colon, injecting a sufficient volume of saline and controlling the power of suction are extremely important, because the cap on the colonoscope is relatively large in size.