Expression patterns of mismatch repair proteins in cervical cancer uncover independent prognostic value of MSH-2.

OBJECTIVE: Although early-detected cervical cancer is associated with good survival, the prognosis for late-stage disease is poor and treatment options are sparse. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) has surfaced as a predictor of prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor(s) in several cancer types, but its value in cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to define the prevalence of MMR-D in cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of MMR protein expression. METHODS: Expression of the MMR proteins MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, and MSH-6 was investigated by immunohistochemical staining in a prospectively collected cervical cancer cohort (n=508) with corresponding clinicopathological and follow-up data. Sections were scored as either loss or intact expression to define MMR-D, and by a staining index, based on staining intensity and area, evaluating the prognostic potential. RNA and whole exome sequencing data were available for 72 and 75 of the patients and were used for gene set enrichment and mutational analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Five (1%) tumors were MMR-deficient, three of which were of neuroendocrine histology. MMR status did not predict survival (HR 1.93, p=0.17). MSH-2 low (n=48) was associated with poor survival (HR 1.94, p=0.02), also when adjusting for tumor stage, tumor type, and patient age (HR 2.06, p=0.013). MSH-2 low tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p=0.003) and higher frequency of (frameshift) mutations in the double-strand break repair gene RAD50 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: MMR-D is rare in cervical cancer, yet low MSH-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor survival.

Expression of epigenetic pathway related genes in association with PD-L1, ER/PgR and MLH1 in endometrial carcinoma.

The distribution of Endometrial Cancer (EC)-related deaths is uneven among the morphologic subtypes of EC. Serous Cancer (SC) makes 10% of all EC and accounts for 40% of EC-related deaths. We investigated expression of selected genes involved in epigenetic pathways by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 106 EC patients and analyzed mRNA-based expression levels for the same set of genes in EC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. A tissue microarray was constructed using low-grade (n = 30) and high-grade (n = 28) endometrioid, serous (n = 31) and clear cell carcinoma (n = 17) samples. Epigenetic marker levels were associated with PD-L1, ER/PgR, and MLH1 expression. Epigenetic markers were evaluated by H-score and PD-L1 expression was recorded by using Combined Positive Score. Results were correlated with disease stage and survival outcome. BRD4, KAT6a and HDAC9 levels were higher in SC compared to other histologic subtypes (p<0.001-0.038). After adjusting for multiple comparisons, DNMT3b expression was higher in SC compared to endometrioid-type but not between SC and CCC. The expression levels of BRD4 (p = 0.021) and KAT6a (p = 0.0027) were positively associated with PD-L abundance, while PgR (p = 0.029) and PD-L1 expression were negatively associated. In addition, BRD4 expression was low in specimens with loss of MLH1 expression (p = 0.02). More importantly, BRD4 abundance had a negative impact on disease outcome (p = 0.02). Transcriptionally, BRD4, KAT6a and DNMT3b expression levels were higher in SC in TCGA dataset. The median PD-L1 expression was marginally associated with BRD4, a transcriptional activator of CD274/PD-L1 (p = 0.069) and positively with KAT6a (p = 0.0095). In conclusion, the protein expression levels of epigenetic markers involved in cancer pathogenesis are increased by immunohistochemistry in SC. PD-L1 levels are associated with BRD4 and KAT6a in EC samples. A combination therapy with BRD4/PD-L1 or KAT6a/PD-L1 inhibitors might have a potential use in EC, in particular serous-type carcinoma.

MLH1, MSH2, MRE11, and XRCC1 in Oral Leukoplakia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: DNA damage is accumulated in the cells over time as the result of both exogenous and endogenous factors. The objective of this study was to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of the repair proteins in oral leukoplakia (OL) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paraffin blocks were selected from the archives of the Laboratory of Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spain. The sample was composed of 16 cases of OL without dysplasia, 14 cases of OL with dysplasia, and 15 cases of OSCC. The patients' clinical data were collected and immunohistochemical analysis was performed for MLH1, MSH2, MRE11, and XRCC1. The data were submitted to the χ2 and the Kruskal-Wallis (P≤0.05) tests. RESULTS: MSH2 was overexpressed in OSCC (P=0.020) and was positive in 100% of patients with OL with dysplasia or OSCC (P=0.019). Positivity for MLH1 was significantly associated with comorbidity (P=0.040), especially in patients who presented with 2 or more pathologies (P=0.028). XRCC1 positivity was also associated with comorbidity (P=0.039). No significant associations were found for the MRE11A expression. Although the simultaneous positivity for the 4 markers was observed in presence of comorbidities (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the effect of the overexpression of MSH2 protein in samples of OL with dysplasia and OSCC, most notably in patients who present with comorbidities and negativity for OL without dysplasia.

Loss of DNA mismatch repair proteins in prostate cancer.

Recent studies have suggested an increased risk of prostate cancer in men with Lynch syndrome driven by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. However, the incidence and clinical implication of MMR deficiency in sporadic prostate cancers remain poorly understood. We immunohistochemically stained for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in a set of tissue microarray consisting of 220 radical prostatectomy specimens and evaluated the relationship between loss of their expression and available clinicopathological features. MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were lost in 2 (0.9%), 6 (2.7%), 37 (16.8%), and 27 (12.3%) prostate cancers, respectively. Loss of at least 1 MMR protein was identified in 50 (22.7%) cases. There were no statistically significant associations between MMR deficiency and patient age, family history of prostate cancer, Gleason score, or pT/pN stage. Nonetheless, the levels of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were significantly (P = .015) higher in patients with MMR deficiency (mean ±â€ŠSD: 9.12 ±â€Š9.01 ng/mL) than in those without abnormal MMR (5.76 ±â€Š3.17 ng/mL). There were 15 (6.8%) cases showing loss of at least 2 MMR proteins, which was not significantly associated with PSA level or tumor grade/stage. Additionally, 5 and 2 cases showed losses of at least 3 MMR proteins and all 4 proteins, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant associations between loss of MLH1 (P = .373), MSH2 (P = .348), MSH6 (P = .946), or PMS2 (P = .681), or at least 1 (P = .477), 2 (P = .486), or 3 (P = .352) MMR proteins and biochemical recurrence. Further analyses of the data on programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression previously stained in the same set of tissue microarray demonstrated associations between loss of ≥2 MMR proteins and a higher rate of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells (17.2% vs 5.2%; P = .033) as well as between cases showing both loss of ≥1 MMR protein(s) and PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells vs a higher risk of biochemical recurrence (P = .045). MMR protein loss was seen in a subset of prostate cancers. Interestingly, it was associated with significantly higher levels of PSA. Moreover, immunohistochemical detection of MMR proteins together with other proteins, such as PD-L1, might be helpful in predicting tumor recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Clinicopathological and survival characteristic of mismatch repair status in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore the expression of mismatch repair (MMR) status and its correlation with clinicopathologic and survival characteristics in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). METHODS: Expression of four MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS, MSH2, and MSH6) were measured using tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry in 120 OCCC patients. The associations of clinicopathologic parameters with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis was further performed by the Cox regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 120 OCCC patients met the entry criteria, and their MMR status was detected, consisting of 24 patients with dMMR and 96 patients with proficient MMR (pMMR). Patients with dMMR were strongly associated with platinum-sensitive disease (P = .006) and large tumor volume (P = .038). Among all the patients who have received surgery, tumors with dMMR had a better RFS and OS than those with pMMR (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence: 0.459 [95% confidence interval {95% CI} = 0.224-0.940], P = .029; HR for death: 0.381 [95% CI = 0.170-0.853], P = .015). In subgroup analysis, dMMR patients experienced a better trend of RFS (HR = 0.273; P = .055) and OS (HR = 0.165; P = .040) than pMMR cases among early stages (I-II), but this difference was not observed in advanced stage (III-IV) patients. Meanwhile, pMMR was associated with a more favorable trend of prognosis than dMMR in platinum-resistant patients (RFS: HR = 0.317, P = .051; OS: HR = 0.370, P = .046). Multivariate analysis revealed that only advanced stages (III-IV) were adverse independent prognosticators for both RFS (HR = 5.938 [95% CI = 2.804-12.574]; P < .001) and OS (HR = 6.209 [95% CI = 2.724-14.156]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Tumors with dMMR were related to better OS in OCCC on univariate analysis. Only the tumor stage was an independent prognosticator for both RFS and OS. MMR status is a potentially valuable prognostic index in OCCC patients, and larger prospective studies are required to validate its prognostic role.

Extracellular vesicles transmitted miR-31-5p promotes sorafenib resistance by targeting MLH1 in renal cell carcinoma.

Sorafenib provides survival benefits in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but its use is hampered by acquired drug resistance. It is important to fully clarify the molecular mechanisms of sorafenib resistance, which can help to avoid, delay or reverse drug resistance. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) can mediate intercellular communication by delivering effector molecules between cells. Here, we studied whether EVs are involved in sorafenib resistance of RCC and its possible molecular mechanisms. Using differential centrifugation, EVs were isolated from established sorafenib-resistant RCC cells (786-0 and ACHN), and EVs derived from sorafenib-resistant cells were uptaken by sensitive parental RCC cells and thus promoted drug resistance. Elevated exogenous miR-31-5p within EVs effectively downregulated MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) expression and thus promoted sorafenib resistance in vitro. Mice experiments also confirmed that miR-31-5p could mediate drug sensitivity in vivo. In addition, low expression of MLH1 was observed in sorafenib-resistant RCC cells and upregulation of MLH1 expression restored the sensitivity of resistant cell lines to sorafenib. Finally, miR-31-5p level in circulating EVs of RCC patients with progressive disease (PD) during sorafenib therapy was higher when compared to that in the pretherapy status. In conclusion, EVs shuttled miR-31-5p can transfer resistance information from sorafenib-resistant cells to sensitive cells by directly targeting MLH1, and thus magnify the drug resistance information to the whole tumor. Furthermore, miR-31-5p and MLH1 could be promising predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets to prevent sorafenib resistance.

Enhanced Tumoral MLH1-Expression in MLH1-/PMS2-Deficient Colon Cancer Is Indicative of Sporadic Colon Cancer and Not HNPCC.

Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is caused by germline mutations of mismatch-repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. MLH1-/PMS2-deficient colorectal carcinomas might be HNPCC-associated but also caused by MLH1-promoter methylation in sporadic colon carcinoma. This study analyzed semiquantitatively whether the MLH1 staining pattern might be indicative of sporadic or HNPCC-associated colorectal cancer. Using a semiquantitative score ranging from 0 (negative) to 12 (maximum immunopositivity) we analyzed MLH1 expression patterns in 130 MLH1-/PMS2-deficient colorectal cancers. The collective consisted of 70 HNPCC-associated colorectal cancers and 60 sporadic colon cancers. In tumor cells of 70 HNPCC-associated colorectal cancers, 64 cases (91.43%) showed no MLH1 staining, 5 cases weak (7.14%) and 1 case (1.43%) stronger staining intensity. In contrast, in tumor cells of 60 sporadic colorectal cancers 45 cases (75.0%) showed no MLH1 staining, 10 cases weak (16.67%) and 5 cases (8.33%) stronger staining intensity to a varying extent. In immunopositive cases, MLH1 showed a characteristic dot-like nuclear staining pattern in the tumor cells. We compared cases with absent to weak MLH1-staining (immunoscores 0 to 2) to cases with elevated immunoscores (3 to 12) detecting a statistically significant difference between HNPCC-associated and sporadic colon cancers (p value = 0.0031, Fisher's exact test). Taken together, enhanced tumoral MLH1 expression in MLH1-/PMS2-deficient colorectal carcinomas seems to be indicative of sporadic origin. In contrast, HNPCC-associated colorectal cancer showed absent or very weak MLH1 immunopositivity. Therefore, this semiquantitative and easy to exert MLH1 immunoscore might help to identify sporadic MLH1-/PMS2-deficient colorectal cancer cases prior to time-consuming methylation analysis.

Loss of expression of MLH1 in non-dysplastic crypts is a harbinger of neoplastic progression in sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.

AIMS: Dysplasia in colonic sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs)/sessile serrated polyps often shows loss of MLH1 expression as determined with immunohistochemistry, but the significance of loss of MLH1 expression in non-dysplastic crypts in these polyps is less well studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of loss of MLH1 expression in non-dysplastic crypts in SSAs, and to evaluate its significance with regard to progression of these polyps. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred SSAs, including 158 SSAs without dysplasia, 219 SSAs with dysplasia (SSAD), and 23 SSAs with invasive adenocarcinoma (SSAC), were evaluated immunohistochemically for loss of MLH1 expression in both non-dysplastic and dysplastic portions of the polyps. Seventy-one of 400 (18%) SSAs showed loss of MLH1 expression in non-dysplastic crypts. The prevalence of MLH1-deficient non-dysplastic crypts was higher in polyps with dysplasia or carcinoma (7%, 22%, and 52% in SSAs, SSADs, and SSACs, respectively; P < 0.0001). When SSAs with MLH1-deficient dysplasia and those with MLH-1-proficient dysplasia were compared, those with MLH1-deficient dysplasia were more likely to have MLH1-deficient non-dysplastic crypts (66% versus 8.1%, P < 0.0001) and a greater number of discrete foci (3.6 foci versus 1.1 foci, P = 0.008). Also, non-dysplastic crypts with loss of MLH1 expression were more likely to be contiguous with the dysplasia when the dysplasia also showed loss of MLH1 expression (26% versus 0%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that loss of MLH1 expression in non-dysplastic crypts in SSAs precedes the development of MLH1-deficient dysplasia and adenocarcinoma, and may be a biomarker of an advanced serrated polyp even in the absence of dysplasia.

Incidence of Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency and Associated Clinicopathologic Features in a Cohort of 104 Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinomas.

Patients with Lynch syndrome have up to a 24% risk of developing ovarian carcinoma, but universal mismatch repair (MMR) protein testing of ovarian carcinomas is not standard practice in most institutions. We reviewed 104 unselected ovarian endometrioid carcinomas (OEC) for various clinicopathologic features to determine if any are predictive of MMR loss. Immunohistochemistry for all 4 MMR proteins was performed followed by MLH1 promoter methylation analysis when indicated. Overall, patients had a mean age of 55 years and tumors averaged 12 cm. Most (72%) patients had stage I tumors, 63% were grade 1, and 30% had a synchronous stage IA endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Peritumoral lymphocytes and intratumoral stromal inflammation were rare, but tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes averaged 47/10 high-power fields. Endometriosis was noted in 71%, adenofibromatous background in 14%, and both in 14% of tumors. Metaplastic changes were common and included squamous metaplasia (63%), clear cell change (32%), mucinous differentiation (24%), and sex cord-like elements (13%). When follow-up was available (n=99), 78% of patients were alive and well, 12% died from disease, 6% died from other causes, and 4% were alive with disease. Unmethylated, MMR-deficient OECs were identified in 7% of the cohort and included MSH2/MSH6 (n=4), MSH6 (n=2), and PMS2 (n=1). All these tumors were stage I, 71% grade 1, and 57% had a synchronous endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Among patients in this group with follow-up (n=5), all were alive without evidence of disease (mean 150 mo). Given that no clinicopathologic features were associated with MMR deficiency on univariate analysis, this study highlights the importance of universal MMR screening in OECs.

Endometrial Cancer Presentation and Outcomes Based on Mismatch Repair Protein Expression From a Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: There is uncertainty about the prognostic significance of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in endometrial cancer. The objective was to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes of endometrial cancers based on MMR status within a population-based study. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all endometrial cancer cases from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority region, evaluated for 4 MMR proteins using immunohistochemistry from 2012 to 2015. Patients were classified as MMR deficient (dMMR, any MMR protein absent) or MMR proficient (pMMR), Demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrences, and survival rates were compared according to MMR status. RESULTS: There were 892 patients, with 650 pMMR (72.5%) and 242 dMMR tumors. The dMMR group had more endometrioid tumors (87.6% vs 74.0%, P < 0.001), lymphovascular space invasion (43.8% vs 30.8%, P = 0.001), and dedifferentiation (5.9% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001), but fewer grade 1 tumors compared with the pMMR group (31.8% vs 40.8%, P < 0.001). Median progression-free survival and overall survival have not been reached. After a median follow-up of 31 months (1-99 months), there was no difference in progression or recurrence rates between pMMR and dMMR tumors (19.5% vs 16.5%; P = 0.31). However, among those with nonendometrioid tumors, recurrence and mortality rates were significantly higher for pMMR than dMMR tumors (42.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.001, and 36.1% vs 13.1%, P = 0.01, respectively), despite similar stage and lymphovascular space invasion distributions. DISCUSSION: In this population-based study, there were no significant differences in recurrence or survival outcomes according to MMR status in endometrial cancer. However, among those with nonendometrioid tumors, there were lower recurrence and mortality rates associated with MMR-deficient compared with MMR-proficient tumors.

Counteraction of Oxidative Stress by Vitamin E Affects Epigenetic Regulation by Increasing Global Methylation and Gene Expression of MLH1 and DNMT1 Dose Dependently in Caco-2 Cells.

Obesity- or diabetes-induced oxidative stress is discussed as a major risk factor for DNA damage. Vitamin E and many polyphenols exhibit antioxidative activities with consequences on epigenetic regulation of inflammation and DNA repair. The present study investigated the counteraction of oxidative stress by vitamin E in the colorectal cancer cell line Caco-2 under normal (1 g/l) and high (4.5 g/l) glucose cell culture condition. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a surrogate marker of lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) was analyzed. Gene expression and promoter methylation of the DNA repair gene MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) and the DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) as well as global methylation by LINE-1 were investigated. Results revealed a dose-dependent counteracting effect of vitamin E on H2O2-induced oxidative stress. Thereby, 10 µM vitamin E proved to be more efficient than did 50 µM in reducing MDA. Further, an induction of MLH1 and DNMT1 gene expression was noticed, accompanied by an increase in global methylation. Whether LINE-1 hypomethylation is a cause or effect of oxidative stress is still unclear. In conclusion, supplementation of exogenous antioxidants like vitamin E in vitro exhibits beneficial effects concerning oxidative stress as well as epigenetic regulation involved in DNA repair.

Expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in ameloblastomas and tooth germs.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair proteins (MMRPs) are a group of nuclear enzymes that participate in the repair of base mismatches that occur during DNA replication in all proliferating cells. The most studied MMRPs are hMSH2 and hMLH1, which are known to be highly expressed in normal tissues. A loss of MMRPs leads to the accumulation of DNA replication errors in proliferating cells. Ki-67 is a biomarker regarded to be the gold-standard tool for determining cell proliferation by immunohistochemical methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and Ki-67 proteins in ameloblastomas and tooth germs, to contribute to the understanding of the development of this odontogenic neoplasm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical assays to determine the presence of proteins hMSH2, hMLH1 and Ki-67 were performed in 80 ameloblastomas (40 solid and 40 unicystic) and five tooth germs. RESULTS: Unicystic ameloblastomas showed higher MMRP expression (hMLH1: 62.5 ± 43.4; hMSH2: 83.3 ± 47.8) than did solid ameloblastomas (hMLH1: 59.4 ± 13.5; hMSH2: 75.8 ± 40.2). Additionally, the cell proliferation index assessed by Ki-67 was inversely proportional to the expression of MMRP. Comparison between tooth germs and ameloblastoma revealed significantly higher expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and Ki-67 in tooth germs (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The differences of MMRP and Ki-67 immunoexpression between ameloblastomas and tooth germ suggest that alterations in the MMRP mechanisms could participate in the biological behavior of ameloblastomas.

Altered expression of HER-2 and the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 predicts the outcome of T1 high-grade bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: The identification of factors predicting the outcome of stage T1 high-grade bladder cancer (BC) is a major clinical issue. METHODS: We performed immunohistochemistry to assess the role of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) and microsatellite instability (MSI) factors MutL homologue 1 (MLH1) and MutS homologue 2 (MSH2) in predicting recurrence and progression of T1 high-grade BCs having undergone transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) alone or TURBT + intravesical instillations of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). RESULTS: HER-2 overexpression was a significant predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) in the overall as well as in the two patients' population; as for progression-free survival (PFS), it was significant in the overall but not in the two patients' population. MLH1 was an independent predictor of PFS only in patients treated with BCG and MSH2 failed to predict DFS and PFS in all populations. Most importantly, the higher the number of altered markers the lowers the DFS and PFS. In multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, the number of altered molecular markers and BCG treatment were significant predictors (p = 0.0004 and 0.0283, respectively) of DFS, whereas the number of altered molecular markers was the only significant predictor (p = 0.0054) of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Altered expression of the proto-oncogene HER-2 and the two molecular markers of genetic instability MLH1 and MSH2 predicted T1 high-grade BC outcome with the higher the number of altered markers the lower the DFS and PFS. These findings provide grounds for further testing them in predicting the outcome of this challenging disease.

Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression Among 700 Consecutive Endometrial Cancers: Strong Association With Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the prevalence of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and determine clinical and pathological associations. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 was performed on sections of a triple-core tissue microarray of 700 ECs. Positive PD-L1 expression, defined as 1% of cells staining positive, was evaluated in tumor and stromal compartments. Using age-adjusted logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between PD-L1 expression (overall and by staining compartment) with clinical and tumor characteristics. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests were used to evaluate associations between PD-L1 expression and EC-specific survival. RESULTS: PD-L1 expression was observed in 100 cases (14.3%), including 27 (3.9%) with expression in tumor cells only, 35 (5.0%) with expression in both tumor cells and stroma, and 38 (5.4%) with expression in stroma only. Expression was observed in ECs of different histologic types. Tumors characterized by loss of mismatch repair proteins were significantly associated with tumoral PD-L1 expression (P < 0.0001), but not with stromal PD-L1 expression. Both tumoral and stromal PD-L1 expressions were associated with high-grade endometrioid histology, nonendometrioid histology, and lymphovascular space invasion. We observed no significant associations between PD-L1 expression and EC-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 is expressed in a significant proportion of EC and is associated with mismatch repair deficiency, potentially representing a mechanism of tumor immune evasion and a therapeutic target in EC.

Clinical characteristics of Lynch-like cases collaterally classified by Lynch syndrome identification strategy using universal screening in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Lynch syndrome (LS), an autosomal-dominant inherited disorder, increases the risk for LS-associated cancers (LS-AC). Molecular LS assessment for all cases is referred to as universal screening (U/S) and is recommended for endometrial cancer (EC) and colorectal cancer. Lynch-like cases (LL) lack LS-pathogenic mutations despite being suspected as LS by U/S, but have been poorly investigated in EC. The aim of this study was to capture the features of LL in EC and to devise LL management in EC. METHODS: U/S, consisting of immunohistochemistry and reflex methylation analysis, was applied to 348 Asian ECs, and sporadic cancer (SC) cases were screened out. Genetic testing was offered to "suspected-LS" cases selected by U/S. The features of the LS, LL, and SC groups were recorded and compared. RESULTS: U/S screened 306 ECs as SC. The recurrence rates of suspected-LS and SC cases were 14.3% (6/42) and 26.5% (81/306), respectively. Of the 42 suspected-LS cases, 10 were identified as LS, 17 were classified as LL, and 15 did not undergo genetic testing. In the LS group, the frequency of personal history (50%) and family history (100%) of LS-AC were prominent. Of note, the prevalence of family history of LS-AC and gastric cancer was significantly higher in the LL group than in the SC group (76.5% vs. 38.6% and 47.1% vs. 25.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we report the features of LL classified by LS identification via U/S in Asian EC. LL should be candidates for tailored surveillance based on regionality and family history.

Sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia: morphological patterns and correlations with MLH1 immunohistochemistry.

Sessile serrated adenomas are the precursor polyp of approximately 20% of colorectal carcinomas. Sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia are rarely encountered and represent an intermediate step to malignant progression, frequently associated with loss of MLH1 expression. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is important to facilitate appropriate surveillance, particularly because progression from dysplasia to carcinoma can be rapid. The current World Health Organization classification describes two main patterns of dysplasia occurring in sessile serrated adenomas, namely, serrated and conventional. However, this may not adequately reflect the spectrum of changes seen by pathologists in routine practice. Furthermore, subtle patterns of dysplasia that are nevertheless associated with loss of MLH1 expression are not encompassed in this classification. We performed a morphological analysis of 266 sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia with concurrent MLH1 immunohistochemistry with the aims of better defining the spectrum of dysplasia occurring in these lesions and correlating dysplasia patterns with MLH1 expression. We found that dysplasia can be divided morphologically into four major patterns, comprising minimal deviation (19%), serrated (12%), adenomatous (8%) and not otherwise specified (79%) groups. Minimal deviation dysplasia is defined by minor architectural and cytological changes that typically requires loss of MLH1 immunohistochemical expression to support the diagnosis. Serrated dysplasia and adenomatous dysplasia have distinctive histological features and are less frequently associated with loss of MLH1 expression (13 and 5%, respectively). Finally, dysplasia not otherwise specified encompasses most cases and shows a diverse range of morphological changes that do not fall into the other subgroups and are frequently associated with loss of MLH1 expression (83%). This morphological classification of sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia may represent an improvement on the current description as it correlates with the underlying mismatch repair protein status of the polyps and better highlights the range of morphologies seen by pathologists.

Somatic Testing on Gynecological Cancers Improve the Identification of Lynch Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Recent data from the literature indicate gynecological cancers (GCs) as sentinel cancers for a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS). Clinical approaches to identifying LS have low sensitivity, whereas somatic tests on GCs may be a more sensitive and cost-effective strategy. METHODS: A series of 78 GCs belonging to 74 patients sent to the Genetic Counselling Service were investigated using microsatellite instability, immunohistochemical expression of mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and MLH1 promoter methylation. RESULTS: The presence of microsatellite instability was observed in 67.5% of GCs, and the absence of immunohistochemical expression of at least 1 of the 4 MMR proteins was observed in 71.4% of GCs, showing 96.1% concordance between the methods. Methylation analysis using methylation specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification performed on 35 samples revealed MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in 18 cases (54%). Molecular analysis identified 36 LS carriers of MMR variants (27 pathogenetic and 9 variants of uncertain significance), and, interestingly, 3 LS patients had MLH1 methylated GC.With regard to histological features, LS-related GCs included endocervical cancers and also histological types different from the endometrioid cancers. The presence of peritumoral lymphocytes in GCs was statistically associated with LS tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic analysis is a useful strategy to distinguish sporadic from LS GC. Our data allow the identification of a subset of LS patients otherwise unrecognized on the basis of clinical or family history alone. In addition, our results indicate that some clinicopathological features including age of GC diagnosis; presence of peritumoral lymphocytes; isthmic, endocervical sites, and body mass index value could be useful criteria to select patients for genetic counseling.

Comparison between mononucleotide and dinucleotide marker panels in gastric cancer with loss of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression.

BACKGROUND: DNA mismatch repair deficiency is an important molecular mechanism of genetic instability in gastric cancer, and a high instability at microsatellites is associated with favorable prognosis. We compared mononucleotide and dinucleotide microsatellite instability (MSI) marker panels in 56 paired gastric tumor and normal samples. METHODS: The mononucleotide marker panel (mono panel) consisted of 8 markers: BAT25, BAT26, BAT40, BAT-RII, NR21, NR22, NR24 and NR27. The dinucleotide marker panel (di panel) contained D2S123, D5S346, D17S250, D17S261, D17S520, D18S34 and D18S58. The NCI panel was used as reference panel. RESULTS: Among 13 gastric tumors showing no hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression, 8 MSI-H (high) and 5 MSI-L (low) were identified. The analytical sensitivities of the NCI, mono and di panels to detect unstable MSI were 61.5% (8/13), 76.9% (10/13) and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. The size change of allele shift was statistically greater in the mono panel than in the di panel (p = 0.02 by Mann-Whitney U-test). The BAT40 (69.2%, 9/13) and D18S34 (76.9%, 10/13) markers showed high sensitivity for determination of MSI status. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the detection rate of MSI in gastric cancer with loss of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression, the kind of MSI marker may need to be considered more, instead of the repetitive type of marker. Thus, an MSI panel designed with a combination of both BAT40 and D18S34 is suggested for providing more accurate and sensitive MSI analysis in gastric cancer.

Morphological Features and Prognostic Significance of ARID1A-Deficient Esophageal Adenocarcinomas.

CONTEXT: - The clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of ARID1A mutation in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: - To determine the morphological correlates and prognostic significance of ARID1A-deficient EAC. DESIGN: - One hundred twenty cases of primary EAC were evaluated for a predetermined set of histologic features and immunohistochemistry for ARID1A, p53, and MLH1 performed on EAC, as well as adjacent Barrett esophagus and Barrett esophagus-associated dysplasia, when feasible. Associations between categorical clinicopathologic variables were analyzed by Fisher exact test, and survival analysis was performed by a Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: - The study group included 97 men and 23 women (mean age, 66 years). Loss of ARID1A expression was seen in 12 of 120 EACs (10%). ARID1A-deficient tumors showed a strong correlation with a medullary and mucinous phenotype, and 8 of 12 (67%) had at least one feature reminiscent of high microsatellite instability colon carcinomas (mucinous or medullary differentiation, marked intratumoral or peritumoral lymphoid infiltrate). A mutant p53 pattern was present in 52 of 120 EACs (43%) and showed no correlation with ARID1A deficiency (P > .05). MLH1 loss was present in only 2 of 120 EACs (2%); both of which were also deficient in ARID1A. ARID1A-deficient EACs showed a trend toward increased risk of nodal metastasis but had no effect on overall patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: - ARID1A-deficient EACs show a phenotype similar to colon cancer with high microsatellite instability but do not appear to have any prognostic significance. Concurrent MLH1 loss is not seen in most ARID1A-deficient tumors, suggesting that ARID1A may be a primary driver of carcinogenesis in a subset of EACs.

Differential Expression and Clinical Significance of DNA Methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B), Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) and Human MutL Homologs 1 (hMLH1) in Endometrial Carcinomas.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the expression and the clinicopathologic significance of DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and human MutL homologs 1 (hMLH1) in endometrial carcinomas between Han and Uygur women in Xinjiang. MATERIAL AND METHODS The expression of DNMT3B, PTEN, and hMLH1 in endometrial carcinomas were assessed by immunohistochemistry, followed by an analysis of their relationship to clinical-pathological features and prognosis. RESULTS There were a 61.7% (95/154) overexpression of DNMT3B, 50.0% (77/154) loss of PTEN expression and 18.2% (28/154) loss of hMLH1 expression. The expression of DNMT3B and PTEN in endometrial carcinomas was statistically significantly different between Uygur women and Han women (p=0.001, p=0.010, respectively). DNMT3B expression was statistically significant based on the grade of endometrial carcinomas (p=0.031). PTEN loss was statistically significant between endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) and non endometrioid carcinomas (NECs) (p=0.040). DNMT3B expression was statistically significant in different myometrial invasion groups in Uygur women (p=0.010). Furthermore, the correlation of DNMT3B and PTEN expression was significant in endometrial carcinomas (p=0.021). PTEN expression was statistically significant in the overall survival (OS) rate of women with endometrial cancers (p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that PTEN and DNMT3B possess common regulation features as well as certain ethnic differences in expression between Han women and Uygur women. An interaction may exist in the pathogenesis of endometrial carcinoma. DNMT3B was expressed differently in cases of myometrial invasion and PTEN was associated with OS, which suggested that these molecular markers may be useful in the evaluation of the biological behavior of endometrial carcinomas and may be useful indicators of prognosis in women with endometrial carcinomas.