Peptide-based tumor inhibitor encoding mitochondrial p14(ARF) is highly efficacious to diverse tumors.

p14(ARF) is one of the major tumor suppressors conventionally identified both as the mdm2-binding molecule restoring p53 function in the nucleus, and as a nucleophosmin-binding partner inside the nucleolous to stabilize ribosomal RNA. However, its recently reported mitochondrial localization has pointed to novel properties as a tumor suppressor. At the same time, functional peptides are gaining much attention in nanomedicine for their in vivo utility as non-invasive biologics. We previously reported the p14(ARF) -specific peptide that restored the sensitivity to gefitinib on the gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cells. Based on the information of this prototype peptide, here we generated the more powerful anti-tumor peptide "r9-CatB-p14 MIS," which comprises the minimal inhibitory sequence of the mitochondrial targeting p14(ARF) protein in combination with the proteolytic cleavage site for cathepsin B, which is activated in various tumor cells, fused with the nine-polyarginine-domain for cell penetration, and demonstrated its novel action of regulating mitochondrial function in accordance with localization of endogenous p14(ARF) . The p14 MIS peptide showed a potent tumor inhibiton in vitro and in vivo against not only lung cancer cells but also tumor cells of diverse lineages, via modulating mitochondrial membrane potential, with minimal cytotoxicity to non-neoplastic cells and tissues. Hence, this mitochondrially targeted p14 peptide agent provides a novel basis for non-invasive peptide-based antitumor therapeutics.

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with intraperitoneal administration of Ad-hARF.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dissemination of cancer is a terminal condition with limited therapeutic options. Because the peritoneal cavity is a single enclosed space, regional treatment approaches for isolated peritoneal cancrinomatosis are appealing. There is a potential role for gene therapy in the management of peritoneal cancrinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An adenoviral construct of the human p14ARF gene (a tumor suppressor) and a 22 amino acid sequence of the ARF gene product, which has cell membrane penetrating properties, were assayed for proapoptotic properties in a human colorectal cancer cell line (Clone A) cells in vitro. Peritoneal carcinomatosis derived from Clone A cells was also established in nude mice and then treated with intraperitoneal administration of an adenoviral construct of the human p14ARF gene. RESULTS: Treatment of ARF-negative Clone A cells with Ad-hARF in vitro reestablished ARF function. However, the cell penetrating ARF-related peptide did not restore ARF function in Clone A cells. Treatment of Clone A peritoneal xenografts with a single intraperitoneal dose of Ad-hARF (9 × 10(6) viral particles) suppressed the progression of peritoneal disease. Weekly (six times) administration of the Ad-hARF at a lower dose (3 × 10(6) viral particles) also suppressed tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis by intraperitoneal administration of adenoviral constructs of inactivated tumor suppressor genes may be a feasible clinical approach, and ARF may represent a suitable molecular target for tumors where the ARF gene is inactivated.

In vitro and in vivo analysis of the interaction between 5.8S rRNA and ARF protein reveal a new difference between murine p19ARF and human p14ARF.

Both human and murine ARF proteins have been recently reported to impair rRNA maturation and ribosomes biogenesis through a p53-independent pathway. A specific interaction has been established between 5.8S rRNA and the murine p19ARF specie. We report here, by use of both in vitro and ChIP-RNA assays, the absence of any interaction between the human p14ARF and the homologous 5.8S rRNA. Our data are not consistent with the involvement of a 5.8S-p14ARF complex in ribosome biogenesis in man. Rather they suggest that the human protein does not require such an interaction to achieve a similar function. This result is a new argument in favour of functional differences between human and murine ARF proteins.

Foxm1b transcription factor is essential for development of hepatocellular carcinomas and is negatively regulated by the p19ARF tumor suppressor.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Here, we provide evidence that the Forkhead Box (Fox) m1b (Foxm1b or Foxm1) transcription factor is essential for the development of HCC. Conditionally deleted Foxm1b mouse hepatocytes fail to proliferate and are highly resistant to developing HCC in response to a Diethylnitrosamine (DEN)/Phenobarbital (PB) liver tumor-induction protocol. The mechanism of resistance to HCC development is associated with nuclear accumulation of the cell cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1) protein and reduced expression of the Cdk1-activator Cdc25B phosphatase. We showed that the Foxm1b transcription factor is a novel inhibitory target of the p19(ARF) tumor suppressor. Furthermore, we demonstrated that conditional overexpression of Foxm1b protein in osteosarcoma U2OS cells greatly enhances anchorage-independent growth of cell colonies on soft agar. A p19(ARF) 26-44 peptide containing nine D-Arg to enhance cellular uptake of the peptide was sufficient to significantly reduce both Foxm1b transcriptional activity and Foxm1b-induced growth of U2OS cell colonies on soft agar. These results suggest that this (D-Arg)(9)-p19(ARF) 26-44 peptide is a potential therapeutic inhibitor of Foxm1b function during cellular transformation. Our studies demonstrate that the Foxm1b transcription factor is required for proliferative expansion during tumor progression and constitutes a potential new target for therapy of human HCC tumors.

p53 apoptotic pathway molecules are frequently and simultaneously altered in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lung carcinomas show frequent inactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor, which regulates an apoptotic pathway. The objective of the current study was to assess how the p53 apoptotic pathway is altered in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), especially in tumors without p53 alterations. METHODS: p53, its upstream regulators (p14(ARF) and HDM2), and downstream effectors of the apoptotic pathway (BAX and BCL2) were studied in 118 NSCLC specimens. p53 was analyzed by single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis covering exons 2-11 and by immunohistochemistry (IHC). p14(ARF) was analyzed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and IHC. HDM2 was analyzed using Southern blot analysis and IHC. BAX and BCL2 were analyzed by IHC. Two other upstream regulators that regulate the stability of HDM2, PTEN and HAUSP, also were studied. RESULTS: Of 118 NSCLC specimens that were analyzed, p53 alterations were detected in 74 tumors (63%), p14(ARF) inactivation was detected in 53 tumors (45%), and overexpression of HDM2 was found in 31 tumors (26%), including 6 tumors with gene amplification. Although p53 inactivation and HDM2 overexpression were detected simultaneously, HDM2 gene amplification was observed only in tumor specimens without p53 mutations. IHC revealed PTEN down-regulation in 22 of 88 tumors (25%). HAUSP Northern blot analysis demonstrated several-fold differences in gene expression that did not correlate with p53 alterations. Of 118 NSCLC specimens, expression of BAX and BCL2 expression were detected in 46 tumors (39%) and 17 tumors (14%), respectively. Finally, ASPP1 and ASPP2, molecules involved in mediating the transcription function of p53, were not found to be aberrantly expressed when tested by Northern blot analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, two or more p53 pathway components were found to be frequently altered in patients with NSCLC. Greater than 90% of the alterations were due to abnormalities of p53, p14(ARF), or HDM2. Therefore, the inactivation of one or more components of the p53 pathway appears to be a prerequisite for the development of most NSCLCs.