Drosophila in the study of hTBP protein interactions in the development and modeling of SCA17.

BACKGROUND: Protein interactions participate in many molecular mechanisms involved in cellular processes. The human TATA box binding protein (hTBP) interacts with Antennapedia (Antp) through its N-terminal region, specifically via its glutamine homopeptides. This PolyQ region acts as a binding site for other transcription factors under normal conditions, but when it expands, it generates spinocerebellar ataxia 17 (SCA17), whose protein aggregates in the brain prevent its correct functioning. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the hTBP glutamine-rich region is involved in its interaction with homeoproteins and the role it plays in the formation of protein aggregates in SCA17. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We characterized hTBP interaction with other homeoproteins using BiFC, and modeled SCA17 in Drosophila melanogaster by targeting hTBPQ80 to the fly brain using UAS/GAL4. RESULTS: There was hTBP interaction with homeoproteins through its glutamine-rich region, and hTBP protein aggregates with expanded glutamines were found to affect the locomotor capacity of flies. CONCLUSIONS: The study of hTBP interactions opens the possibility for the search for new therapeutic strategies in neurodegenerative pathologies such as SCA17.

ANTECEDENTES: Las interacciones proteicas participan en una gran cantidad de mecanismos moleculares que rigen los procesos celulares. La proteína de unión a la caja TATA humana (hTBP) interacciona con Antennapedia (Antp) a través de su extremo N-terminal, específicamente a través de sus homopéptidos de glutaminas. Esta región PolyQ sirve como sitio de unión a factores de transcripción en condiciones normales, pero cuando se expande genera la ataxia espinal cerebelosa 17 (SCA17), cuyos agregados proteicos en el cerebro impiden su funcionamiento correcto. OBJETIVO: Determinar si la región rica en glutaminas de hTBP interviene en su interacción con homeoproteínas y el papel que tiene en la formación de agregados proteicos en SCA17. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se caracterizó la interacción de hTBP con otras homeoproteínas usando BiFC y se modeló SCA17 en Drosophila melanogaster dirigiendo hTBPQ80 al cerebro de las moscas usando UAS/GAL4. RESULTADOS: Existió interacción de hTBP con homeoproteínas a través de su región rica en glutaminas. Los agregados proteicos de hTBP con las glutaminas expandidas afectaron la capacidad locomotriz de las moscas. CONCLUSIONES: El estudio de las interacciones de hTBP abre la posibilidad para la búsqueda de nuevas estrategias terapéuticas en patologías neurodegenerativas como SCA17.

Three-step mechanism of promoter escape by RNA polymerase II.

The transition from transcription initiation to elongation is highly regulated in human cells but remains incompletely understood at the structural level. In particular, it is unclear how interactions between RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) and initiation factors are broken to enable promoter escape. Here, we reconstitute RNA Pol II promoter escape in vitro and determine high-resolution structures of initially transcribing complexes containing 8-, 10-, and 12-nt ordered RNAs and two elongation complexes containing 14-nt RNAs. We suggest that promoter escape occurs in three major steps. First, the growing RNA displaces the B-reader element of the initiation factor TFIIB without evicting TFIIB. Second, the rewinding of the transcription bubble coincides with the eviction of TFIIA, TFIIB, and TBP. Third, the binding of DSIF and NELF facilitates TFIIE and TFIIH dissociation, establishing the paused elongation complex. This three-step model for promoter escape fills a gap in our understanding of the initiation-elongation transition of RNA Pol II transcription.

Ino2, activator of yeast phospholipid biosynthetic genes, interacts with basal transcription factors TFIIA and Bdf1.

Binding of general transcription factors TFIID and TFIIA to basal promoters is rate-limiting for transcriptional initiation of eukaryotic protein-coding genes. Consequently, activator proteins interacting with subunits of TFIID and/or TFIIA can drastically increase the rate of initiation events. Yeast transcriptional activator Ino2 interacts with several Taf subunits of TFIID, among them the multifunctional Taf1 protein. In contrast to mammalian Taf1, yeast Taf1 lacks bromodomains which are instead encoded by separate proteins Bdf1 and Bdf2. In this work, we show that Bdf1 not only binds to acetylated histone H4 but can also be recruited by Ino2 and unrelated activators such as Gal4, Rap1, Leu3 and Flo8. An activator-binding domain was mapped in the N-terminus of Bdf1. Subunits Toa1 and Toa2 of yeast TFIIA directly contact sequences of basal promoters and TFIID subunit TBP but may also mediate the influence of activators. Indeed, Ino2 efficiently binds to two separate structural domains of Toa1, specifically with its N-terminal four-helix bundle structure required for dimerization with Toa2 and its C-terminal ß-barrel domain contacting TBP and sequences of the TATA element. These findings complete the functional analysis of yeast general transcription factors Bdf1 and Toa1 and identify them as targets of activator proteins.

Promoter-proximal nucleosomes attenuate RNA polymerase II transcription through TFIID.

A nucleosome is typically positioned with its proximal edge (NPE) ∼50 bp downstream from the transcription start site of metazoan RNA polymerase II promoters. This +1 nucleosome has distinctive characteristics, including the presence of variant histone types and trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4. To address the role of these features in transcription complex assembly, we generated templates with four different promoters and nucleosomes located at a variety of downstream positions, which were transcribed in vitro using HeLa nuclear extracts. Two promoters lacked TATA elements, but all supported strong initiation from a single transcription start site. In contrast to results with minimal in vitro systems based on the TATA-binding protein (TBP), TATA promoter templates with a +51 NPE were transcriptionally inhibited in extracts; activity continuously increased as the nucleosome was moved downstream to +100. Inhibition was much more pronounced for the TATA-less promoters: +51 NPE templates were inactive, and substantial activity was only seen with the +100 NPE templates. Substituting the histone variants H2A.Z, H3.3, or both did not eliminate the inhibition. However, addition of excess TBP restored activity on nucleosomal templates with TATA promoters, even with an NPE at +20. Remarkably, nucleosomal templates with histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 are active with an NPE at +51 for both TATA and TATA-less promoters. Our results strongly suggest that the +1 nucleosome interferes with promoter recognition by TFIID. This inhibition can be overcome with TBP alone at TATA promoters or through positive interactions with histone modifications and TFIID.

Spt3 and Spt8 Are Involved in the Formation of a Silencing Boundary by Interacting with TATA-Binding Protein.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a heterochromatin-like chromatin structure called the silencing region is present at the telomere as a complex of Sir2, Sir3, and Sir4. Although spreading of the silencing region is blocked by histone acetylase-mediated boundary formation, the details of the factors and mechanisms involved in the spread and formation of the boundary at each telomere are unknown. Here, we show that Spt3 and Spt8 block the spread of the silencing regions. Spt3 and Spt8 are members of the Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex, which has histone acetyltransferase activity. We performed microarray analysis of the transcriptome of spt3Δ and spt8Δ strains and RT-qPCR analysis of the transcript levels of genes from the subtelomeric region in mutants in which the interaction of Spt3 with TATA-binding protein (TBP) is altered. The results not only indicated that both Spt3 and Spt8 are involved in TBP-mediated boundary formation on the right arm of chromosome III, but also that boundary formation in this region is DNA sequence independent. Although both Spt3 and Spt8 interact with TBP, Spt3 had a greater effect on genome-wide transcription. Mutant analysis showed that the interaction between Spt3 and TBP plays an important role in the boundary formation.

Getting off to a good start.

RNA polymerase II transcription can efficiently occur when mouse embryonic stem cells lack TBP and TBP-like proteins, confirming that this initiation factor may not be as essential as once thought.

Paf1 complex subunit Rtf1 stimulates H2B ubiquitylation by interacting with the highly conserved N-terminal helix of Rad6.

Histone modifications coupled to transcription elongation play important roles in regulating the accuracy and efficiency of gene expression. The monoubiquitylation of a conserved lysine in H2B (K123 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; K120 in humans) occurs cotranscriptionally and is required for initiating a histone modification cascade on active genes. H2BK123 ubiquitylation (H2BK123ub) requires the RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-associated Paf1 transcription elongation complex (Paf1C). Through its histone modification domain (HMD), the Rtf1 subunit of Paf1C directly interacts with the ubiquitin conjugase Rad6, leading to the stimulation of H2BK123ub in vivo and in vitro. To understand the molecular mechanisms that target Rad6 to its histone substrate, we identified the site of interaction for the HMD on Rad6. Using in vitro cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry, we localized the primary contact surface for the HMD to the highly conserved N-terminal helix of Rad6. Using a combination of genetic, biochemical, and in vivo protein cross-linking experiments, we characterized separation-of-function mutations in S. cerevisiae RAD6 that greatly impair the Rad6-HMD interaction and H2BK123 ubiquitylation but not other Rad6 functions. By employing RNA-sequencing as a sensitive approach for comparing mutant phenotypes, we show that mutating either side of the proposed Rad6-HMD interface yields strikingly similar transcriptome profiles that extensively overlap with those of a mutant that lacks the site of ubiquitylation in H2B. Our results fit a model in which a specific interface between a transcription elongation factor and a ubiquitin conjugase guides substrate selection toward a highly conserved chromatin target during active gene expression.

Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns.

Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoters is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) is often thought to have a uniform composition and to assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we demonstrate that different promoter classes function via distinct PICs. Promoter DNA of developmentally regulated genes readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoters do not, and instead recruit other factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are differentially required by distinct promoter types. TBP and its paralog TRF2 also function at different promoter types in a partially redundant manner. In contrast, TFIIA is required at all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. Promoter activation by tethering these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes utilize distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which translate into different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns.

RNA Polymerase II transcription independent of TBP in murine embryonic stem cells.

Transcription by RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) is initiated by the hierarchical assembly of the pre-initiation complex onto promoter DNA. Decades of research have shown that the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) is essential for Pol II loading and initiation. Here, we report instead that acute depletion of TBP in mouse embryonic stem cells has no global effect on ongoing Pol II transcription. In contrast, acute TBP depletion severely impairs RNA Polymerase III initiation. Furthermore, Pol II transcriptional induction occurs normally upon TBP depletion. This TBP-independent transcription mechanism is not due to a functional redundancy with the TBP paralog TRF2, though TRF2 also binds to promoters of transcribed genes. Rather, we show that the TFIID complex can form and, despite having reduced TAF4 and TFIIA binding when TBP is depleted, the Pol II machinery is sufficiently robust in sustaining TBP-independent transcription.

A DNA origami-based device for investigating DNA bending proteins by transmission electron microscopy.

The DNA origami technique offers precise positioning of nanoscale objects with high accuracy. This has facilitated the development of DNA origami-based functional nanomechanical devices that enable the investigation of DNA-protein interactions at the single particle level. Herein, we used the DNA origami technique to fabricate a nanoscale device for studying DNA bending proteins. For a proof of concept, we used TATA-box binding protein (TBP) to evaluate our approach. Upon binding to the TATA box, TBP causes a bend to DNA of ∼90°. Our device translates this bending into an angular change that is readily observable with a conventional transmission electron microscope (TEM). Furthermore, we investigated the roles of transcription factor II A (TF(II)A) and transcription factor II B (TF(II)B). Our results indicate that TF(II)A introduces additional bending, whereas TF(II)B does not significantly alter the TBP-DNA structure. Our approach can be readily adopted to a wide range of DNA-bending proteins and will aid the development of DNA-origami-based devices tailored for the investigation of DNA-protein interactions.

Complex Ataxia-Dementia Phenotype in Patients with Digenic TBP/STUB1 Spinocerebellar Ataxia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are autosomal dominant disorders with extensive clinical and genetic heterogeneity. We recently identified a form of SCA transmitted with a digenic pattern of inheritance caused by the concomitant presence of an intermediate-length expansion in TATA-box binding protein gene (TBP40-46 ) and a heterozygous pathogenic variant in the Stip1-homologous and U-Box containing protein 1 gene (STUB1). This SCATBP/STUB1 represents the first example of a cerebellar disorder in which digenic inheritance has been identified. OBJECTIVES: We studied a large cohort of patients with SCATBP/STUB1 with the aim of describing specific clinical and neuroimaging features of this distinctive genotype. METHODS: In this observational study, we recruited 65 affected and unaffected family members from 21 SCATBP/STUB1 families and from eight families with monogenic SCA17. Their characteristics and phenotypes were compared with those of 33 age-matched controls. RESULTS: SCATBP/STUB1 patients had multi-domain dementia with a more severe impairment in respect to patient carrying only fully expanded SCA17 alleles. Cerebellar volume and thickness of cerebellar cortex were reduced in SCATBP/STUB1 compared with SCA17 patients (P = 0.03; P = 0.008). Basal ganglia volumes were reduced in both patient groups, as compared with controls, whereas brainstem volumes were significantly reduced in SCATBP/STUB1 , but not in SCA17 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of the complex SCATBP/STUB1 phenotype may impact on diagnosis and genetic counseling in the families with both hereditary and sporadic ataxia. The independent segregation of TBP and STUB1 alleles needs to be considered for recurrence risk and predictive genetic tests. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

LncRNA-TBP mediates TATA-binding protein recruitment to regulate myogenesis and induce slow-twitch myofibers.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle is comprised of heterogeneous myofibers that differ in their physiological and metabolic parameters. Of these, slow-twitch (type I; oxidative) myofibers have more myoglobin, more mitochondria, and higher activity of oxidative metabolic enzymes compared to fast-twitch (type II; glycolytic) myofibers. METHODS: In our previous study, we found a novel LncRNA-TBP (for "LncRNA directly binds TBP transcription factor") is specifically enriched in the soleus (which has a higher proportion of slow myofibers). The primary myoblast cells and animal model were used to assess the biological function of the LncRNA-TBP in vitro or in vivo. Meanwhile, we performed a RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and pull-down analysis to validate this interaction between LncRNA-TBP and TBP. RESULTS: Functional studies demonstrated that LncRNA-TBP inhibits myoblast proliferation but promotes myogenic differentiation in vitro. In vivo, LncRNA-TBP reduces fat deposition, activating slow-twitch muscle phenotype and inducing muscle hypertrophy. Mechanistically, LncRNA-TBP acts as a regulatory RNA that directly interacts with TBP protein to regulate the transcriptional activity of TBP-target genes (such as KLF4, GPI, TNNI2, and CDKN1A). CONCLUSION: Our findings present a novel model about the regulation of LncRNA-TBP, which can regulate the transcriptional activity of TBP-target genes by recruiting TBP protein, thus modulating myogenesis progression and inducing slow-twitch fibers. Video Abstract.

TFIIB-related factor 1 is a nucleolar protein that promotes RNA polymerase I-directed transcription and tumour cell growth.

Eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (Pol I) products play fundamental roles in ribosomal assembly, protein synthesis, metabolism and cell growth. Abnormal expression of both Pol I transcription-related factors and Pol I products causes a range of diseases, including ribosomopathies and cancers. However, the factors and mechanisms governing Pol I-dependent transcription remain to be elucidated. Here, we report that transcription factor IIB-related factor 1 (BRF1), a subunit of transcription factor IIIB required for RNA polymerase III (Pol III)-mediated transcription, is a nucleolar protein and modulates Pol I-mediated transcription. We showed that BRF1 can be localized to the nucleolus in several human cell types. BRF1 expression correlates positively with Pol I product levels and tumour cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Pol III transcription inhibition assays confirmed that BRF1 modulates Pol I-directed transcription in an independent manner rather than through a Pol III product-to-45S pre-rRNA feedback mode. Mechanistically, BRF1 binds to the Pol I transcription machinery components and can be recruited to the rDNA promoter along with them. Additionally, alteration of BRF1 expression affects the recruitment of Pol I transcription machinery components to the rDNA promoter and the expression of TBP and TAF1A. These findings indicate that BRF1 modulates Pol I-directed transcription by controlling the expression of selective factor 1 subunits. In summary, we identified a novel role of BRF1 in Pol I-directed transcription, suggesting that BRF1 can independently regulate both Pol I- and Pol III-mediated transcription and act as a key coordinator of Pol I and Pol III.

Structural basis of SNAPc-dependent snRNA transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II.

RNA polymerase II (Pol II) carries out transcription of both protein-coding and non-coding genes. Whereas Pol II initiation at protein-coding genes has been studied in detail, Pol II initiation at non-coding genes, such as small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes, is less well understood at the structural level. Here, we study Pol II initiation at snRNA gene promoters and show that the snRNA-activating protein complex (SNAPc) enables DNA opening and transcription initiation independent of TFIIE and TFIIH in vitro. We then resolve cryo-EM structures of the SNAPc-containing Pol IIpre-initiation complex (PIC) assembled on U1 and U5 snRNA promoters. The core of SNAPc binds two turns of DNA and recognizes the snRNA promoter-specific proximal sequence element (PSE), located upstream of the TATA box-binding protein TBP. Two extensions of SNAPc, called wing-1 and wing-2, bind TFIIA and TFIIB, respectively, explaining how SNAPc directs Pol II to snRNA promoters. Comparison of structures of closed and open promoter complexes elucidates TFIIH-independent DNA opening. These results provide the structural basis of Pol II initiation at non-coding RNA gene promoters.

OsTBP2.1, a TATA-Binding Protein, Alters the Ratio of OsNRT2.3b to OsNRT2.3a and Improves Rice Grain Yield.

The OsNRT2.3a and OsNRT2.3b isoforms play important roles in the uptake and transport of nitrate during rice growth. However, it is unclear which cis-acting element controls the transcription of OsNRT2.3 into these specific isoforms. In this study, we used a yeast one-hybrid assay to obtain the TATA-box binding protein OsTBP2.1, which binds to the TATA-box of OsNRT2.3, and verified its important role through transient expression and RNA-seq. We found that the TATA-box of OsNRT2.3 mutants and binding protein OsTBP2.1 together increased the transcription ratio of OsNRT2.3b to OsNRT2.3a. The overexpression of OsTBP2.1 promoted nitrogen uptake and increased rice yield compared with the wild-type; however, the OsTBP2.1 T-DNA mutant lines exhibited the opposite trend. Detailed analyses demonstrated that the TATA-box was the key cis-regulatory element for OsNRT2.3 to be transcribed into OsNRT2.3a and OsNRT2.3b. Additionally, this key cis-regulatory element, together with the binding protein OsTBP2.1, promoted the development of rice and increased grain yield.

LncRNA MIR9-3HG enhances LIMK1 mRNA and protein levels to contribute to the carcinogenesis of lung squamous cell carcinoma via sponging miR-138-5p and recruiting TAF15.

The aberrantly expressed long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are closely correlated with the malignant progression of cancer cells. In our study, we identified lncRNA MIR9-3 host gene (MIR9-3HG) as the research target and explored its roles in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). RT-qPCR was conducted to reveal that MIR9-3HG was observably overexpressed in LUSC cells. Functional assays encompassing colony formation, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) staining, transwell and flow cytometry assays and western blot detecting related proteins demonstrated that MIR9-3HG depletion hampered cell proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) while accelerating cell apoptosis in LUSC. Subcellular fractionation assay were performed to demonstrate that MIR9-3HG was prominently distributed in the cytoplasm of LUSC cells. Luciferase reporter, RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP), immunofluorescence (IF), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and RNA pull down assays were implemented to confirm that MIR9-3HG modulates LIM domain kinase 1 (LIMK1) mRNA and protein levels by sequestering microRNA-138-5p (miR-138-5p) and recruiting TATA-box binding protein associated factor 15 (TAF15) protein. Taken together, our research determined that MIR9-3HG up-regulated LIMK1 mRNA and protein levels to promote LUSC carcinogenesis, which offers a novel insight into mechanisms of LUSC.

Differential dependencies of human RNA polymerase II promoters on TBP, TAF1, TFIIB and XPB.

The effects of rapid acute depletion of components of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) general transcription factors (GTFs) that are thought to be critical for formation of preinitiation complexes (PICs) and initiation in vitro were quantified in HAP1 cells using precision nuclear run-on sequencing (PRO-Seq). The average dependencies for each factor across >70 000 promoters varied widely even though levels of depletions were similar. Some of the effects could be attributed to the presence or absence of core promoter elements such as the upstream TBP-specificity motif or downstream G-rich sequences, but some dependencies anti-correlated with such sequences. While depletion of TBP had a large effect on most Pol III promoters only a small fraction of Pol II promoters were similarly affected. TFIIB depletion had the largest general effect on Pol II and also correlated with apparent termination defects downstream of genes. Our results demonstrate that promoter activity is combinatorially influenced by recruitment of TFIID and sequence-specific transcription factors. They also suggest that interaction of the preinitiation complex (PIC) with nucleosomes can affect activity and that recruitment of TFIID containing TBP only plays a positive role at a subset of promoters.

Trimeric complexes of Antp-TBP with TFIIEß or Exd modulate transcriptional activity.

BACKGROUND: Hox proteins finely coordinate antero-posterior axis during embryonic development and through their action specific target genes are expressed at the right time and space to determine the embryo body plan. As master transcriptional regulators, Hox proteins recognize DNA through the homeodomain (HD) and interact with a multitude of proteins, including general transcription factors and other cofactors. HD binding specificity increases by protein-protein interactions with a diversity of cofactors that outline the Hox interactome and determine the transcriptional landscape of the selected target genes. All these interactions clearly demonstrate Hox-driven transcriptional regulation, but its precise mechanism remains to be elucidated. RESULTS: Here we report Antennapedia (Antp) Hox protein-protein interaction with the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the formation of novel trimeric complexes with TFIIEß and Extradenticle (Exd), as well as its participation in transcriptional regulation. Using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC), we detected the interaction of Antp-TBP and, in combination with Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (BiFC-FRET), the formation of the trimeric complex with TFIIEß and Exd in living cells. Mutational analysis showed that Antp interacts with TBP through their N-terminal polyglutamine-stretches. The trimeric complexes of Antp-TBP with TFIIEß and Exd were validated using different Antp mutations to disrupt the trimeric complexes. Interestingly, the trimeric complex Antp-TBP-TFIIEß significantly increased the transcriptional activity of Antp, whereas Exd diminished its transactivation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide important insights into the Antp interactome with the direct interaction of Antp with TBP and the two new trimeric complexes with TFIIEß and Exd. These novel interactions open the possibility to analyze promoter function and gene expression to measure transcription factor binding dynamics at target sites throughout the genome.

Role of the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and associated family members in transcription regulation.

The assembly of transcription complexes on eukaryotic promoters involves a series of steps, including chromatin remodeling, recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP)-containing complexes, the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, and additional basal transcription factors. This review describes the transcriptional regulation by TBP and its corresponding homologs that constitute the TBP family and their interactions with promoter DNA. The C-terminal core domain of TBP is highly conserved and contains two structural repeats that fold into a saddle-like structure, essential for the interaction with the TATA-box on DNA. Based on the TBP C-terminal core domain similarity, three TBP-related factors (TRFs) or TBP-like factors (TBPLs) have been discovered in metazoans, TRF1, TBPL1, and TBPL2. TBP is autoregulated, and once bound to DNA, repressors such as Mot1 induce TBP to dissociate, while other factors such as NC2 and the NOT complex convert the active TBP/DNA complex into inactive, negatively regulating TBP. TFIIA antagonizes the TBP repressors but may be effective only in conjunction with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme recruitment to the promoter by promoter-bound activators. TRF1 has been discovered inDrosophila melanogasterandAnophelesbut found absent in vertebrates and yeast. TBPL1 cannot bind to the TATA-box; instead, TBPL1 prefers binding to TATA-less promoters. However, TBPL1 shows a stronger association with TFIIA than TBP. The TCT core promoter element is present in most ribosomal protein genes inDrosophilaand humans, and TBPL1 is required for the transcription of these genes. TBP directly participates in the DNA repair mechanism, and TBPL1 mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. TBPL2 is closely related to its TBP paralog, showing 95% sequence similarity with the TBP core domain. Like TBP, TBPL2 also binds to the TATA-box and shows interactions with TFIIA, TFIIB, and other basal transcription factors. Despite these advances, much remains to be explored in this family of transcription factors.

A DINOFLAGELLATE TBP-LIKE FACTOR ACTIVATES TRANSCRIPTION FROM A TTTT-BOX IN YEAST.

Dinoflagellates do not have a typical TATA-binding protein (TBP), a subunit of the general transcription factor TFIID complex. Instead, they have a TBP-like factor (TLF) that has been shown to bind TTTT instead of TATA in vitro. The ability of TLF to act as a functional replacement of TBP in vivo has never been assessed, however. Here, we show that a dinoflagellate TLF can drive expression of a reporter gene controlled by a budding yeast promoter whose TATA box was mutated to TTTT. TLF is thus able to bind and activate the yeast RNA polymerase and appear to function normally in the TFIID complex.