Bilateral Plunging Ranulas in South Auckland: Evidence for a Genetic Basis.

OBJECTIVES: We present a series of bilateral plunging ranula patients to examine the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of this condition. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all cases of plunging ranula treated at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Counties Manukau District Health Board, New Zealand, between 2001 and 2019. RESULTS: There were 17 patients with bilateral plunging ranulas from a total of 187 plunging ranula patients. Eight patients were of Pacific Island descent; six were Maori; and three were Asian. There were no European patients with bilateral plunging ranulas. There were three types of bilateral plunging ranula patients: 1) Metachronous plunging ranulas-Five patients presented with a unilateral plunging ranula with no evidence of a contralateral plunging ranula on initial imaging. Despite negative contralateral imaging findings, these patients developed a clinically evident contralateral plunging ranula 21 to 61 months later. 2) Synchronous plunging ranulas detected on imaging-Eight patients presented with a clinically evident unilateral plunging ranula but also had a contralateral plunging ranula detected on imaging. 3) Clinically evident synchronous plunging ranulas-Four patients presented with bilateral clinically evident plunging ranulas, which were also evident on imaging. Twelve patients underwent bilateral transoral sublingual gland excision and plunging ranula evacuation. CONCLUSION: All patients with a unilateral plunging ranula should be advised of the potential for developing contralateral disease, and this should be emphasized in patients of Pacific Island, Maori, and Asian descent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:73-77, 2021.

Plunging ranula: congenital or acquired?

OBJECTIVE: To review our clinical experience with plunging ranula and examine the evidence in support of our impression that plunging ranula has a genetic basis. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Secondary otolaryngology service. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Review of the medical records of a clinical series of 80 consecutive plunging ranulas in 77 patients was conducted, with recording of clinical and radiological findings, surgical treatment, and outcome. A literature review using MEDLINE and OLD MEDLINE was performed. RESULTS: The majority of plunging ranulas had no intraoral component on clinical examination, although evidence of mucus extravasation from the sublingual gland could be found both radiologically and histologically in all cases. There were four patients with bilateral plunging ranula and one instance of siblings with unilateral plunging ranula. Maoris and Polynesians comprised more than 82 percent of our cases; this was a significant overrepresentation of these ethnic groups (P < 0.0001). A very strong predominance of cases of Chinese origin was also evident in the literature. CONCLUSION: The clinical findings and the supporting data from the literature, when viewed in light of information relating to the known anatomical anomaly of a dehiscence in the mylohyoid muscle and ectopic sublingual gland lying below the plane of the mylohyoid, appear to support the case for a genetic basis for this unusual clinical entity.