Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Pediatr ; 15(6): 586-594, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31342466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with croup are frequently admitted if they require two doses of racemic epinephrine (RE) in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to identify factors associated with the need for additional therapy (> 2 RE doses) among pediatric patients with croup. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients admitted from the ED with a diagnosis of croup between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015. Primary outcome was need for > 2 doses of RE. Secondary outcomes included time to third RE and 72-hour return visits. We performed logistic regression to identify factors associated with use of > 2 RE doses during hospitalization, and survival analysis to identify time to dosing of 3rd RE from 2nd RE. RESULTS: Of 353 included admissions [250 (70.8%) males, median age 1.48, interquartile range 0.97-2.51 years], 106/353 (30.0%) required > 2 RE. In univariate logistic regression, only recent use of steroids within 1 day prior to presentation (4.18, 1.48-11.83; P = 0.007) was associated with need for > 2 RE. Survival from third RE was 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.78), which was similar to the survival at 12 hours (0.70, 95% CI 0.65-0.75). Return visits occurred in 19 (5.4%) patients, of whom 12/19 (63.2%) were given RE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for croup with recent use of steroids prior to ED presentation have a greater need for > 2 RE during hospitalization. The majority who require inpatient RE will do so within 8-12 hours. These data provide information for risk stratification and duration of monitoring for patients hospitalized with croup.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Crupe/tratamento farmacológico , Racepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Hosp Pediatr ; 8(10): 651-657, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30237259

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bronchiolitis is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalizations in the United States. Although the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against routine use of bronchodilators in bronchiolitis management, racemic epinephrine was persistently used for this purpose at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital. Our aim was to decrease racemic epinephrine use for bronchiolitis by 50% within 8 months. METHODS: Our multidisciplinary team used the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement to develop an aim statement, choose metrics, and perform plan-do-study-act cycles to reduce racemic epinephrine use. We used focused education through in-person and online methods and provided direct feedback to residents, respiratory therapists, and nurses primarily caring for these children. The percentage of all patients admitted for bronchiolitis receiving at least 1 dose of racemic epinephrine was collected from the medical record and recorded on statistical process control charts for distribution to their work areas. Albuterol use and length of stay were collected as balancing measures. We used statistical process control charts to establish special cause variation and identify statistically significant differences in our measures. RESULTS: During our intervention period, the percentage of bronchiolitis patients receiving at least 1 dose of racemic epinephrine to treat bronchiolitis decreased from an average of 26% to 5%, and similarly, albuterol use decreased from an average of 48% to 34%. There was no clinically significant difference in length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Using a multidisciplinary approach and focused education techniques may be an effective way to reduce racemic epinephrine use for children with bronchiolitis.


Assuntos
Albuterol/administração & dosagem , Bronquiolite/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Racepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Bronquiolite/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Emerg Med ; 49(4): 408-14, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26242923

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) discharge is safe when croup-related stridor has resolved after corticosteroids and a single dose of racemic epinephrine (RE). Little evidence supports the traditional practice of hospital admission after ≥ 2 doses of RE. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the frequency and timing of clinically important inpatient interventions after ≥ 2 ED RE doses. METHODS: We identified patients hospitalized for croup after ED treatment with corticosteroids and ≥2 doses of RE. We compared asymptomatic (admitted solely on the number of RE doses) and symptomatic (admitted due to disease severity) groups with regard to inpatient RE administration, supplemental oxygen, helium-oxygen mixture (heliox) therapy, intubation, or transfer to a higher level of care, time to hospital discharge, and revisit and readmission rates within 48 h of discharge. RESULTS: Of 200 subjects admitted after ≥ 2 ED RE doses, 72 (36%) received clinically important inpatient interventions: RE (n = 68 [34%]), heliox (n = 9 [5%]), and supplemental oxygen (n = 4 [2%]). Of patients who received inpatient RE, 53% received only 1 dose. No patients underwent intubation or transfer to higher level of care. The 112 asymptomatic patients had fewer interventions (14% vs. 63%; p < 0.001) and shorter hospital durations (14.5 vs. 22 h; p < 0.001). Only 14% of the asymptomatic group received RE, with 75% receiving a single dose. There were no differences in revisit and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient interventions after ≥ 2 ED doses of RE for croup were infrequent, most commonly RE administration. Most patients asymptomatic upon admission require 0-1 inpatient RE doses and may be candidates for outpatient management.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Crupe/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Racepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Intubação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Oxigênio/administração & dosagem , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Racepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Sons Respiratórios/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (10): CD006619, 2013 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24114291

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Croup is a common childhood illness characterized by barky cough, stridor, hoarseness and respiratory distress. Children with severe croup are at risk for intubation. Nebulized epinephrine may prevent intubation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy (measured by croup scores, rate of intubation and health care utilization such as rate of hospitalization) and safety (frequency and severity of side effects) of nebulized epinephrine versus placebo in children with croup, evaluated in an emergency department (ED) or hospital setting. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL 2013, Issue 6, MEDLINE (1966 to June week 3, 2013), EMBASE (1980 to July 2013), Web of Science (1974 to July 2013), CINAHL (1982 to July 2013) and Scopus (1996 to July 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of children with croup evaluated in an ED or admitted to hospital. Comparisons were: nebulized epinephrine versus placebo, racemic nebulized epinephrine versus L-epinephrine (an isomer) and nebulized epinephrine delivered by intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) versus nebulized epinephrine without IPPB. Primary outcome was change in croup score post-treatment. Secondary outcomes were rate and duration of intubation and hospitalization, croup return visit, parental anxiety and side effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently identified potentially relevant studies by title and abstract (when available) and examined relevant studies using a priori inclusion criteria, followed by methodological quality assessment. One author extracted data while the second checked accuracy. We use the standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS: Eight studies (225 participants) were included. In general, children included in the studies were young (average age less than two years in the majority of included studies). Severity of croup was described as moderate to severe in all included studies. Six studies took place in the inpatient setting, one in the ED and one setting was not specified. Six of the eight studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias and the risk of bias was unclear in the remaining two studies.Nebulized epinephrine was associated with croup score improvement 30 minutes post-treatment (three RCTs, standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.37 to -0.51; I(2) statistic = 0%). This effect was not significant two and six hours post-treatment. Nebulized epinephrine was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay than placebo (one RCT, MD -32.0 hours; 95% CI -59.1 to -4.9). Comparing racemic and L-epinephrine, no difference in croup score was found after 30 minutes (SMD 0.33; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.08). After two hours, L-epinephrine showed significant reduction compared with racemic epinephrine (one RCT, SMD 0.87; 95% CI 0.09 to 1.65). There was no significant difference in croup score between administration of nebulized epinephrine via IPPB versus nebulization alone at 30 minutes (one RCT, SMD -0.14; 95% CI -1.24 to 0.95) or two hours (SMD -0.72; 95% CI -1.86 to 0.42). None of the studies sought or reported data on adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized epinephrine is associated with clinically and statistically significant transient reduction of symptoms of croup 30 minutes post-treatment. Evidence does not favor racemic epinephrine or L-epinephrine, or IPPB over simple nebulization.The authors note that data and analyses were limited by the small number of relevant studies and total number of participants and thus most outcomes contained data from very few or even single studies.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Crupe/tratamento farmacológico , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Tempo de Internação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Racepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...