Cananga odorata Aromatherapy Reduces Anxiety in Unexperienced Patients Hospitalized for Interventional Neuroradiology Procedures: A Randomized Control Trial.

The hospitalization and the unfamiliar experiences of patients in interventional radiology procedures cause a moderate to high levels of anxiety. This study was aimed to evaluate the anxiolytic effect of Cananga odorata essential oil (COE) aromatherapy in unexperienced patients hospitalized for interventional neuroradiology (INR) procedures. Forty-four patients admitted for their first INR procedure were randomly divided into COE and placebo control groups. COE or distilled water was dropped onto 2 pieces of mulberry paper and attached to the participant's gown at the shoulder level overnight. The main outcomes were observed from the morning salivary cortisol levels and salivary alpha-amylase activity after intervention. The Thai version of Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) were also assessed before and after COE intervention as the secondary outcome. The demographic and baseline data of both groups did not show any significant difference. After intervention, COE group had a significantly lower salivary alpha-amylase activity than placebo control group. The post-intervention scores of Trait (STAI-T) and State (STAI-S) anxiety were significantly less than those of baseline in both groups. Interestingly, the COE group had a greater percentage reduction on STAI-T after intervention than placebo control group. No significant difference was observed in other outcomes. In addition, the salivary alpha-amylase activity was weak but showed significant correlation with STAI anxiety scores. This study indicates that COE aromatherapy reduces the saliva alpha amylase activity and STAI-T anxiety in unexperienced patients hospitalized for INR procedures.

Why do Thoracic Radiologists Need to Know About Cultural Competence (and What Is it Anyway)?

Thoracic radiologists meet patients when performing procedures such as transthoracic computed tomography-guided biopsy and during shared decision-making required for lung cancer screening. Both patients and thoracic radiologists are influenced by their cultures, which affect their health care interactions. While culture may relate to religion or ethnicity of individuals, it also includes multiple additional characteristics such as gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, education, occupation, age, disability, and more. Patients from different cultures undergo similar medical procedures; however, care must be tailored according to the cultural and linguistic needs of each patient. Cultural competence allows all patients, from the same or different culture as the thoracic radiologist, to receive care that is tailored to the patient's cultural and linguistic needs. Cultural competence includes concepts such as cultural awareness, linguistic competence, and health literacy as well as avoiding bias and stereotyping. Culturally competent care requires appropriate services for interpretation, relating to spoken language, and translation, related to written reports and documents. The implications of not providing adequate interpretation and translation services include the inability to take an accurate health history and patient inability to understand the informed consent forms. Thoracic radiologic services should have culturally competent practices in place at every step of the care, starting from the first phone call when patients are making an appointment. This will allow patients to receive care that is culturally and linguistically appropriate and lead to better satisfaction and outcomes.

Notions of Preprocedural Patient Anxiety in the Realm of IR.

PURPOSE: To determine the views and current practice preferences of interventional radiologists and allied healthcare providers regarding management of preprocedural anxiety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March to April 2018, members of the Society of Interventional Radiology were surveyed regarding their opinions in the assessment and management of patient anxiety. Degree of responsibility for the management of anxiety was also queried through the use of a scale (1 = no responsibility; 2 = some responsibility; 3 = major responsibility). RESULTS: Of 1163 respondents (23.8% response rate), most described preprocedural anxiety as somewhat to very important in their practice (n = 961, 82.6%), somewhat to very important to the patients (n = 1087, 93.5%), and at least sometimes interfering with delivery of care (n = 815, 70.1%). Most respondents did not measure preprocedural anxiety directly (n = 953, 81.9%), but would address it if raised by the patient (n = 911, 82.9%). Patient education (n = 921, 79.1%), medications (n = 801, 68.8%), and therapeutic or empathetic interactions (n = 665, 56.4%) were most preferred to manage anxiety. Radiologists, nurses, patients, primary care providers, family members, and psychologists or psychiatrists were all allocated responsibility to reduce anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiologists and other providers are aware of the importance of preprocedural anxiety. Despite the notion that most radiologists did not address anxiety directly, most indicated a willingness to discuss the issue if raised by patients. Patient education, medications, and several other techniques are preferred to manage preprocedural anxiety. Responsibility to reduce anxiety is perceived to be shared among radiologists, nurses, patients, family members, and other health care providers.

Effects of Patients' Affect on Adverse Procedural Events during Image-Guided Interventions.

PURPOSE: To assess how a patient's affect on presentation relates to the likelihood of adverse events during their subsequent interventional image-guided procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed of an existing dataset from a clinical trial with 230 patients who underwent percutaneous peripheral vascular and renal interventions and who had completed the positive affect (PA) negative affect (NA) schedule (PANAS) before their procedures. Summary PANAS scores were split over the median and used to classify the participants into those with high vs low PA and high vs low NA. Associations between affect and the absence or presence of adverse medical events were examined by two-sided Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Patients with high baseline NA were significantly more likely to have adverse events during their procedures than those with low baseline NA (18% vs 8%; P = .030). High baseline PA was not associated with a significantly higher frequency of subsequent adverse events compared with low PA (15% vs 9%; P = .23). Patients with high NA requested and received significantly more sedative and opioid agents than those with low NA (2.0 vs 1.0 units requested [P = .0009]; 3.0 vs 1.0 units received [P = .0004]). PA levels did not affect medication use. CONCLUSIONS: High NA, but not PA, was associated with an increased likelihood of adverse events. Improving patients' NA before procedures seems a more suitable target than attempting to boost PA to improve the procedural experience.

Pilot Study of a Patient-Centered Radiology Process Model.

PURPOSE: The Radiology Process Model (RPM) was previously described in terms of its conceptual basis and proposed survey items. The current study describes the first pilot application of the RPM in the field and the results of initial psychometric analysis. METHODS: We used an Institutional Review Board-approved pilot RPM survey in 100 patients having outpatient interventional radiology procedures. The 24 survey items had 4 or 5 levels of severity. We assessed for missing data, items that patients found confusing, any suggestions by patients for additional items and clarity of items from patient feedback. Factor analysis was performed and internal consistency measured. Construct validity was assessed by correlation of patient responses to the items as a summated scale with a visual analog scale (VAS) they completed indicating their interventional radiology experience. RESULTS: The visual analog scale and the RPM summated scale were strongly correlated (r = 0.7). Factor analysis showed four factors: interactions with facility and doctors/staff, time-sensitive aspects, pain, and anxiety. The items showed high internal consistency (alpha: 0.86) as a group and approximately 0.7 to 0.9 by the factors. Analysis shows that two items could be deleted (cost and communication between radiologist and referrers). Revision of two items and potential addition of others are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The RPM shows initial evidence of psychometric validity and internal consistency reliability. Minor changes are anticipated before wider use.

Quality of life assessment in interventional radiology.

The aim of this review was to describe quality of life (QoL) questionnaires relevant to interventional radiology. Interventional radiologists perform a large number of palliative procedures. The effect of these therapies on QoL is important. This is particularly true for cancer therapies where procedures with marginal survival benefits may result in tremendous QoL benefits. Image-guided minimally invasive procedures should be compared to invasive procedures, with respect to QoL, as part of comparative effectiveness assessment. A large number of questionnaires have been validated for measurement of overall and disease-specific quality of life. Use of applicable QoL assessments can aid in evaluating clinical outcomes and help to further substantiate the need for minimally invasive image-guided procedures.

[Professional competencies: from conflict to opportunity]. / Competencias profesionales: del conflicto a la oportunidad.

The tough [correction of turf] battles with other specialties that tend to take control of the radiological practice and some of our areas of interest are one of the most important problems that Radiology must face at the present time. Interventional Radiology is the last one and the more recent example of this phenomenon that spreads world-wide. Far from defeatist attitudes, we must learn from our past mistakes to turn this scenario into an opportunity to evolve towards a more competitive and updated specialty according to our time. The authors review the present situation of the tough [correction of turf] batlles of Radiology with other specialties, pointing to their possible causes and proposing the resolution strategies.

Pain and anxiety during interventional radiologic procedures: effect of patients' state anxiety at baseline and modulation by nonpharmacologic analgesia adjuncts.

PURPOSE: To assess how patients' underlying anxiety affects their experience of distress, use of resources, and responsiveness toward nonpharmacologic analgesia adjunct therapies during invasive procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty-six patients undergoing vascular and renal interventions, who had been randomized to receive during standard care treatment, structured empathic attention, or self-hypnotic relaxation, were divided into two groups: those with low state anxiety scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, scores < 43; n = 116) and those with high state anxiety scores (> or = 43; n = 120). All had access to patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl and midazolam. Every 15 minutes during the procedure, patients rated their anxiety and pain on a scale of 0-10 (0, no pain/anxiety at all; 10, worst possible pain/anxiety). Effects were assessed by analysis of variance and repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: Patients with high state anxiety levels required significantly greater procedure time and medication. Empathic attention as well as hypnosis treatment reduced procedure time and medication use for all patients. These nonpharmacologic analgesia adjunct treatments also provided significantly better pain control than standard care for patients with low anxiety levels. Anxiety decreased over the time of the procedure; patients with high state anxiety levels experienced the most significant decreases in anxiety with nonpharmacologic adjuncts whereas patients with low state anxiety levels coped relatively well under all conditions. CONCLUSION: Patients' state anxiety level is a predictor of trends in procedural pain and anxiety, need for medication, and procedure duration. Low and high state anxiety groups profit from the use of nonpharmacologic analgesia adjuncts but those with high state anxiety levels have the most to gain.

Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes resulting from the use of fluoroscopically guided therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain. DESIGN: Retrospective study with independent clinical review. A total of 15 patients who met specific physical examination or electrodiagnostic criteria and failed to improve clinically after at least 4 wks of physical therapy were included. Each patient demonstrated a positive response to a fluoroscopically guided cervical selective nerve root block. Therapeutic selective nerve root blocks were administered in conjunction with physical therapy. Outcome measures included visual analog scale pain scores, employment status, medication usage, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients' symptom duration before diagnostic injection averaged 13.0 mos. An average of 3.7 therapeutic injections were administered. Follow-up data collection transpired at an average of 20.7 mos after discharge from treatment. An overall good or excellent outcome was observed in three patients (20.0%). Among those treated without surgery, a significant reduction (P = 0.0313) in pain score was observed at the time of follow-up. Six patients (40.0%) proceeded to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These initial and preliminary findings do not support the use of therapeutic selective nerve root block in the treatment of this challenging patient population with traumatically induced spondylotic radicular pain.

Gray ramus communicans nerve block: novel treatment approach for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common complication of osteoporosis in the aging population. Refractory chronic pain may develop, and few effective treatment options exist. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 cases in which gray ramus communicans nerve block was used for painful OVCF after failure of conservative analgesic therapy. All were office-based, fluoroscopically guided procedures; a combination of 2% lidocaine and 2% sterile triamcinolone diacetate (Aristocort) was injected on the gray ramus tract of the somatic nerve root corresponding with radiographically documented OVCF. Patient-reported and physician-reported pain scores, analgesic medication use, and overall patient satisfaction were measured. The average follow-up period was 9 months. RESULTS: A 1-point improvement in pain scores was reported by 92% of patients and 88% of physicians; a 4-point improvement was reported by 63% and 58%, respectively. No patients reported increased pain scores; physicians reported increases in two cases. Decreased analgesic requirement was documented in 42%. Patient satisfaction was "high" in 50% and "medium" in 25%. No procedural complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Prompt and sustained improvements in all parameters, especially pain scores, support widespread clinical application of this safe effective and cost-effective therapy.

Rapid anxiety assessment in medical patients: evidence for the validity of verbal anxiety ratings.

Rapid assessment of patient anxiety is necessary to insure quality care. A number of self-report measures provide valid and reliable measures of anxiety. These measures can be time-consuming to complete, however, and may be burdensome to medical patients who are in pain or acute anxiety states. Many medical procedures are performed in conditions in which written measures are cumbersome (e.g. patient in supine position), and scoring and interpretation of written measures in a busy clinical setting may be difficult for medical personnel. The present study provides validity data for a verbally administered (0-10) anxiety rating. One hundred and ninety-eight adult interventional radiology patients completed standard measures assessing state anxiety, trait Negative and Positive Affect, and the dimensions of the five-factor model of personality. Verbal anxiety rating was highly correlated with Spielberger's State Anxiety Inventory, showed moderate correlations to the related constructs of neuroticism and trait Negative Affect, and was largely unrelated to theoretically distinct constructs. Verbal anxiety ratings made prior to the invasive procedure also predicted pain and anxiety during the procedure. The verbal anxiety rating also demonstrated sensitivity to changes in anxiety that occurred as a result of changes in situation. Findings support the convergent and discriminant validity of verbal anxiety ratings.

[Creativity in professional life.... Desire to create and pleasure of doing it]. / La créativité dans la réalité professionnelle.... Le désir de créer et le plaisir de faire.

The human being transforms the rules into actions by using new norms for his work. He transgresses the initial standards to apply them to real life. In the job of radiology manipulation, creativity is in the heart of the ingenuity which would constitute, in a way, the moving force of the profession, the intelligence of the body, the cunning intelligence. Explaining the work is therefore difficult and complex because the visibility spaces are informal spaces, a mixture of fear and of need to show. Creativity, as the binder of the standards jigsaw, adds value to the knowledge and, step by step, makes it more useful.