Why do Thoracic Radiologists Need to Know About Cultural Competence (and What Is it Anyway)?

Thoracic radiologists meet patients when performing procedures such as transthoracic computed tomography-guided biopsy and during shared decision-making required for lung cancer screening. Both patients and thoracic radiologists are influenced by their cultures, which affect their health care interactions. While culture may relate to religion or ethnicity of individuals, it also includes multiple additional characteristics such as gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, education, occupation, age, disability, and more. Patients from different cultures undergo similar medical procedures; however, care must be tailored according to the cultural and linguistic needs of each patient. Cultural competence allows all patients, from the same or different culture as the thoracic radiologist, to receive care that is tailored to the patient's cultural and linguistic needs. Cultural competence includes concepts such as cultural awareness, linguistic competence, and health literacy as well as avoiding bias and stereotyping. Culturally competent care requires appropriate services for interpretation, relating to spoken language, and translation, related to written reports and documents. The implications of not providing adequate interpretation and translation services include the inability to take an accurate health history and patient inability to understand the informed consent forms. Thoracic radiologic services should have culturally competent practices in place at every step of the care, starting from the first phone call when patients are making an appointment. This will allow patients to receive care that is culturally and linguistically appropriate and lead to better satisfaction and outcomes.

Can prevalence expectations drive radiologists' behavior?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To measure the effect of explicit prevalence expectation on the performance of experienced radiologists during image interpretation of pulmonary lesions on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of 22 experienced radiologists was allocated to one of three groups to interpret a set of 30 (15 abnormal) posteroanterior chest images on two occasions to decide if pulmonary lesions were present. Before each viewing, the radiologists were told that the images contained a specific number of abnormal images: group 1, 9 versus 15; group 2, 22 versus 15; and group 3, not told versus 15, respectively. Eye position metrics and receiver operating characteristics confidence ratings were compared for normal and abnormal images. An analysis of false-positive and false-negative decisions was also performed. RESULTS: For normal images, at higher prevalence expectation, significant increases were noted for duration of image scrutiny (group 1: P = .0004; group 2: P = .007; and group 3: P = .003) and number of fixations per image (group 1: P = .0006; group 2: P = .0004; and group 3: P = .0001). Also for normal images, group 1 demonstrated a significant increase (P = .038) in average confidence ratings when prevalence expectation increased. For abnormal images, at higher prevalence expectation, significant increases were noted for duration of image scrutiny in group 1 (P = .005) and number of fixations per image in group 1 (P = .01) and group 2 (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Confidence ratings and visual search of the expert radiologists appear to be affected by changing prevalence expectations. The impact of prevalence expectation appears to be more apparent for normal images.

The value of chest ultrasound along with inflammatory biomarkers in the management of pneumonia in a non-compliant pregnant woman.

During pregnancy, one of the possible complications is pneumonia. Early recognition as well as a timely and appropriate therapy is very important to prevent cardio-respiratory failure which may promote premature birth, low birth weight and miscarriage. In pregnancy, a chest X-ray is not contraindicated but may create a considerable state of maternal anxiety. We report a case of pneumonia in a pregnant woman managed with chest ultrasound and laboratory examinations because the patient refused a chest x-ray for fear of a possible fetal harm. This case is paradigmatic of an unusual but effective approach to pneumonia in pregnancy.

The psychological impact of annual chest X-ray follow-up in head and neck cancer.

CONCLUSION: Annual post-treatment screening of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients for second primary lung cancer and metastatic recurrence appeared to form no major burden for head and neck cancer patients. A majority of patients regard the annual chest X-ray as a reassurance. Given these results a more intensive screening program seems psychologically justifiable for this group. OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychological impact of annual post-treatment screening for second primary lung cancer and metastases in HNSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a cohort of 106 patients, 68 men and 38 women, with a mean age of 56, the impact of the yearly chest radiograph was evaluated by means of a nine-item questionnaire. RESULTS: In all, 90% of the patients were in favor of annual post-treatment screening, 2% would not like to receive this screening, and 8% had no preference. A majority (98%) considered the screening as an extra medical check and 76% felt reassured. Although 21% of the patients were very nervous about the outcome of the screening, only 3% wanted to avoid the yearly chest X-ray for this reason.

Role of faulty visual search in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors tested the hypothesis that satisfaction of search effect, which is associated with the failure to detect native chest abnormalities in the presence of simulated nodules, is caused by reduced gaze on the native abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gaze dwell time of 20 radiologists was recorded for the region around abnormalities on images. Ten radiographs were reviewed, nine of which contained native abnormalities. Each image was seen with and without a simulated nodule. RESULTS: The decrease in the rate of true-positive findings in the detection of native abnormalities on images that contained simulated nodules confirmed the occurrence of a satisfaction of search effect. Gaze times on native abnormalities (up to the time of report of the abnormalities) were the same for images with nodules in which native abnormalities were missed (gaze time, 9.4 seconds) as they were for images without nodules in which native abnormalities were detected (gaze time, 9.5 seconds). Gaze time on missed native abnormalities was not affected by the presence (7.80 seconds) or absence (7.45 seconds) of nodules. CONCLUSION: Reduction in gaze dwell time on the missed abnormalities is not the cause of satisfaction of search errors in chest radiographs.