The Effect of Anesthesia Type on the Stability of the Surgical View on the Monitor in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stone: A Prospective Observational Trial.

Background and Objectives: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive technique for nephrolithiasis. RIRS is performed via a monitor screen displaying a magnified surgical site. Respiration can affect the stability of the surgical view during RIRS because the kidneys are close to the diaphragm. The purpose of this trial is to compare the effect of anesthesia type on the stability of the surgical view during RIRS between spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Patients were allocated to the general anesthesia group or spinal anesthesia group. During surgery, movement of the surgical field displayed on the monitor screen was graded by the first assistant on a 10-grade numeric rating scale (0-10). Next, it was also graded by the main surgeon. After surgery, we evaluated the discomfort with the anesthesia method for all patients. Results: Thirty-four patients were allocated to the general anesthesia group and 32 patients to the spinal anesthesia group. The average values of the two surgeons for surgical field oscillation grade showed vision on the monitor screen was more stable in the general anesthesia group than the spinal anesthesia group (3.3 ± 1.6 vs. 5.0 ± 1.6, p < 0.001). The degrees of the inconvenience of the surgery did not differ between the groups (0.7 ± 1.8 vs. 1.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.114), even though more patients reported inconvenience with a grade of 3 or more in the spinal anesthesia group (8.8% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.042). Conclusions: In terms of the visualization of the surgical site, general anesthesia might provide a more stable surgical view during RIRS compared to spinal anesthesia without increasing inconvenience induced by the type of anesthesia.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus continuous paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femur fracture surgeries have become increasingly prevalent, presenting unique challenges for postoperative pain management due to patient demographics and comorbidities. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a relatively safe alternative to paravertebral block (PVB). Our aim was to compare ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB with continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: A prospective randomized interventional study was conducted on 60 patients between 18 and 60 years of age undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II between January 2019 and April 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB (Group E, n = 30) or ultrasound-guided continuous PVB (Group P, n = 30) using a computer-generated randomization table. The mean maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score, VAS score in the first 24 h, the time of rescue analgesia, and total requirement of rescue analgesia were assessed. RESULTS: The maximum VAS score within the first 24 h was numerically higher in Group P but statistically insignificant (p-value 0.279). VAS scores at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 18 h postoperatively were comparable in both groups. However, at the 24-h mark, the VAS score between Group E and Group P was statistically significant (p-value 0.018) but not clinically relevant. The mean paracetamol and tramadol requirements were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Continuous ESPB is as effective as continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in proximal femur surgeries. The enhanced safety profile of erector spinae block underscores its significance in postoperative pain management.

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Low Dose Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine on Haemodynamic Parameters in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of dexmedetomidine in potentiating the local anaesthetic efficacy of a low dose of bupivacaine when used as an adjuvant. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2021 to February 2022. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and eight patients of ASA physical class I-III undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under sub-arachnoid block (SAB) were enroled and distributed into two equal groups. Group BUPIPURE (BP) was given 7.5 mg of pure 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacain whereas group BUPIDEX (BD) was given 6 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacain with 3 µg dexmedetomidine intrathecally. The effects in Both groups were compared using chi-square and unpaired t-tests. A significance level of p <0.05 was used to evaluate the statistical significance. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated a steady decrease in mean heart rate (mean HR 98.9-62.7 per minute as compared to 79.1-59.4 per minute in groups BP and BD, respectively), however, no patient reached to HR <50/min. Group BP had a higher HR variability than group BD. The two groups' median peak sensory levels were similar. However, a statistically significant difference was revealed in the time taken for 2-segment regression (87.5 ± 11.3 min vs. 115.5 ± 6.2 min p <0.001 in BP and BD), as well as the time to reach T10 sensory level (13.56 ± 2.5 min vs. 10.9 ± 3.0 min p <0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients having TURP, intrathecal dexmedetomidine combined with low-dose bupivacaine results in a quicker start, extended sensory and motor block, and a decreased need for rescue analgesics. KEY WORDS: Adjuvants, Dexmedetomidine, Spinal anaesthesia, Transurethral Resection of Prostate.

Postoperative Outcomes of the Awake Colorectal Surgery with Neuraxial Anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of awake surgery with combined spinal epidural in geriatric colon cancer patients with advanced comorbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from April 2022 to 2023. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-four American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients, aged 25-65 years and scheduled for colon cancer surgery were included in this research. All patients were observed preoperatively, at the operation room and at the postoperative surgery service. Spinal anaesthesia was planned for Group I and general anaesthesia for Group II. Ketofol (1:1) was administered to the combined spinal-epidural group, with a Ramsay sedation score of 3 after the spinal block. Epidural analgesia was planned for all patients. Patients' age, gender, weight, comorbidities, ASA risk scores, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, bleeding amounts, colloid, crystalloid, and blood products were collected. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the demographic characteristics of both anaesthesia groups (p >0.05). The amount of bleeding was statistically lower in Group I than in the general anaesthesia group (p = 0.004). Oral intake, drain withdrawal, mobilisation, discharge times, and costs were similar in all groups (p >0.05). CONCLUSION: The regional anaesthesia applications facilitate compliance with routine mobilisation, discharge procedures and prevent complications in abdominal surgery and its positive perioperative effects in patients with poor respiratory parameters, poor general condition, and high comorbidity in advanced age. KEY WORDS: Regional anaesthesia, Spinal-epidural, Mobilisation, Pain, Colon cancer.

Comparison of four different protocols using levobupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in red-footed tortoises (Chelonoidis carbonarius).

Background: The popularity of tortoises kept in captivity is increasing and has caused concern regarding the necessity to establish safe and straightforward anaesthesia for those reptiles. Aim: This study aimed to compare four protocols using levobupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for the blockade of the caudal neuraxis of red-footed tortoises (Chelonoidis carbonarius). Methods: Twenty-four tortoises were randomly assigned into four groups: G1, levobupivacaine 0.75% (1.15 mg kg-1); G2, levobupivacaine 0.37% (1.15 mg kg-1); G3, levobupivacaine 0.75% (2.3 mg kg-1); and G4, levobupivacaine 0.75% (0.1 ml 5 cm-1 of straight carapace length). Tortoises were evaluated for respiratory rate, muscle relaxation, response to hindlimb or tail pinch, and cloacal reflex. Results: A 1.15 mg kg-1 dose of levobupivacaine 0.37% appears adequate for shorter procedures, whereas a 1.15 mg kg-1 dose of levobupivacaine 0.75% should be appropriate for longer procedures in red-footed tortoises. Conclusion: Our results are the first to show the effects of levobupivacaine on spinal anaesthesia in reptiles. Weight-based doses presented more intense and more homogeneous effects than carapace length-based doses in red-footed tortoises. Spinal anaesthesia of red-footed tortoises was safe and effective with any of the weight-based protocols.

Non-pulmonary complications of intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia for a range of operations. However, widespread implementation into clinical practice is hampered by concerns for potential side-effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression with the primary objective of determining whether a threshold dose for non-pulmonary complications could be defined and whether an association could be established between dose and complication rates when intrathecal morphine is administered for perioperative or obstetric analgesia. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs control in patients undergoing any type of surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia, or women in labour. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention within the first 24 postoperative hours, analysed according to doses (1-100 µg; 101-200 µg; 201-500 µg; >500 µg), type of surgery, and anaesthetic strategy. Trials were excluded if doses were not specified. RESULTS: Our analysis included 168 trials with 9917 patients. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention were significantly increased in the intrathecal morphine group, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.52 (1.29-1.79), P<0.0001; 6.11 (5.25-7.10), P<0.0001; and 1.73 (1.17-2.56), P=0.005, respectively. Meta-regression could not establish an association between dose and rates of non-pulmonary complications. There was no subgroup difference according to surgery for any outcome. The quality of evidence was low (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] system). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal morphine significantly increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention after surgery or labour in a dose-independent manner. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023387838).

Fascia Iliaca Block Combined with Low-dose Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in the Elderly: Effects on Severe Hypotension and Analgesia. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture surgeries in elderly patients often require spinal or general anesthesia, posing risks of severe hypotension and inadequate pain management. The optimal anesthesia type for minimizing these risks remains undetermined. Preliminary studies suggest that a combination of fascia iliaca block (FIB) and low-dose low-specific-gravity spinal anesthesia (LLSA) might offer a solution, but comprehensive evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining FIB with LLSA for reducing severe hypotension and enhancing analgesia during hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted. SETTING: An operating theatre of a tertiary hospital. METHODS: The study comprised 68 patients. They were separated into 2 equal parallel groups 34 patients each: the FIB+LLSA group and the general anesthesia (GA) group. Patients aged 75-96 undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for hip fracture were randomized to receive either FIB+LLSA or GA. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe hypotension; secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, use of rescue analgesia, vasopressor dosage, and complications. RESULTS: We found a significantly lower incidence of severe hypotension in the FIB+LLSA group compared to the GA group (32.4% vs 67.6%). Additionally, postoperative pain scores were significantly lower, and the need for rescue analgesia was reduced in the FIB+LLSA group. Vasopressor use during surgery was also significantly lower in the FIB+LLSA group. The hospital stay was shorter in the FIB+LLSA group, with an average of 5.9 days compared to 6.7 days in the GA group. LIMITATIONS: The study's limitations include its single-center nature, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the inability to conduct a double-blind study could introduce biases, though measures were taken to minimize this. The sample size might not be sufficient to determine the broader implications of LLSA. CONCLUSIONS: Combining FIB with LLSA for elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery significantly reduces the incidence of severe intraoperative hypotension and postoperative pain. It also decreases the need for rescue analgesia and shortens hospital stays, suggesting that FIB+LLSA could be a beneficial regional anesthesia technique for elderly hip fracture surgery patients, aligning with enhanced recovery protocols.

Accessing the efficacy and peri-operative adverse effects of three different hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosages for spinal anesthesia induction in lower limb orthopedic surgeries: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a conventional method for proper nerve block in abdominopelvic and lower extremity surgeries. Compared to general anesthesia, SA has reduced perioperative complications significantly. The hyperbaric type of bupivacaine hydrochloride (HB) induces spinal anesthesia more efficiently with a lower incidence of life-threatening adverse reactions like Perioperative hemodynamic changes and respiratory depression. More investigations are needed to define the best dosage that provides adequate anesthesia while reducing adverse effects for each surgical procedure. METHODS: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial compared the consequences of the (12.5mg,15mg,20mg) dosages of HB-bupivacaine in elective lower limb orthopedic surgery. Using block randomization, we allocated 60 participants to three (n = 20) study groups. Utilizing the same protocol of anesthesia induction, outcome variables assumed and measured as the incidence of the adverse effects (Hypotension, Anxiety, Bradycardia, Nausea and Vomiting(N/V), Hypoventilation, and Decreased o2 saturation), and the requirement for intervention to control the unwanted reaction. Addressing that, outcome variables were measured 10 times perioperatively. One-way ANOVA test, the chi2 test, or repeated measures ANOVA test with the Bonferroni adjustment were utilized as appropriate. RESULTS: We found that the incidence of hypotension (P-value:0.02) and the N/V (P-value < 0.001) are associated with the HB-bupivacaine dosage. Contrary, our findings indicate that the incidence of apnea, bradycardia, and hypoventilation did not exhibit a significant dose-dependent pattern between the groups. Repeated measures analysis revealed significant intergroup differences for Herat rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (group*time Pvalue < 0.001). The observed differences were more prominent 10-30 min after injection of HB-bupivacaine. The regression model claimed that gender (P-value:0.002) and drug dosage (P-value:0.03) significantly predict the incidence of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Our results, suggest that the administration of the 12.5mg HB-bupivacaine provides adequate anesthesia while minimizing the risk of adverse events for lower limb orthopedic surgeries lasting up to 180 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry Center (IRCT20160202026328N7), Registered on 2022.01.10.

Evaluation of oxygen administration in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia via lung ultrasound and the oxygen reserve index.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory functions may be impaired in cesarean section (C/S) delivery performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) and oxygen supplementation may be required. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of different oxygen administrations in pregnant women on the lungs during C/S under SA using ultrasound and oxygen reserve index (ORI). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-center study from May 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. A total of 90 patients scheduled for C/S under SA were randomly divided into 3 groups. Following the SA, patients in group 0 were treated with room air, in Group 3 were administered 3 L/min O2 with a nasal cannula (NC), in Group 6 were administered 6 L/min O2 with a simple face mask. In addition to routine monitoring, ORI values were measured. Lung aeration was evaluated through the modified lung ultrasound score (LUS) before the procedure (T0), at minute 0 (T1), 20 (T2), and hour 6 (T3) after the procedure, and ∆LUS values were recorded. RESULTS: After SA, the ORI values of Group 3 were higher than Group 0 at all times (p < 0.05), while the intraoperative 1st minute and the 10th, 25th and 40th minutes after delivery (p = 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.001, p = 0.019) was higher than Group 6. When the LUS values of each group were compared with the T0 values a decrease was observed in Group 3 and Group 6 (p < 0.001, p = 0.016). While ∆LUS values were always higher in Group 3 than in Group 0, they were higher only in T1 and T2 in Group 6. CONCLUSION: We determined that it would be appropriate to prefer 3 L/min supplemental oxygen therapy with NC in C/S to be performed under SA.

Anesthesia management for cesarean section in a woman with chronic renal failure and heart failure: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy in a woman with heart and chronic renal failure can lead to life-threatening complications for both mother and child. Although such cases are often delivered by cesarean section, few reports have described anesthesia methods. CASE PRESENTATION: We encountered a case in which cesarean section was performed using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for a pregnant woman with chronic renal and heart failure. The 35-year-old Japanese woman had been undergoing hemodialysis for several years. Heart failure symptoms that appeared during pregnancy initially improved with treatments such as increasing hemodialysis, but recurred. She was admitted to the intensive care unit. The initial plan was to deliver the baby after a few weeks, but further progression of heart failure became a concern. After a clinical conference among staff, a cesarean section with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was scheduled for 24 weeks, 0 days of gestation. The anticoagulant for dialysis was also changed from heparin to nafamostat in preparation for cesarean section. Monitoring was started with central venous and radial artery pressures before induction of anesthesia. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was induced and the cesarean section was completed without complications. Surgery was initiated under continuous administration of phenylephrine, which was intended to avoid hypotension due to anesthesia. The hemodynamic and respiratory status of the patient remained stable postoperatively. After the cesarean section, morphine was administered epidurally and the epidural catheter was removed. CONCLUSION: Cesarean section was safely performed for a pregnant woman with renal and heart failure using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.

Prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to treat hypotension after spinal anaesthesia during caesarean section: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia is a common anaesthetic method for caesarean sections but often results in hypotension, posing potential risks to maternal and neonatal health. Norepinephrine, as a vasopressor, may be effective in preventing and treating this hypotension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for the treatment of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia in caesarean sections. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant studies on prophylactic administration of norepinephrine for the treatment of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery. Reference lists of included articles were also searched. The latest search update was on March 20, 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software. The methods recommended by the Cochrane Handbook, Begge's and Egger's tests were used for risk of bias evaluation of the included literature. RESULTS: Nine studies were finally included in this study. The results showed that prophylactic administration of norepinephrine was superior to the control group in four aspects of treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery: the incidence of hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.34, 95%CI (0.27-0.43), P < 0.01]; the incidence of severe hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.21-0.51), P < 0.01]; and maternal blood pressure was more stable with MDPE [MD = -5.00, 95%CI (-7.80--2.21), P = 0.06] and MDAPE [MD = 4.11, 95%CI (1.38-6.85), P < 0.05], the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced [RR = 0.52, 95%CI (0.35-0.77), P < 0.01]. On the other hand, the incidence of reactive hypertension was higher than the control group [RR = 3.58, 95%CI (1.94-6.58), P < 0.01]. There was no difference between the two groups in one aspects: newborn Apgar scores [MD = -0.01, 95%CI (-0.10-0.09, P = 0.85)]. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of norepinephrine is effective in treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery patients; however, it does not provide improved safety and carries a risk of inducing reactive hypertension.

Hypotension, or low blood pressure, after spinal anaesthesia can threaten the health of both mothers and their babies during caesarean sections. Norepinephrine is a drug that affects heart rate less and does not easily cross the placental barrier, which may reduce its potential negative effects on the baby. However, there are not many studies on using norepinephrine as a preventive measure. Our study systematically evaluated the use of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to prevent hypotension in caesarean section patients. We found that it is effective in preventing low blood pressure but does not show improved safety and carries some risk of causing high pressure as a reaction.

The Relationship between Body Mass Index and Frontal QRS-T Angle in Pregnant Women Undergoing Cesarean Section with Spinal Anesthesia.

Background and objectives: The frontal QRS-T angle is a novel parameter of myocardial repolarization. Weight gain during pregnancy and physiological changes during a cesarian section may affect the frontal QRS-T angle. We aimed to assess the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the frontal QRS-T angle in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Method and materials: This study included 90 pregnant women. BMI was calculated for all pregnant women. The study population was divided into two groups: BMI < 30 (n = 66) and BMI ≥ 30 (n = 24). QT interval measurements and the frontal QRS-T angle were obtained from the report of an electrocardiography machine. Results: It was found that the pre-operative and post-operative frontal QRS-T angle (p = 0.045 and p = 0.007) and QTc interval (p = 0.037 and p < 0.001) were higher in pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 30 than in pregnant women with a BMI < 30. In addition, when compared to pre-operative values, the post-operative frontal QRS-T angle (from 24.0 [20.0-41.5] to 34.5 [19.5-50.0], p = 0.031) and QTc interval (from 420.6 ± 13.3 to 431.7 ± 18.3, p = 0.010) were increased in the BMI ≥ 30 group, whereas no significant post-operative increase was observed in the BMI < 30 group. In correlation analysis, BMI was positively correlated with the frontal QRS-T angle and QTc interval. Conclusions: The frontal QRS-T angle and QTc interval were importantly increased in pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 30 than in pregnant women with a BMI < 30. Also, after cesarean section operation with spinal anesthesia, the frontal QRS-T angle and QTc were increased significantly in the BMI ≥ 30 group, whereas no significant change was observed in the BMI < 30 group. Therefore, it is suggested to perform close post-operative monitoring in pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 30 undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia.

Effect of Intraspinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Study.

AIM: Acute appendicitis is a common disease in the elderly. Exploring a suitable anesthesia method is crucial in promoting postoperative recovery in elderly patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of intraspinal anesthesia in elderly patients with appendicitis. METHODS: This study included the clinical data of 217 elderly patients with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) at Tianjin Hospital of Tianjin University from January 2022 to January 2023. After excluding 8 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, the data from 209 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the different anesthesia methods, the study participants were divided into a reference group (n = 106) and a study group (n = 103). We compared the heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), blood oxygen saturation (SaO2), operation duration, hospitalization costs, discharge time, postoperative adverse reactions, inflammatory factor levels, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, anal exsufflation time, out-of-bed time, and incidence of postoperative complications between the two experimental groups. RESULTS: We observed that the study group exhibited higher levels of HR, RR, SBP, DBP, and SaO2 compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in operation time between the two groups (p > 0.05). The study group showed lower hospitalization cost and shorter discharge time than the reference group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the study group had lower incidence of postoperative adverse reactions than reference group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α between the two groups before and after surgery (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the study group had a lower VAS score compared to the reference group at 3 h, 6 h and 12 h after surgery (p < 0.001). The recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, anal exsufflation time, and out-of-bed time in the study group were substantially shorter than the reference group (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups within 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intraspinal anesthesia, as a safe anesthesia method, can reduce the discharge time of elderly patients with acute appendicitis who underwent LA, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, and is beneficial for postoperative recovery.

Is intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine superior to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as a bupivacaine adjuvant for caesarean section can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, the time interval to the first analgesic request, the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects, and the fetal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The study compared the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (group BD) to the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine alone (group B) for cesarean sections. RESULTS: Fourteen publications were included. Among patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section, 514 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine alone, and 533 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine. The onset of sensory and motor block was essentially the same in both groups; the time for sensory and motor block regression was significantly longer in the BD group. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values were similar in group BD when compared to group B. Postoperative VAS scores remained consistently low in Group BD compared to Group B, starting from 1 hour after surgery. The level of sedation measured at the end of the cesarean section in both groups was almost similar. No difference in terms of safety, adverse events, and neonatal outcomes was found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section significantly prolongs sensory and motor block compared to using bupivacaine alone as an adjuvant. It also improves analgesia after 1 hour with no difference in the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse effects compared to bupivacaine alone. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine to use remains to be ingested.

Awake Robotic Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Study with 1-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: We describe our protocol and outcomes of awake robotic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 10 consecutive patients undergoing awake robotic single-level MIS-TLIF with the Mazor X robot. We prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes (back and leg pain visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index) preoperatively at 1-month and 1-year follow-ups and assessed fusion and screw placement accuracy with a 1-year computed tomography (CT) scan. RESULTS: Median age was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 57.7-66). Median body mass index was 27 kg/m2. No intraoperative complications were reported. Most (9/10) patients were discharged home, and 50% discharged on the day of surgery. Median length of stay was 16.5 hours (IQR = 5-35.5). Median follow-up was 12.5 months (IQR = 12-13.5), with 9 patients having at least 12-month follow-up, with CT scans documenting good screw placement (Gertzbein-Robbins grade A) and solid bony fusion. Median preoperative back pain visual analog scale score was 7.8 (IQR = 6.9-8) versus 1.5 (IQR = 0-3.2) at 1-month post operation, P < 0.01, and 0 (IQR = 0-1) at 1-year follow-up, P < 0.01; median preoperative leg pain 8 (IQR = 7.4-8) versus 0 (IQR = 0-1.2) at 1-month post operation, P < 0.01, and 0 (IQR = 0-2) at 1-year follow-up, P < 0.01; median preoperative Oswestry Disability Index 47.5 (IQR = 27.8-57.5) versus 4 (IQR = 0-16) at 1-month postoperation, P < 0.01, and 0 (IQR = 0-7) at 1-year follow-up, P < 0.01. Median preoperative disk height of the index level was 8 mm (IQR = 2.4-9.5) versus 11.4 mm (IQR = 9.2-11.2) postoperatively,P < 0.01. Median preoperative lordosis of the index level was 5 degrees (IQR = 3.4-8.5) versus 10.1 degrees (7.3-12.2) postoperatively, P < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes at 1-month and 1-year follow-ups after awake robotic MIS-TLIF, as well as solid bony fusion on CT scans.