Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 52: 151738, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33865185

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The TNM staging system is the main prognostic tool for GC, but the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) can be affected by surgical, pathological, tumor or host factors. Several authors have shown that lymph node ratio (LNR) may be superior to TNM staging in GC. However, cut-off values vary between studies and LNR assessment is not standardized. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all GC resected in a western tertiary center (N = 377). Clinical features were collected and pathological features were assessed by two independent pathologists. Eight LNR classifications were selected and applied to our patients. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: 315 patients were included. Most tumors were T3 (49.2%) N+ (59.3%). During follow-up, 36.7% of patients progressed and 27.4% died due to tumor. All LNR classifications were significantly associated with clinicopathological features such as Laurén subtype, lymphovascular invasion, perineural infiltration, T stage, tumor progression or death. All LNR classifications were independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS, and ROC analyses calculated similar AUC values for all staging systems. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that Pedrazzani, Wang, Liu and Huang classifications stratified patients better into three (Pedrazzani) or four categories. These classifications tended to downstage TNM N2 and N3 tumors. In cases with less than 16 LNs resected, Pedrazzani and Wang classifications showed the best prognostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: Pedrazzani, Wang, Liu and Huang classifications showed good prognostic performance in western GC patients. Larger studies in other cohorts are needed to identify the most consistent LNR classification for GC.


Assuntos
Razão entre Linfonodos/classificação , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Razão entre Linfonodos/métodos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Patologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Padrões de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 50: 151677, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33310591

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer (GC) shows high recurrence and mortality rates. The AJCC TNM staging system is the best prognostic predictor, but lymph node assessment is a major source of controversy. Recent studies have found that lymph node ratio (LNR) may overcome TNM limitations. Our aim is to develop a simplified tumor-LNR (T-LNR) classification for predicting prognosis of resected GC. METHODS: Retrospective study of all GC resected in a tertiary center in Spain (N = 377). Clinicopathological features were assessed, LNR was classified into N0:0%, N1:1-25%, N2:>25%, and a T-LNR classification was developed. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: 317 patients were finally included. Most patients were male (54.6%) and mean age was 72 years. Tumors were intestinal (61%), diffuse (30.8%) or mixed (8.1%). During follow-up, 36.7% and 27.4% of patients progressed and died, respectively. T-LNR classification divided patients into five prognostic categories (S1-S5). Most cases were S1-S4 (26.2%, 19.9%, 22.6% and 23.6%, respectively). 7.6% of tumors were S5. T-LNR classification was significantly associated with tumor size, depth, macroscopical type, Laurén subtype, signet ring cells, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural infiltration, infiltrative growth, patient progression and death. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS showed an excellent patient stratification with evenly spaced curves. As for DFS, T-LNR classification also showed good discriminatory ability with non-overlapping curves. T-LNR classification was independently related to both OS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: T-LNR classifications can successfully predict prognosis of GC patients. Larger studies in other geographic regions should be performed to refine this classification and to validate its prognostic relevance.


Assuntos
Razão entre Linfonodos/classificação , Linfonodos/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Razão entre Linfonodos/métodos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...