Novel cannula design improves large volume auto-injection rates for high viscosity solutions.

A prototype reusable large-volume (2 mL) autoinjector (LVAI) was designed to compare injection performance of a novel 27 gauge ultra-thin wall (UTW) pre-filled syringe (PFS) cannula (8 mm external cannula length, 14.4 mm total needle length) against an existing 27 gauge special thin wall (STW) PFS cannula (12.7 mm external cannula length, 19 mm total needle length) across a range of injectate viscosities (2.3-30 cP) in a series of in vivo feasibility studies in swine. The UTW cannula had an approximately 30% greater cross-sectional lumen area than the STW cannula. The target exposed needle length was adjusted to ensure appropriate needle penetration depth and achieve injectate deposition in the subcutaneous (SC) tissue. Delivery time and volume, injection site leakage, injectate depot location, and local tissue effects were examined. The STW and UTW cannulae both provided effective SC delivery of contrast placebo solutions, and were able to accommodate injectate viscosity up to 30 cP without quantifiable leakage from the tissue and with minor tissue effects which resolved within 1-2 hours. Delivery times at each viscosity were significantly different between PFS types with the UTW PFS producing faster delivery times. In a histological substudy of the UTW cannula using injectate viscosities up to 50 cP, injection site reactions were rare and, when present, were of minimal severity. This series of studies demonstrates the feasibility of LVAI SC injection and informs autoinjector and PFS design considerations. Use of a UTW cannula may enable more rapid LVAI injections with minimal tissue effects, especially for higher viscosity formulations.

Multi-Electrode Array of Sensory Neurons as an In Vitro Platform to Identify the Nociceptive Response to Pharmaceutical Buffer Systems of Injectable Biologics.

PURPOSE: Pharmaceutical buffer systems, especially for injectable biologics such as monoclonal antibodies, are an important component of successful FDA-approved medications. Clinical studies indicate that buffer components may be contributing factors for increased injection site pain. METHODS: To determine the potential nociceptive effects of clinically relevant buffer systems, we developed an in vitro multi-electrode array (MEA) based recording system of rodent dorsal root ganglia (DRG) sensory neuron cell culture. This system monitors sensory neuron activity/firing as a surrogate of nociception when challenged with buffer components used in formulating monoclonal antibodies and other injectable biologics. RESULTS: We show that citrate salt and citrate mannitol buffer systems cause an increase in mean firing rate, burst frequency, and burst duration in DRG sensory neurons, unlike histidine or saline buffer systems at the same pH value. Lowering the concentration of citrate leads to a lower firing intensity of DRG sensory neurons. CONCLUSION: Increased activity/firing of DRG sensory neurons has been suggested as a key feature underlying nociception. Our results support the utility of an in vitro MEA assay with cultured DRG sensory neurons to probe the nociceptive potential of clinically relevant buffer components used in injectable biologics.

Subcutaneous Injection Site Pain of Formulation Matrices.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to systematically evaluate the effects of formulation composition on subcutaneous injection site pain (ISP) using matrices comprising of common pharmaceutical excipients. METHODS: Two randomized, blinded, crossover studies in healthy subjects were conducted at a single site, where subjects received 1 mL SC injections of the buffer matrices. ISP intensity was measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), which was then analyzed via heatmap, categorical grouping, subgroup analysis, and paired delta analysis. RESULTS: Buffer type, buffer concentration and tonicity agent showed a substantial impact on ISP. Citrate buffer demonstrated a higher ISP than acetate buffer or saline). The 20 mM citrate buffer was more painful than 10 or 5 mM citrate buffers. NaCl and propylene glycol were significantly more painful than sugar alcohols (mannitol, sucrose, trehalose or glycerol). Histidine buffers exhibited ISP in the descending order of 150 mM > 75 mM > 25 mM > 0 mM NaCl, while histidine buffers containing Arginine-HCl at 0, 50, or 150 mM all showed very low ISP. Histidine buffer at pH 6.5 showed a lower ISP than pH 5.7. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic study via orthogonal analyses demonstrated that subcutaneous ISP is significantly influenced by solution composition.

Traditional Chinese medicine auricular point acupressure for the relief of pain, fatigue, and gastrointestinal adverse reactions after the injection of novel coronavirus-19 vaccines: a structured summary of a study protocol for a multicentre, three-arm, single-blind, prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) auricular point acupressure (APA) can alleviate and (or) reduce the pain (including injection site pain, headache, other muscle and joint pain), fatigue, and gastrointestinal adverse reactions (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), after the injection of novel coronavirus-19 vaccines (NCVs). TRIAL DESIGN: The study is designed as a multicentre, parallel-group, three-arm, single-blind, prospective, randomized (1:1:1 ratio) study. PARTICIPANTS: More than 360 participants will be recruited from healthy people who vaccinate NCVs in 5 community healthcare centres in the Sichuan province of China and 1 university hospital (Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine). INCLUSION CRITERIA: ①Vaccinators meets the conditions of NCVs injection and have no contraindications to it. The details shall be subject to the instructions of the NCVs used and the statement of medical institutions. The first dose of NCVs injection shall be completed within 24 hours from the time of injection to the time of enrolment; ②No redness, swelling, injury or infection of the skin or soft tissue of both ears, which is not suitable for APA; ③No history of alcohol and adhesive tape contact allergy; ④18-59 years old, regardless of gender; ⑤Those who were able to complete the questionnaire independently at the time of the first and second dose of NCVs and on the 3rd, 7th and 15th day after the first and second dose of NCVs respectively; ⑥Those who agree to participate in the trial and sign the informed consent, and can seriously abide by the precautions after the injection of NCVs and the requirements of traditional Chinese medicine auricular point plasters sticking and acupressure. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: ①Those who are not suitable to be vaccinated because they belong to the contraindication or cautious population; ②Those who have participated in other clinical trials within 4 weeks before the start of this study; ③No chronic/habitual/persistent headache, Muscle or joint pain, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, retching or vomiting before the injection of NCVs, and no related diseases present (details of this item is listed in full protocol); ④Those who are in use or have received TCMAPA within 2 weeks before the trial; ⑤Pregnant or lactating women; ⑥Participants with other serious primary diseases and psychosis. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: ①Auricular point acupressure group: participants receive bilateral, symptom-specific TCMAPA in 5 auricular points (per side, 10 points bilateral) for 5 days, 3-4 times (about 1 min each time) of self-acupressure per day, after each NCVs injection (10 days in total). ②Sham auricular point acupressure group: participants receive bilateral, none symptom-specific, sham APA in 5 auricular points (per side, 10 points bilateral) for 5 days, 3-4 times (about 1 min each time) of self-acupressure per day, after each NCVs injection (10 days in total). ③Blank control group: Non-intervention blank control. The Hebei medical device Co. Ltd, Hebei, China manufactured the auricular point sticking plasters. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes are all scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) based on subjective judgment of the participants included, including VAS score of pain at injection site, headache, muscle and joint pain, fatigue, nausea, retching, vomiting and diarrhea. Time points for outcomes above are the same: ①Immediately after first and second injection of the vaccine (Baseline assessment); ②Three days after first and second injection of the vaccine; ③Seven days after first and second injection of the vaccine; ④Fifteen days after first and second injection of the vaccine. RANDOMISATION: Participants will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to each group by computerized random number generator, and independently in each sub-centre. BLINDING (MASKING): Participants, information collectors and statistical evaluators will be blinded between APA group and sham APA group. No blinding in the control group. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): No less than 360 participants will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to each group. TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version 2.0 of February 3rd, 2021. Recruitment is expected to start on February 18th, 2021, and to finish on March 12th, 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ( ChiCTR2100043210 ) on 8th February, 2021. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Attenuation of subcutaneous insulin induced amyloid mass in vivo using Lumbrokinase and Serratiopeptidase.

The protein misfolded structure called amyloids is related with extensive range of pathologies like local amyloidosis and neurodegenerative diseases. Several studies have reported the potential of insulin to generate local amyloidosis under certain state. Reports also showed that fibrils of insulin generated local amyloid mass due to continuous subcutaneous injection in mouse as well as rat. The present study was designed to examine the consequence of insulin fibril injections in rats, as well as the ability of enzymes, Lumbrokinase (LK) and Serratiopeptidase (SP) in diminishing this amyloid mass progression. The results showed that insulin fibrils generated amyloid masses in rats after subcutaneous injection for two weeks which was significantly condensed in size for the groups injected with insulin fibrils combined with LK or SP. At higher doses of LK and SP, the absence of amyloid structure was observed in histopathological studies. Light microscopy, polarized microscopy as well as Lumia live in vivo imaging system was used to analyze the results. In conclusion, the overall outcome of this study showed the anti-amyloid potential of enzyme LK and SP in the attenuation of local amyloidosis.

Prevention and conduct against the Extravasation of antineoplastic chemotherapy: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: to identify and synthesize scientific evidence on prevention and management of extravasation of antineoplastic agents in adult patients by nurses. METHODS: scoping review, according to Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR. Research was conducted in five electronic databases, Cochrane Library and eight catalogs of theses and dissertations. Data collection occurred from April to July 2018, with no time limit. The extracted data were analyzed and synthesized in a narrative way. RESULTS: a total of 3,110 records were retrieved and 18 studies were kept for review. Most publications (66.6%) had a qualitative approach and addressed both aspects, i.e., prevention and management of extravasation of chemotherapy in adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: the implementation of protocols based on scientific evidence on prevention and management of extravasation of antineoplastic agents is paramount in order to provide patient safety and support to the nursing staff.

Facial aesthetic injections in clinical practice: Pretreatment and posttreatment consensus recommendations to minimise adverse outcomes.

Facial aesthetic treatment with injectable neuromodulators and hyaluronic acid fillers is well established, with favourable safety profiles and consistent outcomes. As with any medical treatment, adverse events and complications may occur. Adverse events associated with these products are typically transient and mild to moderate in severity. Serious adverse events, such as infection and intravascular occlusion, are rare. Proper patient selection, consent and counselling, preparation and impeccable injection technique are important risk reduction strategies. Both clinicians and patients must be alert to the signs and symptoms of complications so that appropriate treatment can be started promptly. In this article, the authors review the current literature and provide their consensus recommendations for minimising adverse outcomes when treating patients with botulinum toxin or hyaluronic acid fillers.

Classification and mitigation of negative injection experiences with biologic medications.

Injection site reactions with biologic medications are encountered with variable frequency. Although there is no clear definition, they commonly manifest with pain and irritation at the injection site. Previously proposed reaction classification systems may be impractical or insufficient, and more intuitive nomenclature may benefit clinical dermatologists and patients. Negative injection experiences (NIE) are common reasons for biologic medication nonadherence. Here we provide clinical classifications and recommendations for mitigating these reactions. We categorized NIEs into the following: (a) physical, due to the needle and injection process, (b) irritant, related to properties of the injected solution, and (c) allergic, both immediate and delayed.

Botulinum toxin: Pharmacology and injectable administration for the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis.

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatological condition defined by excessive sweating beyond thermoregulatory needs with significant effects on patients' quality of life. Hyperhidrosis is categorized as primary or secondary: primary hyperhidrosis is mostly focal and idiopathic, whereas secondary hyperhidrosis is commonly generalized and caused by an underlying medical condition or use of medications. Various surgical and nonsurgical therapies exist for primary hyperhidrosis. Although botulinum toxin is one of the deadliest toxins known, when used in small doses, it is one of the most effective therapies for primary hyperhidrosis. Botulinum toxin injections are widely used as a second-line primary hyperhidrosis treatment option once topical treatment strategies have failed. This article provides an overview of the commercially available botulinum toxin formulations and their applications in the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis.

Premedication with intravenous steroids does not influence the incidence of infusion reactions following infliximab infusions in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients-a case-control study.

PURPOSE: Infusion reactions (IR) are commonly described side effects of infliximab (IFX) infusions, often leading to discontinuation of IFX. This study aimed to investigate the influence of steroid premedication (PM) on incidence of IR in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) patients receiving IFX. METHODS: A case-control study in two tertiary centers in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, including PIBD patients receiving IFX. PM with steroids was part of standard care in one center (PM+) but not in the other center (PM-). Acute IR were divided into mild/severe reactions and in grade 1/2/3/4 for detailed exploration. Differences between subgroups were assessed with the T or chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess associations between PM and IR incidence, correcting for co-medication usage. RESULTS: We included 226 patients (91 PM+, 50% male, mean age at onset of IBD 12.7 years), receiving 3433 infusions. There was no difference between the PM+ and PM- subgroups in incidence of IR (14.3% vs. 17.0% of patients, p = 0.58) and in percentage of infusions followed by IR (1.4% in both subgroups). The OR of developing IR when using PM was 1.06 (95% CI 0.49-2.27, p = 0.89), and the OR of developing a grade 3 or 4 IR when using PM was 0.90 (95% CI 0.24-3.39, p = 0.88) when correcting for co-medication usage. CONCLUSION: The incidence of IR was low, and premedication with steroids did not decrease the incidence of IR in this cohort of PIBD patients receiving IFX. Our results indicate that PM with steroids is not indicated in PIBD to prevent IR.

Pressure monitoring: The evidence so far.

Nerve injury is a relatively rare but devastating complication of peripheral nerve blockade (PNB). Monitoring injection pressure during PNB is one method advocated to prevent injury by detecting needle tip placement in a noncompliant position (intraneural or abutting the epineurium). Animal studies show that gross neural damage and clinical injury are associated with injection pressures exceeding 15-20 psi. In contrast, pressures <15 psi are associated with an extraneural needle tip position and no histologic or clinical injury. Injection pressure monitoring has been shown to prevent injection against the brachial plexus roots or femoral nerve during peripheral nerve block. Multiple methods are available to monitor injection pressure, and most of them are inexpensive and easy to use. Large-scale registry database or pragmatic trials are indicated to show that injection pressure monitoring reduces injury in a patient setting.

Epirubicin chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: Alternating arms for intravenous administration to reduce chemical phlebitis.

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether using alternating arms for peripheral intravenous epirubicin administration affects the severity or duration of epirubicin-induced phlebitis. METHODS: An observational study of women with breast cancer (n = 237) in a UK Cancer Centre. Data were analysed after receiving three treatment cycles according to the arm used for epirubicin administration: same, alternating or mixed arm (two consecutive cycles in one arm and one in the alternate arm). Phlebitis severity was graded by clinical staff after each treatment; participants also self-reported symptoms during treatment and for up to 6 months after. RESULTS: The alternating arm group experienced significantly less severe symptoms than the other arm use groups, 6% (4 of 64) compared with 34% (p < 0.001, odds ratio: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.043-0.38) alternating arm compared with same arm group). The alternating arm group reported less pain (p = 0.013), lower overall impact (p = 0.009), lower effect on function (p = 0.032) and shorter duration of symptoms (p = 0.001) than the other arm use groups. CONCLUSION: Using alternating arms for peripheral administration of epirubicin significantly reduces the severity and duration of chemical phlebitis and is recommended to improve patient experience and reduce the need for central venous access devices.

Ocrelizumab infusion experience in patients with relapsing and primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results from the phase 3 randomized OPERA I, OPERA II, and ORATORIO studies.

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is an infusible humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were summarized from the OPERA I, OPERA II, and ORATORIO trials for relapsing and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: OPERA I and OPERA II were identical, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trials that enrolled patients with relapsing MS (RMS). Patients in the ocrelizumab group initially received two 300-mg intravenous (IV) infusions separated by 14 days (on Days 1 and 15); subsequent doses were administered as single 600-mg IV infusions. Ocrelizumab-treated patients also received subcutaneous (SC) placebo injections 3 times weekly. Patients in the active comparator group received SC injections of IFN ß-1a 3 times weekly, as well as placebo infusions on Days 1 and 15 and Weeks 24, 48, and 72. ORATORIO was a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that enrolled patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). As in the OPERA studies, patients in the ocrelizumab group initially received two 300-mg infusions separated by 14 days; however, ORATORIO patients continued to receive this divided-dose regimen throughout the study. The ORATORIO control group received IV placebo. Prior to each infusion, all patients in the OPERA and ORATORIO studies were pretreated with 100 mg IV methylprednisolone; additional prophylactic treatment with analgesics, antipyretics, and/or an IV or oral antihistamine was optional. IRRs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or within 24 h of IV infusion of ocrelizumab or placebo. RESULTS: Safety analyses included 1651 patients with RMS from OPERA I and OPERA II (ocrelizumab, n = 825; IFN ß-1a, n = 826) and 725 patients with PPMS from ORATORIO (ocrelizumab, n = 486; placebo, n = 239). Across studies, IRRs were reported in 34.3% (vs 9.7% with IFN ß-1a) and 39.9% (vs 25.5% with placebo) of ocrelizumab-treated patients in the pooled OPERA and ORATORIO populations, respectively. The majority of IRRs were mild to moderate in the OPERA (ocrelizumab, 92.6%; IFN ß-1a, 98.8%) and ORATORIO (ocrelizumab, 96.9%; placebo, 93.4%) studies. IRRs most commonly occurred with the first infusion. Severe IRRs were reported in 2.4% of ocrelizumab-treated patients in the OPERA studies (vs 0.1% with IFN ß-1a) and 1.2% of ocrelizumab-treated patients in ORATORIO (vs 1.7% with placebo). Two serious IRRs occurred across the OPERA studies, both of which occurred with the initial infusion. The first event occurred in an IFN ß-1a-treated patient in association with the initial infusion of IV placebo and consisted of severe balance disorder, dizziness, flushing, and hypoesthesia. The second event was a life-threatening reaction (bronchospasm) that occurred in an ocrelizumab-treated patient 15 min after the infusion started. Frequently reported IRR symptoms included pruritus, rash, throat irritation, and flushing. Premedication use, particularly antihistamines, was associated with fewer IRRs. CONCLUSION: Findings from the OPERA I, OPERA II, and ORATORIO trials show that IRRs were the most frequently reported adverse events with ocrelizumab, were mostly mild to moderate in severity, were reduced with appropriate pretreatment, and decreased with subsequent dosing. IRRs that did occur were effectively managed through infusion rate adjustment and symptomatic treatment.

Premedication as primary prophylaxis does not influence the risk of acute infliximab infusion reactions in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 25% of patients treated with infliximab experience hypersensitivity reactions. Prophylactic premedication prior to infliximab infusion, comprising corticosteroids and/or antihistamines, is widely used in clinical practice but its efficacy has recently been called into question due to the lack of pathophysiological rationale and validation by controlled trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple electronic databases from inception to June 2017 to identify studies reporting the impact of corticosteroid and/or antihistamine premedication on the risk of acute (<24 h) hypersensitivity reaction to infliximab in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ten studies, eight observational studies and two randomized control trials, were identified including a total of 3892 patients with IMIDs, and 1,385 patients with IBD. Corticosteroid premedication was not associated with a decreased risk of hypersensitivity reaction in either IMIDs (7 studies; OR, 1.07, 95%CI, 0.64-1.78; I2 = 57.5%) or IBD (3 studies; OR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.52-2.07; I2 = 57%). Antihistamine premedication was not associated with a decreased risk of hypersensitivity reaction in IMIDs (3 studies: OR, 1.39, 95% CI, 0.70-2.73; I2 = 85%). The combination of corticosteroids and antihistamines did not decrease the risk of acute infliximab infusion reaction in IMIDs (6 studies; OR, 2.12, 95% CI, 0.61-7.35; I2 = 94%), but was associated with an increased risk in IBD (4 studies, OR, 4.17, 95% CI, 1.61-10.78; I2 = 77%). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid and/or antihistamine premedication is not associated with a decreased risk of acute hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab in patients with IMIDs. We believe that these premedications should no longer be part of standard protocols.

Detailed Sonographic Anatomy of Dorsal Hand Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyapatite Fillers.

BACKGROUND: Volume restoration using filler in the dorsum of the hand is a simple and effective procedure to improve wrinkles and hide veins and tendons. Currently, calcium-hydroxyapatite (CaHA) filler is the only FDA-accepted material to use in the hand dorsum. However, it is not easy to inject due to swelling and redness. In addition, hand anatomy through sonography is wrongly described in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® Journal. Through incorrect marking in sonographic hand anatomy, physicians will conduct erroneous procedures and surgeries. OBJECTIVES: CaHA filler and hyaluronic acid (HA) filler were both injected into the hand to compare intra-individually the effect of each filler. Through this study, the author introduced detailed and refined sonographic anatomy. Overall, the author identified the correct injection method and depth. METHODS: In this prospective, intra-individual, comparative study, patients were injected 1 cc of CaHA filler to the left hand and 3 cc (36 mg) of microphasic hyaluronic acid to the right. Outcomes were assessed by Merz hand grading scale, skin bio-parameters, dermascopic finding, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) with follow-up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: The average GAIS score improved in both hands and generally maintained over the course of the study. There was significantly more bruising and swelling in the CaHA-injected hands compared with the HA-injected hands. The skin roughness and appearance improved in both sets of hands on dermascope. The average Trans-Epidermal-Water-Loss decreased and the average Stratum Corneum Hydration increased in HA-injected hands. The biopsy study showed that the HA particles lasted for 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The author reestablished sonographic anatomy. Veins and tendons became less apparent after injections.

Results of an early access treatment protocol of daratumumab in United States patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is a human CD38-directed monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: A multicenter, open-label treatment protocol provided early access to daratumumab for patients who had progressive MM after they received ≥3 prior lines of therapy that included a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent or if they were refractory to both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent. Patients received daratumumab 16 mg/kg weekly for 8 weeks, every other week for 16 weeks, and monthly until they developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or 60 days after the drug gained US approval. Treatment-emergent grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs of special interest were collected. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight patients were enrolled at 39 US sites between June and December 2015. Patients received study therapy for a median of 1.9 months (range, 0.03-6.0 months). Fifty-two percent of patients transitioned to commercially-available daratumumab and 37% discontinued because of progressive disease. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 50% of patients, including thrombocytopenia (15%) and anemia (14%). Serious AEs occurred in 35% of patients (12% were drug-related), including infections (11%). Infusion reactions occurred in 56%, 2%, and 2% of patients during the first, second, and all subsequent infusions, respectively; respiratory symptoms (cough, dyspnea, throat irritation, nasal congestion) were common. The infusion reaction rate for the first infusion was 38% in 50 patients at 2 sites who received montelukast as premedication for their first infusion and 59% in patients who did not receive montelukast. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings are consistent with previously reported trials and confirm the safety profile of daratumumab in heavily pretreated US patients who have relapsed or refractory MM. Cancer 2018;124:000-000.