Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 13(3): e0192020, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29494604

RESUMO

The PUREX technology based on aqueous processes is currently the leading reprocessing technology in nuclear energy systems. It seems to be the most developed and established process for light water reactor fuel and the use of solid fuel. However, demand driven development of the nuclear system opens the way to liquid fuelled reactors, and disruptive technology development through the application of an integrated fuel cycle with a direct link to reactor operation. The possibilities of this new concept for innovative reprocessing technology development are analysed, the boundary conditions are discussed, and the economic as well as the neutron physical optimization parameters of the process are elucidated. Reactor physical knowledge of the influence of different elements on the neutron economy of the reactor is required. Using an innovative study approach, an element priority list for the salt clean-up is developed, which indicates that separation of Neodymium and Caesium is desirable, as they contribute almost 50% to the loss of criticality. Separating Zirconium and Samarium in addition from the fuel salt would remove nearly 80% of the loss of criticality due to fission products. The theoretical study is followed by a qualitative discussion of the different, demand driven optimization strategies which could satisfy the conflicting interests of sustainable reactor operation, efficient chemical processing for the salt clean-up, and the related economic as well as chemical engineering consequences. A new, innovative approach of balancing the throughput through salt processing based on a low number of separation process steps is developed. Next steps for the development of an economically viable salt clean-up process are identified.


Assuntos
Césio/isolamento & purificação , Neodímio/isolamento & purificação , Reatores Nucleares/instrumentação , Sais/isolamento & purificação , Água/química , Simulação por Computador , Desenho de Equipamento , Modelos Químicos , Nêutrons , Energia Nuclear , Reatores Nucleares/economia , Samário/isolamento & purificação , Zircônio/isolamento & purificação
3.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 110(24): 9686-91, 2013 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23716682

RESUMO

Analysts and decision makers frequently want estimates of the cost of technologies that have yet to be developed or deployed. Small modular reactors (SMRs), which could become part of a portfolio of carbon-free energy sources, are one such technology. Existing estimates of likely SMR costs rely on problematic top-down approaches or bottom-up assessments that are proprietary. When done properly, expert elicitations can complement these approaches. We developed detailed technical descriptions of two SMR designs and then conduced elicitation interviews in which we obtained probabilistic judgments from 16 experts who are involved in, or have access to, engineering-economic assessments of SMR projects. Here, we report estimates of the overnight cost and construction duration for five reactor-deployment scenarios that involve a large reactor and two light water SMRs. Consistent with the uncertainty introduced by past cost overruns and construction delays, median estimates of the cost of new large plants vary by more than a factor of 2.5. Expert judgments about likely SMR costs display an even wider range. Median estimates for a 45 megawatts-electric (MWe) SMR range from $4,000 to $16,300/kWe and from $3,200 to $7,100/kWe for a 225-MWe SMR. Sources of disagreement are highlighted, exposing the thought processes of experts involved with SMR design. There was consensus that SMRs could be built and brought online about 2 y faster than large reactors. Experts identify more affordable unit cost, factory fabrication, and shorter construction schedules as factors that may make light water SMRs economically viable.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Tomada de Decisões , Prova Pericial/economia , Reatores Nucleares/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Prova Pericial/métodos , Humanos , Julgamento , Reatores Nucleares/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Incerteza , Água
9.
Hist Stud Nat Sci ; 39(2): 171-218, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20073126

RESUMO

This study investigates how, in the late 1940s and 1950s, fears of nuclear accidents and nuclear warfare shaped postwar radiobiology. The new and intense forms of radiation generated by nuclear reactor technology, and which would be released in the event of a nuclear war, created concerns about a public-health hazard unprecedented in form and scale. Fears of inadvertent exposure to acute and potentially lethal radiation launched a search for anti-radiation therapies, out of which emerged the new technique of bone marrow transplantation (BMT). This study analyzes the use of BMT first as a research tool to explore the biological effects of ionizing radiation, and then as an adjunct to radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer. In highlighting how BMT became the province of different research and clinical constituencies, this study develops an understanding of the forces and contingencies that shaped its development. Exploring the emergence of BMT and the uses to which it was put, it reveals that BMT remained a technique in the making -- unstable and far from standardized, even as it became both a widely used research tool and rapidly made its way into the clinic. More broadly, it casts new light on one route through which the Manhattan Project influenced postwar radiobiology; it also affords new insights into one means by which radiobiology came to serve the interests of the Cold War state. In its focus on BMT this paper provides a new perspective on the evolving relationship between radiobiology and biomedicine in the postwar period.


Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Leucemia , Reatores Nucleares , Radiobiologia , Pesquisadores , Células-Tronco , Irradiação Corporal Total , Pesquisa Biomédica/educação , Pesquisa Biomédica/história , Transplante de Medula Óssea/educação , Transplante de Medula Óssea/etnologia , Transplante de Medula Óssea/história , Transplante de Medula Óssea/fisiologia , Transplante de Medula Óssea/psicologia , História do Século XX , Leucemia/economia , Leucemia/etnologia , Leucemia/história , Leucemia/psicologia , Pessoal de Laboratório Médico/educação , Pessoal de Laboratório Médico/história , Pessoal de Laboratório Médico/psicologia , Medicina Nuclear/economia , Medicina Nuclear/educação , Medicina Nuclear/história , Reatores Nucleares/economia , Reatores Nucleares/história , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/educação , Saúde Pública/história , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Prática de Saúde Pública/economia , Prática de Saúde Pública/história , Prática de Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Radiobiologia/educação , Radiobiologia/história , Pesquisadores/educação , Pesquisadores/história , Pesquisadores/psicologia , Irradiação Corporal Total/economia , Irradiação Corporal Total/história , Irradiação Corporal Total/psicologia
10.
Hist Sci (Tokyo) ; 19(2): 105-18, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20518158

RESUMO

Two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 brought the unexpected liberation of Korea from the 35-year Japanese occupation. Koreans therefore had a very favorable and positive image of the nuclear bomb and nuclear energy from the beginning. The image of the nuclear bomb as "savior" was strengthened during the Korean War when the United States openly mentioned the possible use of the nuclear bomb against North Korean and Chinese military. After the end of the Korean War in July 1953 South Koreans strongly supported the development of the nuclear bomb in order to deter another North Korean invasion. When the US government provided South Korea with a research nuclear reactor in the late 1950s, most South Koreans hailed it as the first step to developing their own nuclear bomb. This paper will analyze how and why the savior image of the nuclear bomb originated and spread in Korea during the 1950s.


Assuntos
Guerra da Coreia , Energia Nuclear , Armas Nucleares , Política Pública , Ferimentos e Lesões , Queimaduras/etnologia , Queimaduras/história , República Democrática Popular da Coreia/etnologia , História do Século XX , Japão/etnologia , Militares/educação , Militares/história , Militares/legislação & jurisprudência , Militares/psicologia , Energia Nuclear/economia , Energia Nuclear/história , Energia Nuclear/legislação & jurisprudência , Reatores Nucleares/economia , Reatores Nucleares/história , Reatores Nucleares/legislação & jurisprudência , Armas Nucleares/economia , Armas Nucleares/história , Armas Nucleares/legislação & jurisprudência , Opinião Pública/história , Política Pública/economia , Política Pública/história , Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , República da Coreia/etnologia , Estados Unidos/etnologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etnologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/história
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...