Ligand binding determinants for angiotensin II type 1 receptor from computer simulations.

The ligand binding determinants for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), have been characterized by means of computer simulations. As a first step, a pharmacophore model of various known AT1R ligands exhibiting a wide range of binding affinities was generated. Second, a structural model of AT1R was built making use of the growing set of crystal structures of GPCRs, which was further used for the docking of the AT1R ligands based on the devised pharmacophore model. Next, ligand-receptor-lipid bilayer systems were studied by means of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Overall, the present study has permitted, combining the pharmacophore model with binding free energy calculations obtained from the MD simulations, to propose the molecular mechanisms by which sartans interact with AT1R.

Different AT1 receptor subtypes at pre- and postjunctional sites: AT1A versus AT1B receptors.

Angiotensin (AT) II is known to enhance responses to electrical field stimulation (EFS) via AT1 receptors located on sympathetic nerve terminals. Differences in potency exist between AT1 receptor antagonists regarding the inhibition of the prejunctional and postjunctional AT1 receptors. It is hypothesized that prejunctional AT1 receptors might belong to the AT1B receptor subtype. Accordingly, the authors investigated whether AT1B receptor inhibition by high concentrations of PD123319 could suppress ATII-augmented noradrenergic transmission (prejunctional) in the rabbit thoracic aorta by means of a noradrenaline spillover model. Additionally, the influence of PD123319 on ATII-enhanced constrictor responses to electrical field stimulation was investigated in the isolated rabbit mesenteric artery. Furthermore, the authors investigated whether PD123319 could influence the constrictor responses (postjunctional) to ATII in both preparations. In the thoracic aorta, ATII (10 nM) caused a significant enhancement of EFS-evoked [3H]-noradrenaline release by a factor of 2.0 +/- 0.1. This reinforcement could be inhibited by PD123319 (0.1, 1, and 10 microM). The constrictor response to ATII was unaffected by PD123319. In the mesenteric artery, ATII (0.5 nM) caused a significant enhancement of constrictor responses to EFS by factors of 2.9 +/- 0.3, 2.3 +/- 0.3, and 1.6 +/- 0.1 at 1, 2, and 4 Hz, respectively. This enhancement could be attenuated by PD123319 (1 and 10 microM). The constrictor response to ATII was unaffected by PD123319. It is concluded that the prejunctional AT1 receptors belong to the AT1B subtype whereas postjunctional AT1 receptors do not.

Prejunctional AT(1) receptor subtype-dependent modification of neurotransmitter releases in canine isolated splenic arteries.

1. The regulation by angiotensin II (Ang II) formed locally on nerve-stimulated purinergic and adrenergic components of double-peaked vasoconstrictions in the canine splenic artery and Ang II receptor subtypes involved were investigated. 2. The perfusion of the precursor angiotensin I (Ang I, 0.1-1 nm) did not affect the vasoconstrictor responses to noradrenaline (NA, 0.03-1 nmol) and adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP, 0.03-1 micromol). The second component vasoconstrictor response to nerve stimulation was dose dependently potentiated by Ang I (0.1-1 nm). The first peaked constriction was slightly, but insignificantly increased. The potentiating effects of Ang I were abolished by KRH-594 (10 nm), a selective AT(1) receptor antagonist, but not by PD 123319 (1-10 nm), an AT(2) receptor antagonist. KRH-594 (10 nm) or PD 123319 (10 nm) never affected the vasoconstrictions to either NA or ATP. 3. The treatment with KRH-594 (1-10 nm) produced a greater inhibition on the second peaked response than the first one, although both of them were dose dependently inhibited. PD 123319 (1-10 nm) did not affect the vasoconstrictor responses induced by nerve stimulation. 4. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme with 10 nm enalaprilat reduced the second peaked response, having no significant inhibition on the first peaked response. A higher dose of enalaprilat (100 nm) produced a greater inhibition of the second peak than the first one. It reduced the second peak by approximately 65%, while the first peak was decreased approximately 35%. After treatment with enalaprilat, Ang I (1 nm) failed to enhance the neuronal vascular response. Enalaprilat at doses used did not affect the vasoconstrictions to either NA or ATP. 5. The present results indicate that endogenously generated Ang II may produce a more marked potentiation of adrenergic transmission than purinergic transmission via activation of prejunctional AT(1) receptors.