Native profiles of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor phenotypes in rabbit prostate.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: alpha(1)-Adrenoceptors in the rabbit prostate have been studied because of their controversial pharmacological profiles in functional and radioligand binding studies. The purpose of the present study is to determine the native profiles of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor phenotypes and to clarify their relationship. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Binding experiments with [3H]-silodosin and [3H]-prazosin were performed using intact tissue segments and crude membrane preparations of rabbit prostate and the results were compared with alpha(1)-adrenoceptor-mediated prostate contraction. KEY RESULTS: [3H]-Silodosin at subnanomolar concentrations bound specifically to intact tissue segments of rabbit prostate. However, [3H]-prazosin at the same range of concentrations failed to bind to alpha(1)-adrenoceptors of intact segments. Binding sites of [3H]-silodosin in intact segments were composed of alpha(1L) phenotype with low affinities for prazosin (pKi=7.1), 5-methyurapidil and N-[2-(2-cyclopropylmethoxyphenoxy)ethyl]-5-chloro-alpha,alpha-dimethyl-1H-indole-3-ethamine hydrochloride (RS-17053), and alpha(1A)-like phenotype with moderate affinity for prazosin (pKi=8.8) but high affinity for 5-methyurapidil and RS-17053. In contrast, both radioligands bound to a single population of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in the membrane preparations at the same density with a subnanomolar affinity, showing a typical profile of 'classical' alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors (pKi for prazosin=9.8). The pharmacological profile of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor-mediated prostate contraction was in accord with the alpha(1L) phenotype observed by intact segment binding approach. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Three distinct phenotypes (alpha(1L) and alpha(1A)-like phenotypes in the intact segments and a classical alpha(1A) phenotype in the membranes) with different affinities for prazosin were detected in rabbit prostate. It appears that the three phenotypes are phenotypic subtypes of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, but are not genetically different subtypes.

Identification of alpha-1L and alpha-1A adrenoceptors in human prostate by tissue segment binding.

PURPOSE: Silodosin (KMD-3213 or [(-)-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-5-[(2R)-2-({2-[2-(2,2,2trifluoroethoxy)phenoxy]ethyl}amino)propyl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole-7-carboxamide]) (Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Matsumoto, Japan) is a selective antagonist for alpha-1A and alpha-1L adrenoceptors. Using this tritiated ligand the 2 alpha-1 adrenoceptors were examined in binding studies with intact tissue segments and membrane preparations of human prostate, and compared with functionally identified alpha-1 adrenoceptor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Binding assays with tissue segments and membrane preparations of human prostate samples were performed using [3H]-silodosin and binding affinities for various drugs were estimated. In functional experiments antagonist affinities were evaluated from the inhibitory potency against the contractile response to noradrenaline. RESULTS: [3H]-silodosin bound to intact segments and membrane preparations of human prostate with subnanomolar affinity. [3H]-silodosin binding sites in intact segments were divided into 2 distinct components with different affinities for prazosin and RS-17053 (N-[2(2-cyclopropylmethoxyphenoxy)ethyl]-5-chloro-alpha, alpha-dimethyl1H-indole-3-ethanamine hydrochloride) (Research Biochemicals International, Natick, Massachusetts), while binding in membrane preparations showed single high affinity for these drugs. [3H]-silodosin binding sites also showed high affinity for silodosin and tamsulosin but low sensitivity to BMY 7378 (8-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-8-azaspiro(4.5)decane-7,9-dione) (Research Biochemicals International) in intact segments and in membrane preparations. In functional experiments silodosin and tamsulosin potently inhibited the contractile response to noradrenaline but prazosin, RS-17053 and BMY 7378 showed low antagonistic affinity. CONCLUSIONS: The current binding studies in human prostate samples clearly show that alpha-1L and alpha-1A adrenoceptors coexist as pharmacologically distinct entities in intact tissues but not in crude membrane preparations. Also, alpha-1 adrenoceptors involved in the contractile response to noradrenaline are the alpha-1L subtype.

Identification of alpha-1L adrenoceptor in rabbit ear artery.

The alpha-1L adrenoceptor (AR) was identified in rabbit ear artery by both functional and ligand binding studies. In functional studies using arterial rings, the contractile response to NS-49 [(R)-(-)-3'-(2-amino-1-hydroxyethyl)-4'-fluorometh-anesulfonanilide hydrochloride] (alpha-1A and alpha-1L AR-selective agonist) was competitively antagonized with low affinities by prazosin, RS-17053 [N-[2-(2-cyclopropylmethoxyphenoxy) ethyl]-5-chloro-alpha,alpha-dimethyl-1H-indole-3-ethamine hydrochloride], and 5-methylurapidil but with high affinities by tamsulosin and KMD-3213 [(-)-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-5-[(2R)-2-([2-[(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phenoxy]ethyl]amino)propyl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole-7-carboxamide]. In contrast, the response to noradrenaline (nonselective alpha-1 AR agonist) was inhibited noncompetitively by these antagonists (except 5-methylurapidil) with Schild slopes different from unity. These results suggest that the response to NS-49 was mediated predominantly via alpha-1L ARs, whereas the response to noradrenaline was produced through two distinct alpha-1 AR subtypes (presumably alpha-1B and alpha-1L ARs). In binding studies with intact segments of rabbit ear artery, [3H]KMD-3213 bound with high affinity (pKD=9.7) to alpha-1 ARs, which were subdivided by prazosin, RS-17053, and 5-methylurapidil into two subtypes (alpha-1A and alpha-1L ARs). In contrast, [3H]prazosin binding sites in ear artery segments (pKD = 9.8) were identified as alpha-1A and alpha-1B ARs. In conventional binding studies using isolated rabbit ear artery microsomal membranes, [3H]KMD-3213 binding sites were identified as alpha-1A ARs with high affinities for prazosin, RS-17053, and 5-methylurapidil. Our study indicates that an alpha-1L AR having a unique pharmacological profile coexists with alpha-1A and alpha-1B ARs in rabbit ear artery and can be identified either functionally or by binding studies using intact tissues but not microsomal membrane preparations.

[Categorization of adrenergic alpha 1 receptors in detrusor of patients with obstructive BPH. Initial study on experimental animal model]. / Categorización de receptores alpha 1-adrenérgicos en el detrusor de pacientes con HBP obstructiva. Estudio inicial en modelo animal de experimentación.

INTRODUCTION: The action of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonists in ameliorating irritation and obstruction in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-BPH) has been demonstrated. Although it is well known that alpha 1-a receptors are responsible for prostate smooth muscle relaxation, the mechanism by which irritative bladder symptoms are improved is unknown. Different alpha 1 receptor subtypes may be involved. The objective of this study is to investigate the changes in the alpha-adrenergic receptor populations in the obstructed detrusor, and to determine which subtype is proportionally increased in this situation (bladder outlet obstruction). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an in vivo study in an experimental model: male NZ (New Zealand) rabbits. The bladder neck of one group of rabbits was obstructed surgically using the technique proposed by Levin et al. Subsequent to bladder catherization with a 8Fr catheter, the bladder neck was exposed by means of a low medial abdominal incision. The bladder neck was tied with a 2/0 silk thread below the ureteral orifices. The catheter was taken out at the end of the intervention. The rabbits were sacrificed after 4 weeks using intracardiac pentothal and cystectomy was performed. A control group that did not undergo bladder obstruction were also sacrificed at this time, for the comparative study. Part of the detrusor was used for a pathological study and the rest for a physio-pharmacological study in which the organ was placed in a bath of adrenoceptor agonists (phenylephrine and noradrenaline) and antagonists WB101, AH11101A and BMY7378 (antagonists of the alpha 1a, b, d, respectively). RESULTS: The findings of the pathological study show that the bladder wall was thicker in the rabbits that underwent bladder obstruction. The physio-pharmacological studies demonstrate that the detrusor response to the selective alpha-1 adrenergic agonist was greater in the rabbits that underwent bladder obstruction, however detrusor contractility was decreased (KPSS). With bladder obstruction the alpha 1d receptors were increased. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Receptor-binding studies (Malloy et al) aim to differentiate the alpha-adrenoreceptor populations. These studies identify and quantitate the different receptor subtypes in tissue without taking into account their activity. The isometric and physio-pharmacological tests evaluate active receptors, i.e. those that respond to agonist and antagonist stimuli. This enables detrusor activity to be evaluated accurately. The results obtained in this investigational study support the hypothesis that there is a high statistically significant increase in the alpha 1 adrenergic receptors in the obstructed detrusor. Furthermore, in agreement with previous molecular studies, during prostate obstruction alpha 1d is the predominate sub-population in the bladder. These findings may have patho-physiological, clinical and pharmacological implications. If this hypothesis which has been demonstrated in an experimental model, is also demonstrated in studies in humans, pharmacological development should not only be focussed on selective alpha 1a receptor antagonists (prostate) but also on those of alpha 1d, for relieving symptoms in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BPH and prostatism).

Identification of alpha1-adrenergic receptors and their involvement in phosphoinositide hydrolysis in the frog heart.

The aim of this study was to characterize alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors in frog heart and to examine their related signal transduction pathway. alpha(1)-Adrenergic binding sites were studied in purified heart membranes using the specific alpha(1)-adrenergic antagonist [(3)H]prazosin. Analysis of the binding data indicated one class of binding sites displaying a K(d) of 4.19 +/- 0.56 nM and a B(max) of 14.66 +/- 1.61 fmol/mg original wet weight. Adrenaline, noradrenaline, or phenylephrine, in the presence of propranolol, competed with [(3)H]prazosin binding with a similar potency and a K(i) value of about 10 microM. The kinetics of adrenaline binding was closely related to its biological effect. Adrenaline concentration dependently increased the production of inositol phosphates in the heart in the presence or absence of propranolol. Maximal stimulation was about 8.5-fold, and the half-maximum effective concentration was 30 and 21 microM in the absence and presence of propranolol, respectively. These data clearly show that alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors are coupled to the phosphoinositide hydrolysis in frog heart. To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence supporting the presence of functional alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors in the frog heart.

Using reverse transcription and a competitive polymerase chain reaction for quantification of alpha1B-adrenoceptor mRNA.

Molecular cloning studies have revealed the existence of three subtypes of alpha1-adrenergic receptor (alpha1-AR), namely alpha1A, alpha1B and alpha1D. They are encoded by separate genes and have distinct pharmacological profiles. In rats' brain, the expression of mRNA for subtypes of an alpha1-AR is partially structure-dependent. Our previous studies employing Northern blot analysis of mRNA have shown that in the hippocampus, where alpha1A predominates, the alpha1B receptor (alpha1B-AR) was almost undetectable. The goal of the present study was to establish the method of reverse transcription and competitive polymerase chain reaction (RT-cPCR) to quantify a steady state level of alpha1B-AR mRNA in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and thalamus, and to compare the alpha1B-AR' pattern of expression with that revealed by Northern blot analysis. Our results have shown that alpha1B-AR is similarly represented in the thalamus and prefrontal cortex. In the hippocampus, ten times lower expression of alpha1B mRNA has been demonstrated with RT-cPCR, which was below a detection limit of Northern blot hybridization technique.