Metastasis-Entrained Eosinophils Enhance Lymphocyte-Mediated Antitumor Immunity.

The recognition of the immune system as a key component of the tumor microenvironment (TME) led to promising therapeutics. Because such therapies benefit only subsets of patients, understanding the activities of immune cells in the TME is required. Eosinophils are an integral part of the TME especially in mucosal tumors. Nonetheless, their role in the TME and the environmental cues that direct their activities are largely unknown. We report that breast cancer lung metastases are characterized by resident and recruited eosinophils. Eosinophil recruitment to the metastatic sites in the lung was regulated by G protein-coupled receptor signaling but independent of CCR3. Functionally, eosinophils promoted lymphocyte-mediated antitumor immunity. Transcriptome and proteomic analyses identified the TME rather than intrinsic differences between eosinophil subsets as a key instructing factor directing antitumorigenic eosinophil activities. Specifically, TNFα/IFNγ-activated eosinophils facilitated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration and promoted antitumor immunity. Collectively, we identify a mechanism by which the TME trains eosinophils to adopt antitumorigenic properties, which may lead to the development of eosinophil-targeted therapeutics. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate antitumor activities of eosinophils in the metastatic tumor microenvironment, suggesting that harnessing eosinophil activity may be a viable clinical strategy in patients with cancer.

CCL26 and CCR3 are associated with the acute inflammatory response in the CNS in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Chemokine ligand 26 (CCL26) is a member of the eotaxin family. It works by interacting exclusively with chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) and acts as an eosinophil-selective chemoattractant. There is an emerging role for eotaxins in autoimmune diseases. Studies have reported that chemokine ligand 11 (CCL11) and CCL26 are upregulated in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) during remission, CCL26 levels appear to be decreased in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), whereas CCL26 levels are significantly increased in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), indicating that CCL26 participates in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the levels of CCL26, CCR3 and claudin-5 (a marker of changes in BBB (blood-brain barrier) permeability) at different stages of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) to explore the underlying immune mechanisms of EAE. Our results showed that the levels of CCL26 and CCR3 in EAE rats were significantly increased compared with those in the control group. The levels of CCL26 in the serum and in brain tissues as well as the protein expression of CCR3 in brain tissues were positively correlated with the inflammatory scores of brain tissues from EAE rats and were negatively correlated with the protein expression of claudin-5. We concluded that CCL26, which in turn binds to the receptor CCR3, showed pro-inflammatory effects and aggravated tissue damage involving BBB impairment, especially in the acute stage of EAE. Our study uncovers another possible immunopathological mechanism of MS and provides a possible target for immune therapy.

CCL26/eotaxin-3 is more effective to induce the migration of eosinophils of asthmatics than CCL11/eotaxin-1 and CCL24/eotaxin-2.

CCL11, CCL24, and CCL26 are chemokines involved in the recruitment of eosinophils into tissues and mainly activate CCR3. Whereas the genomic or pharmacological inhibition of CCR3 prevents the development of experimental asthma in rodents, it only impairs the recruitment of eosinophils by ∼40% in humans. As humans, but not rodents, express CCL26, we investigated the impact of CCL11, CCL24, and CCL26 on human eosinophils recruitment and evaluated the involvement of CCR3. The migration of eosinophils of healthy volunteers was similar for the three eotaxins. Eosinophils of mild asthmatics had a greater response to CCL11 and a much greater response to CCL26. Whereas all eotaxins induced the migration of eosinophil of asthmatics from 0 to 6 h, CCL26 triggered a second phase of migration between 12 and 18 h. Given that the CCR3 antagonists SB 328437 and SB 297006 inhibited the 5-oxo-eicosatetraenoate-induced migration of eosinophils and that the CCR3 antagonist UCB 35625 was not specific for CCR3, CCR3 blockade was performed with the CCR3 mAb. This antibody completely blocked the effect of all eotaxins on eosinophils of healthy subjects and the effect of CCL24 on the eosinophils of asthmatics. Interestingly, CCR3 blockade did not affect the second migration phase induced by CCL26 on eosinophils of asthmatics. In conclusion, CCL26 is a more effective chemoattractant than CCL11 and CCL24 for eosinophils of asthmatics. The mechanism of this greater efficiency is not yet defined. However, these results suggest that CCL26 may play a unique and important role in the recruitment of eosinophils in persistent asthma.

The murine CCR3 receptor regulates both eosinophilia and hyperresponsiveness in IgE-mediated allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Allergic conjunctivitis is characterised by early-phase clinical symptoms and late-phase inflammation in the conjunctiva. The role of different chemokine receptors in allergic conjunctivitis, especially during the early-phase reaction, is still unclear. We investigated the importance of CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 3 in a murine model of IgE-mediated allergic conjunctivitis using CCR3-deficient (CCR3(-/-)) mice. METHODS: Allergic conjunctivitis was initiated in wild-type (WT) and CCR3(-/-) mice by passive transfer of ragweed (RW)-specific IgE, followed by topical challenge with RW in eye drops. Early-phase reactions including clinical symptoms and vascular leakage, as well as late-phase eosinophil infiltration of the conjunctiva were evaluated. The expression of mRNAs in the conjunctiva was quantified by real-time PCR analysis. RESULTS: The number of infiltrated eosinophils in the conjunctiva following RW challenge, was significantly higher in RW-IgE-sensitised WT mice compared with those sensitised with phosphate-buffered saline for WT, but this was not observed in similarly treated CCR3(-/-) mice. The early-phase clinical symptoms and vascular leakage were also suppressed in CCR3(-/-) mice. The number of conjunctival mast cells were not different between CCR3(-/-) mice and WT mice, and the mRNAs for FcεRІα and the connective tissue-type mast cell proteases were detected in the conjunctiva of both WT and CCR3(-/-) mice. RW-IgE-sensitised CCR3(-/-) mice displayed significantly reduced expression of CCL2, CCL3, and IL-6 compared with WT mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a direct contribution of CCR3 to both the early-phase reaction and late-phase inflammation during ocular allergy.

CCR3 and choroidal neovascularization.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the elderly in industrialized countries. The "wet" AMD, characterized by the development of choroidal neovacularization (CNV), could result in rapid and severe loss of central vision. The critical role of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in CNV development has been established and VEGF-A neutralization has become the standard care for wet AMD. Recently, CCR3 was reported to play an important role in CNV development and that CCR3 targeting was reported to be superior to VEGF-A targeting in CNV suppression. We investigated the role of CCR3 in CNV development using the Matrigel induced CNV and found that in both rats and mice, CNV was well-developed in the control eyes as well as in eyes treated with CCR3 antagonist SB328437 or CCR3 neutralizing antibodies. No statistically significant difference in CNV areas was found between the control and SB328437 or CCR3-ab treated eyes. Immunostaining showed no specific expression of CCR3 in or near CNV. In contrast, both VEGF-A neutralizing antibodies and rapamycin significantly suppressed CNV. These results indicate that CCR3 plays no significant role in CNV development and question the therapeutic approach of CCR3 targeting to suppress CNV. On the other hand, our data support the therapeutic strategies of VEGF-A and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) targeting for CNV.

The CKLF1-C19 peptide attenuates allergic lung inflammation by inhibiting CCR3- and CCR4-mediated chemotaxis in a mouse model of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Human chemokine-like factor 1 (CKLF1) is a functional ligand for human CCR4, which is highly expressed on Th2 lymphocytes and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. The expression and function of CKLF1 are associated with asthma. The CKLF1 C-terminal peptides C19 and C27 also interact with human CCR4. Albeit with weaker chemotactic activity, C19 can inhibit chemotaxis induced by both CKLF1 and CCL17. Here, we explore whether C19 can act as an antagonist in the development of asthma. METHODS: A mouse model of asthma and in vitro and in vivo chemotaxis assays were used. RESULTS: Using a mouse model of asthma, we demonstrate here that C19 reduces airway eosinophilia, lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness; in contrast, C27 has little effect on these parameters. The inhibitory effects of C19 on CCR4-mediated chemotaxis could be observed in human Th2 lymphocytes and in the splenocytes from ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Furthermore, we show that C19 can inhibit CCL11-induced chemotaxis of mouse eosinophils and human CCR3-transfected or mouse Ccr3-transfected HEK293 cells. In vivo chemotaxis assays revealed that C19 and C27 can reduce CCL11-mediated recruitment of eosinophils into the peritoneal cavity and that this inhibitory effect is stronger for C19 than for C27. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, C19 can attenuate airway eosinophilia and lung inflammation by inhibiting CCR3- and CCR4-mediated chemotaxis in a mouse model of asthma. Given its ability to inhibit human CCR3- and CCR4-meditated chemotaxis, C19 has great therapeutic potential for use in the treatment and control of allergic asthma.

Eotaxin-3/CC chemokine ligand 26 is a functional ligand for CX3CR1.

Eotaxin-3/CCL26 is a functional ligand for CCR3 and abundantly produced by IL-4-/IL-13-stimulated vascular endothelial cells. CCL26 also functions as a natural antagonist for CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5. In this study, we report that CCL26 is yet a functional ligand for CX3CR1, the receptor for fractalkine/CX3CL1, which is expressed by CD16(+) NK cells, cytotoxic effector CD8(+) T cells, and CD14(low)CD16(high) monocytes. Albeit at relatively high concentrations, CCL26 induced calcium flux and chemotaxis in mouse L1.2 cells expressing human CX3CR1 but not mouse CX3CR1 and competed with CX3CL1 for binding to CX3CR1. In chemotaxis assays using human PBMCs, CCL26 attracted not only eosinophils but also CD16(+) NK cells, CD45RA(+)CD27(-)CD8(+) T cells, and CD14(low)CD16(high) monocytes. Intraperitoneal injection of CCL26 into mice rapidly recruited mouse eosinophils and intravenously transferred human CD16(+) NK cells into the peritoneal cavity. IL-4-stimulated HUVECs produced CCL26 and efficiently induced adhesion of cells expressing CX3CR1. Real-time PCR showed that skin lesions of psoriasis consistently contained CX3CL1 mRNA but not CCL26 mRNA, whereas those of atopic dermatitis contained CCL26 mRNA in all samples but CX3CL1 mRNA in only about half of the samples. Nevertheless, the skin lesions from both diseases consistently contained CX3CR1 mRNA at high levels. Thus, CCL26 may be partly responsible for the recruitment of cells expressing CX3CR1 in atopic dermatitis particularly when the expression of CX3CL1 is low. Collectively, CCL26 is another agonist for CX3CR1 and may play a dual role in allergic diseases by attracting eosinophils via CCR3 and killer lymphocytes and resident monocytes via CX3CR1.

Novel subtype C human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelopes cloned directly from plasma: coreceptor usage and neutralization phenotypes.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is classified into different phylogenetic subtypes, with subtype C representing more than half of the novel infections globally. However, there are relatively few subtype C envelopes available for study. We amplified 18 unique env genes from 13 patients who were infected with subtype C HIV-1 in six African countries and in Scotland to create replication-competent viruses. These envelopes are phylogenetically diverse across the subtype C spectrum, and have on average more N-linked glycosylation sites and slightly longer variable loops than previously described C envelopes. We found that CCR3 coreceptor usage is less prevalent in subtype C than in subtype B viruses, and these envelopes have varied sensitivity to neutralization. The subtype C chimeric viruses generated in this study will be useful for evaluating the breadth of neutralizing antibodies and other entry inhibitors.

Transcriptional analyses before and after suppression of immediate hypersensitivity reactions by CCR3 blockade in eyes with experimental allergic conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: To characterize the transcriptome of allergic conjunctivitis mediated by eosinophil-related chemokine receptor CCR3 and to identify a candidate for possible therapeutic intervention in eosinophilic inflammation of the eye. METHODS: Mice were sensitized to ragweed pollen, and allergic conjunctivitis was induced by an allergen challenge. The induction of allergic conjunctivitis was used to determine whether an inhibition of CCR3 would suppress eosinophilic inflammation and the allergen-induced immediate hypersensitivity reaction. In addition, sensitized mice were treated with a CCR3 antagonist or an anti-CCR3 antibody before the allergen challenge. Eosinophilic inflammation was evaluated histologically at 24 hours after the allergen challenge. Transcriptional changes with or without a blockade of CCR3 were determined by microarray analyses. RESULTS: Blockade of CCR3 significantly suppressed allergen-induced clinical signs, mast cell degranulation, and eosinophilic inflammation. Clustering analysis of the transcriptome during the early phase identified clusters of genes associated with distinct biological processes. A CCR2 ligand, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, was identified in the cluster of genes related to mast cell activation. MCP-1, an attractant of monocytes but not eosinophils, was in the top 10 transcripts among the genome and was suppressed by CCR3 blockade. Importantly, antibody blockade of MCP-1 suppressed the eosinophilic inflammation significantly. CONCLUSIONS: CCR3 regulates not only the eosinophilic inflammation but also the clinical signs and mast cell degranulation. The CCR3-mediated transcriptome is characterized by many biological processes associated with mast cell activation. Among these CCR3-mediated processes, MCP-1 was found to be significantly involved in eosinophilic inflammation probably by an indirect pathway.