Cost-effectiveness of treating relapsed or refractory 3L+ follicular lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel vs mosunetuzumab in the United States.

Introduction: Novel therapies for 3L+ relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) have been approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration including anti-CD19 CAR-T therapies such as axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and CD20 × CD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific monoclonal antibodies such as mosunetuzumab (mosun). The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel compared to mosun in 3L+ r/r FL patients from a US third-party payer perspective. Methods: A three-state (progression-free, progressed disease, and death) partitioned-survival model was used to compare two treatments over a lifetime horizon in a hypothetical cohort of US adults (age ≥18) receiving 3L+ treatment for r/r FL. ZUMA-5 and GO29781 trial data were used to inform progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Mosun survival was modeled via hazard ratios (HRs) applied to axi-cel survival curves. The PFS HR value was estimated via a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) based on mosun pseudo-individual patient data and adjusted axi-cel data to account for trial populations differences. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Scenario analyses included: 1) the mosun HRs were applied to the weighted (adjusted) ZUMA-5 24-month data to most exactly reflect the MAIC, 2) mosun HR values were applied to axi-cel 48-month follow-up data, and 3) recent axi-cel health state utility values in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Results: The analysis estimated increases of 1.82 LY and 1.89 QALY for axi-cel compared to mosun. PFS for axi-cel patients was 6.42 LY vs. 1.60 LY for mosun. Increase of $257,113 in the progression-free state was driven by one-time axi-cel treatment costs. Total incremental costs for axi-cel were $204,377, resulting in an ICER of $108,307/QALY gained. The OWSA led to ICERs ranging from $240,255 to $75,624, with all but two parameters falling below $150,000/QALY. In the PSA, axi-cel had an 64% probability of being cost-effective across 5,000 iterations using a $150,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. Scenarios one and two resulted in ICERs of $105,353 and $102,695, respectively. Discussion: This study finds that axi-cel is cost-effective compared to mosun at the commonly cited $150,000/QALY US willingness-to-pay threshold, with robust results across a range of sensitivity analyses accounting for parameter uncertainty.

[Patient with TNBC with early relapse within 12 months from adjuvant treatment.] / Paziente affetta da TNBC con ricaduta precoce entro 12 mesi dal trattamento adiuvante.

Triple negative disease, defined by a lack of tumor cell expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2, remains to date the worst prognosis subtype and especially in metastatic disease triple negative breast cancer is still un unmet clinical need. However, even in this setting, now we can use new drugs such as immunotherapy and antibodies drug conjugated to improve outcome. Particularly, sacituzumab govitecan is the first Ab drug conjugated demonstrating a significant improvement in terms of overall and progression free survival in patients affected by metastatic TNBC pretreated with 2-3 previous lines of therapy.

[Efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan in a patient with TNBC with early relapse after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.] / Efficacia del sacituzumab govitecan in paziente con TNBC con recidiva precoce dopo chemioterapia neoadiuvante.

Triple-negative breast cancers patients who relapse within 12 months from the end of neoaadjuvant chemotherapy represent a subgroup with a particularly poor prognosis, due to resistance to common chemotherapy treatments. Therefore, innovative therapeutic strategies are necessary for these patients. The therapeutic arsenal for triple-negative breast cancer has been enriched in recent years with new drugs, including antibody-drug conjugates. Sacituzumab govitecan, the first antibody directed against Trop-2, has been shown to improve survival in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer (the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer) in women who have received at least two prior chemotherapy treatments in the metastatic setting. This drug has demonstrated its effectiveness even in patients with early relapse after neoadjuvant treatment. In this clinical case we describe the story of a young patient with triple-negative breast cancer, with lymphnodal recurrence, who relapses within the first 12 months after the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sacituzumab govitecan resulted in a rapid and impressive clinical and instrumental response, associated with an improvement in quality of life and excellent functional status during therapy.

PD-1 inhibitor combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic hypopharyngeal/laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: efficacy and survival outcomes.

Objective: This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP regimen) in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic hypopharyngeal/laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (RMHSCC/RMLSCC). Methods: Patients diagnosed and treated at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from August 1, 2020, to August 15, 2023, with histologically confirmed RMHSCC/RMLSCC were included. All patients received PD-1 inhibitors combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel (260mg/m2) and cisplatin (60mg/m2) for 3-4 cycles. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 50 patients with RMHSCC/RMLSCC who received TP+PD-1 inhibitor therapy were included, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 56.0% (28/50). The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 80.2% (95% CI: 69.3%-92.9%) and 68.6% (95% CI: 52.6%-89.5%), respectively, while the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 44.7% (95% CI: 31.9%-62.5%) and 26.0% (95% CI: 12.6%-53.4%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events mainly included rash, myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and hypothyroidism. Conclusion: In the treatment of RMHSCC/RMLSCC with TP + PD-1 inhibitors, survival rates of patients can be improved while ensuring the safety of the treatment regimen.

Real-world outcomes of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in advanced, unresectable, and recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: There are limited treatment options available to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma particularly intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 drugs compared to chemotherapy alone in advanced, unresectable, and recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients. Methods: Patients with advanced, unresectable, or recurrent iCCA who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or chemotherapy alone were retrospectively screened and analyzed. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: 81 eligible patients were included in the study (chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group n=51, and chemotherapy-alone group n=30). The median OS was 11 months for the chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group, significantly longer than the 8 months in the chemotherapy-alone group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.53 (95% CI 0.30-0.94, P = 0.008). The median PFS of 7 months in the chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group was significantly longer than the 4 months in the chemotherapy-alone group, with HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.87); P = 0.002). Similarly, the combined therapy group showed a higher ORR (29.4%) and DCR (78.4%) compared to 13.3% and 73.3% in the chemotherapy-alone group, respectively. More grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse effects were recorded in the chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group (66.7%) compared to the chemotherapy-alone group (23.3%), however, they were manageable and tolerable. Conclusion: Chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 represents a more effective and tolerable treatment option for advanced, unresectable, and recurrent iCCA patients compared to chemotherapy alone.

Nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine versus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: randomised phase 3 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. DESIGN: Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial. SETTING: Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m2 on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) v 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) v 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) v 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up. CONCLUSION: The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.

Prolonged 14-day continuous infusion of high-dose ifosfamide for patients with relapsed and refractory high-grade osteosarcoma: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with Relapsed/Refractory Osteosarcoma (R/R OS) remains dismal without an agreement on systemic therapy. The use of High-Dose Ifosfamide (14 g/sqm) with an external pump in outpatient setting (14-IFO) in R/R OS patients is limited. This study represents the first retrospective cohort analysis focused on evaluating the activity and toxicity of 14-IFO in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study investigated 14-IFO activity, in terms of tumour response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, as well as survival rates and toxicity, according to CTCAE v.5. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 26 patients with R/R OS. The Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) obtained was 23% and 57.5%, respectively. Patients with relapsed OS showed a higher ORR (45%) and DCR (82%) compared to refractory patients, irrespective of the number of prior treatment lines received. The achievement of disease control with 14-IFO administration enabled 27% of patients to undergo new local treatment. Four-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was 54% for all patients and 82% for the relapsed OS sub-group. Median Overall Survival (OSurv) was 13.7 months, with 1-year OSurv of 51% for all patients and 71% for relapsed patients. Age over 18 years and the presence of refractory disease were identified as negative prognostic factors for this patient cohort. A total of 101 cycles were evaluated for toxic assessment, demonstrating a tolerable profile without grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: 14-IFO should be considered a viable treatment option for R/R OS, particularly due to its well tolerated toxicity profile and the potential for home-administration, which can improve patient quality of life without compromising efficacy.

Safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab in relapsed or refractory CC chemokine receptor 4-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma and relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: A post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

Mogamulizumab is a humanized antibody targeting CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4). This post-marketing surveillance was conducted in Japan as a regulatory requirement from 2014 to 2020 to ensure the safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) CCR4-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) or r/r cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Safety and effectiveness data were collected for up to 31 weeks after treatment initiation. A total of 142 patients were registered; safety was evaluated in 136 patients. The median number of doses was 8.0 (range, 1-18). The main reasons for treatment termination were insufficient response (22.1%) and adverse events (13.2%). The frequency of any grade adverse drug reaction was 57.4%, including skin disorders (26.5%), infections and immune system disorders (16.2%), and infusion-related reactions (13.2%). Graft-versus-host disease, grade 2, developed in one of two patients who underwent allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after receiving mogamulizumab. Effectiveness was evaluated in 131 patients (103 with PTCL; 28 with CTCL). The best overall response rate was 45.8% (PTCL, 47.6%; CTCL, 39.3%). At week 31, the survival rate was 69.0% (95% confidence interval, 59.8%-76.5%) [PTCL, 64.4% (54.0%-73.0%); CTCL, 90.5% (67.0%-97.5%)]. Safety and effectiveness were comparable between patients <70 and ≥ 70 years old and between those with relapsed and refractory disease. The safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab for PTCL and CTCL in the real world were comparable with the data reported in previous clinical trials. Clinical Trial Registration.

Long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance treatment in patients with TP53wt advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A subgroup analysis of the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance therapy in adults with TP53 wild-type (TP53wt) stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) who achieved partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) following chemotherapy. METHODS: Analysis of the prespecified, exploratory subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC from the phase 3 SIENDO study was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with TP53wt EC and across other patient subgroups were exploratory endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 263 patients enrolled in the SIENDO trial, 113 patients had TP53wt EC; 70/113 (61.9%) had TP53wt/proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) EC, and 29/113 (25.7%) had TP53wt/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) EC. As of April 1, 2024, the median PFS (mPFS) for TP53wt patients who received selinexor compared with placebo was 28.4 versus 5.2 months (36.8-month follow-up, HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.73). A benefit in mPFS was seen with selinexor versus placebo regardless of MMR status (patients with TP53wt/pMMR EC: 39.5 vs 4.9 months, HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.71; patients with TP53wt/dMMR EC: 13.1 vs 3.7 months, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18-1.34). Selinexor treatment was generally manageable, with no new safety signals identified. CONCLUSION: In the phase 3 SIENDO study, selinexor maintenance therapy showed a promising efficacy signal and a manageable safety profile in the prespecified subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC who achieved a PR or CR following chemotherapy. These results are being further evaluated in an ongoing randomized phase 3 trial (NCT05611931).

A phase 1 study of concurrent cabozantinib and cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition with cetuximab is a standard treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Activation of the receptor tyrosine kinases AXL, MET and VEGFR can mediate resistance to cetuximab. Cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor (MKI) targeting AXL/MET/VEGFR, has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models of HNSCC. This investigator- initiated phase I trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of cetuximab plus cabozantinib in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received cetuximab concurrently with cabozantinib daily on a 28-day cycle. Using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, the primary endpoint was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of cabozantinib. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) RESULTS: Among the 20 patients enrolled, most had prior disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors (95 %), platinum-based chemotherapy (95 %), and cetuximab (80 %). No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded and the MTD for cabozantinib was established to be 60 mg. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 65 % of patients (n = 13). ORR was 20 %, with 4 partial responses (PRs). Two PRs were observed in cetuximab-naïve patients (n = 4), with an ORR of 50 % in this subgroup. In the overall population, DCR was 75 %, median PFS was 3.4 months and median OS was 8.1 months. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab plus cabozantinib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile and preliminary efficacy in patients with heavily treated R/M HNSCC. The combination of cetuximab with MKIs targeting the AXL/MET/VEGFR axis warrants further investigation, including in cetuximab-naïve patients.

Phase Ib trial of IRX-2 plus durvalumab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: IRX-2 is a multi-cytokine immune-activating agent with anti-tumor activity in non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we evaluated combined IRX-2 and durvalumab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase Ib trial consisting of dose escalation and expansion. Primary endpoints were safety and biomarkers to assess the immune response in the tumor microenvironment including significant increases in PD-L1 expression and CD8 + tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) comparing pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies. Secondary endpoints were objective response rates (ORR) and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were evaluable for response, and nine patients were evaluable for biomarkers. Thirteen patients (68 %) had exposure to prior anti-PD-1 therapy. No dose-limiting or grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed. On-treatment biopsies showed significantly increased PD-L1 (p = 0.005), CD3+ (p = 0.020), CD4+ (p = 0.022), and CD8 + T cells (p = 0.017) compared to pre-treatment. Median overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 6.18 months (95 % CI, 2.66-8.61) and 2.53 months (95 % CI, 1.81-4.04), respectively. One patient had an objective response (ORR, 5.3 %) with an ongoing PFS of > 25 months. Disease control rate was 42 %. The responder harbored an ARID1A variant of unknown significance (VUS) that was predicted to bind her HLA-I alleles with a higher affinity than the reference peptide. CONCLUSIONS: IRX-2 and durvalumab were safe and elicited the evidence of immune activation in the tumor microenvironment determined by increased PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TILs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03381183.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge with limited treatment success. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a potential treatment avenue, necessitating a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their efficacy and safety. METHODS: Adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, culminating in the inclusion of studies focusing on the treatment of recurrent OC with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and analyzed using fixed or random effects models depending on heterogeneity levels. RESULTS: Our search yielded 1215 articles, with 6 meeting the inclusion criteria for final analysis. Studies varied in size and reported median age, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. The meta-analysis showed improved Objective Response Rates (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and PFS in patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The overall adverse event rate was 17.9%, indicating a need for careful patient selection and monitoring. No significant publication bias was detected, enhancing the reliability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors offer a promising treatment option for recurrent OC, improving ORR, DCR, and PFS. However, the higher incidence of adverse events necessitates a cautious approach to their use. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, biomarker identification, and optimal combination therapies.

Outcomes of pirtobrutinib for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in compassionate use program in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a type of B-cell lymphoma that is currently incurable. Pirtobrutinib shows promising response rates in heavily pretreated MCL patients according to the approval study, but the real-world data are scarce. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety profile of pirtobrutinib in 10 relapsed/refractory MCL patients from compassionate use program (CUP). RESULTS: On average, the patients underwent three lines of systemic therapy prior to pirtobrutinib and were predominantly BTKi exposed (9/10). The best overall response rate (BORR) was 67%. In a median follow-up of 8.6 months, the mean duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were not reached. No new safety signals were documented. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, pirtobrutinib represented a safe and effective treatment option in a small real-world population.

Effects of Apatinib combined with Temozolomide on levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 in patients with drug-resistant recurrent glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effects of Apatinib combined with Temozolomide (TMZ) on the levels of Soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) and Soluble Programmed Death-1 Ligand (sPD-L1) in patients with drug-resistant recurrent Glioblastoma (GB). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 69 patients with recurrent GB from September 2020 to March 2022 were recruited and assigned to the control group (n = 34) and observation group (n = 35) according to different treatment options after tumor recurrence. The control group was treated with TMZ, and the observation group was treated with Apatinib combined with TMZ. Levels of sPD-1 and spd-l1, clinical efficacy, survival time and adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: General data including gender, age, body mass index, and combined diseases indicated no statistical significance between groups (p > 0.05). Before the intervention, sPD-1 and sPD-L1 levels were not significantly different in the two groups (p > 0.05). After interventions, levels of PD-1 and sPD-L1 levels decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The objective remission rate and clinical benefit rate of the observation group were higher and overall survival and progression-free survival were longer than those of the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in major adverse reactions among patients (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib combined with TMZ is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent GB. The combined application of the two can reduce the levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1, which has important clinical application value.

Electrochemotherapy as palliative care in patients with local or metastatic recurrence of head and neck cancer: review of state of the art.

Head and neck cancers are mostly represented by squamous cell carcinoma. Despite effective treatment of primary tumours, local recurrences and metastases are frequent, with up to a 60% risk of local and 30% of distant failure. Moreover, second primary tumours sometimes occur in these patients (2-3% per year). Treatment of recurrences, metastases, and second primary tumours can be extremely challenging for Otorhinolaryngologists, especially in patients who have already been treated with radiotherapy, previous surgery, or both. Electrochemotherapy represents an effective and valid option in these cases.

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in American patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Toripalimab, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin, has been approved as the first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC), representing a significant milestone as the first FDA-approved innovative therapy for this condition. Despite this achievement, there's a lack of data on the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab for RM-NPC patients in the American context. METHODS: To assess the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, a 3-state partitioned survival model was constructed. The study involved participants with characteristics matching those in the JUPITER-02 trial. Cost and utility inputs were collected from literature. Main outcomes measured were quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of results. RESULTS: The study found that the toripalimab regimen resulted in 4.390 QALYs at a cost of $361,813, while the chemotherapy-only regimen yielded 1.685 QALYs at a cost of $161,632. This translates to an ICER of $74,004/QALY, below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated that utility values, discount rate, and the price of toripalimab significantly impact INMB. With an 87.10% probability of being cost-effective at a $150,000/QALY threshold, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis supports toripalimab plus chemotherapy as a viable option. Scenario analysis showed that toripalimab remains cost-effective unless its price increases by 125%. Additionally, a simulated 15-year study period increases the ICER to $88,026/QALY. Subgroup analysis revealed ICERs of $76,538/QALY for PD-L1 positive and $70,158/QALY for PD-L1 negative groups. CONCLUSIONS: Toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to standard chemotherapy for American patients with RM-NPC. This evidence can guide clinical and reimbursement decision-making in treating RM-NPC patients.

Comparison of target agent treatment strategies for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare 7 newer immunotherapies and targeted therapies for platinum-resistant relapsed ovarian cancer. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases for phase III trials involving platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy in combination with chemotherapy. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the GRADE method. The primary outcome of comparison was progression-free survival, and secondary outcomes included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: This analysis included 7 randomized phase III controlled trials, encompassing 2485 PRrOC patients. Combining bevacizumab plus chemotherapy and lurbinectedin demonstrated statistically significant differences in progression-free survival compared to all other regimens of interest. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the overall survival. Nivolumab and mirvetuximab exhibited fewer serious adverse events than the other regimens of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and lurbinectedin monotherapy has significant efficacy in patients with PRrOC. For patients with PRrOC who have exhausted treatment options, nivolumab and mirvetuximab may be considered as alternatives because of their better safety profiles.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose chemotherapy as the first or subsequent salvage treatment line in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer: an international multicentric analysis.

BACKGROUND: In relapsed or refractory (RR) metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC), high-dose (HD) chemotherapy (CTX) plus autologous stem cell transplantation is considered the standard of care. Limited data exist regarding the efficacy of HD-CTX following conventionally dosed salvage regimens (CDRs). This analysis explores and contrasts the efficacy of HD-CTX as the first or subsequent salvage regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected to explore the efficacy of HD-CTX administered as the first (group A) or subsequent salvage CTX (group B) after a CDR. The primary endpoint was OS from the time of HD-CTX. Associations of survival, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity with clinical characteristics were explored using stratified Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 283 patients with GCC were included from 11 international centers, with 159 patients (56%) in group A and 124 patients (44%) in group B. The first salvage treatment was administered between 1998 and 2022, with a median follow-up of 27.0 [standard deviation (SD) 46.2] months for group A and 17.0 (SD 48.5) months for group B. The median OS from HD-CTX treatment initiation was not reached in group A, compared with 25 months in group B (P = 0.00027), associated with 2- and 5-year OS rates of 74% and 63% (group A) versus 53% and 37% (group B), respectively. When administered as the first salvage treatment, HD-CTX was associated with a higher ORR (79% versus 60%; P = 0.013) and lower nonhematologic grade ≥3 toxicity rate (78% versus 97%; P < 0.001). Concerning risk factor analysis for the total cohort, the International Prognostic Factors Study Group score was the only independent predictor of OS in multivariable analysis (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: When administered as the initial salvage treatment or after CDR, HD-CTX exhibits curative potential for patients with RR GCC. The efficacy and safety outcomes were more favorable when HD-CTX was conducted as the first salvage treatment line.

Adapted EXTREME regimen in the first-line treatment of fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ELAN-FIT): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: A standard treatment for fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is yet to be established. In the previous EXTREME trial, few older patients were included. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of an adapted EXTREME regimen in fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. METHODS: This single-arm, phase 2 study was done at 22 centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older and assessed as not frail (fit) using the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation (EGE) and had recurrent or metastatic HNSCC in the first-line setting that was not eligible for local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. The adapted EXTREME regimen consisted of six cycles of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m2 on days 1-4, carboplatin with an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m2 on cycle 1-day 1, and 250 mg/m2 subsequently), all intravenously, with cycles starting every 21 days. In patients with disease control after two to six cycles, cetuximab 500 mg/m2 was continued once every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was systematically administered and erythropoietin was recommended during chemotherapy. The study was based on the two-stage Bryant and Day design, combining efficacy and toxicity endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate at week 12 after the start of treatment, assessed by central review (with an unacceptable rate of ≤15%). The primary toxicity endpoint was morbidity, defined as grade 4-5 adverse events, or cutaneous rash (grade ≥3) that required cetuximab to be discontinued, during the chemotherapy phase, or a decrease in functional autonomy (Activities of Daily Living score decrease ≥2 points from baseline) at 1 month after the end of chemotherapy (with an unacceptable morbidity rate of >40%). Analysis of the coprimary endpoints, and of safety in the chemotherapy phase, was based on the per-protocol population, defined as eligible patients who received at least one cycle of the adapted EXTREME regimen. Safety in the maintenance phase was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of cetuximab as maintenance therapy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01864772, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Sept 27, 2013, and June 20, 2018, 85 patients were enrolled, of whom 78 were in the per-protocol population. 66 (85%) patients were male and 12 (15%) were female, and the median age was 75 years (IQR 72-79). The median number of chemotherapy cycles received was five (IQR 3-6). Objective response at week 12 was observed in 31 patients (40% [95% CI 30-51]) and morbidity events were observed in 24 patients (31% [22-42]). No fatal adverse events occurred. Four patients presented with a decrease in functional autonomy 1 month after the end of chemotherapy versus baseline. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological events (leukopenia [22 patients; 28%], neutropenia [20; 26%], thrombocytopenia [15; 19%], and anaemia [12; 15%]), oral mucositis (14; 18%), fatigue (11; 14%), rash acneiform (ten; 13%), and hypomagnesaemia (nine; 12%). Among 44 patients who received cetuximab during the maintenance phase, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypomagnesaemia (six patients; 14%) and acneiform rash (six; 14%). INTERPRETATION: The study met its primary objectives on objective response and morbidity, and showed overall survival to be as good as in younger patients treated with standard regimens, indicating that the adapted EXTREME regimen could be used in older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who are deemed fit with use of a geriatric evaluation tool adapted to patients with head and neck cancer, such as the EGE. FUNDING: French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC, and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), Sandoz, GEFLUC, and GEMLUC. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.