The use of the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in isolated and multiligament knee injuries: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in isolated PCL injuries and multiligament knee injuries, analysing clinical, radiographic, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was performed through Embase via Ovid, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies reviewing LARS use for PCL reconstruction. The methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: From 225 results screened, 13 studies were included published between 2004 and 2020, analysing LARS use for PCL reconstruction. Mean follow-up was 21 months to 11.9 years, however only four studies had follow-up of over five years. Results in isolated PCL reconstruction utilising LARS demonstrated scores that were consistent with good function and minimal limitation in daily or sporting activities, in addition to a significant improvement in knee laxity and low complication rates. Symptomatic rupture and synovitis rates were both 1.7% in this group. LARS use in complex multiligament injuries demonstrated satisfactory PROMs, although there was concern regarding residual laxity on stress radiography. CONCLUSIONS: LARS demonstrates good outcomes in PCL injury reconstruction in the short to mid-term, particularly in isolated PCL injuries, achieving equivocal or improved results compared to autograft reconstruction using hamstring tendon in the three comparative studies included. LARS has a quicker recovery time and no donor-site morbidity, however long-term data is lacking. Utilising LARS for reconstruction of the PCL in multiligament injuries revealed more variable results.

All-Inside PCL Reconstruction.

Many different techniques with multiple graft types have been described for the reconstruction of the injured posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); autograft versus allograft, single- versus double-bundle, open inlay versus arthroscopic inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial, and recently described the arthroscopic "all-inside" socket technique. Reported clinical outcomes have demonstrated no significant difference in any of these PCL reconstruction techniques, likely because of the heterogeneity in injury characteristics and patient population. The ideal surgical technique should be safe, simple, and reproducible while allowing treatment of concomitant knee injuries resulting and return to function.

Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction implemented by the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System over a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the long-term clinical follow-up results of patients who underwent double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS). METHODS: Patients were assessed using clinical scores that included the Tegner activity level scale, the Lysholm score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. KT-1000 was adopted to assess stability. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate osteoarthritis and LARS condition. RESULTS: This study examined 38 patients, of which follow-up procedures were completed for 33 patients, resulting in a follow-up rate of 86.8%. The average follow-up period was 11.9 ±â€¯1.2 years (range: 10.3-14.2 years). The median scores of the clinical scales were as follows: Tegner activity score, 6 (range: five to seven); Lysholm score, 90 (range: 67-100); and IKDC score, 89.7 (range: 46-100). The median of the side-to-side difference (SSD) was four millimeters (range: 0-10 mm). In radiographs, the moderate OA rate was 6.9%. MRI results revealed that 26 patients exhibited ingrowth and 11 patients exhibited partial rupture of the LARS. With SSD ≤ 3 mm set as the standard for successful knee stabilization, the optimal cutoff point of LARS midsubstance thickness in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was 14.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of the studied patients demonstrated the durability of LARS. However, clinical outcomes showed no enhancement using LARS, so it is not recommended for routine use in PCL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Primary Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With The Novel Suture Tape Augmentation Technique.

BACKGROUND: A posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture is less common than an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. PCL reconstruction remains controversial with variable outcomes and problems. The encouraging results of the novel ACL repair techniques led to renewed interest in PCL repair. Primary arthroscopic PCL repair has been rarely discussed and literature is scarce. To the best of our knowledge, no PCL repair patient outcome has been reported with one of the novel PCL repair techniques. We present the first case report of two patients who have been treated with the novel PCL repair technique, the suture tape augmentation technique. CASE DESCRIPTION: Two patients who underwent primary PCL repair after an acute PCL rupture with a two-year follow up are presented. Patients were evaluated according to the Lysholm scale, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Tegner activity scale. Follow up also included objective physical examinations-knee function and posterior drawer test using a rolimeter-and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Physical examinations were performed at three months, six months, one year, and two years after surgery. OUTCOMES: At two-year follow up, both patients had a full range of motion and experienced no pain, nor swelling. IKDC scores were 83% (good) and 100% (excellent), Lysholm scores were 99 and 100 two years after surgery. At three months postoperative, the Tegner activity scale equaled the preinjury Tegner activity scale. One patient was horseback riding within three months. There were some increased posterior translation differences after two years-+2 and +3mm-compared with six weeks postoperative. MRI showed a healed PCL in both cases. DISCUSSION: PCL repair could be a promising treatment option for acute PCL ruptures. Advantages of this technique are the retaining of the natural proprioceptive capacities due to preserving native PCL fibers, the surgical technique is less invasive compared to a reconstruction, and no donor graft morbidity is expected as no graft is needed. CONCLUSION: In these two cases, good subjective and objective results are demonstrated after PCL repair using the novel suture tape augmentation technique. MRI confirmed the healing of the PCL. Although this is a small case series, as PCL ruptures are less common compared to ACL ruptures, it is a stepping-stone for further PCL repair research.

[A Novel Technique for the Preparation of a 3- or 5-Stranded Hamstring Graft for Individualised Single-Bundle ACL or PCL Reconstruction]. / Neuartige Technik zur Präparation eines 3- oder 5-strängigen Hamstring-Transplantats für die individualisierte Single-Bundle-VKB- oder -HKB-Rekonstruktion.

Objective Development of a preparation technique for hamstring tendons to ensure a maximum of intraoperative flexibility during individualised cruciate ligament surgery. Indications Primary ACL- and PCL-reconstruction as well as cases of later revision. Method Three- or five-stranded grafts can be obtained with the use of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with fiber tape enforcement and use of a conventional femoral cortical suspensory fixation device. Fibre tape and knotting style ensure free motion of the continous loop. Through its simplicity, the technique offers the highest grade of intraoperative scalability.