Long time consequences after STARR procedure: Report of 15 years experience and medico-legal perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Stapled transanal rectal resection is the most surgical procedure used for obstructed defecation syndrome, rectal prolapse, rectocele and rectal intussusception worldwide. The aim of this study is to report our experience and long time consequences and to offer a new medico-legal perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospective review medical charts of patients treated between 2006 and 2021 â€‹b â€‹y the same team directed by the same senior surgeon. We consider major complications and long time sequelaeses as main object for the discussion. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were created. IRB approved the study. After revision a medico-legal perspective was done based on major complications. RESULTS: During the study period 1726 patients, ages between 18 and 71 years old, were treated with 1280 STARR procedures and 446 "Longo" [was stopped on 2012]; all procedures were performed by the senior surgeon and visited by the team at the same control visit at 7days, 30 days and 12 and 18 months after surgery. All patients had 100 â€‹% compliance at 30 days, while 85 â€‹% had long time visit (more than 18 months). During the study period 6 â€‹% (104 subjects) of patients had minor complications while 1 patient (42 â€‹yrs female) reported total fecal incontinence after 18 months (0,05 â€‹%). This patient had mental disorder treated with drugs unknown before surgery and long time mental disorder after surgery. We focused on this last case to discuss long time complication DISCUSSION: This survey reports some interesting clinical data; respect to standard complications minor complications such as pain, bleeding and anal discomfort represent less than 10 â€‹% of procedures that is a good results in this perineal surgery. For those working with rectal mucosal prolapse, obstructed defecation syndrome, rectocele or rectal intussusception is essential to distinguish these diagnosis to have a good counselling with patient before surgery (at least 1 month before). It is essential to check these patients with a close follow-up especially after surgery, to avoid any other mental discomfort related to fecal incontinence; long time fecal incontinence, without anatomical disorders as our case, could be associated and related to drugs consumption or mental disorder, or perineal insensitivity due to surgical procedure. In conclusion it is essential to have good clinical practice to suggest STARR procedure, having idea about different diseases, different surgical approaches and different long time complications.

Maternal and neonatal consequences of cystocele and rectocele in the delivery process.

The study aimed to investigate the effects of cystocele and rectocele on the stages of vaginal birth and maternal and newborn outcomes. A total of 672 multiparous pregnant women between the ages of 18 to 40 who underwent normal vaginal delivery in our tertiary center between November 2022 and February 2023, were included in this prospective study. Among the participants, 348 (51.8%) had no abnormalities, 78 (11.6%) had rectocele only, 112 (16.7%) had cystocele only, and 134 (19.9) had both cystocele and rectocele. Patients with the coexistence of cystocele and rectocele experienced a notably extended duration for both the first stage and second stage of labor, although the extension in the second stage was not statistically significant. Among the maternal complications, the development of maternal laceration and chorioamnionitis was significantly more common in the patient group with cystocele and rectocele compared to the other groups. When the groups were assessed for postpartum bleeding, while the bleeding risk increased from the normal group to the rectocele + cystocele group, this increase was not statistically significant. There was no difference between the groups in terms of neonatal outcomes. The delivery time of pregnant women with cystocele and rectocele, in the absence of additional risk factors, was determined to be significantly longer than that of the control group. We think that these patients should receive more vigilant monitoring, and this criterion should be kept in mind when assessing the indication for a cesarean section.

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs. transperineal mesh repair for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele: comparison of selectively distributed patients.

PURPOSE: Obstructed defecation syndrome represents 50-60% of patients with symptoms of constipation. We aimed to compare the two frequently performed surgical methods, laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair, for this condition in terms of functional and surgical outcomes. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 131 female patients who were diagnosed with obstructed defecation syndrome, attributed to rectocele with or without rectal intussusception, enterocele, hysterocele or cystocele, and who underwent either laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy or transperineal mesh repair. Patients were evaluated for surgical outcomes based on the operative time, the length of hospital stay, operative complications, using prospectively designed charts. Functional outcome was assessed by using the Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with complex rectocele underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, and 80 patients diagnosed with simple rectocele underwent transperineal mesh repair. Mean age was found to be 50.35 ± 13.51 years, and mean parity 2.14 ± 1.47. Obstructed defecation symptoms significantly improved in both study groups, as measured by the Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory, Constipation Severity Instrument and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms scores. Minor postoperative complications including wound dehiscence (n = 3) and wound infection (n = 2) occurred in the transperineal mesh repair group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy and transperineal mesh repair are efficient and comparable techniques in terms of improvement in constipation symptoms related to obstructed defecation syndrome. A selective distribution of patients with or without multicompartmental prolapse to one of the treatment arms might be the preferred strategy.

The Clinical Impact of Obesity in Patients With Disorders of Defecation: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1,155 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a global epidemic. Its clinical impact on symptoms of fecal incontinence (FI) and/or constipation and underlying anorectal pathophysiology remains uncertain. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients meeting Rome IV criteria for FI and/or functional constipation, with data on body mass index (BMI), attending a tertiary center for investigation between 2017 and 2021. Clinical history, symptoms, and anorectal physiologic test results were analyzed according to BMI categories. RESULTS: A total of 1,155 patients (84% female) were included in the analysis (33.5% normal BMI; 34.8% overweight; and 31.7% obese). Obese patients had higher odds of FI to liquid stools (69.9 vs 47.8%, odds ratio [OR] 1.96 [confidence interval: 1.43-2.70]), use of containment products (54.6% vs 32.6%, OR 1.81 [1.31-2.51]), fecal urgency (74.6% vs 60.7%, OR 1.54 [1.11-2.14]), urge FI (63.4% vs 47.3%, OR 1.68 [1.23-2.29]), and vaginal digitation (18.0% vs 9.7%, OR 2.18 [1.26-3.86]). A higher proportion of obese patients had Rome criteria-based FI or coexistent FI and functional constipation (37.3%, 50.3%) compared with overweight patients (33.8%, 44.8%) and patients with normal BMI (28.9%, 41.1%). There was a positive linear association between BMI and anal resting pressure (ß 0.45, R 2 0.25, P = 0.0003), although the odds of anal hypertension were not significantly higher after Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Obese patients more often had a large clinically significant rectocele (34.4% vs 20.6%, OR 2.62 [1.51-4.55]) compared with patients with normal BMI. DISCUSSION: Obesity affects specific defecatory (mainly FI) and prolapse symptoms and pathophysiologic findings (higher anal resting pressure and significant rectocele). Prospective studies are required to determine whether obesity is a modifiable risk factor of FI and constipation.

Laparoscopic or transanal repair of rectocele? Comparison of a reduction in rectocele size.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the reduction in rectocele size after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) with that after transanal repair (TAR). METHODS: Forty-six patients with rectocele who underwent LVR and 45 patients with rectocele who received TAR between February 2012 and December 2022 were included. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. All patients had clinical evidence of a symptomatic rectocele. Bowel function was evaluated using the constipation scoring system (CSS) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI). Substantial symptom improvement was defined as at least a 50% reduction in the CSS or FISI scores. Evacuation proctography was performed before surgery and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Constipation was substantially improved in 40-70% of the LVR patients and 70-90% of the TAR patients over 5 years. Fecal incontinence was markedly improved in 60-90% of the LVR patients across 5 years and in 75% of the TAR patients at 1 year. Postoperative proctography showed a reduction in rectocele size in the LVR patients (30 [20-59] mm preoperatively vs. 11 [0-44] mm postoperatively, P < 0.0001) and TAR patients (33 [20-55] mm preoperatively vs. 8 [0-27] mm postoperatively, P < 0.0001). The reduction rate of rectocele size in the LVR patients was significantly lower than that in the TAR patients (63 [3-100] % vs. 79 [45-100] %, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The reduction in rectocele size was lower in the patients who underwent LVR than in those who received TAR.

Pathophysiological basis, clinical assessment, investigation and management of patients with obstruction defecation syndrome.

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a clinical syndrome manifest as difficulty in faecal evacuation despite no mechanical obstruction. It is the final clinical pathway of a number of anatomical and physiological pathologies they can result in considerable misery to the lives of the patients it afflicts. Herein, the authors seek to breakdown the syndrome into its component parts, looking first at normal pelvic floor anatomy and physiology; followed by each pathological element; clinical features and investigation; individual management and management of the patient as a whole. It must be stated that correction of anatomy is not the sine qua non, as this does not always correlate to improvement of symptoms. There is a complex interplay of all elements, and a holistic approach appreciating the gestalt principle of "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" is paramount. Causes of pelvic pain (levator ani syndrome, coccygodynia, proctalgia fugax and pudendal neuralgia) do not fall into ODS and are beyond the scope of this paper.

Is posterior compartment prolapse associated with anal incontinence?

OBJECTIVE: It has been claimed that manifestations of posterior compartment prolapse, such as rectocele, enterocele and intussusception, are associated with anal incontinence (AI), but this has not been studied while controlling for anal sphincter trauma. We aimed to investigate this association in women with intact anal sphincter presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1133 women with intact anal sphincter presenting to a tertiary urogynecological center for pelvic floor dysfunction between 2014 and 2016. All women underwent a standardized interview, including assessment of symptoms of AI, clinical examination and three-/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. Descent of the rectal ampulla, true rectocele, enterocele, intussusception and anal sphincter trauma were diagnosed offline. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.1 (range, 17.6-89.7) years and mean body mass index was 29.4 (range, 14.7-67.8) kg/m2 . AI was reported by 149 (13%) patients, with a median St Mark's anal incontinence score of 12 (interquartile range, 1-23). Significant posterior compartment prolapse was seen in 693 (61%) women on clinical examination. Overall, 638 (56%) women had posterior compartment prolapse on imaging: 527 (47%) had a true rectocele, 89 (7.9%) had an enterocele and 26 (2.3%) had an intussusception. Women with ultrasound-diagnosed enterocele had a significantly higher rate of AI (23.6% vs 12.3%; odds ratio (OR), 2.21 (95% CI, 1.31-3.72); P = 0.002), but when adjusted for potential confounders, this association was no longer significant (OR, 1.56 (95% CI, 0.82-2.77); P = 0.134). CONCLUSION: In women without anal sphincter trauma, posterior compartment prolapse, whether diagnosed clinically or by imaging, was not shown to be associated with AI. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Tailoring surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome to the 'iceberg diagram': Long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Patients with obstructed defecation syndrome may present with a wide spectrum of disorders. The iceberg diagram, which focuses on the underlying occult diseases, has been proposed for an accurate diagnosis. The iceberg diagram deals with lesions, which, if neglected, may worsen the prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using the iceberg diagram on the clinical results. METHODS: Patients operated for obstructed defecation syndrome based on the iceberg diagram between 2008 and 2018 were evaluated pre- and postsurgery. All patients underwent psychosomatic assessment, abdominal and perineal examination, proctoscopy, vaginoscopy, transanal ultrasound, and defecography. Postoperative complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 80 operated patients, 73 were females; median age was 47 (range 26-78) years. All had a rectal internal mucosal prolapse and 85% had a rectocele. The most frequent occult diseases were functional (mental distress [46%]) or organic (colpo-cysto-enterocele [44%]). Surgery was tailored according to the iceberg diagram with prolapsectomy and rectocele repair the most commonly used among 8 different procedures. A total of 14% of patients had a postoperative complication. Median follow-up was 72 months. Obstructed defecation syndrome score significantly decreased from 10.5 ± 4.8 (mean + standard deviation) to 3.4 ± 3.6 (P < .01) and 68% of patients reported to be either improved or cured. CONCLUSION: The use of the iceberg diagram in obstructed defecation syndrome patients assists in identifying latent "submerged lesions' that may negatively impact the functional outcome of surgery. A clinical approach to patients with obstructed defecation syndrome tailored according to the iceberg diagram allows the identification of occult lesions and to achieve good long-term results.

Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is challenging, with several surgical options showing inconsistent functional results over time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend in surgical management of ODS in a 10-year timeframe across Italian referral centers. METHODS: Surgeons from referral centers for the management of pelvic floor disorders and affiliated to the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery provided data on the yearly volume of procedures for ODS from 2010 to 2019. Six common clinical scenarios of ODS were captured, including details on patient's anal sphincter function and presence of rectocele and/or rectal intussusception. Perineal repair, ventral rectopexy (VRP), transanal repair (internal Delorme), stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR), Contour Transtar, and transvaginal repair were considered in each clinical scenario. RESULTS: Twenty-five centers were included providing data on 2943 surgical patients. Procedure volumes ranged from 10-20 (54%) to 21-50 (46%) per year across centers. The most performed techniques in patients with good sphincter function were transanal repair for isolated rectocele (243/716 [34%]), transanal repair for isolated rectal intussusception (287/677 [42%]) and VRP for combined abnormalities (464/976 [48%]). When considering poor sphincter function, these were perineal repair (112/194 [57.8%]) for isolated rectocele, and VRP for the other two scenarios (60/120 [50%] and 97/260 [37%], respectively). The use of STARR and Contour Transtar decreased over time in patients with impaired sphincter function. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of ODS treatment is confirmed by the variety of clinical scenarios that can occur and by the changing trend of surgical management over the last 10 years.

Transvaginal rectocoele repair for the surgical treatment of a "symptomatic" rectocoele when conservative measures fail: A 12 year experience of 215 patients.

BACKGROUND: Conservative measures are first-line treatment for a "symptomatic" rectocoele, while surgery to correct the anatomical defect may be considered in selected cases. The standard repair offered in our trust is a native tissue transvaginal rectocoele repair (TVRR) combined with levatorplasty. The primary aim of the study was to conduct a retrospective study to assess the outcome of this procedure, while secondary aims were to assess whether specific characteristics and symptoms were associated with response to surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 215 patients who underwent TVRR in a single tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2018. In total, 97% of patients had symptoms of obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) and 81% had a feeling of vaginal prolapse/bulge. We recorded in-hospital and 30 days post-operative complications and pre- and post-operative symptoms. KEY RESULTS: The majority of patients selected for surgery had rectocoele above 4 cm or medium size with contrast trapping. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.2 days. The in-hospital complication rate was 11.2% with the most common complications being urinary retention (8.4%). Mean length of follow-up was 12.7 months (SD 13.9, range 1.4-71.5) with global improvement of symptoms reported in 87.9% cases. Feeling of vaginal bulge improved in 80% of patients while ODS-related symptoms improved in 58% of cases. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The data suggest that TVRR might be a valid option in patients with rectocoele when conservative treatment has failed. Overall patient satisfaction is good, with improvement of ODS symptoms.

Rectoceles: Is There a Correlation Between Presence of Vaginal Prolapse and Radiographic Findings in Symptomatic Women?

BACKGROUND: Constipation is highly prevalent. Women with constipation are evaluated for the presence of vaginal prolapse that may contribute to obstructed defecation syndrome. Defecography can identify anatomic causes of obstructed defecation syndrome (rectocele, intussusception, and enterocele). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the characteristics of women with obstructed defecation syndrome and radiographic rectoceles with and without posterior vaginal wall prolapse and to characterize the relationship between anatomical abnormalities and dysfunction. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study of women with obstructed defecation syndrome who had radiographic rectoceles on defecography. SETTINGS: Women who presented to a Pelvic Floor Disorders Center were included. PATIENTS: Cases were defined as constipated women with radiographic rectoceles and at least stage II posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination. Controls were patients with radiographic rectoceles but without posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, anorectal testing results, and validated questionnaires were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 106 women met inclusion criteria. Women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse (48 (45.3%)) had larger rectoceles on defecography than women without it on examination (3.4 cm vs 3.0 cm, p < 0.01). Women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination were more likely to splint during defecation than women without vaginal wall prolapse (63.8% vs 27.3%, p < 0.01). All other defecatory symptoms, anorectal manometry parameters, and questionnaire responses were similar between groups. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective study design. Our data were taken from a single institution within a center specializing in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders, potentially limiting generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with constipation, radiographic rectoceles, and vaginal prolapse may differ from those without evidence of prolapse. Patients with vaginal prolapse were more likely to splint to aide evacuation and demonstrated larger rectoceles on defecography. Further studies are needed to determine whether constipation causes progression along this continuum or whether progression of prolapse is a cause of worsening defecatory dysfunction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B626. RECTOCELES EXISTE UNA CORRELACIN ENTRE LA PRESENCIA DE PROLAPSO VAGINAL Y LOS HALLAZGOS RADIOLGICOS EN MUJERES SINTOMTICAS: ANTECEDENTES:El estreñimiento es una enfermedad muy prevalente. Las mujeres con estreñimiento se evalúan para detectar la presencia de prolapso vaginal que pueda contribuir al síndrome de defecación obstructiva. La defecografía puede identificar las causas anatómicas del síndrome de defecación obstructiva (rectocele, invaginación intestinal (intususcepción) y enterocele).OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las características de las mujeres con síndrome de defecación obstructiva y la presencia de rectocele como hallazgo radiológico, con y sin prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior, y caracterizar la relación entre las anomalías anatómicas y la presencia de disfunción.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles, de mujeres con síndrome de defecación obstructiva, que tenían rectocele como hallazgo radiológico en una defecografía.MARCO:Mujeres que acudieron a un Centro de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico.PACIENTES:Los casos fueron definidos como mujeres con estreñimiento con hallazgos radiológicos de rectocele, con al menos un prolapso estadio II de la pared vaginal posterio, en el examen físico. Los controles fueron pacientes con solo rectocele por hallazgos radiológicos, sin prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior en el examen físico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon entre los grupos: las características de las pacientes, los resultados de las pruebas diagnósticas anorrectales y los cuestionarios validados.RESULTADOS:Un total de 106 mujeres cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Las mujeres con prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior 48 (45,3%) tenían rectoceles de mayor tamaño en la defecografía en comparación con las mujeres sin rectocele en el examen físico (3,4 cm versus 3,0 cm, p <0,01). Las mujeres con prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior en el examen, tenían una mayor probabilidad de que les fuera necesario ejercer una maniobra de presión manual o digital del periné durante la defecación, comparado con las mujeres sin rectocele clínico (63,8% versus 27,3%, p <0,01). Todos los demás síntomas defecatorios, los parámetros de la manometría anorrectal, y las respuestas al cuestionario fueron similares entre los grupos.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo. Los datos fueron obtenidos de la base de datos de un centro especializado en el tratamiento de los trastornos del piso pélvico lo que potencialmente limita generalizar.CONCLUSIONES:Las pacientes con estreñimiento, rectocele como hallazgo radiológico, y prolapso vaginal pueden ser diferentes de aquellas sin evidencia de prolapso. Las pacientes con prolapso vaginal, tenían una mayor probabilidad de que les fuera necesario ejercer maniobras manuales o digitales de presión a nivel del periné para ayudar a la evacuación, y tenían rectoceles de mayor tamaño en la defecografía. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar si el estreñimiento causa que el rectocele aumente progresivamente de tamaño, empeorando la disfunción defecatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B626.

X-ray video defaecography is superior to magnetic resonance defaecography in the imaging of defaecation disorders.

AIM: The aim of this work was to study the technical success and diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance defaecography (MRD) compared with video defaecography (VD). METHOD: Sixty four women with defaecation disorders underwent both MRD and x-ray VD over 1 year. The assessment by two radiologists in consensus was retrospective and blinded. The technical success of straining and evacuation was evaluated subjectively. The presence of enterocele, intussusception, rectocele and dyssynergic defaecation was analysed according to established criteria, with VD as the standard of reference. RESULTS: It was found that 62/64 (96.9%) VD studies were technically fully diagnostic compared with 29/64 (45.3%) for MRD. The number of partially diagnostic studies was 1/64 (1.6%) for VD versus 21/64 (32.8%) for MRD, with 1/64 (1.6%) (VD) and 14/64 (21.9%) (MRD) being nondiagnostic. Thirty enteroceles were observed by VD compared with seven in MRD with moderate agreement (κ = 0.41). Altogether 53 intussusceptions were observed by VD compared with 27 by MRD with poor agreement (κ = -0.10 and κ = 0.02 in recto-rectal and recto-anal intussusception, respectively). Moderate agreement (κ = 0.47) was observed in diagnosing rectocele, with 47 cases by VD and 29 by MRD. Dyssynergic defaecation was observed in three patients by VD and in 11 patients by MRD, with slight agreement (κ = 0.14). CONCLUSION: The technical success and diagnostic capabilities of VD are better than those of MRD. VD remains the method of choice in the imaging of defaecation disorders.

Long-term annual functional outcome after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception and/or rectocele: evaluation of sustained improvement.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term annual functional results and quality of life (QOL) after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) for rectoanal intussusception (RAI) and/or rectocele. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. The study was conducted on patients who underwent LVR for RAI and/or rectocele at our institution between February 2012 and July 2015. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), Constipation Scoring System (CSS), and QOL instruments (i.e., 36-item Short-form Health Survey [SF-36], Patient Assessment of Constipation-QOL [PAC-QOL] scale, and Fecal Incontinence-QOL [FIQL]) were administered before and annually after surgery. The sustainability of substantial symptom improvement (reduction of at least 50% in CSS or FISI scores) postoperatively was evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (median age 76 [range 60-93] years, 48 women [94%]) were analyzed. No mortality or major morbidity occurred. After a median follow-up of 60 months (range 12-84 months), no mesh-related complications occurred. The median CSS and FISI scores were significantly reduced at 1 year and remained significantly reduced for 7 years. In patients who reported symptom scores ≥ 3 times postoperatively, sustained improvement of constipation and fecal incontinence was found in about 50% (18/38) and 75% (26/35) of relevant patients, respectively. All PAC-QOL and FIQL scales significantly improved over time for 5 years. Of the SF-36 scales, four showed significant improvement at 1 year but none was significantly improved after 3 years, except for the social functioning scale. CONCLUSIONS: LVR for RAI and/or rectocele was associated with low morbidity and long-term improvement in symptom-specific QOL. The sustainability of postoperative improvement in fecal incontinence was satisfactory, and that in constipation was fair.

A step-by-step approach to endorectal proctopexy (ERPP): how we do it.

There are many surgical treatments aimed at correcting internal mucosal prolapse and rectocele associated with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Perineal procedures can be considered as first options in young men in whom an abdominal approach poses risks of sexual dysfunction and in selected women with isolated posterior compartment prolapse who failed conservative treatment. About 20 years ago, we described endorectal proctopexy (ERPP) also known as internal Delorme procedure. The aim of the present study was to describe, with attention to technical details and the aid of a video, the different steps of ERPP for the treatment of ODS. A retrospective analysis of our last 100 cases confirms our initial good results. Complications included suture line dehiscence with consequent stricture in four patients (4%). Bleeding occurred in four (4%) patients and was conservatively treated. Transient anal continence impairment consisting of urgency and soiling occurred in 12 (12%) and 6 (6%) patients, respectively. At 6-month follow-up the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score and ODS score improved from a median preoperative value of 18.9 and 18.5 to 5 and 5, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean follow-up was 36.05 ± 13.3 (range 12-58) months and anatomical recurrence rate was 6 (%). Due to its excellent safety profile and the ability to tailor the procedure to different disease presentations, we think that ERPP should be part of the basic armamentarium of all colorectal surgeons operating on the pelvic floor.

Rectal-vaginal pressure gradient in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and symptomatic rectocele.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between rectal-vaginal pressure and symptomatic rectocele in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHOD: Patients with posterior vaginal prolapse staged III or IV in accordance with the POP Quantitation classification method who were scheduled for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery in the years 2016-2019 were included in the study. Rectocele was diagnosed using translabial ultrasound, and obstructed defecation (OD) was diagnosed in accordance with the Roma IV diagnostic criteria. Both rectal and vaginal pressure were measured using peritron manometers at maximum Vasalva. To ensure stability, the test was performed three times with each patient. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were enrolled in this study. True rectocele was diagnosed in 68 patients at a main rectal ampulla depth of 19 mm. Furthermore, 36 patients were diagnosed with OD. Symptomatic rectocele was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.01), a higher OD symptom score (p < 0.001), and a lower grade of apical prolapse (p < 0.001). The rectal-vaginal pressure gradient was higher in patients with symptomatic rectocele (37.4 ± 11.7 cm H2O) compared with patients with asymptomatic rectocele (16.9 ± 8.4 cm H2O, p < 0.001), and patients without rectocele (17.1 ± 9.2 cm H2O, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rectal-vaginal pressure gradient was found to be a risk factor for symptomatic rectocele in patients with POP. A rectal-vaginal pressure gradient of > 27.5 cm H2O was suggested as the cut-off point of the elevated pressure gradient.

Is perineal hypermobility an independent predictor of obstructive defecation?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Symptoms of obstructed defecation (OD) and anatomical abnormalities of the posterior compartment are prevalent in urogynecological patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether perineal hypermobility is an independent predictor of OD, as is the case for rectocele, enterocele and rectal intussusception. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 2447 women attending a tertiary urodynamic center between September 2011 and December 2016. The assessment included a structured interview, urodynamic testing, a clinical examination and 4D transperineal ultrasound. After exclusion of previous pelvic floor surgery and defined anatomical abnormalities of the anorectum, 796 patients were left for analysis. Perineal hypermobility was defined as rectal descent ≥ 15 mm below the symphysis pubis, determined in stored ultrasound volume datasets offline, using proprietary software, blinded to all other data. Any association between perineal hypermobility and symptoms of obstructed defecation was tested for by chi-square (X2) test. RESULTS: For the 796 patients analyzed, median age was 52 (range, 16-88) years with a mean BMI of 27 (range, 15-64) kg/m2. Average vaginal parity was two (range, 0-8). Reported OD symptoms in this group included sensation of incomplete emptying in 335 (42%), straining at stool in 300 (37%) and digitation in 83 (10%). At least one of those symptoms was reported by 424 (53%) women; 153 showed perineal hypermobility. There was no significant association between perineal hypermobility and OD symptoms on univariate testing. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of an independent association between perineal hypermobility and obstructed defecation.

Horizontal versus vertical plication of the rectovaginal septum in transperineal repair of anterior rectocele: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

AIM: Anterior rectocele is usually an asymptomatic condition in many women, yet it can be associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). Transperineal repair of rectocele (TPR) has been followed by variable rates of improvement in ODS. The present pilot randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the outcome of TPR with vertical plication (VP) of the rectovaginal septum compared to horizontal plication (HP). METHODS: Adult women with anterior rectocele were recruited to the study and were randomly allocated to one of two equal groups. The first group underwent TPR with VP of the rectovaginal septum and the second group underwent TPR with HP. The main outcome measures were improvement in ODS, recurrence of rectocele, complications and dyspareunia. RESULTS: The trial included 40 female patients with anterior rectocele. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative Wexner score. Complete cure and significant improvement in ODS symptoms were comparable after the two techniques. The reduction in rectocele size after HP was significantly greater than after VP (1.7 vs. 2.6, P < 0.0001). Significant improvement in dyspareunia was recorded after HP (P = 0.001) but not after VP (P = 0.1). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to operating time, complications and recurrence. CONCLUSION: VP and HP of the rectovaginal septum in TPR were associated with a comparable improvement in ODS symptoms and similar complication rates. HP was followed by a greater reduction in the rectocele size and greater improvement in dyspareunia than VP.

Does the presence of a true radiological rectocele increase the likelihood of symptoms of prolapse?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Posterior compartment prolapse is commonly due to a 'true' rectocele, i.e., a diverticulum of the rectal ampulla. This condition is associated with symptoms of obstructed defecation and may contribute to prolapse symptoms. We tested the hypothesis: 'A true rectocele is an independent predictor of symptoms of prolapse.' METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a urogynecology unit for symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction between September 2011 and June 2016. Assessment included a structured interview, POP-Q examination and 4D TLUS. Ultrasound volume data were acquired on Valsalva. Offline measurements were performed by analysis of stored volume data sets at a later date, blinded to all clinical data. RESULTS: One hundred six patients were excluded because of incomplete data. Of the remainder, Bp was the most distal point on POP-Q in 348. Statistical analysis was performed on this cohort. Mean age was 60 (33-86) years and mean BMI 31 (18-55) kg/m². One hundred fifty-three patients (44%) presented with symptoms of prolapse; 272 were diagnosed with a true rectocele on TLUS. Bp on POP-Q and true rectocele on TLUS were both significantly associated with prolapse symptoms; however, on multivariate analysis the latter became nonsignificant (p = 0.059). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed that the presence of a true rectocele on TLUS did not contribute significantly to symptoms of prolapse (AUC 0.66 for model with rectocele, AUC 0.65 without). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a true rectocele on TLUS does not seem to contribute substantially to the manifestation of clinical symptoms of prolapse.

Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Transvaginal Posterior Colporrhaphy in Management of Anterior Rectocele.

BACKGROUND: Management of rectocele is challenging. Treatment usually starts with conservative measures and may involve surgical intervention in non-responding patients. We compared the outcomes of transvaginal posterior colporrhaphy (PC) and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) in treatment of anterior rectocele. METHODS: Patients with anterior rectocele who underwent PC or LVMR were functionally assessed using Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) was used for clinical assessment, defecography for anatomic assessment, and manometry for physiologic assessment. In addition, quality of life was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 231 female patients with a mean age of 39 years were included to the study. One hundred fifty-nine underwent PC and 72 underwent LVMR. The LVMR group showed significantly a better functional outcome as compared with the PC group (p < 0.0001). The mean of CCCS at 1 year after LVMR was 6 ± 2.3 vs 9.2 ± 1.2 after PC. The mean of PISQ-12 at 1 year after LVMR was 39.3 ± 2.8 vs 35.8 ± 2.2 after PC. LVMR showed better anatomic correction by defecography, had significantly higher quality of life scores, and had a longer operative time as compared with PC, yet with comparable incidence of complications. CONCLUSION: PC and LVMR are both effective treatment options for treatment of rectocele. LVMR was associated with better anatomic correction and greater improvement in constipation, sexual symptoms, and quality of life compared with PC. Although LVMR had a longer operation time than PC, the complication rate of the two procedures was comparable.

Improvement in Outlet Obstructive Constipation Symptoms After Vaginal Stent Treatment for Rectocele.

Objective. The objective is to determine the possible improvement in outlet obstructive constipation symptoms after vaginal stent treatment for rectocele. Methods. Female patients with rectocele (n = 156) accompanied with outlet obstructive constipation were selected in this study. Longo's obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) questionnaire, rectoanal pressures, and rectal balloon expulsion (BET) were evaluated at baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6 months follow-up. Moreover, the side effects and the potential reasons for giving up treatment were also detected. Results. Vaginal stent significantly decreased the straining intensity, shortened the straining extensity time, decreased the use of laxatives, and alleviated the symptoms of incomplete evacuation (P < .05). The vaginal stent also increased the rectal pressure and shortened the balloon expulsion time (P < .05). Conclusions. As an effective, feasible, and safe procedure, the vaginal stent can be recommended as a treatment of choice for rectocele combined with outlet obstructive constipation.