Twin Vaginal Deliveries in Labor Rooms: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Twin vaginal deliveries (VDs) are often performed in the operating room (OR) given the theoretical risk of conversion to cesarean delivery (CD) for the aftercoming twin. We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of performing VDs for twin gestations in the labor and delivery room (LDR) versus OR. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-analysis model that compared the costs and effectiveness of two strategies of twin deliveries undergoing a trial of labor: (1) intended delivery in the LDR and 2) delivery in the OR. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess strength and validity of the model. Primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) defined as cost needed to gain 1 quality-adjusted life year (QALY). RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, where 7% of deliveries resulted in conversion to CD for twin B, attempting to deliver twins in the LDR was the most cost-effective strategy. For every QALY gained by delivering in the OR, 243,335 USD would need to be spent (ICER). In univariate sensitivity analyses, the most cost-effective strategy shifted to delivering in the OR when the following was true: (1) probability of successful VD was less than 86%, (2) probability of neonatal morbidity after emergent CD exceeded 3.5%, (3) cost of VD in an LDR exceeded 10,500 USD, (4) cost of CD was less than 10,000 USD, or (5) probability of neonatal death from emergent CD exceeded 2.8%. Assuming a willingness to pay of 100,000 USD per neonatal QALY gained, attempted VD in the LDR was cost effective in 51% of simulations in the Monte Carlo analysis. CONCLUSION: Twin VDs in the LDR are cost effective based on current neonatal outcome data, taking into account gestational age and associated morbidity. Further investigation is needed to elucidate impact of cost and outcomes on optimal utilization of resources. KEY POINTS: · Cost effectiveness of twin VDs in the LDR versus OR was assessed.. · Twin VDs in the LDR are cost effective based on current neonatal outcome data.. · Attempted VD in the LDR was cost effective in 51% of simulations in the Monte Carlo analysis..

Análisis con GRD: El egreso hospitalario indiferenciado de la maternidad no representa la complejidad de las pacientes con alto riesgo obstétrico / DRG analysis: undifferentiated hospital discharges of maternity does not represent the complexity of patients with high obstetric risk

INTRODUCCIÓN: La gestión actual de camas hospitalarias sigue un modelo de indiferenciación en el que existen camas quirúrgicas, médicas y de pacientes críticos. Las maternidades si bien no siguen este modelo, tienen egresos indiferenciados con pacientes que pueden egresar post parto o aún embarazadas (con patologías perinatales). OBJETIVO: Evaluar diferencias entre egresos con parto normal y aquellos con patologías de alto riesgo obstétrico (ARO) respecto a estancia media (EM) y el consumo de recursos cuantificado con el peso medio de los grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico (PMGRD). MÉTODO: Estudio transversal con egresos maternales periodo 2017-2018. Se usó Categoría Diagnóstica Mayor (CIE - 10) para definir dos grupos de egreso: 1. Con parto normal a término o 2. Con patología ARO. Se compararon 1.658 y 1.669 egresos del grupo 1 y 2 respectivamente. Las variables de resultado son EM y PMGRD. Se compararon variables cuantitativas con t de student y Kruskal Wallis. Se usó Odds Ratio con respectivo intervalo de confianza para evaluar asociación entre variables y regresión logística multivariada para ajustar asociación. RESULTADOS: La edad, proporción de gestantes tardías, EM y PMGRD fue mayor en los egresos ARO (p<0,05). Existe fuerte asociación de EM prolongada (>4 días) y PMGRD elevado (>0.3109) con los egresos ARO (ORa=3.75; IC95%=3.21-4.39 y ORa=1.28; IC95%=1.1-1.49 respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario diferenciar los egresos del servicio de maternidad porque los egresos de ARO muestran mayor complejidad. La evaluación del riesgo usando EM y PMGRD permite analizar con especificidad los egresos maternales para una mejor gestión de camas y del recurso humano.

INTRODUCTION: The current management of hospital beds in Chile follows an undifferentiation model in which there are surgical, medical and critical patient bed. Maternity hospitals although they do not follow this model, have undifferentiated discharges with patients who may leave poatpartum or still pregnant (with perinatal pathologies) OBJECTIVE: To assess differences between discharges with normal delivery and those with high obstetric risk pathologies (HOR) with respect to mean stay (MS) and the resource spending quantified with the average weight of the diagnosis related group (AWDRG). METHOD: Cross-sectional study with maternal discharges between 2017-2018 period. Major Diagnostic Category (ICD - 10) was used to define two discharge groups: 1. With normal term birth or 2. With HOR pathology. 1,658 and 1,669 egress from group 1 and 2 were compared respectively. The outcome variables are EM and AWDRG. Quantitative variables were compared with student t and Kruskal Wallis. Odds Ratio and respective confidence interval were used to evaluate association between variables and multivariate logistic regression to adjust association. RESULTS: Age, proportion of late pregnant women, MS and AWDRG was higher in HOR discharges (p <0.05). There is a strong association of prolonged MS (> 4 days) and elevated AWDRG (> 0.3109) with HOR discharges (ORa = 3.75; 95% CI 3.21-4.39 and ORa = 1.28; 95% CI 1.1-1.49 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to differentiate medical discharge of the maternity service because the HOR egress show greater complexity. The risk assessment using MS and AWDRG allows to analyze with specificity the maternal discharge for a better management of beds and human resources.

Strategies for Providing Low-Cost Water Immersion Therapy With Limited Resources.

At our university-affiliated medical center, a major renovation of the women's health and birthing unit resulted in the temporary loss of the permanent tub used for water immersion therapy during labor. Because 40 percent of the women in the nurse-midwifery practice utilize hydrotherapy, we undertook a rigorous search for an interim solution. We developed a safe and cost-effective strategy that can be easily replicated and utilized by others to provide hydrotherapy for laboring women.

A Systematic Review of the State of Economic Evaluation for Health Care in India.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Economic evaluations are one of the important tools in policy making for rational allocation of resources. Given the very low public investment in the health sector in India, it is critical that resources are used wisely on interventions proven to yield best results. Hence, we undertook this study to assess the extent and quality of evidence for economic evaluation of health-care interventions and programmes in India. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to search for published full economic evaluations pertaining to India and addressing a health-related intervention or programme. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ScienceDirect, and York CRD database and websites of important research agencies were identified to search for economic evaluations published from January 1980 to the middle of November 2014. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the studies based on Drummond and modelling checklist. RESULTS: Out of a total of 5013 articles enlisted after literature search, a total of 104 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The majority of these papers were cost-effectiveness studies (64%), led by a clinician or public-health professional (77%), using decision analysis-based methods (59%), published in an international journal (80%) and addressing communicable diseases (58%). In addition, 42% were funded by an international funding agency or UN/bilateral aid agency, and 30% focussed on pharmaceuticals. The average quality score of these full economic evaluations was 65.1%. The major limitation was the inability to address uncertainties involved in modelling as only about one-third of the studies assessed modelling structural uncertainties (33%), or ran sub-group analyses to account for heterogeneity (36.5%) or analysed methodological uncertainty (32%). CONCLUSION: The existing literature on economic evaluations in India is inadequate to feed into sound policy making. There is an urgent need to generate awareness within the government of how economic evaluation can inform and benefit policy making, and at the same time build capacity of health-care professionals in understanding the economic principles of health-care delivery system.

Implementing the Use of Chemical-Free Products in a Perinatal Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a process to identify, adopt, and increase individual awareness of the use of chemical-free products in perinatal hospital units and to develop leadership skills of the fellow/mentor pair through the Sigma Theta Tau International Maternal-Child Health Nurse Leadership Academy (STTI MCHNLA). DESIGN: Pretest/posttest quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary care 80-bed perinatal unit. PATIENTS: Mothers and newborns on perinatal unit. INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS: The chemical hazard ratings of products currently in use and new products were examined and compared. Chemical-free products were selected and introduced to the hospital system, and education programs were provided for staff and patients. We implemented leadership tools taught at the STTI MCHNLA to facilitate project success. Pre- and postproject evaluations were used to determine interest in the use of chemical-free products and satisfaction with use of the new products. Cost savings were measured. RESULTS: Products currently in use contained potentially harmful chemicals. New, chemical-free products were identified and adopted into practice. Participants were interested in using chemical-free products. Once new products were available, 71% of participants were positive about using them. The fellow and mentor experienced valuable leadership growth throughout the project. CONCLUSIONS: The change to chemical-free products has positioned the organization and partner hospitals as community leaders that set a health standard to reduce environmental exposure for patients, families, and staff. The fellow and mentor learned new skills to assist in practice changes in a large organization by using the tools shared in the STTI MCHNLA.

Eradicating reliance on free artificial milk.

Hospitals that set forth to obtain Baby-Friendly Hospital designation often face considerable challenges in implementing the purchase of formula and supplies at a fair market rate as outlined in the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. Some of the challenges include difficulty tracking products in use and volumes used and obtaining pricing information from manufacturers of artificial milk. We report on our experience with assessing these factors, with an example of calculations used to arrive at fair market pricing, which might benefit other institutions seeking Baby-Friendly Hospital designation.

Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth. DESIGN: Economic evaluation with individual level data from the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. SETTING: 142 of 147 trusts providing home birth services, 53 of 56 freestanding midwifery units, 43 of 51 alongside midwifery units, and a random sample of 36 of 180 obstetric units, stratified by unit size and geographical region, in England, over varying periods of time within the study period 1 April 2008 to 30 April 2010. PARTICIPANTS: 64,538 women at low risk of complications before the onset of labour. INTERVENTIONS: Planned birth in four alternative settings: at home, in freestanding midwifery units, in alongside midwifery units, and in obstetric units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost per adverse perinatal outcome avoided, adverse maternal morbidity avoided, and additional normal birth. The non-parametric bootstrap method was used to generate net monetary benefits and construct cost effectiveness acceptability curves at alternative thresholds for cost effectiveness. RESULTS: The total unadjusted mean costs were £1066, £1435, £1461, and £1631 for births planned at home, in freestanding midwifery units, in alongside midwifery units, and in obstetric units, respectively (equivalent to about €1274, $1701; €1715, $2290; €1747, $2332; and €1950, $2603). Overall, and for multiparous women, planned birth at home generated the greatest mean net benefit with a 100% probability of being the optimal setting across all thresholds of cost effectiveness when perinatal outcomes were considered. There was, however, an increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcome associated with planned birth at home in nulliparous low risk women, resulting in the probability of it being the most cost effective option at a cost effectiveness threshold of £20 000 declining to 0.63. With regards to maternal outcomes in nulliparous and multiparous women, planned birth at home generated the greatest mean net benefit with a 100% probability of being the optimal setting across all thresholds of cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: For multiparous women at low risk of complications, planned birth at home was the most cost effective option. For nulliparous low risk women, planned birth at home is still likely to be the most cost effective option but is associated with an increase in adverse perinatal outcomes.

[Extreme prematurity--medical and social problem].

The survival rate for extremely preterm newborns born at the threshold of viability (25 or fewer completed weeks of gestation) improved in the early 1990s, largely as the result of a greater use of assisted ventilation in the delivery room and surfactant therapy. This led WHO in 1993 to define the perinatal period as commencing at 22 completed weeks of gestation. Infants born at 22-28 weeks gestation have been termed as having "threshold viability", though in developed countries this term is more often used in reference to infants of < 26 weeks. However, this improvement in survival has not been associated with an equal improvement in morbidity The increasing potential risk of residual disability or early death associated with decreasing gestational age raises serious medical, social and ethical problems in respect to appropriate management. These include whether elective delivery for fetal indication is appropriate or whether intensive care should be provided following delivery.

El renacer de una sala de partos / A labour room is re-born

El Servicio de Urgencias Gineco-Obstétricas, conocido por “Sala de Partos” es un servicio con una actividad asistencial muy marcada por los pacientes obstétricas. También, existe un grupo notable de pacientes ginecológicas, a pesar de que esta última actividad representa un porcentaje mucho menor. El servicio tiene una voluntad universitaria muy acusada, aunque la investigadora se encuentra obstaculizada por la organización actual y por el gran volumen asistencial. La “Sala de Partos” (SP), está muy orientada a la demanda de la puerta de urgencias y a todas las intervenciones que de éstas derivan. La Dirección del Servicio de Obstetricia, se plantea la creación de una SP con mayor autonomía de gestión, orientada a un modelo organizativo basado en el proceso asistencia. En este caso se va analizar la estructura y la actividad e la SP actual y posteriormente se discutirán oportunidades de mejora en la gestión clínica y la eventualidad de la fusión o no con las urgencias ginecológicas (AU)

The obstetrics and gynecology emergency service, Known as the “Labour Ward”, is a service whose nursing care is highly marked by obstetrics patients. The “Labour Ward” is oriented to emergency demands and all the interventions deriving from this. This work analyses the structure and activity of the current Labour Ward and discusses opportunities for improving clinical management and the possibility of its fusion with gynecological emergencies (AU)

Perinatal patient safety from the perspective of nurse executives: a round table discussion.

Six nurse executives across the United States discussed issues related to perinatal patient safety. Gaps in communication were identified as one of the biggest challenges facing nurse executives. Other issues included expectations of regulators and accreditors, the pressure for productivity with limited resources and staffing, and undercapitalized technology versus safety and staff competence. Each nurse executive discussed a perinatal patient safety initiative implemented recently in her organization. If costs were not an issue, construction of facilities, adoption of electronic documentation, and adding positions to help assure patient safety were at the top of their wish lists. Patient safety continues as the number one priority for nurse executives.

Single room maternity care: perinatal outcomes, economic costs,and physician preferences.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare perinatal outcomes and costs of care among women giving birth in a single room maternity care (SRMC) setting versus a traditional delivery suite or postpartum setting; and (2) to report on physicians' responses to the SRMC environment. METHODS: Among women who were determined to be at "low risk" for intrapartum complications through the use of a triage tool, the outcomes of those receiving care in the new SRMC unit were compared to the outcomes of those cared for in the traditional delivery suite and postpartum modules. Total costs of the entire maternity service before and after implementation of SRMC were also compared. Physicians were surveyed about the adequacy of the physical environment. RESULTS: Rates of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes were similar in both groups, with the exception of less frequent electronic fetal monitoring in the SRMC setting. Caesarean section rates were lower than expected in both groups. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the SRMC group (55.1 +/- 26.5 days vs. 61.0 +/- 24.3 days; <.001). Staff positions in the hospital were reduced from 206 to 193.7. Direct costs for women of similar acuity (resource intensity weightings) were reduced by 24% (1809 dollars vs. 2377 dollars). The proportion of physicians preferring SRMC to the traditional setting increased from 45.8% at 6 months to 78.7% at 12 months after implementation of the SRMC model (P =.003). CONCLUSION: SRMC is a model of obstetric care for women at low risk for intrapartum complications, offering cost savings without affecting perinatal outcomes, and is well accepted by physicians.

Maternal and infant health prepayment schemes in Shandong, China: a survey of demand and supply.

Maternal and infant prepayment schemes (MIPSs) appeared in China in the early 1980s, as a way of helping women to set aside adequate funds for childbirth. The responsibility for design was devolved to the county level, and many different approaches have been applied. For this and other reasons, there has been no consensus on important matters such as the level of prepayment, the range of covered services, and whether township health centres or family planning stations should operate the schemes. We aimed to clarify some of the uncertainty by conducting combined analyses of cost, willingness to pay, and willingness to supply. We used structured survey instruments to interview 4271 households with children aged under one year, and 18 township health institutions. Our analyses suggest that the ideal prepayment should be higher and the range of covered services should be wider than the current average, and that health centres rather family planning stations should operate the schemes.

DSH adjustment controversies continue.

Some Medicare intermediaries are reducing the disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payment by excluding labor/delivery room days and dual-eligible days from the DSH calculation. Some intermediaries are excluding maternity patients who are in a labor/delivery room at the census-taking hour unless the patient previously occupied a routine bed. Intermediaries also are excluding Medicaid-eligible days attributable to patients who are not entitled to payment under Medicare Part A. These adjustments are of questionable legal validity and hospitals should protect their rights to appeal these issues.

Optimal number of beds and occupancy to minimize staffing costs in an obstetrical unit?

PURPOSE: We describe how the science of analyzing patient arrival and discharge data can be used to determine the optimal number of staffed OB beds to minimize labour costs. METHODS: The number of staffed beds represents a balance between having as few staffed beds as possible to care properly for parturients vs having enough capacity to assure available staff for new admissions. The times of admission and discharge of patients from the OB unit can be used to calculate an average census. From this average census, and the properties of the Poisson distribution, the optimal number of staffed beds can be estimated. This calculation requires specification of the risk of having all in-house and on-call staff caring for patients, such that additional staff are unavailable should another parturient arrive. As an example, patient admission and discharge times were obtained for 777 successive patients cared for at an obstetrical unit. The numbers of patients present in the OB unit each two-hour period were calculated and analyzed statistically. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There was variation in the average census among hours of the day and days of the week. Poisson distributions fit the data for each of four periods throughout the week. Simply benchmarking the current average occupancy and comparing it to a desired occupancy would have been inadequate as this neglected consideration of the risk of being unable to appropriately care for an additional patient. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal number of beds and occupancy of an OB unit to minimize staffing costs can be determined using straightforward statistical methods.