From CGRP to PACAP, VIP, and Beyond: Unraveling the Next Chapters in Migraine Treatment.

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder that can be debilitating for individuals and society. Current research focuses on finding effective analgesics and management strategies for migraines by targeting specific receptors and neuropeptides. Nonetheless, newly approved calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have a 50% responder rate ranging from 27 to 71.0%, whereas CGRP receptor inhibitors have a 50% responder rate ranging from 56 to 71%. To address the need for novel therapeutic targets, researchers are exploring the potential of another secretin family peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), as a ground-breaking treatment avenue for migraine. Preclinical models have revealed how PACAP affects the trigeminal system, which is implicated in headache disorders. Clinical studies have demonstrated the significance of PACAP in migraine pathophysiology; however, a few clinical trials remain inconclusive: the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide 1 receptor mAb, AMG 301 showed no benefit for migraine prevention, while the PACAP ligand mAb, Lu AG09222 significantly reduced the number of monthly migraine days over placebo in a phase 2 clinical trial. Meanwhile, another secretin family peptide vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is gaining interest as a potential new target. In light of recent advances in PACAP research, we emphasize the potential of PACAP as a promising target for migraine treatment, highlighting the significance of exploring PACAP as a member of the antimigraine armamentarium, especially for patients who do not respond to or contraindicated to anti-CGRP therapies. By updating our knowledge of PACAP and its unique contribution to migraine pathophysiology, we can pave the way for reinforcing PACAP and other secretin peptides, including VIP, as a novel treatment option for migraines.

Substance P inhibits bicarbonate secretion from guinea pig pancreatic ducts by modulating an anion exchanger.

The stimulatory pathways controlling HCO3- secretion by the pancreatic ductal epithelium are well described. However, only a few data are available concerning inhibitory mechanisms, which may play an important role in the physiological control of the pancreas. The aim of this study was to investigate the cellular mechanism by which substance P (SP) inhibits pancreatic ductal HCO3- secretion. Small intra/interlobular ducts were isolated from the pancreas of guinea pigs. During overnight culture the ducts seal to form a closed sac. Transmembrane HCO3- fluxes were calculated from changes in intracellular pH (measured using the pH-sensitive dye BCECF) and the buffering capacity of the cells. We found that secretin can stimulate HCO3- secretion in guinea pig pancreatic ducts about fivefold and that this effect could be totally blocked by SP. The inhibitory effect of SP was relieved by spantide, an SP receptor antagonist. SP had no effect on the activity of basolateral Na+-HCO3- cotransporters and Na+/H+ exchangers. However, the peptide did inhibit a Cl--dependent HCO3- efflux (secretory) mechanism, most probably the Cl-/HCO3 exchanger on the apical membrane of the duct cell.

Silencing of secretin receptor function by dimerization with a misspliced variant secretin receptor in ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Secretin receptors that are key for regulation of healthy pancreatic ductal epithelial cells have been reported to be functionally absent on ductal pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Here, we examine the possible presence and function of molecular forms of the secretin receptor in pancreatic cancer cell lines and in primary tumors. Surprisingly, reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing demonstrated wild-type secretin receptor mRNA in each of four cell lines and three primary tumors. Lack of biological response to nanomolar concentrations of secretin was best explained by the demonstrated coexpression of a second and predominant transcript in each of the cell lines and tumors. This represented a variant of the secretin receptor in which the third exon was spliced out to eliminate residues 44-79 from the NH(2)-terminal tail. This spliceoform has only recently been recognized in a rare gastrinoma, where it was incapable of binding secretin or signaling, and possessed dominant-negative activity to suppress hormone action at the wild-type secretin receptor (1). Overexpression of wild-type secretin receptor in Panc-1 cells driven by transfection of fully processed cDNA resulted in normal responsiveness to low concentrations of secretin, establishing the ability of these cells to produce a receptor capable of normal biosynthesis, trafficking, and signaling. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer demonstrated that the variant receptor could form a heterodimer with wild-type receptor, providing a molecular mechanism for its dominant-negative activity. This suggests that missplicing is responsible for expression of a secretin receptor variant having the ability to suppress the function of wild-type receptor by a direct interaction. In 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays in receptor-bearing Chinese hamster ovary cells, the secretin receptor was shown to have growth-inhibitory effects. Suppression of this activity in pancreatic carcinoma might, therefore, facilitate tumor growth and progression of this aggressive neoplasm.

Endothelin-1 inhibits secretin-stimulated ductal secretion by interacting with ETA receptors on large cholangiocytes.

We studied the expression of endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptors (ETA and ETB) and the effects of ET-1 on cholangiocyte secretion. The effects of ET-1 on cholangiocyte secretion were assessed in normal and bile duct-ligated (BDL) rats by measuring 1) basal and secretin-induced choleresis in vivo, 2) secretin receptor gene expression and cAMP levels in small and large cholangiocytes, and 3) luminal expansion in response to secretin in intrahepatic bile duct units (IBDU). ETA and ETB receptors were expressed by small and large cholangiocytes. ET-1 had no effect on basal bile flow or bicarbonate secretion in normal or BDL rats but decreased secretin-induced bicarbonate-rich choleresis in BDL rats. ET-1 decreased secretin receptor gene expression and secretin-stimulated cAMP synthesis in large cholangiocytes and secretin-induced luminal expansion in IBDU from normal or BDL rats. The inhibitory effects of ET-1 on secretin-induced cAMP synthesis and luminal duct expansion were blocked by specific inhibitors of the ETA (BQ-610) receptor. ET-1 inhibits secretin-induced ductal secretion by decreasing secretin receptor and cAMP synthesis, two important determinants of ductal secretion.

Secretin inhibits gastric acid secretion via a vagal afferent pathway in rats.

Secretin is an enterogastrone that inhibits gastric acid secretion and motility. Recently, it was reported that secretin inhibited gastric emptying via a capsaicin (Cap)-sensitive vagal afferent pathway. However, a possible role of the sensory afferent pathway in secretin-inhibited acid secretion has not been clarified. We investigated whether or not the acid secretion suppressed by secretin is modulated by a vagal and/or splanchnic afferent pathway in rats. Subdiaphragmatic perivagal (PV) or periceliac ganglionic (PCG) application of Cap (10 mg/ml) or vehicle was performed in both conscious and anesthetized rats 2 wk before experiments. Bilateral vagotomy was performed in some conscious rats 5 days before studies. Pentagastrin was administered intravenously at 0.6 microg . kg-1 . h-1. Secretin (20 pmol . kg-1 . h-1 iv) or 0.03 N HCl (4.32 ml/h id) was infused in conscious rats with gastric cannulas or anesthetized rats with ligation of the pylorus, respectively. A rabbit antisecretin serum was injected in some anesthetized rats before duodenal acidification. Secretin significantly inhibited pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion by 63% (P < 0.01), which was abolished by both vagotomy and PV treatment of Cap in conscious rats. In anesthetized rats, duodenal infusion of 0.03 N HCl suppressed pentagastrin-induced acid secretion by 59.4% (P < 0.01), which was reversed not only by antisecretin serum but also by PV application of Cap. However, PCG treatment with Cap did not influence the inhibition by secretin or duodenal acidification in either awake or anesthetized rats. These results indicate that the inhibition by secretin of pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion is mediated by a Cap-sensitive vagal afferent pathway but not via a splanchnic afferent pathway in rats.

Gastrin inhibits secretin-induced ductal secretion by interaction with specific receptors on rat cholangiocytes.

We assessed the effect of gastrin on ductal secretion in normal and bile duct-ligated (BDL) rats. The effect of gastrin on ductal secretion was examined in the presence of proglumide, a specific antagonist for gastrin receptor (GR). We isolated pure cholangiocytes from normal and BDL rats and assessed gastrin effects on secretin receptor (SR) gene expression and intracellular adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) levels. We examined the presence of GR mRNA in cholangiocytes by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In normal or BDL rats, gastrin produced no changes in spontaneous bile secretion. Simultaneous infusion of gastrin inhibited secretin-induced choleresis and bicarbonate output in BDL rats. In the presence of proglumide gastrin did not inhibit secretin-induced choleresis in BDL rats. Gastrin decreased in cholangiocytes from BDL rats 1) SR gene expression and 2) secretin-induced cAMP levels. With the use of RT-PCR, GR mRNA was detected in cholangiocytes. Similar to what is shown for secretin and somatostatin, we propose that the opposing effects of secretin and gastrin on cholangiocyte secretory activity regulate ductal secretion in rats.

Interactions between secretin and acetylcholine in the regulation of fluid secretion by isolated rat pancreatic ducts.

1. Interlobular ducts were isolated from the rat pancreas and maintained in short-term tissue culture. Fluid secretion from these isolated ducts was measured using micropuncture techniques, intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) by fura-2 microspectrofluorimetry, and cyclic AMP by radioimmunoassay. 2. Applying secretin and ACh simultaneously to ducts caused either a stimulation or an inhibition of fluid secretion depending on the doses employed. 3. The inhibitory effect of secretin and ACh could be relieved by atropine, and by the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors staurosporine and 1-(5-isoquinolinylsulphonyl)-2-methyl-piperazine (H-7). 4. Activation of PKC by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and phorbol 12, 13-dibutyrate (PDBu) inhibited secretin-evoked fluid secretion. 5. ACh and TPA also inhibited fluid secretion stimulated by the adenylate cyclase activator, forskolin. 6. Neither secretin nor the PKC activators and inhibitors had any effect on either the increase in [Ca2+]i evoked by ACh or the increase in intracellular cyclic AMP evoked by secretin and forskolin. 7. We conclude that the inhibitory effect of combined doses of secretin and ACh on ductal fluid secretion is probably mediated by PKC at a point in the secretory mechanism distal to the generation of intracellular messengers.

Somatostatin inhibits secretin-induced ductal hypercholeresis and exocytosis by cholangiocytes.

Previous work from our laboratory has implicated hormone-induced plasma membrane movement (i.e., endo- and exocytosis) in water and electrolyte transport by the epithelial cells that line the ducts in the liver (i.e., cholangiocytes). To further explore the cellular mechanisms regulating ductal bile secretion, we infused somatostatin and/or secretin intravenously into rats 2 wk after either bile duct ligation (BDL), a procedure that induces selective proliferation of cholangiocytes, or sham surgery and measured bile flow and biliary constituents. We also determined the effect of somatostatin on basal and secretin-induced exocytosis by purified cholangiocytes isolated from rat liver after BDL. Finally, we studied the expression of the somatostatin receptor gene by both ribonuclease (RNase) protection and nuclear run-on assays using cDNA encoding for two subtypes of the somatostatin receptor gene (i.e., SSTR1 and SSTR2). In vivo, somatostatin infusion caused a dose-dependent bicarbonate-poor decrease (57% maximal decrease below baseline; P < 0.05) in bile flow in BDL but not in sham-operated rats; in contrast, secretin caused a dose-dependent bicarbonate-rich choleresis (228% maximal increase above baseline; P < 0.05) in BDL but not in sham-operated rats. Simultaneous or prior infusion of somatostatin inhibited the secretin-induced hypercholeresis in BDL rats. In vitro, somatostatin had no effect on basal exocytosis by cholangiocytes isolated from BDL rats; however, somatostatin inhitibed (88% maximal inhibition; P < 0.05) secretin-induced exocytosis by cholangiocytes in a dose-dependent fashion. In addition, somatostatin inhibited secretin-induced increases in levels of adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) in cholangiocytes isolated from BDL rats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acid secretion during indomethacin therapy. Effect of misoprostol.

Secretin is an important physiologic regulator of gastric acid and pancreatic bicarbonate secretion. Endogenous prostaglandins play an important intermediary role, because indomethacin pretreatment prevents the physiological actions of secretin. Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analog used for the prevention of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulceration. This study sought to determine whether cotherapy with misoprostol reverses the NSAID-induced blockade of secretin's inhibition of human gastric acid secretion. Seven healthy volunteers were studied. Gastric acid secretion was measured during the basal, pentagastin-stimulated and intravenous secretin--inhibited states. The studies were then repeated after 3 days of oral indomethacin (50 mg p.o. t.i.d. for 10 doses) with and without concomitant misoprostol (200 micrograms q.i.d. for 13 doses). Exogenous secretin reduced pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion by 35%, and this inhibition was reduced to 9% during indomethacin treatment (p < 0.05). Cotherapy with misoprostol during indomethacin treatment did not restore secretin's inhibition of gastric acid secretion; paradoxically, during secretin administration, acid secretion increased. When subjects received misoprostol treatment only, secretin failed to inhibit gastric acid secretion. We conclude that during indomethacin treatment, cotherapy with misoprostol cannot restore the inhibitory action of secretin to inhibit gastric acid secretion. These results suggest that PGE1 is an unlikely intermediate in secretin's physiological action. Although misoprostol can prevent NSAID-induced ulcers, it does not ameliorate all physiological perturbations induced by cyclooxygenase inhibition.

Aspirin inhibits secretagogue-stimulated and postprandial pancreatic exocrine secretion in conscious rats.

The effect of salicylate and nonsalicylate antiinflammatory drugs and prostaglandins (PGs) on pancreatic exocrine secretion are controversial. We studied the effect of aspirin (ASA) on secretin- and cholecystokinin (CCK)- or meal-stimulated pancreatic secretion. The interrelation between ASA, PG, and pancreatic exocrine secretion was also investigated. Conscious rats with chronic duodenal, pancreatic, and biliary cannulas received secretin (5 pmol/kg/h, i.v.) and CCK (56 pmol/kg/h) or a meal with administration of cimetidine (20 mg/kg/h, i.v.), ASA (1.2, 12, or 60 mumol/h, i.v.), Salicylic acid (SA) (1.2, 12, or 60 mumol/h, i.v.), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (10 micrograms/kg/h), or indomethacin (2 mg/kg) was given, respectively. Pancreatic flow volume, bicarbonate, and protein were determined every 15 min. An inhibitor, 1-(5-isoquinolinylsulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine (H-7) (36 micrograms/kg/h) and an activator, phorbol ester (12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol 13-acetate, TPA) (100 ng/kg/h) were used for evaluation of the role of protein kinase C on basal and secretagogue-stimulated pancreatic secretion. ASA, but not SA inhibited the secretin- and CCK-stimulated pancreatic secretion including volume, bicarbonate, and protein in a dose-dependent manner without affecting basal pancreatic secretion. ASA and indomethacin suppressed meal-stimulated pancreatic secretion up to 83.8%. PGE2 significantly inhibited the secretin- and CCK-stimulated pancreatic secretion which was further suppressed by the concomitant ASA infusion. Modulation of protein kinase C failed to affect pancreatic secretion. The data indicate that ASA inhibits both secretin- and CCK-stimulated pancreatic secretion by a mechanism independent of prostaglandin biosynthesis inhibition.

Alterations of the pancreatic secretory responses to secretin and to the ionophore A23187 by reserpine: a calcium-mediated phenomenon?

This study was undertaken to further characterize the secretory response of the rat pancreas after reserpine treatment. Rats were given reserpine (1 mg kg-1 day-1 i.p.) or vehicle for 7 days. To distinguish between specific effects of reserpine and those related to secondary malnutrition caused by the drug, the secretory response of a group of pair-fed (PF) animals to reserpine was also investigated. Amylase release from dispersed pancreatic acini, prepared from control (C), PF and reserpine-treated (R) rats were used to evaluate functional secretory capacity. Reserpine and pair-feeding caused reduced responses of pancreatic acini to secretin. The pair-feeding-altered secretin response was greatly improved by increasing extracellular Ca2+ concentration, whereas a slight improvement was noticed in the R group. Reserpine significantly reduced the secretory response to the ionophore A23187 at concentrations above 5 x 10(-7) M in 1.25 mM Ca2+; in 2.5 mM Ca2+, the response to the ionophore was significantly higher in the R group than in C at all ionophore concentrations. Furthermore, at 2 x 10(-7) M ionophore, the secretory response to secretin in the R group became significantly higher than that in the C group but comparable to that of the control+ionophore. In conclusion, reserpine affects the secretory response to secretin as did pre-exposure of pancreatic acini to a high concentration of carbamylcholine. The modified secretory response to the ionophore following reserpine treatment indicates that reserpine may act as a 'Ca2+ entry mechanism' antagonist which may explain the partial reduction in the secretin response.

Does acetylsalicylic acid interfere with stimulated pancreatic secretion? An experimental study in the rat.

To evaluate the effect of the prostaglandin inhibitor acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) on rat exocrine pancreas secretion, three groups of rats were administered ASA by infusion: Groups 1-3, 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg body wt, respectively; Group 4 received saline. Twenty minutes later these ASA-pretreated groups were given intraarterial secretin (18 CU/kg) and cholecystokinin (CCK) (18 micrograms/kg). In an additional three groups of seven rats each, saline solution rather than secretin-CCK was given after ASA pretreatment. Pancreatic juice was collected every 10 min by means of a chronic pancreatic fistula. Bicarbonate and protein concentrations were measured and variations in outputs observed. No significant variations were found in the bicarbonate concentrations and outputs of rats with different types of pharmacological treatment, while protein concentrations and outputs were found to vary with time and type of experiment. There was, however, no interaction between these two variables. At lower ASA dosages, the bicarbonate and protein concentrations and outputs of secretin-CCK-stimulated rats were higher than the basal values and the levels of rats without hormonal stimulation. At higher dosages, no difference was found between the two groups. In conclusion, ASA seems to interfere with stimulated pancreatic exocrine secretion of proteins, even when its effect on bicarbonate concentration is factored in, and its effect seems to be present at the highest dosages considered in the study. Among the various hypotheses that may explain this phenomenon, an antagonizing effect of ASA on secretin-CCK action should be the first to be considered.

Dual actions of glucagon: direct stimulation and indirect inhibition of dog pancreatic secretion.

The secretory actions of glucagon on the exocrine pancreas were examined using two kinds of canine preparations. In the isolated and blood-perfused dog pancreas with venous drainage, i.a. injection of glucagon did not inhibit secretin/cholecystokinin-octapeptide (CCK-8)-stimulated pancreatic secretion, but instead dose dependently enhanced both basal and stimulated pancreatic secretion. Glucagon-induced increase of pancreatic secretion was potentiated by 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine. In contrast, i.v. bolus injection of glucagon (3 and 10 nmol/kg) first augmented transiently then suppressed secretin/CCK-8-stimulated pancreatic secretion while simultaneously increasing circulating plasma somatostatin immunoreactivity from 14.2 to 214 fmol/ml in anesthetized intact dogs. The inhibition of secretin/CCK-8-stimulated pancreatic secretion and elevation of plasma somatostatin immunoreactivity induced by glucagon were comparable with those due to somatostatin-14. Thus, these results indicate that glucagon stimulates pancreatic secretion directly; the inhibitory action of glucagon is indirect and appears to be related to a rise in the circulating level of somatostatin immunoreactivity.

[Inhibitory effect of somatostatin analogue, SMS 201-995, on secretin-stimulated exocrine secretion in isolated perfused rat pancreas].

In order to clarify the effect of somatostatin of the ductal secretion of the exocrine pancreas, we measured pancreatic juice and protein secretion stimulated with 10 pM secretin and/or 10 pM cholecystokinin (CCK) in the presence or absence of somatostatin analogue, SMS 201-995 (SMS) utilizing the isolated perfused pancreas of rats. SMS significantly inhibited both pancreatic juice flow and protein output elicited by 10 pM secretin without affecting basal secretion. The inhibitory effect of SMS was dose-dependent and maximal inhibition was observed with 1-10 nM. Half-inhibitory dose of SMS for juice secretion was 140 pM. Because CCK is thought to potentiate secretin action on the ductal system, we examined the effect of SMS on pancreatic secretory response to 10 pM secretin in combination with 10 pM CCK. In the experimental system we used, the amounts of pancreatic juice and protein secreted during a 30-min stimulation with secretin and CCK were additive. SMS inhibited both pancreatic juice and protein secretion to the level comparable with that obtained with either stimulus and SMS. SMS had no effect on CCK-stimulated pancreatic juice secretion but significantly inhibited protein output. The present study demonstrated, therefore, that SMS inhibits ductal secretion in response to physiological concentration of secretin.

Protective effects of therapy with a protease and xanthine oxidase inhibitor in short form pancreatic biliary obstruction and ischemia in rats.

The current study was done to evaluate the effects of short term (60 minutes) pancreatic biliary duct obstruction (PBDO) with intraductal hypertension (IDH) stimulated by secretin (0.2 clinical unit per kilogram per hour) and caerulein (0.2 microgram per kilogram per hour) plus 30 minutes of temporary pancreatic ischemia (ISCH) produced by ligation of celiac and superior mesenteric artery on the exocrine pancreas and protective effects of a new potent protease inhibitor, ONO3307 in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitor, allopurinol, in this multifactor related model of acute pancreatitis in rats. Twelve hours after PBDO with IDH plus ISCH, we observed hyperamylasemia (23 +/- 3 units per milliliter) (p < 0.01); moderate pancreatic histologic changes; pancreatic edema (water content--81 +/- 2 percent) (p < 0.02), as well as the impaired amylase (2,889 +/- 328 units per kilogram per hour) (p < 0.01) and cathepsin B output (7 +/- 3 units per kilogram per hour) (p < 0.01) into the pancreatic juice of rats stimulated by caerulein (control group--serum amylase levels, 6 +/- 1 units per milliliter; pancreatic water content, 74 +/- 1 percent. Furthermore, PBDO with IDH plus ISCH caused the redistribution of lysosomal enzyme from lysosomal fraction (12 kilo times gravity pellet; 40 +/- 3 percent; p < 0.01) to zymogen fraction (1.3 kilo times gravity pellet; 38 +/- 3 percent; p < 0.01) (control group--12 kilo times gravity pellet, 59 +/- 2 percent; 1.3 kilo times gravity pellet, 24 +/- 2 percent) and the impaired pancreatic adenylate energy metabolism (0.79 +/- 0.02, p < 0.02) (control group--energy charge equals 0.88 +/- 0.01). Only PBDO with IDH caused no significant changes. Although only ONO3307 or allopurinol therapy showed the partial significant protective effects against pancreatic injuries, improving serum amylase levels, the administration of ONO3307 in combination therapy with allopurinol showed almost complete protective effects against the pancreatic injuries induced by PBDO with IDH plus ISCH (serum amylase levels, 9 +/- 2 units per milliliter; pancreatic water content, 76 +/- 2 percent; amylase and cathepsin B output, 7,127 +/- 946 and 18 +/- 3 units per kilogram per hour; 1.3 kilo times gravity pellet, 28 +/- 2 percent; 12 kilo times gravity pellet, 54 +/- 2 percent, and energy charge equals 0.85 +/- 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

In vitro inhibitory effect of somatostatin on secretin action in exocrine pancreas of rats.

BACKGROUND: Exocrine pancreatic function is influenced by pancreatic islet hormones. Although the existence of somatostatin receptors has been shown on pancreatic acinar cells, the in vitro effect of somatostatin on exocrine secretory function has not been established. METHODS: Using isolated rat pancreatic acini, the effect of somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 (SMS) and somatostatin 14 (S-14) on amylase release, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production, and hormone binding were determined. RESULTS: SMS inhibited the potentiating effect of secretin on amylase response to cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory effects of SMS and S-14 were similar on a molar basis and were observed when vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) but not 8bromoadenosine 3':5' cyclic monophosphate was used instead of secretin and when carbachol, bombesin, A23187, and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate were used instead of CCK-8. SMS inhibited secretin-induced cAMP production, and the dose-inhibition curve for cAMP was similar to that for amylase release. SMS had no influence on 125I-secretin and 125I-VIP binding. CONCLUSIONS: Somatostatin acts directly on acinar cells and inhibits secretin potentiation of secretory response in part by inhibiting secretin-induced cAMP production.

The inhibitory effect of octreotide on exocrine pancreatic secretion in conscious dogs.

The effects of somatostatin and its analogue, octreotide (SMS201-995), on pancreatic secretion and gastroduodenal motility in response to secretin and cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) were studied in five conscious dogs. Intravenous infusions of octreotide or somatostatin (1 nmol kg-1 h-1) inhibited periodic pancreatic secretion and the potentiation of fluid and bicarbonate responses to secretin at 60 ng kg-1 h-1 associated with the interdigestive gastroduodenal motility peaks (migrating motor complex). Pancreatic fluid and bicarbonate responses to secretin (125-1,000 ng kg-1 h-1) were not inhibited by octreotide or somatostatin. Pancreatic protein and enzyme responses to secretin and CCK-8 at 50 and 100, but not at 200 and 400, ng kg-1 h-1 were inhibited by octreotide and somatostatin. These inhibitory effects were similar to those of atropine (25 micrograms kg-1 h-1). The inhibition of protein responses to CCK-8 (100 ng kg-1 h-1) was dependent on octreotide dose. It is concluded that both octreotide and somatostatin, like atropine, inhibit interdigestive pancreatic secretion and the responses to small, but not large, doses of secretin and CCK-8 in conscious dogs.

[Inhibitory effect of somatostatin analog, SMS 201-995, on exocrine secretion from isolated rat pancreatic acini].

In vitro effect of somatostatin analog, SMS 201-995 (SMS), on pancreatic exocrine secretion was investigated using isolated rat pancreatic acini. SMS had no effect on basal, cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8)- or secretin-stimulated amylase release. SMS inhibited pancreatic amylase release in response to simultaneous stimulation with secretin and CCK-8 in a dose-dependent manner. Significant inhibition was observed with 10 nM SMS and maximal inhibition with 0.1-1 microM SMS. Amylase release in response to the combination of 100 pM CCK-8, 1 nM secretin and 0.1-1 microM SMS was similar to that to 100 pM CCK-8 alone. Secretin significantly increased acinar cell cAMP content. SMS partially inhibited an increase in cAMP content induced by secretin. The present study has demonstrated, therefore, that SMS directly inhibits the potentiating effect of secretin on exocrine secretion in part by inhibiting an increase in secretin-induced cAMP accumulation in rat pancreatic acinar cells.

Role of endogenous secretin and cholecystokinin in intraduodenal oleic acid-induced inhibition of gastric acid secretion in rats.

We investigated a possible role of endogenous secretin and cholecystokinin (CCK) in inhibition of gastric acid secretion induced by intraduodenal administration of oleic acid in rats. Intraduodenal administration of oleic acid emulsion in a dose of 1 mmol/hr resulted in significant inhibition of gastric acid secretion stimulated by intravenous infusion of pentagastrin (0.3 micrograms/kg/hr), and this was accompanied by an increase in the plasma concentration of both secretin and CCK, from 1.2 +/- 0.08 pM and 20.6 +/- 1.2 pM to 4.3 +/- 0.18 pM and 31.6 +/- 0.9 pM, respectively (P less than 0.001). Intravenous infusion of secretin (0.05 CU/kg/hr) inhibited pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion, but CCK-8 (0.03 micrograms/kg/hr) failed, although intravenous infusion of secretin and CCK in those doses produced plasma levels comparable to the levels achieved in response to oleic acid administration. Furthermore, the oleic acid-induced suppression of gastric acid secretion was blocked significantly by intravenous injection of rabbit anti-secretin serum (0.1 ml), but not by intravenous infusion of a CCK-receptor antagonist, CR 1409 (5 mg/kg/hr). Thus, the results of this study indicate that endogenous secretin rather than CCK is involved in the hormonal mechanism regulating the inhibition of gastric acid secretion by intestinal fat in rats.

Route of access of secretin into rabbit duodenal lumen during acid perfusion.

The route of entry of immunoreactive secretin into the duodenal lumen during acid perfusion is unknown. Possible sites include paracellular diffusion from the extracellular space, transapical secretion from S cells, or leaching from cells damaged by the perfusate. Antisecretin in the extracellular space and interstitium should reduce access due to paracellular diffusion from the interstitium without significantly affecting secretion or leaching. We therefore studied the effect of intravenous antisecretin antibody on luminal secretin output. Two groups of rabbits received either intravenous normal rabbit serum (controls) or antisecretin antibody, before perfusing a closed segment of duodenum with hydrochloric acid. Preliminary experiments established that duodenal perfusion with HCl concentrations below 0.025N produced no apparent mucosal damage on electron microscopy. HCl concentrations above this significantly damaged the mucosa. In the control group, perfusion with 0.01N, 0.0125N, and 0.025N hydrochloric acid resulted in a dose-dependent increase in secretin in the perfusate. Secretin output was markedly reduced in the group injected with secretin antibody. Antisecretin antibody significantly reduced bile flow at all levels of HCl concentration in the duodenal perfusate. These data suggest that luminal secretin is probably derived from the interstitium and travels to the lumen across narrow paracellular channels.