Transcriptional control of the MUC16 promoter facilitates follicle-stimulating hormone peptide-conjugated shRNA nanoparticle-mediated inhibition of ovarian carcinoma in vivo.

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among gynecological malignancies. The high mortality rate has not been significantly reduced despite advances in surgery and chemotherapy. Gene therapy shows therapeutic potential, but several key issues must be resolved before clinical application. To minimize toxicity in noncancerous tissues, tumor-specific ligands are conjugated to vectors to increase the selectivity of drug delivery. The expression pattern of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor in normal and cancer tissues provides an opportunity for highly selective drug delivery in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, tumor-specific promoters can conditionally regulate therapeutic gene expression in tumor or normal tissues. The mucin 16 (MUC16) promoter might be a potential tool to drive ovarian cancer-localized gene expression since MUC16/CA125 is overexpressed in most ovarian carcinomas. Here, we screened the possible MUC16 promoter sequences and constructed MUC16 promoter-driven gro-α shRNA plasmid vectors. The vectors were specifically delivered into ovarian cancer cells via FSH peptide-conjugated nanoparticles. The predicted promoter sequence with TAAA repeats showed high transcriptional activity. The nanoparticle complex containing MUC16 promoter-driven gro-α shRNA and FSH peptides had the ability to decrease gro-α protein secretion in ovarian cancer cells and block tumor growth without obvious toxic effects in a nude mouse model bearing ovarian cancer. Our study provides a novel gene delivery system using a MUC16 promoter trigger and FSH peptide-mediated active targeting in ovarian cancer, and this system may be a promising strategy for specific genetic therapeutic delivery.

A randomized assessor-blind trial comparing highly purified hMG and recombinant FSH in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of highly purified menotropin (hphMG) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) for controlled ovarian stimulation in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, assessor-blind, parallel groups, multicenter, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Twenty-five infertility centers in seven countries. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred forty-nine women. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian stimulation with hphMG or rFSH in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer on day 5 in one fresh or subsequent frozen blastocyst replacement in natural cycles initiated within 1 year of each patient's start of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy (primary end point) and live birth rates, as well as pharmacodynamic parameters. RESULT(S): The ongoing pregnancy rate after a fresh cycle was 30% with hphMG versus 27% with rFSH for the per-protocol (PP) population and 29% versus 27% for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Noninferiority of hphMG compared to rFSH was established. Considering frozen cycles initiated within 1 year, the cumulative live birth rate for a single stimulation cycle was 40% and 38% for women treated with hphMG and rFSH, respectively (both PP and ITT). Significant differences in pharmacodynamic end points were found between the two gonadotropin preparations. CONCLUSION(S): Highly purified hMG is at least as effective as rFSH in GnRH antagonist cycles with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00884221.

Patient evaluation of the use of follitropin alfa in a prefilled ready-to-use injection pen in assisted reproductive technology: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Self-administration of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) can be performed using injection pen devices by women undergoing assisted reproductive technology procedures. The objective of this study was to explore the use of the prefilled follitropin alfa pen in routine assisted reproductive technology procedures in Germany. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted across 43 German IVF centres over a period of 1.75 years. Patients who had used the prefilled follitropin alfa pen in the current or a previous cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation completed a questionnaire to assess their opinions of the device. RESULTS: A total of 5328 patients were included in the study. Of these, 2888 reported that they had previous experience of daily FSH injections. Significantly more patients reported that less training was required to use the prefilled follitropin alfa pen than a syringe and lyophilized powder (1997/3081 [64.8%]; p < 0.001 'less' versus 'more' training). Significantly more patients rated the prefilled follitropin alfa pen as easier in terms of use (2321/3206, 72.4%; p < 0.001 'much more easy' versus 'less easy') and daily injection (2384/3262, 73.1%; p < 0.001 'much more easy' versus 'less easy') than existing injection methods. Approximately one third of respondents rated the prefilled follitropin alfa pen as easier to use than the follitropin beta pen with reloadable cartridges. The majority (3378/4024, 83.9%) of patients had a general preference for the prefilled follitropin alfa pen over other injection methods. CONCLUSIONS: In this questionnaire-based survey, routine use of the prefilled follitropin alfa pen was well accepted and associated with favourable patient perceptions. Users of the pen found it easier to initially learn how to use, and subsequently use, than other injection methods. In general, the prefilled follitropin alfa pen was the preferred method for self-administration of gonadotrophins. Together with previous findings, the results here indicate a high level of patient satisfaction among users of the prefilled follitropin alfa pen for daily self-administration of r-hFSH.

A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.

BACKGROUND: Corifollitropin alfa, a fusion protein lacking LH activity, has a longer elimination half-life and extended time to peak levels than recombinant FSH (rFSH). A single injection of corifollitropin alfa may replace seven daily gonadotrophin injections during the first week of ovarian stimulation. METHODS: In this large, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial the ongoing pregnancy rates were assessed after one injection of 150 microg corifollitropin alfa during the first week of stimulation and compared with daily injections of 200 IU rFSH using a standard GnRH antagonist protocol. RESULTS: The study population comprised 1506 treated patients with mean age of 31.5 years and body weight of 68.6 kg. Ongoing pregnancy rates of 38.9% for the corifollitropin alfa group and 38.1% for rFSH were achieved, with an estimated non-significant difference of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.9; 5.7] in favor of corifollitropin alfa. Stratified analyses of pregnancy rates confirmed robustness of this primary outcome by showing similar results regardless of IVF or ICSI, or number of embryos transferred. A slightly higher follicular response with corifollitropin alfa resulted in a higher number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes compared with rFSH [estimated difference 1.2 (95% CI: 0.5; 1.9)], whereas median duration of stimulation was equal (9 days) and incidence of (moderate/severe) ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was the same (4.1 and 2.7%, respectively P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Corifollitropin alfa is a novel and effective treatment option for potential normal responder patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist co-treatment for IVF resulting in a high ongoing pregnancy rate, equal to that achieved with daily rFSH. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NTC00696800.

Follicle-stimulating hormone peptide can facilitate paclitaxel nanoparticles to target ovarian carcinoma in vivo.

Chemotherapy is an important treatment for ovarian cancer. However, conventional chemotherapy has inevitable drawbacks due to side effects from nonspecific biodistribution of the chemotherapeutic drugs. To solve such problem, targeted delivery approaches were developed. The targeted delivery approaches combine drug carriers with the targeting system and can preferentially bring drugs to the targeted sites. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) is an ovarian cancer-specific receptor. By using a peptide derived from FSH (amino acids 33-53 of the FSH beta chain, named as FSH33), we developed a conjugated nanoparticle, FSH33-NP, to target FSHR in ovarian cancer. FSH33-NP was tested for recognition specificity and uptake efficiency on FSHR-expressing cells. Then, the antitumor efficiency of paclitaxel (PTX)-loaded FSH33-NP (FSH33-NP-PTX) was determined. FSH33-NP-PTX displayed stronger antiproliferation and antitumor effects compared with free PTX or naked PTX-loaded nanoparticles (NP-PTX) both in vitro and in vivo. In summary, this novel FSH33-NP delivery system showed very high selectivity and efficacy for FSHR-expressing tumor tissues. Therefore, it has good potential to become a new therapeutic approach for patients with ovarian cancer.

[Preparation and in vitro targeting of follicle stimulating hormone polypeptide modified nanoparticles].

OBJECTIVE: To prepare follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) polypeptide modified nanoparticles (NP) in order to achieve specific ovarian tumor targeting. METHODS: Expression of FSH receptor protein in human liver cancer and ovarian cancer cell lines BEL-7402, SKOV-3 and Caov-3 was detected by immunocytochemistry. The polypeptide fragment of FSH beta 81-95 amino acids (FSHL81-95) was synthesized and covalently coupled to NP. The specific binding of FSHL81-95 and FSHL81-95-NP was examined by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: BEL-7402 and SKOV-3 cells were negative for FSH receptor staining, while Caov-3 cells were positive. The diameters of NP were about 100 nm, with a Zeta potential of -25 mV or so. Caov-3 cells showed a more specific interaction with FSHL81-95-NP than SKOV-3 cells (4.17 +/- 0.86 and 2.30 +/- 0.21; P < 0.05). The uptake of FSHL81-95-NP was more than NP in Caov-3 cells (4.17 +/- 0.86 and 0.41 +/- 0.32; P < 0.05). FSHL81-95-NP showed a selective targeting at Caov-3 cells compared with control NP. CONCLUSION: FSH polypeptide modified NP could selectively target ovarian cancer cells expressing FSH receptor, which might contribute to specific endocytosis mediated by FSH receptor.

Comparison of follitropin-beta administered by a pen device with conventional syringe in an ART programme - a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the efficacy and patient tolerance of follitropin-beta (recagon) administered using a pen device with conventional syringe in infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. METHODS: Data for 481 patients were retrieved retrospectively for the analysis. Conventional syringe group constituted 204 patients with 217 cycles and 265 patients with 294 cycles in the pen-device group. Down-regulation was achieved with GnRH agonist. RESULTS: Comparison of follitropin-beta administered with pen and syringe showed the following data, respectively. A total dose of 1909.38/2100.65 IU (P < 0.001), duration of stimulation, 9.70/10.47 days (P < 0.05), oestradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin, 1488.34/1067.63 pg/ml, number of follicles reaching >16-mm size, 9.75/7.34 (P < 0.05), number of oocytes retrieved, 13.84/9.55 (P < 0.001) and number of embryos available for freezing, 4.56/1.30 (P < 0.05), the above data were observed in pen/conventional syringe groups, respectively. The live birth rates per cycle were 28.85% and 30.95% in the conventional syringe/pen-device groups, respectively. Patient tolerance with respect to pain at injection site was better with the pen device (P < 0.025). CONCLUSION: The data show that follitropin-beta administered with pen device is well tolerated and more efficacious with respect to ovarian stimulation outcome compared with the conventional syringe.

[Mono-follicular development--the objective of ovulation induction with follitropin beta combined with intrauterine insemination]. / Monofolikulární vývoj--cíl indukce ovulace folitropinem beta pro intrauterinní inseminaci.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of different starting follitropin's beta dose (50 IU, 75 IU and 100 IU daily) for ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination on mono-follicular development. SUBJECT: Prospective study. SETTING: Centre for Assisted Reproduction SANUS, Pardubice. SUBJECT AND METHOD: From March 2005 to November 2007 we performed a total number of 111 ovarian stimulations for patients with unexplained infertility, anovulatory disorder or mild male factor. We divided patients into groups based on patient's response to clomifen citrate treatment. We examined follicular growth day 9 by transvaginal ultrasound and if necessary we adjusted gonadotropins's dose. RESULTS: We performed 104 intrauterine inseminations (94% of cycles with ovulation induction). We proved mono-follicular development in 36%, 37% and 36% (ns), number of follicles 1,9 +/- 0,8, 2,2 +/- 1,2 and 2,5 +/- 1,8 (ns), endometrial thickness (mm) 8,5 +/- 1,2, 8,6 +/- 1,7 and 9,1 +/- 1,8 (ns), total dose of rFSH (IU) 440 +/- 156, 583 +/- 154 and 830 +/- 268 (p < 0.001) in 50 IU, 75 IU and 100 IU follitropin's beta groups. We achieved a total of 18 pregnancies (pregnancy rate 17%). CONCLUSIONS: 50 IU follitropin beta daily offers 36% probability of mono-follicular development. The disadvantage may be an increased risk of cycle cancellation due to low ovarian response. Daily doses 75 IU or 100 IU increase total consumption of rFSH.

Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although initial studies in poor responders using GnRH antagonists have reported encouraging results, they are limited in number, only a few of them are prospective, while the majority is characterized by limited power to detect a clinically important difference. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed in patients with one or more previous failed IVF cycles in which five or less oocytes were retrieved, using > or =300 IU of gonadotrophins/day. Patients were randomized by computer-generated list and treated by either the flare-up GnRH agonist protocol (n = 90) or a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol (n = 180). RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rate, the primary outcome measure, was significantly higher in the antagonist group compared with the agonist group (12.2 versus 4.4%, P< 0.048; difference 7.8%, 95% CI: 0.2 to 14.0). Estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration were lower in the antagonist protocol [median (interquartile range): 572 (325-839) versus 727 (439-1029) pg/ml, P = 0.018]. Clinical and biochemical pregnancy rates, fertilization and implantation rates, as well as the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of mature oocytes present, the stimulation period and the gonadotrophin dosage were not significantly different between the two groups compared. CONCLUSIONS: The flexible GnRH antagonist protocol is associated with significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates compared with the flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders.

Patient and nurse evaluation of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone administration methods: comparison of two follitropin injection pens.

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian stimulation by injection of gonadotrophins is an essential part of assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Two studies (a German pilot study and an Australian study) aimed to assess and compare the ease-of-use, safety and efficacy of two follitropin injection pens. METHODS: Patient satisfaction (questionnaire) and safety were assessed in patients undergoing ART at a German centre for in vitro fertilisation (IVF), randomised either to the follitropin alfa pen or to the follitropin beta pen. Patient satisfaction (questionnaire) was assessed in patients undergoing ART at an Australian IVF centre, using the follitropin alfa pen, and previous experience with the follitropin beta pen was compared. The experience of IVF nurses with both pens was assessed using a similar questionnaire. Statistical significance was not determined in either study. RESULTS: In the German study (n = 31), patients favored the follitropin alfa pen over the follitropin beta pen because they found preparation faster, were more confident of accurate dosing and had to make fewer dose adjustments. Treatments delivered by both pens were well tolerated; eight adverse events (AEs) occurred, two AEs (including one case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, OHSS) in two patients using the follitropin alfa pen and six AEs (including three cases of OHSS, one of which was serious) in six patients using the follitropin beta pen. Patients (n = 140) and nurses (n = 11) in the Australian study scored the follitropin alfa pen highly and patients favored it over the follitropin beta pen; the risk of OHSS was also considered greater in the follitropin beta pen group, with nearly a twofold higher rate of cycle cancellation due to OHSS risk compared with the follitropin alfa pen group. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, results from these two small studies suggest that the follitropin alfa pen was effective, well tolerated, and patient and nurse acceptance appeared to be higher for the follitropin alfa pen versus the follitropin beta pen, which may benefit compliance, leading to improved outcomes.

Initiation of GnRH antagonist on Day 1 of stimulation as compared to the long agonist protocol in PCOS patients. A randomized controlled trial: effect on hormonal levels and follicular development.

BACKGROUND The optimal time for GnRH antagonist initiation is still debatable. The purpose of the current randomized controlled trial is to provide endocrine and follicular data during ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treated either with a long GnRH agonist scheme or a fixed day-1 GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS Randomized patients in both groups (antagonist: n = 26; long agonist: n = 52) received oral contraceptive pill treatment for three weeks and a starting dose of 150 IU of follitropin beta. The primary outcome was E(2) level on Day 5 of stimulation, while secondary outcomes were follicular development, LH during ovarian stimulation and progesterone levels. RESULTS Significantly more follicles on days 5, 7 and 8 of stimulation, significantly higher estradiol (E(2)) levels on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 and significantly higher progesterone levels on days 1, 5 and 8 of stimulation were observed in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. E(2) was approximately twice as high in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group on day 5 of stimulation (432 versus 204 pg ml(-1), P lt; 0.001). These differences were accompanied by significantly lower LH levels on days 3 and 5 and significantly higher LH levels on days 1, 7 and 8 of stimulation in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. CONCLUSIONS In PCOS patients undergoing IVF, initiation of GnRH antagonist concomitantly with recombinant FSH is associated with an earlier follicular growth and a different hormonal environment during the follicular phase when compared with the long agonist protocol.

Economic evaluation of the administration of follitropin-beta with a pen device.

Previous studies suggest that administration of follitropin-beta with a pen device (Puregon Pen(R)) is more convenient, less painful and 16-18% more efficient. The aim of this study was to perform an economic evaluation of the administration of follitropin-beta by this pen device against follitropin-alpha by multidose and highly purified (HP) HMG by conventional syringe in IVF treatment by comparing the process utilities and the costs for the Dutch setting. Conjoint analysis assessed the process utilities for the three administration modes on a scale from 0 to 1. A decision analytic model estimated the costs of an average IVF cycle from a societal perspective. Patients estimated the process utility at 0.96 for the pen, 0.53 for the multidose and 0.36 for the conventional syringe. Additional costs were estimated at 0 Euros and 194 Euros, comparing the pen with multidose or conventional methods respectively. Assuming a 16% efficiency gain of the pen, costs ranged from Euros-135 (savings) to 60 Euros (extra costs). In conclusion, patients perceive sufficient benefits to the pen device to choose it over other dosing methods. Dominance of the pen device over the multidose method was shown. Compared with the conventional administration method, the added value of the pen device was 2.7 (0.96/0.36) times higher.

Comparison of two different fixed doses of follitropin-beta in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: A prospective randomized, double blind clinical trial.

A prospective randomized, double blind, single centre study was conducted to compare the efficacy, efficiency and clinical side effects of daily fixed dose regimen of either 100 IU or 200 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone(rFSH) Follitropin beta in down-regulated women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation(COH) for either conventional in vitro fertilization(IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI). A total of sixty women were randomly allocated according to the criteria for the treatment by either 100 IU(n = 30) or 200 IU (n = 30) of FSH. Although more cycle cancellations due to low response were observed in the 100 IU group (n = 9 vs n = 2), two cases of mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were noted in the higher dose group. Subjects in the group treated with 200 IU appeared to yield more follicles > 17 mm (4.4 vs 3.3, p = 0.05) and more oocytes compared to the group treated with 100 IU (9.2 versus 6.0 oocytes, NS). The total dosage required to develop at least three follicles according to the protocol was significantly lower in the group treated with 100 IU (1203.33 versus 2106. 67, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, a fixed daily dose of 200 IU of rFSH Follitropin beta compared to a fixed daily dose of 100 IU is more effective in terms of follicles > 17 mm development and the number of oocytes retrieved along with a lower cancellation rate, but less efficient as indicated by a higher total rFSH dose needed

Evaluation of a pen device for self-administration of recombinant human FSH in clomiphene citrate-resistant anovulatory women undergoing ovulation induction.

This open-label multicentre study evaluated ease of use, safety, and efficacy of a pen device for self-administration of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) in 43 subjects undergoing ovulation induction. Follitropin beta was administered subcutaneously with the Follistim Pen within 3 days of onset of menses. A 75 IU starting dose could be increased by 25 or 50 IU on days 8 and 15 if no ovarian response was observed. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 10,000 IU) was administered when one follicle > or =18 mm or two to three follicles > or =15 mm were observed. Subjects received standardized instruction for the pen device and subject comprehension was recorded as subjects practised and prepared injections. Ease of use was also evaluated by questionnaire. Forty-four subjects enrolled; 43 were treated with rFSH and 41 were treated with HCG. The comprehension questionnaire revealed that during the mock injection, 100% of subjects properly loaded the cartridge into the pen device, while 95% selected the correct dose and 100% self-injected the medication prescribed. During the second actual injection, 100% of subjects comprehended these pen-related steps. The ease-of-use questionnaire showed that 100% of the subjects rated the overall experience of self-administering with the pen as 'very good' to 'good'. Mean duration and total amount of follitropin beta were 11.4 +/- 4.2 days and 1070.3 +/- 580.3 IU respectively. Ovulation rate was 95%. Biochemical and ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 34.9 and 30.2% respectively. Three subjects experienced serious adverse events [asthma; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and pain; OHSS]. In conclusion, the pen device provides an easy, safe, and effective way for women to self-administer follitropin beta during ovarian stimulation.

Administration of recombinant human FSH (solution in cartridge) with a pen device in women undergoing ovarian stimulation.

This study evaluated the first multiple-use pen device for the self-administration of recombinant FSH. The pen device is used for the subcutaneous injection of a pre-mixed ready-to-use solution of follitropin beta from a multiple-dose cartridge, and has flexible dosing capabilities. In the ease-of-use questionnaire, 90% of subjects rated the overall experience of self-injecting follitropin beta using the pen device as 'very good' (on day 6). The comprehension questionnaire revealed that prior to the first injection and during the second injection, the follitropin beta cartridge was properly loaded into the pen device by 96.7 and 100% of the subjects respectively. The questionnaire also showed that the correct dose was selected and self-administered by 98.3 and 100% of the subjects respectively. Biochemical and ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 56.7 and 45.0% respectively. The pen device is safe, effective, and easy to use for self-administering recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation.

An open, randomized single-centre study to compare the efficacy and convenience of follitropin beta administered by a pen device with follitropin alpha administered by a conventional syringe in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI.

BACKGROUND: A pen device, similar to an insulin pen, has been recently marketed for the administration of follitropin beta in cartridges. A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and convenience of this pen device delivering follitropin beta with a conventional syringe delivering follitropin alpha. METHODS: A total of 200 patients needing IVF/ICSI treatment and willing to self-inject were enrolled in the study. All subjects had ovarian stimulation according to a long protocol and were randomized to the pen or the conventional syringe group during down-regulation by means of a computer-generated randomization list using random numbers. Patients were asked to fill in a daily local tolerance book after each injection. On the day of hCG the patients scored a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and convenience. RESULTS: The average duration, total dose of recombinant FSH and number of cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved were 10.8/12.0 days (P = 0.001), 1880/2226 IU (P < 0.001) and 15.2/13.1 respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups; the presence of pain after the daily injection was significantly higher in the conventional syringe group (P = 0.027); the visual analogue scale score was similar for pain but significantly more convenient for the pen device (P < 0.001). The live birth rate per embryo transfer was 32.9 and 34.4% respectively in the pen device and conventional syringe groups. CONCLUSIONS: Self-injection with the pen device is safe and easy, more convenient and less painful for the patient, requires less FSH and shortens the treatment duration.

Concurrent ganirelix and follitropin beta therapy is an effective and safe regimen for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate controlled ovarian stimulation cycles using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix in combination with the recombinant FSH, follitropin-beta, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical study. SETTING: Hospital-based infertility practice. PATIENT(S): Twenty women with PCOS planning to undergo ovarian stimulation. INTERVENTION(S): Fasting glucose and insulin levels were used to calculate insulin resistance ratios (FG/I). After pretreatment with oral contraceptives, serum LH levels were determined, and 250 microg ganirelix was administered on cycle day 2. Upon suppression of LH, concurrent ganirelix and follitropin-beta therapy (morning ganirelix and evening follitropin-beta) was started and continued until the day of hCG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days of stimulation, dose of follitropin-beta, pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy were compared based on FG/I ratios. RESULTS: One dose of ganirelix effectively suppressed LH levels in all patients. All patients ovulated as documented by a rise in progesterone. Significant differences were observed between the insulin-resistant and non-insulin-resistant groups for both days of stimulation and dose of follitropin-beta. The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 44.4%, with an ongoing pregnancy rate of 27.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of a concurrent ganirelix and follitropin-beta therapy for ovarian stimulation in women with PCOS.