Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microb Drug Resist ; 24(1): 40-47, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28537778

RESUMO

Currently, data on Escherichia coli antibacterial susceptibilities in the Faroe Islands are lacking. The aim was to investigate the antibacterial susceptibilities of E. coli from patients with community-acquired urinary tract infections in the Faroe Islands, correlate with antibacterial sales, and compare with Iceland and Denmark. From 2009 to 2010 and in 2012, 12 general practitioners from the Faroe Islands were recruited to provide urine samples from patients. Antibacterial susceptibilities were determined by disc diffusion testing according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methods and criteria. Logistic regression (quasibinomial) of the antibacterial resistance proportions versus mean sales during the period of 2008-2011 was used to determine association. Nonsusceptibility to at least 1 of the 14 antibacterial drugs investigated was found in 54% of the E. coli isolates and was most common to ampicillin (46%), followed by sulfamethoxazole (39%), trimethoprim (27%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (27%), and <10% to the remaining 10 antibiotics. The resistance prevalence did not change significantly with time. From logistic regression modeling, we find significant associations between antibacterial mean sales and antibacterial resistances. For the resistances in the Faroe Islands compared with data from Denmark and Iceland, we infer two groups of resistances indicating different responses-one steep and one gradual-to antibacterial sales. For these two groups, we find ß1 = 4.77 (Std. Error = 0.624, p-value = 0.002) and ß1 = 0.26 (Std. Error = 0.020, p-value = 4e-7) for the steep and gradual groups, respectively. This knowledge can potentially be used to predict and control the future increase in E. coli resistance with antibacterial sales.


Assuntos
Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Ampicilina/economia , Antibacterianos/economia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Humanos , Islândia/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Sulfametoxazol/economia , Trimetoprima/economia , Trimetoprima/uso terapêutico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/economia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
2.
Clin Ther ; 21(9): 1578-88, 1999 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10509852

RESUMO

This retrospective cohort study used North Carolina Medicaid paid-claims data to assess clinical and economic outcomes of treatments for urinary tract infection (UTI). The study population comprised female Medicaid recipients, between 15 and 64 years of age, with a paid claim filed for a primary diagnosis of UTI or acute UTI from January 1 to June 30, 1994, who were treated with ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ). Patients had follow-up for 6 months after the primary diagnosis. Patients who did not receive further treatment for UTI with 1 of the 3 drugs within 30 days after initial treatment were assumed to be cured. Costs were measured as the sum of reimbursements for UTI-related medical services and drug treatments. Outcomes for 409 patients were assessed. Cure rates of initial treatment with ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and TMP/SMZ were 81%, 88%, and 93%, respectively. Cost-effectiveness ratios of initial treatment with the 3 drugs were $150.80, $81.20, and $69.00, respectively. When efficacy rates generated from published randomized clinical studies were applied, cost-effectiveness ratios for the 3 drugs were $130.96, $86.17, and $72.00, respectively. A decision model of treatment pattern and associated costs is presented. Several patient variables indicate that the ciprofloxacin group included more severe cases of UTI than did the other groups. Study limitations, confounders, and future research suggestions are discussed. Our results show that treatment for >7 days results in a better cure rate regardless of the drug used than does treatment for < or =7 days and that TMP/SMZ is the most cost-effective of the 3 drugs for UTI or acute UTI.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/economia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Medicaid/economia , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Ciprofloxacina/economia , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrofurantoína/economia , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapêutico , North Carolina , Polimedicação , Sulfametoxazol/economia , Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Trimetoprima/economia , Trimetoprima/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...