A biorelevant in vitro release/permeation system for oral transmucosal dosage forms.

This research describes the development and validation of a biorelevant in vitro release/permeation system to predict the in vivo performance of oral transmucosal dosage forms. The system is a biorelevant bidirectional transmucosal apparatus which allows better simulation of oral cavity physiological variables in comparison to compendial dissolution apparatuses and therefore may be a better predictor of in vivo behavior. The feasibility of the bidirectional apparatus was studied using smokeless tobacco (snus) as a model oral transmucosal product. In this research, nicotine release and permeation was investigated from commercially available snus using a modified USP IV flow-through apparatus, a commercially available vertical diffusion cell and a fabricated novel bidirectional transmucosal apparatus. The percent nicotine released/permeated was utilized as an input function for the prediction of in vivo plasma nicotine profiles by back calculation based on the Wagner-Nelson method. The prediction errors in C(max) and AUC(0-∞) with the USP IV flow-through device, vertical diffusion cell and novel apparatus were 4.03, 22.85 and 1.59 and -5.85, 5.85 and -9.27% respectively. This work demonstrated the suitability of the novel bidirectional transmucosal apparatus for predicting the in vivo behavior of oral transmucosal products.

Toxicological evaluation of smokeless tobacco: 90-day rodent feeding studies.

This manuscript presents data from 90-day toxicology studies designed to characterize the subchronic effects of a smokeless tobacco blend and an aqueous extract of that blend when administered to rodents in NTP-2000 feed. Positive control (nicotine tartrate) and treatment groups were matched for a range of nicotine levels. The doses evaluated were 0.3, 3, and 6 mg nicotine/kg body weight/day in Wistar Hannover rats and 6, 60, and 120 mg nicotine/kg/day in CD-1 mice. Variables evaluated included plasma nicotine and cotinine, body weights, feed consumption, clinical observations, clinical and anatomic pathology (including organ weights), and histopathology. Plasma nicotine and cotinine levels were dose-responsive. Key effects such as body weight reductions and organ weight changes occurred in rats and mice predominantly at the highest doses of test articles and positive control in the absence of treatment-related gross or histopathological changes. Organ weight changes were attributed mainly to the lower body weights of treated vs. control groups. The blend- and extract-induced effects generally paralleled each other and the nicotine-induced effects. Based on these studies, the doses evaluated spanned the no observable adverse effect level, the lowest observable adverse effect level and the maximum tolerated dose.

Nicotine delivery and subjective effects of Swedish portion snus compared with 4 mg nicotine polacrilex chewing gum.

INTRODUCTION: Snus availability has been claimed to have contributed to the low rates of smoking among Swedish men and made possible the transfer to a less harmful form of nicotine dependence. METHODS: Fourteen cigarette smokers were randomly assigned to 2 types of 1 g Swedish portion snus and 4 mg nicotine polacrilex (NP) chewing gum in open-label, single-dose crossover study. Nicotine delivery and pharmacokinetics were estimated, and self-reports of subjective effects were obtained using Visual Analogue Scales (VASs). RESULTS: Extracted dose from the NP gum averaged 2.56 mg compared with 2.12 and 2.18 mg, respectively, for Swedish portion snus. This resulted in a slightly larger area under the curve (AUC) for the NP chewing gum. The rise of the nicotine plasma concentration was faster for Swedish snus. Median T(max) was shorter, 30 min for snus compared with 45 min for the NP gum. The lower C(max) of NP gum compared with the snus products in spite of larger AUC may be explained by slower absorption from the chewing gum. The faster absorption of nicotine from Swedish portion snus was mirrored in a higher VAS score for "head rush." Craving/urges to smoke decreased similarly for all treatments. Salivation and throat burn were rated higher for the 4 mg NP gum compared with both types of snus. CONCLUSIONS: Swedish snus produced higher maximum blood nicotine concentration in shorter time and with a quicker onset of "head rush" compared with 4 mg NP chewing gum in spite of a smaller extracted dose. The quicker onset of "head rush" and supposedly higher satisfaction from snus may partly explain the widespread use of snus for stopping smoking in Sweden.

Evaluating oral noncombustible potential-reduced exposure products for smokers.

INTRODUCTION: Potential-reduced exposure products (PREPs) are marketed as a way for smokers to continue using tobacco while possibly lessening their tobacco toxicant intake. Some tobacco-based PREPs are combustible and intended to be smoked, while others are noncombustible and intended to be administered orally (e.g., Camel Snus [CS] tobacco sachets and Ariva tobacco tablets). The ability of these noncombustible PREPs to reduce smokers' exposure to cigarette-delivered toxicants and suppress tobacco abstinence symptoms effectively is unclear. Clinical laboratory methods have been used to measure combustible PREP-associated toxicant exposure and abstinence symptom suppression and could be applied to evaluating the effects of orally administered noncombustible PREPs. METHODS: In this study, 21 smokers (6 women) participated in four 5-day conditions that differed by product used: CS, Ariva, own brand cigarettes, or no tobacco. Measures included expired-air carbon monoxide (CO), the urinary metabolite of nicotine (cotinine), the urinary metabolite of the carcinogen NNK (NNAL-T), and subjective effect ratings. RESULTS: Relative to own brand, all other conditions were associated with CO and cotinine levels that were lower and abstinence symptom ratings that were greater. Only no-tobacco use was associated with significantly lower NNAL levels. Acceptability ratings were also lower in all conditions relative to own brand. DISCUSSION: Although these oral products reduce exposure to CO, their ineffective abstinence symptom suppression and low acceptability may limit their viability as PREPs. As with combustible PREPs, clinical laboratory study of orally administered noncombustible PREPs will be a valuable part of any comprehensive PREP evaluation strategy.

Pilot study on lower nitrosamine smokeless tobacco products compared with medicinal nicotine.

Smokeless tobacco (ST) products have the potential to be used as a harm reduction method for cigarette smokers. These products can deliver significantly less toxicants than cigarettes, although they are not toxicant free nor harmless. It is important to examine potential health risks and benefits of these products. These two small pilot studies examined the effects of two different ST products (Exalt and Ariva) compared with medicinal nicotine, another potential harm reduction product. Dependent, healthy adult cigarette smokers, who were motivated to quit smoking, underwent 1 week of baseline smoking measurement. They were then asked to quit smoking and were randomly assigned to use either an ST product or a medicinal nicotine lozenge (MNL, Commit) for 2 weeks, then crossed over to use the other product for 2 weeks. In the last week, following the sampling phase, subjects could choose the product they wished to use. Assessments were made repeatedly during baseline cigarette use and throughout the 5 weeks of treatment. Outcome measures included biomarkers for tobacco exposure and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses. Tobacco-specific carcinogen uptake was greater from Exalt than from the MNL, and was comparable between the MNL and Ariva. Physiological effects and subjective effects on withdrawal and craving were comparable among Exalt, Ariva, and the MNL. Ariva was preferred over the MNL, which was preferred over Exalt. With the exception of medicinal nicotine products, low-nitrosamine ST products have the greatest potential to result in reduced toxicant exposure compared with other combustible reduced exposure products and have promise for reducing individual risk for disease. However, the population effect of marketing of such products as reduced exposure/reduced risk is unknown. The need for further research in this area and regulation of tobacco products is evident.

Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of three potential reduced exposure products, moist snuff and nicotine lozenge.

OBJECTIVE: To compare nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of three new smokeless tobacco potential reduced exposure products (PREPs; Ariva, Revel and Stonewall) with moist snuff (Copenhagen) and medicinal nicotine (Commit lozenge). METHODS: 10 subjects completed a randomised, within-subject, crossover study. Subjects used one product for 30 min at each of the five laboratory sessions. Maximal nicotine concentration (Cmax) was determined and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) was calculated for a 90-min period (during use and 60 min after use). Nicotine craving, withdrawal symptoms and ratings of product effects and liking were measured during product use. RESULTS: Nicotine AUC and Cmax were higher for Copenhagen than for any other product (p<0.002) and higher for Commit than for either Ariva or Revel (p<0.001). Cmax for Commit was also higher than for Stonewall (p = 0.03). Craving was lowest during use of Copenhagen (p<0.03). Craving during use of Stonewall, Ariva and Commit was lower than during use of Revel (p<0.05). Withdrawal symptom score during use of Copenhagen was lower than during use of Revel (p = 0.009). Copenhagen scores were higher (p<0.005) than all other products in several measures of drug effects and liking (feel good effects, satisfaction, liking and desire for product, and strength of product). CONCLUSION: The new smokeless tobacco PREPs result in lower nicotine concentrations and equivalent or lower reductions in subjective measures compared with medicinal nicotine. Since health effects of PREPs are largely unknown, medicinal nicotine should be preferentially encouraged for smokers or smokeless tobacco users wishing to switch to lower-risk products.

Cotinine as a biomarker of systemic nicotine exposure in spit tobacco users.

Unlike cigarette smokers, spit tobacco (ST) users absorb a significant amount of nicotine through the gastrointestinal tract while swallowing tobacco juice. The majority of the absorbed nicotine is rapidly converted to cotinine during first-pass hepatic metabolism. This process potentially compromises the utility of cotinine as a biomarker for systemic nicotine exposure in ST users. To investigate this question, we correlated nicotine and cotinine concentrations with clinical measures of ST use in 68 daily ST users enrolled in a non-nicotine pharmacologic intervention trial. We found that a higher frequency of swallowing tobacco juice (P=.007) was an independent predictor of higher serum cotinine concentrations. Serum nicotine concentrations, on the other hand, were not correlated with a higher frequency of swallowing. In the absence of a reliable way to measure frequency of swallowing, we conclude that cotinine should not be used for guiding clinical decisions that depend upon a precise quantification of systemic nicotine exposure, such as tailored nicotine replacement therapy.

Quantitation of metabolites of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone after cessation of smokeless tobacco use.

Two major metabolites of the tobacco-specific lung carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) were previously shown to be highly persistent in human urine after cessation of cigarette smoking. We hypothesized that NNK or its metabolite, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), was sequestered in the lung. In this study, we further evaluated this hypothesis by quantifying the NNK metabolites, NNAL and its glucuronides (NNAL-Gluc), in urine and plasma after cessation of smokeless tobacco use, in which NNK is administered p.o. rather than by inhalation. Thirteen male nonsmokers, 11 snuff dippers and 2 tobacco chewers, participated in the study. Urine and plasma were obtained at baseline and at intervals 2-126 days after cessation of smokeless tobacco use. The distribution half-lives t(1/2alpha) (days) of NNAL (1.32 +/- 0.85 versus 3.35 +/- 1.86) and NNAL-Gluc (1.53 +/- 1.22 versus 3.89 +/- 2.43) were significantly shorter in smokeless tobacco users than in smokers. There were no significant differences in the terminal half-lives t(1/2beta) (days) of NNAL (26.3 +/- 16.7 versus 45.2 +/- 26.9) and NNAL-Gluc (26.1 +/- 15.1 versus 39.6 +/- 26.0) in smokeless tobacco users and smokers. Baseline levels as well as renal clearance of the NNK metabolites correlated with number of tins or pouches of smokeless tobacco consumed. Ratios of (S)-NNAL:(R)-NNAL and (S)-NNAL-Gluc:(R)-NNAL-Gluc in urine were significantly (3.1-5.7 times) higher 7 days after cessation than at baseline in both smokeless tobacco users and smokers, indicating stereoselective retention of (S)-NNAL. Collectively, the results of this study suggest that there is a receptor in the human body, possibly in the lung, for (S)-NNAL, the more carcinogenic NNAL enantiomer. These data may have considerable implications for understanding mechanisms of tumor induction by NNK.

Modeling nicotine arterial-venous differences to predict arterial concentrations and input based on venous measurements: application to smokeless tobacco and nicotine gum.

Significant arterio-venous differences in nicotine concentrations have been observed during and after cigarette smoking, nicotine nasal spray, and intravenous nicotine administration. In this paper we describe a novel mathematical method for estimating arterial blood levels from venous blood level data. The model allows to quantify: (i) the influence of the microcirculation in the hands and forearm on the distribution of nicotine, and (ii) the influence of disregarding the venous to arterial circulation in the estimate of systemic inputs. We also (iii) propose a general method to predict arterial concentrations and inputs given venous data. The basic model we adopt is based on the relationship Cv = T * Ca, where Cv and Ca are the concentration in the venous and arterial site, respectively, T is the arterio-venous transfer function and * indicates convolution. We use empirical data to estimate T. We then compare estimates of systemic inputs to the venous site obtained taking into account the transfer function or, as usually done, disregarding it. The relationship we use to compare estimated inputs are: Cv = T * ka * A (where Ka is the arterial disposition function and A the systemic input), and Cv = Kv * A (where Kv is the venous disposition function), respectively. Finally, the estimated transfer function allows to estimate (average) Ca or A given arbitrary venous data. (i) Our analysis suggests that a bi-exponential T is needed to describe observed arterial-venous differences. The estimated transfer function indicates that no elimination of nicotine is involved in the forearm. (ii) Disregarding T, as usually done, erroneously obtains too complex venous input functions (because these input functions incorporate T). (iii) Disregarding T erroneously estimates significantly higher total inputs. (iv) Using the proposed model and previously published venous nicotine level data we predict substantial arterial-venous differences in blood nicotine levels for smokeless tobacco and nicotine gum. The use of disposition functions obtained from venous data may lead to erroneous estimation of the rates of entry into the circulation and systemic bioavailability for many drugs.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of moist snuff in humans.

INTERVENTION: Four brands of moist snuff and a non-tobacco mint snuff were tested. Subjects reported to the laboratory for five experimental sessions. After baseline measurement of dependent variables, each subject placed 2 g of one of the brands of snuff (or one Skoal Bandits pouch) between the cheek and gum for 30 minutes. The subjects remained in the experimental laboratory for an additional 60 minutes. SUBJECTS: Ten volunteers who were daily users of smokeless tobacco. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma nicotine concentration, cardiovascular effects, and subjective effects. RESULTS: Large amounts of nicotine were delivered rapidly to the bloodstream. The amount of nicotine absorbed and the rate of absorption were related to the pH of the snuff product in aqueous suspension. Cardiovascular and subjective effects were related to the amount of nicotine absorbed. CONCLUSIONS: Snuff products are capable of rapidly delivering high doses of nicotine, which can lead to dependence. Long-term use of snuff can lead to a number of adverse health effects including oral cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and gingival diseases. For these reasons, it is important that the public health community considers oral snuff use as a burden on public health in the same way that cigarette smoking is recognised.

In vitro study of nicotine release from smokeless tobacco.

Four brands (Copenhagen Snuff, Skoal Bandit Classic, Skoal Wintergreen Long Cut, and Skoal Wintergreen Fine Cut) of smokeless tobacco products were tested for their rate of nicotine release into artificial saliva via direct contact or through a dialysis bag. Nicotine was determined by reversed-phase liquid chromatography. When samples were in direct contact with artificial saliva, most of the nicotine was released from the tobacco in the first minute. Nicotine release from Skoal Bandit Classic, marketed as smokeless tobacco in a sachet, was slower with the sachet intact than without the sachet. When smokeless tobacco and artificial saliva were placed inside a dialysis bag, nicotine release was much slower and primarily depended upon the permeability of the dialysis membrane. Although total nicotine was lowest for Skoal Bandit Classic, little difference was seen in nicotine release rates among the brands tested. When smokeless tobacco was placed in dialysis bags with artificial saliva outside, a significant difference was seen in rates of nicotine migration through the membrane. In this model, nicotine release from Copenhagen Snuff was much faster than from Skoal Bandit Classic with or without the sachet. This difference may be related to the pH of the smokeless tobacco products.

Systemic absorption and effects of nicotine from smokeless tobacco.

Nicotine is absorbed in substantial quantities from smokeless tobacco and could contribute to the adverse consequences of smokeless tobacco use. Chronic systemic exposure to nicotine could contribute to accelerated coronary artery disease, acute cardiac ischemic events, and hypertension. Systemic absorption of sodium and mutagenic chemicals from smokeless tobacco could aggravate hypertension or cardiac failure, or contribute to cancer, respectively. Information concerning the potential hazards of nicotine and other systemically absorbed toxins may be incorporated into educational programs to discourage the use of smokeless tobacco.