Noninvasive prenatal screening and diagnosis of two fetuses with Williams syndrome in a cohort of 19,607 pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) technology in screening for microdeletions in the 7q11.23 region. METHODS: 19,607 pregnant women underwent NIPS in our hospital. Maternal peripheral cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) was routinely screened for aneuploidy by cffDNA enrichment and simultaneously analyzed for pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs). The Williams syndrome (WS) 7q11.23 region was targeted in this study. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was used to verify the screen-positive samples. RESULTS: The mean concentration of cffDNA before and after enrichment increased from 9.44% to 19.32%, with a statistically significant difference. Two out of 19,607 samples tested for CNVs were found to have a heterozygous deletion at the 7q11.23 region, indicating a high risk for WS. CMA results confirmed the 1.5 megabase (Mb) deletions at the 7q11.23 region in amniotic fluid samples. One of the two WS foetuses had a small left ventricle by ultrasound screening, and the other did not have a significant cardiovascular abnormality phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: NIPS screening for Williams syndrome can be achieved by enriching cell-free foetal DNA and improving bioinformatic analysis algorithms.

Genetic counseling of mosaic and non-mosaic tetrasomy 9p at prenatal diagnosis.

Genetic counseling of mosaic and non-mosaic tetrasomy 9p remains difficult because of the possible associated congenital abnormalities, cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues, true-positive and false-positive diagnosis in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), uniparental disomy (UPD) 9, tissue-limited mosaicism, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line, phenotypic normal carriers and possible favorable fetal outcome in the cases with mosaic tetrasomy 9p at amniocentesis. This article presents a comprehensive review of various counseling issues concerning mosaic and non-mosaic tetrasomy 9p at prenatal diagnosis, and the information provided is very useful for genetic counseling under such circumstances.

Low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, positive non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 14, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 14 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We present low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old, gravida 2, para 1, woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+14 [4]/46,XX [27], consistent with 12.9% mosaicism for trisomy 14. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed the result of arr (1-22, X) × 2 with no genomic imbalance. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. She was referred for genetic counseling at 21 weeks of gestation and was offered expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) which was positive for trisomy 14. At 24 weeks of gestation, she underwent repeat amniocentesis which revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+14 [2]/46,XX [26], consistent with 7% mosaicism for trisomy 14. The parental karyotypes were normal. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed no genomic imbalance. Polymorphic marker analysis excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 14. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 104 uncultured amniocytes detected no trisomy 14 cell. At 35 weeks of gestation, a 2315-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The umbilical cord and placenta had the karyotype of 46, XX (40/40 cells). aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from peripheral blood and buccal mucosal cells at the age of three months revealed no genomic imbalance. The neonate was normal in phenotype and development during postnatal follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level mosaic trisomy 14 at amniocentesis can be associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the trisomy 14 cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

Unusual Maternal and Fetal Findings With Cell-Free DNA Screening.

Importance: With advances in prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) technology, the information available with cfDNA continues to expand beyond the common fetal aneuploidies such as trisomies 21, 18, and 13. Due to the admixture of maternal and fetal/placental DNA, prenatal cfDNA remains a screening test with the possibility of false-positive and false-negative results. Objective: This review aims to summarize unusual incidental maternal and fetal genomic abnormalities detectable by cfDNA and to provide anticipatory guidance regarding management. Evidence Acquisition: Of 140 articles identified with keywords such as "incidental" and "discordant" cfDNA, 55 original research articles, review articles, case series, and societal guidelines were reviewed. Results: Prenatal cfDNA may incidentally identify a spectrum of maternal genomic abnormalities such as malignancy, mosaicism, and copy number variants. When discordant with fetal diagnosis, these cases require additional investigation with maternal genetic testing and follow-up evaluation. Such incidental fetal/placental abnormalities may include rare autosomal trisomies, uniparental disomy, and triploidy. Further evaluation of fetal/placental abnormalities can be pursued with a combination of ultrasound and prenatal diagnosis with chorionic villous sampling and/or amniocentesis. Societal guidelines do not currently recommend cfDNA screening for rare autosomal trisomies, microdeletions, or copy number variants, and some experts suggest that sex chromosome screening should be opted in after counseling. Conclusions: Knowledge about possible incidental findings with prenatal cfDNA is needed to inform pretest and posttest counseling with appropriate follow-up evaluation. Relevance: As cfDNA technology has advanced to include genome-wide findings, it is important for clinicians, genetic counselors, and societal guidelines to acknowledge the spectrum of possible results outside of the traditional and sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Prenatal and postnatal evaluation of differences of sex development: a user's guide for clinicians and families.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Differences of sex development (DSD) are a group of chromosomal, gonadal, and anatomic conditions that are not often diagnosed during pregnancy. Families and clinicians need diagnostic guidance that supports all aspects of the care from the prenatal to postnatal period. RECENT FINDINGS: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is obtained by sampling cell-free fetal DNA in the mother's bloodstream in the first trimester. While its primary purpose is to screen for genetic aneuploidies, it is also used to determine the sex of the fetus. When screening ultrasound shows genital anatomy that is discordant with the sex determination by NIPS, a DSD workup is warranted. The use of this relatively new screening tool may result in a higher number of prenatal referrals than in the past. SUMMARY: This review summarizes suggested prenatal counseling, neonatal management, and postnatal workup of the most common DSD diagnoses. All of these diagnoses are rare, but the common features that families face are addressed with particular emphasis on psychosocial support and a measured shared decision-making approach.

Performance evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing on 24 chromosomes in a cohort of 118,969 pregnant women in Sichuan, China.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the detection capacity of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for chromosomal abnormalities of all 24 chromosomes, as well as high-risk indications for pregnancy and the fetal fraction, in a large cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 118,969 pregnant women who underwent NIPT at Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital from March 2019 to June 2022. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive chromosomal abnormality rate were calculated. The fetal fraction based on gestational age, maternal body mass index, and number was examined. RESULTS: NIPT demonstrated > 99% sensitivity and specificity for almost all of the common trisomies (T21, T18, and T13), sex chromosomal aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. Positive predictive values varied from 12.0% to 89.6%. Advanced maternal age was associated with an increased risk of three major aneuploidies. The fetal fraction was positively correlated with gestational age and negatively correlated with the maternal body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT can be used to effectively screen for chromosomal abnormalities across all 24 chromosomes. Advanced maternal age is a risk factor for high-risk pregnancy, and careful consideration of the fetal fraction is essential during NIPT.

Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of a de novo 10q11.21q11.23 duplication associated with a normal phenotype.

Copy number variants (CNVs) are an important source of normal and pathogenic genome variations. Unbalanced chromosome abnormalities are either gains or losses of large genomic regions that do not or only minimally clinically affect the individual. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used in the screening of common fetal chromosome aneuploidy. One example is the duplication of 10q11.21q11.23, which includes the 10q11.2 region. This region contains a complex set of low-copy repeats that may lead to various genomic alterations through non-allelic homologous recombination. In this report, we present a case of a de novo 10q11.21q11.23 duplication with a normal phenotype. This case may be helpful for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling. A combination of NIPT, prenatal ultrasound, karyotype analysis, copy number variation sequencing, and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of CNVs.

Early Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing at 6-9 Weeks of Gestation.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is usually performed beyond 10 weeks of gestation, because earlier in pregnancy, the fetal fraction is low, resulting in failure to obtain reliable results. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT earlier in pregnancy using a method for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis that eliminates the need for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), DNA sequencing, or microarrays (Vanadis® system, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Cell-free DNA was extracted from the maternal plasma of 30 singleton pregnancies at 6-9 weeks of gestation (group 1) and at 11-14 weeks of gestation of the same patients (group 2). The mean crown-rump length (CRL) and gestational age in group A was 16.12 mm and that in group B was 61.45 mm. In group A, results were obtained in all, but one, cases (97%). From the remaining pregnancies, one miscarried at 8 weeks and, therefore, the follow-up NIPT at 12 weeks could not be performed. The fetal sex was diagnosed correctly in the 28 cases that had a successful early test, and the results were in accordance with the examination at 12 weeks. There were no cases of aneuploidies and disomy was diagnosed correctly in all. The "Vanadis" prenatal NIPT assay can successfully be used early during the first trimester at 6-9 weeks of gestation (early NIPT) to identify the fetal sex. Further studies are needed to explore the diagnostic potential for aneuploidies.

Potential efficacy of digital polymerase chain reaction for non-invasive prenatal screening of autosomal aneuploidies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) presents a promising approach for quantifying DNA and analyzing copy number variants, particularly in non-invasive prenatal testing. This method offers a streamlined and time-efficient procedure in contrast to the widely used next-generation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal testing. Studies have reported encouraging results for dPCR in detecting fetal autosomal aneuploidies. Consequently, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dPCR in screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for relevant articles published up to December 30, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was utilized for the quality assessment of the included articles. Furthermore, a bivariate random-effect regression model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the utility of dPCR for trisomy 21 screening. RESULTS: A total of 9 articles were included in this review, with all of them assessing the utility of dPCR in trisomy 21 screening, and 2 and 1 studies conducting additional analysis on the screening abilities of dPCR for trisomy 18 and 13, respectively. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing trisomy-21 screening with karyotyping demonstrated dPCR's pooled sensitivity of 98% [95% CI: 94 -100] and specificity of 99% [95% CI: 99 -100]. While conducting a meta-analysis for trisomy 13 and 18 proved impractical, reported values for sensitivity and specificity were favorable. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that dPCR holds promise as an effective tool for non-invasive prenatal testing, presenting a less time-consuming and intricate alternative to next-generation sequencing. However, further research is necessary to evaluate dPCR's applicability in clinical settings and to delineate its specific advantages over next-generation sequencing. This study contributes valuable insights into the potential of dPCR for enhancing prenatal screening methodologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7/3/2024, with a registration code of CRD42024517523.

Accuracy of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing for maternal copy number variations: A comparative study with CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for maternal copy number variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Expanded NIPT was used to detect CNVs ≥2 Mb at a whole-genome scale. The threshold of maternal deletion was copy numbers (CN) ≤ 1.6, and the threshold of maternal duplication was CN ≥ 2.4. RESULTS: Of the 5440 pregnant women with successful expanded NIPT results, 28 maternal CNVs ≥2 Mb were detected in 27 pregnant women. Except for five cases reported as test failure, 23 CNVs ≥2 Mb were confirmed among the remaining 22 pregnant women by CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA. The genomic location, copy numbers and fragment size of maternal CNVs reported by expanded NIPT were consistent with the results of CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal CNVs ≥2 Mb can be accurately evaluated according to the CN indicated by expanded NIPT results.

[Comparison of two superparamagnetic purification magnetic beads-based screening and enrichment techniques for isolating cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma for non-invasive prenatal screening].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of modified enrichment method for cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) through purified superparamagnetic beads during non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). METHODS: A total of 26 252 pregnant women undergoing NIPT at the Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Haidian District from December 2017 to September 2022 were recruited and randomly assigned into the conventional group (n = 10 573) and the modified enrichment group (n = 15 679), who were then subjected to the screening and enrichment of the cffDNA using a conventional and a modified technique, respectively. High-risk pregnant women detected by NIPT were subjected to invasive prenatal diagnosis. All women were followed up for their pregnancy outcomes, and the detection efficacy of the two methods was compared in terms of fragment size, concentration of cffDNA, duplicate detection rate, and indices of clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: The fragment size of the main peak of the cell-free DNA library of the modified enrichment group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group [267 (264, 269) bp vs. 294 (292, 296) bp, P < 0.01], while the concentration of cffDNA was significantly higher [21.86% (17.61%, 26.36%) vs. 9.08% (6.87%, 11.87%), P < 0.01]. In addition, the duplicate detection rate (0.740% vs. 2.02%, X2 = 83.90, P < 0.01) and detection failure rate (0.006% vs. 0.057%, P < 0.05) in the modified enrichment group were significantly lower than those of the conventional group. The combined positive predictive value (PPV) in both high-risk (64.3% vs. 76.1%) and low-risk (35.3% vs. 45.5%) pregnant women from the modified enrichment group was slightly lower than those from the conventional group, though no significant difference was detected. There was one false negative case for trisomy 21 among the high-risk pregnant women from the conventional group, and no false negative case was found in the modified enrichment group. CONCLUSION: The modified technique to screen and enrich the cffDNA has significantly enhanced the relative concentration of cffDNA and reduced the failure and duplication detection rate of NIPT, which has significantly reduced the incidence of false negative cases due to the low concentration of cffDNA, and greatly increased the overall detection efficacy of NIPT.

Noninvasive Prenatal Test Results Indicative of Maternal Malignancies: A Nationwide Genetic and Clinical Follow-Up Study.

The author describes the results and implications of a study on noninvasive prenatal test results that indicate maternal malignancies.

Perspectives of pregnant women on broadening the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing from screening for foetal aneuploidies to prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perspectives of pregnant women on broadening the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) from screening for foetal aneuploidies to prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: Four online focus groups (n = 23 participants) and 14 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants included pregnant women with and without a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Both women at low and high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes had a positive attitude towards using NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. Perceived benefits included the possibility to potentially improve maternal and foetal outcomes by taking risk-reducing measures and/or intensified monitoring during pregnancy and the ability to mentally prepare for the potential adverse outcome. Perceived concerns included anxiety and stress caused by a high-risk test result, a false sense of control over pregnancy, and potential false reassurance. Additionally, women reasoned that broadening the scope of NIPT could increase the complexity of prenatal screening and raised concerns on the combined screening aims in one test (prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes to improve foetal and maternal health vs. screening for foetal aneuploidies to increase reproductive autonomy). On a societal level, considerations on the risk of medicalising pregnancy and overall pressure to opt for NIPT were mentioned. CONCLUSION: In general, pregnant women have a positive attitude towards broadening the scope of NIPT to the prediction of pregnancy outcomes, although some concerns are acknowledged.

Universal Targeted Haplotyping by Droplet Digital PCR Sequencing and Its Applications in Noninvasive Prenatal Testing and Pharmacogenetics Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of haplotypes of variants is important for pharmacogenomics analysis and noninvasive prenatal testing for monogenic diseases. However, there is a lack of robust methods for targeted haplotyping. METHODS: We developed digital PCR haplotype sequencing (dHapSeq) for targeted haplotyping of variants, which is a method that compartmentalizes long DNA molecules into droplets. Within one droplet, 2 target regions are PCR amplified from one template molecule, and their amplicons are fused together. The fused products are then sequenced to determine the phase relationship of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles. The entire haplotype of 10s of SNPs can be deduced after the phase relationship of individual SNPs are determined in a pairwise manner. We applied dHapSeq to noninvasive prenatal testing in 4 families at risk for thalassemia and utilized it to detect NUDT15 diplotypes for predicting drug tolerance in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (72 cases and 506 controls). RESULTS: For SNPs within 40 kb, phase relation can be determined with 100% accuracy. In 7 trio families, the haplotyping results for 97 SNPs spanning 185 kb determined by dHapSeq were concordant with the results deduced from the genotypes of both parents and the fetus. In 4 thalassemia families, a 19.3-kb Southeast Asian deletion was successfully phased with 97 downstream SNPs, enabling noninvasive determination of fetal inheritance using relative haplotype dosage analysis. In the NUDT15 analysis, the variant status and phase of the variants were successfully determined in all cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The dHapSeq represents a robust and scalable haplotyping approach with numerous clinical and research applications.