Cost-effectiveness of using recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone before radioiodine ablation for thyroid cancer treatment in Spanish hospitals. / Coste-efectividad de la utilización de la tirotropina recombinante humana previa a la ablación con radioyodo en el tratamiento del cáncer de tiroides en hospitales españoles.

OBJECTIVES: In thyroid cancer treatment, the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) must be elevated before radioiodine ablation, either by exogenous (with recombinant human thyrotropin [rhTSH]) or endogenous stimulation by thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW). The use of rhTSH avoids hypothyroidism and favours the subsequent elimination of radioiodine, but involves the cost of the product. For this reason, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed, taking into account all costs involved and the benefits associated with the use of this therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a Markov modelling with two analysis arms (rhTSH and THW), stratified into high (100mCi/3700 MBq) and low (30mCi/1110 MBq) radioiodine doses, and using 17 weekly cycles, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) related to the use of rhTSH was determined. The clinical inputs included in the model were based on published studies and in a treatment survey conducted in Spain. RESULTS: Radioablation preparation with rhTSH is superior to THW, showing additional benefits (0.048 AVAC), as well as cost savings (-€614.16), with an incremental cost-effectiveness rate (ICER) of -€12,795/QALY. The univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses showed the result to be robust. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rhTSH previous to radioablation in Spain has cost savings, as well as a series of health benefits for the patient, making it highly cost-effective.

Is TSH necessary for initial assessment of thyroid nodules?

OBJECTIVE: The use of thyrotropin (TSH) in the initial assessment of thyroid nodules is inefficient and leads to unnecessary assessment costs. We compared the total costs of thyroid nodule assessment with or without the use of TSH in the initial assessment. METHODS: A total of 1808 patients with thyroid nodules received TSH, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and thyroid scintigraphy (TS) assessment, including 83 autonomously functioning thyroid nodule (AFTN) cases and 1725 non-AFTN cases. The total costs of the TSH strategy and non-TSH strategies were compared. The ratio of single-use costs of FNA to TS (CFNA/TS ) was used as the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Only when 6·03 ≤ CFNA/TS ≤ 27·17, the lowest total costs were associated with using the conventional TSH strategy. When CFNA/TS <6·03 or CFNA/TS >27·17, the lowest costs were found with FNA and TS, respectively. CONCLUSION: From the perspective of cost economics, in iodine-sufficient areas, we recommend that the decision on the use of TSH for the initial assessment of thyroid nodules should be based on the testing costs of FNA and TS in that medical unit.

Recombinant human TSH versus hypothyroidism. Cost-minimization-analysis in the follow-up care of differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: The primary aim of this study was to compare pharmacoeconomic effects of hypothyroidism secondary to hormone withdrawal (THW) and recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) for follow-up WBS in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The second aim was to determine patients' preference for one procedure or the other. PATIENTS, METHODS: This retrospective survey included 327 patients with DTC who underwent at least one in-hospital WBS with rhTSH between 1999 and 2006. They had also undergone THW for WBS. Patients received a two-page questionnaire via mail addressing five symptoms and ten items regarding managing their daily life which was answered by 61.6%. The responder group did not differ from the entire group. The medical and societal cost of both procedures for diagnostic WBS was calculated including direct and all ascertainable indirect cost for the reference year 2005. A sensitivity analysis included the German DRG system of 2007 and 2010. RESULTS: After THW, 94% of patients reported hypothyroid symptoms. Using rhTSH, symptoms occurred significantly less. As a result, 97% of patients favored rhTSH over THW. Mean absence from salaried work was 12.3 days after THW compared to 4 days with rhTSH. Family members of salaried employees missed 3 and 0.7 workdays after THW and rhTSH, respectively. Almost twice as often, medical attention was sought after THW (36%) compared to rhTSH (19 %). Undergoing THW, 48% of patients still used their car while hypothyroid. Our cost calculation revealed a slight benefit of about 89.00 Euro in favour of rhTSH stimulation. CONCLUSION: Hypothyroidism after THW causes significant morbidity and safety risks. The clinical and societal benefits associated with rhTSH are roughly gained at equivalent overall cost to that of THW.

Cost-effectiveness of using recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone before radioiodine ablation for thyroid cancer: the Canadian perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Radioiodine ablation for the treatment of thyroid cancer is traditionally performed after preparing patients by inducing hypothyroidism. Exogenous stimulation of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) using recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) avoids hypothyroidism and hastens the clearance of radioiodine from the patient. These advantages are achieved without jeopardizing the success rate of remnant ablation. An economic analysis was performed to place the increased acquisition cost of rhTSH in the context of the health benefits achieved and the earlier discharge from radioprotection. METHODS: Markov modeling, using 17 individual weekly cycles, was used to assess the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) associated with exogenous stimulation. Clinical inputs were largely sourced from a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing remnant ablation success after either rhTSH or hypothyroid preparation. The model applied Canadian unit costs, taking a societal perspective. Additional costs associated with rhTSH were considered in the context of the clinical benefits and cost offsets. These included avoidance of hypothyroidism, increased work productivity, earlier administration of ablation after surgery, and earlier discharge from the radio-protective ward because of faster radioiodine clearance following rhTSH preparation. The model duration avoided the need for discounting. RESULTS: The additional benefits of rhTSH (0.0576 QALY) are obtained with an incremental cost of CDN$87, generating an incremental cost per QALY of CDN$1520. Deterministic one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated the result to be robust. CONCLUSIONS: The use of rhTSH before radioiodine ablation represents a reasonable allocation of costs, with the benefits to patients, hospitals, and society as a whole, obtained at modest cost.

Length and cost of hospital stay of radioiodine ablation in thyroid cancer patients: comparison between preparation with thyroid hormone withdrawal and thyrogen.

PURPOSE: Treatment of thyroid cancer consists of thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablation following thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation. Similar ablation rates were obtained with either thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or rhTSH. But with rhTSH, the elimination of radioiodine is more rapid, thus reducing its whole-body retention and potentially resulting in a shorter hospital stay. The aim of this study was to assess the financial impact of a reduced length of hospital stay with the use of rhTSH. METHODS: This was a case-control study of thyroid cancer patients treated postoperatively with 3,700 MBq (100 mCi) radioiodine; 35 patients who received rhTSH were matched with 64 patients submitted to THW according to covariates influencing radioiodine retention. The length of hospitalization (LOH) was estimated for each method according to the threshold of radioiodine retention below which the patient can be discharged from the hospital. The economic analysis was conducted from a hospital perspective. Simulations were performed. RESULTS: For a threshold of 400 MBq, the LOH was 2.4 days and 3.5 days with rhTSH and THW, respectively, and the cost for an ablation stay was, respectively, 2,146 and 1,807 . In the French context, 57% of the acquisition cost of rhTSH was compensated by the reduction of the length of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: By increasing the iodine excretion, rhTSH allows a shorter hospitalization length, which partially compensates its acquisition cost.