Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 24(4): 412-20, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24417679

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although commonly performed, tonsillectomy is not necessarily a low-risk procedure for litigation. We have reviewed malpractice claims involving fatal and nonfatal injuries following tonsillectomy with an emphasis on anesthesia- and opioid-related claims and their characteristics. METHODS: Tonsillectomy-related malpractice claims and jury verdict reports from the United States (US) between 1984 and 2012 found in the LexisNexis MEGA™ Jury Verdicts and Settlements database were reviewed by two independent reviewers. LexisNexis database collects nationwide surgical, anesthesia, and other malpractice claims. Data including years of case and verdicts, surgical, anesthetic and postoperative opioid-related complications, details of injury, death, cause of death, litigation result, and judgment awarded were analyzed. When there were discrepancies between the two independent reviewers, a third reviewer (SS) was involved for resolution. Inflation adjusted monetary awards were based on 2013 US dollars. RESULTS: There were 242 tonsillectomy-related claim reports of which 98 were fatal claims (40.5%) and 144 nonfatal injury claims (59.5%). Verdict/settlement information was available in 72% of cases (n = 175). The median age group of patients was 8.5 years (range 9 months to 60 years). Primary causes for fatal claims were related to surgical factors (n = 39/98, 39.8%) followed by anesthesia-related (n = 36/98, 36.7%) and opioid-related factors (n = 16/98, 16.3%). Nonfatal injury claims were related to surgical (101/144, 70.1%), anesthesia (32/144, 22.2%)- and opioid-related factors (6/144, 4.2%). Sleep apnea was recorded in 17 fatal (17.4%) and 15 nonfatal claims (10.4%). Opioid-related claims had the largest median monetary awards for both fatal ($1 625 892) and nonfatal injury ($3 484 278) claims. CONCLUSIONS: Tonsillectomy carries a high risk from a medical malpractice standpoint for the anesthesiologists and otolaryngologists. Although surgery-related claims were more common, opioids- and anesthetic-related claims were associated with larger median monetary verdicts, especially those associated with anoxic, nonfatal injuries. Caution is necessary when opioids are prescribed post-tonsillectomy, especially in patients with sleep apnea.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Tonsilectomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Tonsilectomia/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 92 Suppl 1: S33-72, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23625716

RESUMO

Septoplasty, tonsillectomy (with and without adenoidectomy) and cervical lymph node excision are amongst the most common 50 inpatient operations in Germany. Intracapsular tonsillectomies (i.e., tonsillotomies) are increasingly performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate alleged medical malpractice, technical traps and pitfalls associated with tonsillectomy (TE), adenoidectomy (AE), tonsillotomy (TT), septoplasty (SP) and cervical lymph node excision (LN).A questionnaire was sent to the Regional Medical Conciliation Boards, Medical Services of the Health Insurance Companies (MDK) and Regional Institutes of Forensic Medicine in Germany to collect anonymized cases of complications or medico legal implications following TE, TT, AE, LN and SP. The results were discussed in the light of the contemporary medical literature and published verdicts in Germany.The response rate of our survey was 55.9%. The Institutes of Forensic Medicine contributed 9 cases, 49 cases were submitted by the Regional Conciliation Boards and none by MDK. All forensic cases were associated with exsanguinations following tonsillectomy including 2 children (5 and 8 years of age) and 7 adults (aged 20-69 years). The fatal post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH) had occurred 8.7 days on average; 4 patients experienced the bleeding episode at home (day 5, 8, 9 and 17, respectively). Repeated episodes of bleeding requiring surgical intervention had occurred in 6 patients. 3 Conciliation Boards submitted expert opinions concerning cases TT (1), AE (4), LN (3), SP (16) and TE (25). Cases with lethal outcome were not registered. Only 3 of the 49 cases were assessed as surgical malpractice (6.1%) including lesion of the spinal accessory nerve, wrong indication for TE and dental lesion after insertion of the mouth gag. The review of the medico legal literature yielded 71 published verdicts after AE and TE (29), LN (28) and SP (14) of which 37 resulted in compensation of malpractice after LN (16; 57%), TE (11; 41%), SP (8; 57%) and AE (2; 100%). There were 16 cases of PTH amongst 27 trials after TE resulting either in death (5) or apallic syndrome (5). Bleeding complications had occurred on the day of surgery in only 2 patients. 16 trials were based on malpractice claims following SP encompassing lack of informed consent (6), anosmia (4), septal perforation (2), frontobasal injury (2) and dry nose (2). Trials based on LN were associated exclusively with a lesion of the spinal accessory nerve (28), including lack of informed consent in 19 cases. 49 cases (69%) were decided for the defendant, 22 (31%) were decided for the plaintiff with monetary compensation in 7 of 29 AE/TE-trials, 9 of 28 LN-trials and 6 of 14 SP-trials. Lack of informed consent was not registered for AE/TE but LN (11) and SP (2).Complicated cases following TE, TT, ATE, SP and LN are not systematically collected in Germany. It can be assumed, that not every complicated case is published in the medical literature or law journals and therefore not obtainable for scientific research. Alleged medical malpracice is proven for less than 6% before trial stage. Approximately half of all cases result in a plaintiff verdict or settlement at court. Proper documentation of a thorough counselling, examination, indication, informed consent and follow-up assists the surgeon in litigation. An adequate complication management of PTH is essential, including instructions for the patients/parents, instructions for the medical staff, readily available surgical instruments and appropriate airway management in an interdisciplinary approach. Electrosurgical tonsillectomy techniques were repeatedly labeled as a risk factor for bleeding complications following TE. Institutions should analyse the individual PTH rate on a yearly basis. Contradictory expert opinions and verdicts of the courts concerning spinal accesory nerve lesions following LN are due to a lack of a surgical standard.


Assuntos
Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Tonsilectomia/normas , Adenoidectomia/efeitos adversos , Adenoidectomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Adenoidectomia/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Prova Pericial/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Excisão de Linfonodo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Septo Nasal/cirurgia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pescoço/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/mortalidade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tonsilectomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto Jovem
3.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 121(5): 337-40, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22724280

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We determined the characteristics of medical negligence claims following tonsillectomy. METHODS: Claims relating to tonsillectomy between 1995 and 2010 were obtained from the National Health Service Litigation Authority database. The number of open and closed claims was determined, and data were analyzed for primary injury claimed, outcome of claim, and associated costs. RESULTS: Over 15 years, there were 40 claims of clinical negligence related to tonsillectomy, representing 7.7% of all claims in otolaryngology. There were 34 closed claims, of which 32 (94%) resulted in payment of damages. Postoperative bleeding was the most common injury, with delayed recognition and treatment of bleeding alleged in most cases. Nasopharyngeal regurgitation as a result of soft palate fistulas or excessive tissue resection was the next-commonest cause of a claim. The other injuries claimed included dentoalveolar injury, bums, tonsillar remnants, and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Inadequate informed consent was claimed in 5 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical negligence claims following tonsillectomy have a high success rate. Although postoperative bleeding is the most common cause of negligence claims, a significant proportion of claims are due to rare complications of surgery. Informed consent should be tailored to the individual patient and should include a discussion of common and serious complications.


Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia , Erros Médicos , Tonsilectomia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal , Imperícia/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Tonsilectomia/economia , Tonsilectomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Tonsilectomia/mortalidade
5.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 138(3): 315-20, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18312878

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the background and outcomes of tonsillectomy malpractice claims. METHODS: Review of 69 New York State insurance claims (Part I) and 87 national court trials (Part II) alleging injury after tonsillectomy. RESULTS: Part I. New York State insurance cases were most commonly discontinued (44%) or settled (42%) before trial. Compensations with a settlement or verdict were made in 48 percent of cases. Part II. Death or major injury occurred in 52 percent of insurance cases, with a mean award of $403,656 being made to plaintiffs. Of cases reaching trial, 60 percent of plaintiffs were compensated. Awards against anesthesiologists were more frequent and higher than against surgeons ($5 million vs $839,650). Death or major injury occurred in 52 percent of court cases, resulting in mean indemnity of $3.8 million. Most cases of death or major injury were attributable to airway complications. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of both New York state claims and court cases involved death or devastating morbidity, mostly related to airway complications, resulting in large awards. Tonsillectomy is a source of uncommon but potentially high-dollar-value litigation exposure to the surgeon, often attributable to non-surgical complications.


Assuntos
Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Tonsilectomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Anestesiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Criança , Cirurgia Geral/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , New York/epidemiologia , Tonsilectomia/mortalidade , Estados Unidos
7.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci ; 29(4): 362-8, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15270823

RESUMO

Rulings in recent negligence cases reveal a shift towards what the 'reasonable patient' would expect in deciding the risks doctors must disclose to patients. This survey aimed to investigate whether the 'reasonable patient' and 'responsible body of medical opinion' agree about which risks should be discussed regarding tonsillectomy. Using questionnaires, surgeons were asked which of the 10 complications they routinely discussed and patients were asked how seriously they regarded these complications. The results were compared with the Test of Proportions. Most surgeons routinely mentioned otalgia, odynophagia, throat infection and re-operation. Most patients regarded potentially fatal bleeding, pneumonia and blood transfusion as very serious but only the minority of surgeons mentioned these (P < 0.001). When obtaining consent for tonsillectomy, surgeons do not routinely mention all the risks that the 'reasonable patient' would expect. The 'reasonable patient' would expect that re-operation, transfusion, pneumonia and fatal blood loss are discussed.


Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Tonsilectomia/psicologia , Transfusão de Sangue , Queimaduras , Dor de Orelha , Humanos , Infecções , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Boca/lesões , Pneumonia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória , Reoperação , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Tonsilectomia/legislação & jurisprudência , Traumatismos Dentários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...