The effects of pharmacological accommodation and cycloplegia on axial length and choroidal thickness / Efeitos da acomodação farmacológica e da cicloplegia no comprimento axial e na espessura da coroide

ABSTRACT Purpose: To investigate the effects of pharmacological accommodation and cycloplegia on ocular measurements. Methods: Thirty-three healthy subjects [mean (±SD) age, 32.97 (±5.21) years] volunteered to participate in the study. Measurement of the axial length, macular and choroidal thickness, refractive error, and corneal topography, as well as anterior segment imaging, were performed. After these procedures, pharmacological accommodation was induced by applying pilocarpine eye drops (pilocarpine hydrochloride 2%), and the measurements were repeated. The measurements were repeated again after full cycloplegia was induced using cyclopentolate eye drops (cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1%). The correlations between the measurements were evaluated. Results: A significant increase in subfoveal choroidal thickness after applying 2% pilocarpine was identified (without the drops, 319.36 ± 90.08 µm; with pilocarpine instillation, 341.60 ± 99.19 µm; with cyclopentolate instillation, 318.36 ± 103.0 µm; p<0.001). A significant increase in the axial length was also detected (without the drops, 23.26 ± 0.83 mm; with pilocarpine instillation, 23.29 ± 0.84 mm; with cyclopentolate instillation, 23.27 ± 0.84 mm; p=0.003). Comparing pharmacological accommodation and cycloplegia revealed a significant difference in central macular thickness (with pilocarpine instillation, 262.27 ± 19.34 µm; with cyclopentolate instillation, 265.93 ± 17.91 µm; p=0.016). Pilocarpine-related miosis (p<0.001) and myopic shift (p<0.001) were more severe in blue eyes vs. brown eyes. Conclusion: Pharmacological accommodation may change ocular measurements, such as choroidal thickness and axial length. This condition should be considered when performing ocular measurements, such as intraocular lens power calculations.(AU)

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar os efeitos da acomodação farmacológica e da cicloplegia nas medições oculares. Métodos: participaram do estudo 33 voluntários saudáveis (média de idade [± DP], 32,97 anos [± 5,21 anos]). Foram medidos o comprimento axial, a espessura macular e coroidal e o erro refrativo, bem como realizados exames de imagem da topografia corneana e do segmento anterior. Em seguida, foi induzida a acomodação farmacológica aplicando-se colírio de pilocarpina (cloridrato de pilocarpina a 2%) e as medições foram repetidas nos participantes. As mesmas medições foram repetidas depois de induzir a cicloplegia completa com colírio de ciclopentolato (cloridrato de ciclopentolato a 1%) e foram avaliadas as correlações entre as medidas. Resultados: Identificou-se aumento significativo da espessura coroidal subfoveal com o uso da pilocarpina a 2% (sem colírio, 319,36 ± 90,08 µm; com a instilação de pilocarpina, 341,60 ± 99,19 µm; com a instilação de ciclopentolato, 318,36 ± 103,0 µm; p<0,001). Detectou-se também aumento significativo do comprimento axial (sem colírio, 23,26 ± 0,83 mm; com a instilação de pilocarpina, 23,29 ± 0,84 mm; com a instilação de ciclopentolato, 23,27 ± 0,84 mm; p=0,003). Ao se comparar a acomodação farmacológica e a cicloplegia, houve diferença significativa na espessura macular central (com a instilação de pilocarpina, 262,27 ± 19,34 µm; com a instilação de ciclopentolato, 265,93 ± 17,91 µm; p=0,016). Observou-se que a miose associada à pilocarpina (p<0,001) e o desvio miópico (p<0,001) foram mais severos nos olhos azuis que nos castanhos. Conclusão: A acomodação farmacológica pode alterar medidas oculares como a espessura da coroide e o comprimento axial. Essa possibilidade deve ser levada em consideração ao se efetuarem medições oculares, tais como cálculos de potência de lentes intraoculares.(AU)

Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation / Comparação da previsibilidade refrativa pós-operatória do Pentacam HR e IOLMaster 500 após implante de lentes intraoculares multifocais

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the postoperative refractive predictability of IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR on the basis of keratometry and anterior chamber depth values in eyes with an indication for multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted on 118 eyes treated with phacoemulsification and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Only the eyes that achieved emmetropia in the dynamic refraction performed on postoperative day 30 were included. Haigis' formula was used in each case to calculate the intraocular lens power, and the intraocular lens with the target refraction closest to emmetropia was implanted. Four lens calculation scenarios were tested by combining keratometry and anterior chamber depth measurements obtained using the two devices. Results: IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR differed with regard to mean keratometry (D 0.07 ± 0.03 D; p=0.0065) and anterior chamber depth (D 0.08 ± 0.01 mm; p<0.001). In the analysis of covariance, the following differences were obtained using the Haigis' formula when confronted with the biometric values obtained by inserting keratometry and anterior chamber depth values, respectively: Penta/IOL x IOL/Penta (0.13 ± 0.03; p<0.0001); Penta/Penta × IOL/Penta (0.13 ± 0.03; p<0.0001); Penta/IOL × IOL/IOL (0.11 ± 0.03; p=0.001); Penta/Penta × IOL/IOL (0.11 ± 0.03; p=0.002); IOL/IOL × IOL/Penta (0.02 ± 0.03; p=0.865); and Penta/IOL × Penta/Penta (0.002 ± 0.03; p=0.99). The difference was smaller when measuring the anterior chamber depth using the IOLMaster 500, regardless of which device was used to measure keratometry. Conclusions: Pentacam HR significantly differed from IOLMaster 500 when calculating keratometry. As regards the anterior chamber depth, the two devices were equally accurate.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a previsibilidade refrativa pós-operatória do IOLMaster 500 e Pentacam HR com base nos valores de ceratometria e profundidade de câmara anterior nos olhos com indicação de implante de lentes intraoculares multifocais. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo realizado em 118 olhos tratados com facoemulsificação e implante de lentes intraoculares multifocal. Apenas os olhos que atingiram a emetropia na refração dinâmica no 30º dia pós-operatório foram incluídos. A fórmula de Haigis foi usada em cada caso para calcular o poder das lentes intraoculares, e a lente intraocular com a refração alvo mais próxima da emetropia foi implantada. Cenários de cálculo de quatro lentes foram testados pela combinação de medidas de ceratometria e profundidade de câmara anterior obtidas usando os dois dispositivos. Resultados: IOLMaster 500 e Pentacam HR diferiram quanto à média de ceratometria (D 0,07 ± 0,03 D; p=0,0065) e profundidade de câmara anterior (D 0,08 ± 0,01 mm; p<0,001). Na análise da covariância, as seguintes diferenças foram obtidas usando a fórmula de Haigis quando confrontadas com os valores biométricos obtidos pela inserção dos valores de ceratometria e profundidade de câmara anterior, respectivamente: Penta/IOL x IOL/Penta (0,13 ± 0,03; p<0,0001); Penta/Penta x IOL/Penta (0,13 ± 0,03; p<0,0001); Penta/IOL x IOL/IOL (0,11 ± 0,03; p=0,001); Penta/Penta x IOL/IOL (0,11 ± 0,03; p=0,002); IOL/IOL x IOL/Penta (0,02 ± 0,03; p=0,865); Penta/IOL x Penta/Penta (0,002 ± 0,03; p=0,99). A diferença foi menor ao medir a profundidade da câmara anterior usando o IOLMaster 500, independentemente de qual dispositivo foi usado para medir a ceratometria. Conclusões: O Pentacam HR diferiu significativamente do IOLMaster 500 no cálculo de ceratometria. Quanto à profundidade da câmara anterior, os dois dispositivos foram igualmente precisos.

Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers / Diferenças entre as córneas de pacientes saudáveis e pacientes subclínicos avaliados com dois tipos de tomógrafos de córnea

ABSTRACT Purpose: To analyze subclinical keratoconus topography indexes using Pentacam and Orbscan-II measurements to identify evidences for seeking sensitive indexes to screen and diagnose subclinical keratoconus. Methods: Fifty healthy participants (50 eyes) and 40 patients with subclinical keratoconus (40 eyes) were included. Seven common parameters including corneal thickness at the thinnest point; minimum curvature of the front surface (minimum simulated keratometry value, SimK's Min); maximum curvature of the front surface (maximum simulated keratometry value, SimK's Max); the frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of the curvature; the back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature; the anterior corneal surface height (anterior Diff value); and the posterior corneal surface height (posterior Diff value) measured by Pentacam and Orbscan-II between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes were compared. Results: Statistical differences between the healthy and subclinical keratoconus groups (p<0.01) were found in all corneal parameters measured using both devices. Differences in the minimum curvature of the front surface (SimK's Min), thinnest point, anterior Diff value, and posterior Diff value were significant between Pentacam and Orbscan-II in the subclinical keratoconus group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study identify the differences between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes at the minimum curvature of the front surface, maximum curvature of the front surface, frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, Anterior Diff value, and Posterior Diff value measures using Orbscan II and Pentacam that can help eye care practitioners clinically diagnose subclinical keratoconus.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar os índices subclínicos de to pografia de ceratocone utilizando as medidas feitas com Pentacam e com Orbscan-II para identificar evidências para a busca de índices sensíveis para triagem e diagnóstico de ceratocone subclínico. Métodos: Cinquenta participantes saudáveis (50 olhos) e 40 pacientes com ceratocone subclínico (40 olhos) foram incluídos. Sete parâmetros comuns, incluindo a espessura da córnea no ponto mais fino; a curvatura mínima da superfície frontal (valor mínimo da ceratometria simulada, Min de SimK); a curvatura máxima da superfície frontal (valor máximo da ceratometria simulada, Max de SimK); a superfície frontal e a superfície posterior da córnea de melhor ajuste ao raio da curvatura, a altura da superfície anterior da córnea (valor Diff anterior) e a altura da superfície corneana posterior (valor Diff posterior) medidos pelo Pentacam e pelo Orbscan-II entre os olhos normais e com ceratocone subclínico foram comparados. Resultados: As diferenças estatísticas entre os grupos saudável e com ceratocone subclínico (p<0,01) foram encontradas em todos os parâmetros corneanos medidos usando ambos os dispositivos. Diferenças na curvatura mínima da superfície frontal (Min de SimK) no ponto mais fino, no valor Diff anterior e no valor Diff posterior foram significativas entre Pentacam e Orbscan-II no grupo com ceratocone subclínico (p<0,05). Conclusão: Os achados deste estudo identificam as diferenças entre olhos normais e com ceratocone subclínico para a curvatura mínima da superfície frontal, a curvatura máxima da superfície frontal, a superfície corneana frontal e a superfície corneana posterior de melhor ajuste ao raio esférico da curvatura e as medidas de Diff anterior e posterior usando Orbscan II e o Pentacam que podem auxiliar os profissionais de oftalmologia a diagnosticar clinicamente o ceratocone subclínico.

Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative refractive predictability of IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR on the basis of keratometry and anterior chamber depth values in eyes with an indication for multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted on 118 eyes treated with phacoemulsification and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Only the eyes that achieved emmetropia in the dynamic refraction performed on postoperative day 30 were included. Haigis' formula was used in each case to calculate the intraocular lens power, and the intraocular lens with the target refraction closest to emmetropia was implanted. Four lens calculation scenarios were tested by combining keratometry and anterior chamber depth measurements obtained using the two devices. RESULTS: IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR differed with regard to mean keratometry (D 0.07 ± 0.03 D; p=0.0065) and anterior chamber depth (D 0.08 ± 0.01 mm; p<0.001). In the analysis of covariance, the following differences were obtained using the Haigis' formula when confronted with the biometric values obtained by inserting keratometry and anterior chamber depth values, respectively: Penta/IOL x IOL/Penta (0.13 ± 0.03; p<0.0001); Penta/Penta × IOL/Penta (0.13 ± 0.03; p<0.0001); Penta/IOL × IOL/IOL (0.11 ± 0.03; p=0.001); Penta/Penta × IOL/IOL (0.11 ± 0.03; p=0.002); IOL/IOL × IOL/Penta (0.02 ± 0.03; p=0.865); and Penta/IOL × Penta/Penta (0.002 ± 0.03; p=0.99). The difference was smaller when measuring the anterior chamber depth using the IOLMaster 500, regardless of which device was used to measure keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: Pentacam HR significantly differed from IOLMaster 500 when calculating keratometry. As regards the anterior chamber depth, the two devices were equally accurate.

Corneal differences between healthy and subclinical patients assessed using two diferente corneal tomographers.

PURPOSE: To analyze subclinical keratoconus topography indexes using Pentacam and Orbscan-II measurements to identify evidences for seeking sensitive indexes to screen and diagnose subclinical keratoconus. METHODS: Fifty healthy participants (50 eyes) and 40 patients with subclinical keratoconus (40 eyes) were included. Seven common parameters including corneal thickness at the thinnest point; minimum curvature of the front surface (minimum simulated keratometry value, SimK's Min); maximum curvature of the front surface (maximum simulated keratometry value, SimK's Max); the frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of the curvature; the back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature; the anterior corneal surface height (anterior Diff value); and the posterior corneal surface height (posterior Diff value) measured by Pentacam and Orbscan-II between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes were compared. RESULTS: Statistical differences between the healthy and subclinical keratoconus groups (p<0.01) were found in all corneal parameters measured using both devices. Differences in the minimum curvature of the front surface (SimK's Min), thinnest point, anterior Diff value, and posterior Diff value were significant between Pentacam and Orbscan-II in the subclinical keratoconus group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study identify the differences between normal and subclinical keratoconus eyes at the minimum curvature of the front surface, maximum curvature of the front surface, frontal corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, back corneal surface best-fit spherical radius of curvature, Anterior Diff value, and Posterior Diff value measures using Orbscan II and Pentacam that can help eye care practitioners clinically diagnose subclinical keratoconus.

Effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking on ocular response analyzer waveform-derived parameters in progressive keratoconus / Efeito do crosslimking corneano acelerado nos parâmetros derivados da forma de onda do analisador de resposta ocular no ceratocone progressivo

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking on corneal biomechanics with an ocular response analyzer in patients with progressive keratoconus. Methods: In this retrospective study, 50 eyes of 45 patients with progressive keratoconus who underwent accelerated corneal crosslinking were evaluated with ocular response analyzer waveform parameters before and one year after corneal crosslinking. Paired two-tailed Student's t-test was performed to compare the parameters before vs. after corneal crosslinking. Results: Mean patient age was 17.6 ± 3.6 (range 9-25) years. A significant increase was observed in p1 area, p2 area, h2, and dive2 values. No significant difference in corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, or other waveform-derived parameters was observed at one year postoperatively. Conclusion: For estimating the effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking on corneal biomechanics, parameters such as p1 area, p2 area, h2, and dive2 are more sensitive than corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor. These results may help us to find out which corneal crosslinking method is most effective for stiffening the cornea.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito do cross-linking corneano acelerado na biomecânica corneana com analisador de resposta ocular em pacientes com ceratocone progressivo. Métodos: Neste estudo retrospectivo, 50 olhos de 45 pacientes com ceratocone progressivo submetidos à cross-linking corneano acelerado foram avaliados com os parâmetros da forma de onda do analisador de resposta ocular antes e um ano após o tratamento com cross-linking corneano. O teste t de Student pareado bicaudal foi realizado para comparar os parâmetros antes e depois do cross-linking corneano. Resultados: A média de idade dos pacientes foi de 17,6 ± 3,6 (variação de 9 a 25) anos. Um aumento significativo foi observado nos valores de p1area, p2area, h2 e dive2. Nenhuma diferença significativa foi encontrada na histerese da córnea, fator de resistência da córnea ou outros parâmetros derivados da forma de onda foi observada em um ano de pós-operatório. Conclusão: Para estimar o efeito do cross-linking corneano acelerado na biomecânica corneana, parâmentros como p1area, p2area, h2 e dive2 são mais sensíveis que histerese da córnea e fator de resistência corneana. Esses resultados podem nos ajudar a descobrir qual método cross-linking corneano é mais eficaz no enrijecimento da córnea.

Effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking on ocular response analyzer waveform-derived parameters in progressive keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking on corneal biomechanics with an ocular response analyzer in patients with progressive keratoconus. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 50 eyes of 45 patients with progressive keratoconus who underwent accelerated corneal crosslinking were evaluated with ocular response analyzer waveform parameters before and one year after corneal crosslinking. Paired two-tailed Student's t-test was performed to compare the parameters before vs. after corneal crosslinking. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 17.6 ± 3.6 (range 9-25) years. A significant increase was observed in p1 area, p2 area, h2, and dive2 values. No significant difference in corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, or other waveform-derived parameters was observed at one year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: For estimating the effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking on corneal biomechanics, parameters such as p1 area, p2 area, h2, and dive2 are more sensitive than corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor. These results may help us to find out which corneal crosslinking method is most effective for stiffening the cornea.

Assessment of non-invasive tear break-up time and tear meniscus height after instillation of three different formulations of anesthetic eye drops by Oculus Keratograph 5M / Avaliação do tempo de ruptura lacrimal não invasivo e da altura do menisco lacrimal após a instilação de três diferentes formulações de colírio anestésico por Oculus Keratograph 5M

Abstract Purpose: To assess the non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) and tear meniscus height (TMH) after instilling the three different types of anesthetic eye drops by Oculus Keratograph 5M. Methods: In this prospective study, 85 healthy subjects (85 eyes) were randomly divided into three groups. The groups were randomly received lidocaine hydrochloride 2%, proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5%, and tetracaine hydrochloride 0.5%. The qualitative and quantitative parameters of tear film were assessed using NITBUT and TMH, respectively. In all groups, the quantity of tear film using TMH was measured in the right eye of subjects, while the quality of tear film using NITBUT was assessed in the left eye. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the difference between before and after the intervention. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Differences for TMH and NITBUT between before and after applying lidocaine hydrochloride 2% were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The mean values of NITBUT and TMH after the instillation of proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% showed a significant decrease than before the intervention (P < 0.05). Also, after the use of tetracaine hydrochloride 0.5%, the mean value of NITBUT was significantly increased (P < 0.05), but the mean value of TMH was significantly decreased than before the intervention (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Our study showed that lidocaine hydrochloride 2% as an anesthetic eye drops can be an appropriate choice for eye examinations due to a lack of significant effect on the quantity and quality of tear film.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar o tempo de ruptura lacrimal não invasivo (NITBUT) e a altura do menisco lacrimal (TMH) após instilar os três tipos diferentes de colírio anestésico pelo Oculus Keratograph 5M. Métodos: Neste estudo prospectivo, 85 indivíduos saudáveis (85 olhos) foram divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos. Os grupos receberam aleatoriamente cloridrato de lidocaína a 2%, cloridrato de proparacaína a 0.5% e cloridrato de tetracaína a 0.5%. Os parâmetros qualitativos e quantitativos do filme lacrimal foram avaliados utilizando NITBUT e TMH, respectivamente. Em todos os grupos, a quantidade de filme lacrimal utilizando TMH foi medida no olho direito dos sujeitos, enquanto a qualidade do filme lacrimal usando NITBUT foi avaliada no olho esquerdo. A análise de variância (ANOVA) foi utilizada para comparar a diferença entre antes e depois da intervenção. Um valor de P < 0.05 foi considerado significativo. Resultados: Diferenças para TMH e NITBUT entre antes e depois da aplicação de cloridrato de lidocaína a 2% não foram estatisticamente significantes (P > 0.05). Os valores médios de NITBUT e TMH após a instilação de cloridrato de proparacaína a 0.5% mostraram uma diminuição significativa do que antes da intervenção (P < 0.05). Além disso, após o uso de cloridrato de tetracaína a 0.5%, o valor médio de NITBUT foi significativamente aumentado (P < 0.05), mas o valor médio de TMH foi significativamente menor do que antes da intervenção (P < 0.05). Conclusão: Nosso estudo mostrou que o cloridrato de lidocaína a 2% como colírio anestésico pode ser uma escolha apropriada para exames oftalmológicos devido à falta de efeito significativo sobre a quantidade e a qualidade do filme lacrimal.

Analysis between two optical biometric devices in patients with cataract / Análise entre dois dispositivos de biometria óptica em pacientes com catarata

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the correlation of optical biometry and target with variable ages, anterior chamber depth, axial length, R1/K1 and R2/K2 established by two optical biometry devices in patients with cataract. Methods: The study included the analysis of 348 medical records, from which 503 cataract eyes were selected, which underwent evaluation by the optical biometric devices IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900 in the period of April to July 2017. Data collected were: age, anterior chamber depth, axial length, R1/K1 and R2/K2. Results: The average of the biometrics obtained using Lenstar was 21.02, varying 3.46, more or less, with an average target of -0.02, varying 0.45. In relation to the IOL Master it was 21.19, with a variation of 3.40 and average target of -0.01, a variation of 0.11. It can be observed that despite close values in relation to the mean, there was significance (p<0.001). Axial length (p<0.001) and R1/K1 (p<0.001) had an influence on the difference of the biometric values between the devices. Conclusion: A high degree of clinical and statistical correspondence was observed between the results obtained by the biometry devices in patients with cataract.

RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar a correlação da biometria óptica e target com as variáveis idade, profundidade da câmara anterior, comprimento axial, R1/K1 e R2/K2 estabelecidos por dois dispositivos de biometria óptica em pacientes com catarata. Métodos: O trabalho abrangeu a análise de 348 prontuários dos quais foram selecionados 503 olhos com catarata ,que passaram pela avaliação nos dispositivos de biometria óptica IOL Master 700 e Lenstar LS 900 no período de abril a julho de 2017. Os dados colhidos foram: idade, profundidade da câmara anterior, comprimento axial, R1/K1 e R2/K2 . Resultados: A média da biometria obtida utilizando o Lenstar foi de 21,02, variando 3,46 para mais ou para menos, com target médio de -0,02, variando 0,45. Já em relação ao IOL Master foi de 21,19, com variação de 3,40 e target médio de -0,01, variação de 0,11. Pode-se observar que apesar de valores próximos em relação à média, houve significância (p < 0,001). Houve a concordância da biometria em relação ao comprimento axial (p < 0,001) e R1/K1(p < 0,001). Conclusão: Observou-se alto grau de correspondência clínica e estatística entre os resultados obtidos pelos dispositivos de biometria em pacientes com catarata.

Satisfação de pacientes após cirurgia refrativa de monovisão avançada / Satisfaction of patients after advanced mono-refractive surgery

Resumo Objetivo: Monovisão é um conceito que descreve a correção propositadamente desigual da visão de em um olho para longe e outro olho para perto, sendo utilizada principalmente para correção da presbiopia. O objetivo principal foi avaliar a satisfação dos pacientes com a cirurgia refrativa de monovisão avançada. Os objetivos secundários foram avaliar a necessidade de uso de óculos após a cirurgia, e analise do perfil dos participantes. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo transversal observacional de série de casos baseado na revisão de prontuários de participantes submetidos a cirurgia refrativa de monovisão em uma clínica oftalmológica privada. A população estudada foi do tipo não-probabilistica com n de 50 participantes. A amostragem foi por conveniência, sendo selecionados os prontuários dos últimos 50 participantes que retornaram para consulta de revisão após a cirurgia refrativa realizada até novembro de 2016. Resultados: Foram analisados 50 prontuários. Quando questionados sobre a satisfação com o procedimento, a nota média atribuída foi 9,4 ± 0,6 dentro de uma escala de 0 a 10. Sobre a necessidade do uso de óculos após o procedimento, 92% dos pacientes referiram não necessitar. Os demais 8% que referiram utilizar eventualmente óculos para perto eram hipermetropes antes da cirurgia Conclusão: Concluímos que o índice de satisfação com a cirurgia de monovisão na amostra estudada foi alto e a maioria dos participantes referiu não necessitar de óculos após o procedimento. A amostra foi composta majoritariamente por mulheres com média de idade de 52 anos, hipermetropes, que realizaram a cirurgia em ambos os olhos. Nossa amostra foi distinta de outros estudos devido ao fato de incluirmos maior parte de participantes hipermetropes.

Abstract Objective: Monovision is a concept that describes the purposely unequal correction of vision from one eye to the other and eye to eye, and is mainly used to correct presbyopia. The main objective was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with advanced monovision refractive surgery. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the need for glasses after surgery, and to analyze the profile of the participants. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study of a series of cases was carried out based on the review of medical records of participants submitted to refractive surgery of monovision in a private ophthalmologic clinic. The population studied was of the non-probabilistic type with n of 50 participants. Sampling was for convenience, and the medical records of the last 50 participants who returned for revision consultation after refractive surgery performed until November 2016 were selected. Results: Fifty patients were analyzed. When questioned about satisfaction with the procedure, the mean score assigned was 9.4 ± 0.6 on a scale of 0 to 10. Regarding the need for glasses after the procedure, 92% of the patients reported not needing it. Conclusion: We concluded that the satisfaction index with monovision surgery in the sample studied was high and most of the participants reported that they did not require glasses after the procedure. The sample consisted mainly of women with mean age of 52 years, hypermetropes, who underwent surgery in both eyes. Our sample was different from other studies due to the fact that we included most participants with hypermetropes.

Queratocono: Caracterización clínico epidemiológica y topográfica. Consulta de Córnea. Sancti Spíritus, Abril - Octubre 2013 / Keratoconus: A Clinic epidemiologic and topographic characterization. Corneal surgery consults. Sancti Spíritus, April- October 2013

El queratocono constituye una de las distrofias corneales de etiología no precisada, caracterizada por una ectasia no inflamatoria y vascular de la córnea, se manifiesta en la adolescencia y adultos jóvenes dando lugar a un adelgazamiento corneal y disminución dela agudeza visual a causa del desarrollo de un astigmatismo miópico irregular, con el objetivo de describir las características clínicas, epidemiológicas y topográficas de pacientes con queratocono atendidos en la consulta de Córnea del Hospital General Camilo Cienfuegos de Sancti-Spíritus, en el periodo comprendido entre Abril y Octubre del 2013. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal. La muestra quedó conformada por 29 pacientes (58 ojos) con criterios de inclusión. Predominó el sexo femenino entre 20 y 29 años. La visión borrosa fue el síntoma principal. El mayor número de pacientes presentó un queratocono avanzado con signos corneales y paquimetría por debajo de 400 μm. Seencontró una estrecha relación entre el grado de severidad del queratocono, los signos clínicos predominantes, los valores de la paquimetría y el patrón topográfico central asimétrico(AU)

The Keratoconus is a corneal dystrophy with a non precise etiology; it is characterized by a non inflammatory and vascular ectasia of the cornea. It is presented in adolescents andyoung adults bringing as a result a corneal thinning and lowering of the visual accuracy due to the development of an irregular myopic astigmatism. To describe the clinic, epidemiologicand topographic characteristics of the patients with Keratoconus who were assisted at the corneal surgery consults in Camilo Cienfuegos General Hospital in Sancti Spiritus, during the period of April to October 2013: A transversal descriptive study was carried out from April to October in 2013. The sample was constituted by 29 patients (58 eyes) with criteria of inclusion. The highest incidence was in the female sex between 20 and 29 years old. Blurred vision was the main symptom. The highest number of patients had an advanced Keratoconus with pachimetric and corneal signs below 400um. It was established a close relationship between the level of severity of the Keratoconus, the predominant clinic signs, the values of the pachimetry and the central asymmetric topographical pattern(AU)

Repeatability and comparability of corneal power and corneal astigmatism obtained from a point-source color light-emitting diode topographer, a Placido-based corneal topographer, and a low-coherence reflectometer.

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability and agreement of corneal power and astigmatism obtained from the Cassini point-source color light-emitting diode (LED) topographer, Humphrey Atlas 9000 Placido-based corneal topographer, and Lenstar LS-900 low-coherence reflectometer in normal eyes. SETTING: Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. METHODS: Consecutively enrolled patients with normal corneas were enrolled. Three sets of measurements were obtained using the color-LED topographer, the Placido topographer, and the reflectometer. Vector analysis was used in the astigmatism analysis. The repeatability was evaluated using the within-subject standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement was verified using Bland-Altman plots. The paired Student t test was used to assess statistical significance. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes (32 patients) were evaluated. All devices provided highly repeatable corneal power and astigmatism measurements (ICC > 0.9) except for the Placido topographer with regard to J45 (ICC = 0.721). The color-LED topographer and the reflectometer obtained similar mean values of corneal power, astigmatism magnitude, J0, and J45 (P > .05), which was also true when comparing the color-LED topographer and the Placido topographer, except for the mean corneal power (P = .0007). The Bland-Altman plots showed a wide data spread for all analyzed variables. CONCLUSIONS: The color-LED topographer provided highly repeatable corneal power and astigmatism measurements. Even though it obtained values similar to those of the reflectometer and the Placido topographer, the wide data spread discourages their interchangeable use to assess corneal power and astigmatism. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs. Wang, Koch, and Weikert are consultants to Ziemer USA, Inc. Dr. Koch is a consultant to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Alcon Surgical, Inc., and i-Optics, Corp. Drs. Ventura and Al-Mohtaseb have no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Perfil paquimétrico horizontal para a detecção do ceratocone / Horizontal pachymetric profile for the detection of keratoconus

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a capacidade de dados de perfil paquimétrico horizontal, a fim de distinguir o ceratocone de córneas normais, e comparar a precisão de índices com outros tomográficos mais complexos. Métodos: Em um estudo retrospectivo, um olho selecionado aleatoriamente de 225 pacientes com ceratocone bilateral e de 335 pacientes com córneas normais foram incluídos. Todos os pacientes foram examinados por um especialista em córnea e foram submetidos ao exame de tomografia de córnea, Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Alemanha). Os dados de perfil paquimétrico horizontal em 6 milímetros passando pelo ápice foi avaliado. Com esses dados, a espessura no ápice corneano (P.ápice), a espessura no ponto mais fino do perfil horizontal (P.min.H), a progressão paquimétrica do ponto mais fino para o mais espesso (PPmin-máx), a progressão paquimétrica média no meridiano temos como referencial a média normal (PPméd) e a adequação a uma linha de tendência polinomial do segundo grau (R2). Um modelo de inteligência artificial foi construído para combinar esses dados. O desempenho para distinguir ceratocone do normal foi avaliada por curvas ROC. Resultados: Todos os índices avaliados foram estatisticamente diferentes entre os dois grupos (p <0,001). A área sob a curva ROC (AUC) de paquimetria no ápice e no TP foram de 0,904 e 0,938, respectivamente. O índice tomográfico com maior AUC foi o BAD-D (0,997). Em relação ao perfil horizontal, a AUC do P.min.H e PPmin-max foram 0,915 e 0,927, respectivamente. A adequação à linha de tendência para o gráfico de espessura no ápice apresentou AUC 0,896. O melhor desempenho foi obtido com o PPméd (AUC 0,932 Sensibilidade = 84,4% e especificidade de 92,5%). O modelo de inteligência artificial combinando todos os itens derivados do perfil horizontal melhorou o desempenho (AUC 0,991 Sens. = 96% e espec. = 98%). Conclusão: O perfil de espessura horizontal permite detectar o ceratocone, com capacidade comparável aos índices mais complexos. Esse tipo de análise pode fornecer o básico para novas abordagens, que utilizem dados presentes em aparelhos mais simples que o tomógrafo, reduzindo o custo para os pacientes.

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the ability of horizontal thickness profile to distinguish keratoconus from normal corneas, and compare the accuracy of these indices with more complex tomographic indices. Methods: In a retrospective study, one eye randomly selected from 225 patients with bilateral keratoconus and 335 patients with normal corneas were included. All patients were examined by a corneal specialist and underwent the examination of corneal tomography, Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Data of horizontal pachymetric profile passing through the apex of 6 mm was evaluated. With these data, the thickness at the corneal apex (P.ápice), the thickness of the thinnest point of the horizontal profile (P.min.H), the pachymetric progression from the thinnest point to the thickest (PPmin-max), the average pachymetric progression in the meridian as reference the average from the normal population (PPméd) and the fitness with a second degree polynomial trendline (R2). An artificial intelligence model was built to combine this data. The performance for distinguishing normal keratoconus was evaluated by ROC curves. Results: All of these indices were statistically different between the two groups (p <0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) thickness at the apex and TP were 0.904 and 0.938, respectively. The tomographic index with higher AUC was BAD-D (0.997). Regarding the horizontal profile, the AUC of PP.min.H and PPmin-max were 0.915 and 0.927, respectively. The fitness to the trendline to the horizontal thickness graph AUC was 0.896. The best performance was obtained with the PPméd (AUC 0.932 sensitivity = 84.4% and specificity of 92.5%). The artificial intelligence model combining all items derived from horizontal profile improved performance (AUC 0.991 Sensitivity = 96% and specificity of 98%). Conclusion: The horizontal thickness profile can detect keratoconus, with a capacity comparable to more complex indices. This type of analysis can provide the basics for new approaches, using data present in simpler devices than the tomographer reducing the cost for the patients.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera / Comparação entre medidas de espessura central da córnea com reflectometria óptica de baixa coerência, tomografia de coerência óptica de domínio Fourier, e câmera Scheimpflug

Purpose: To compare the results of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and a Scheimpflug camera (SC), combined with Placido corneal topography. Methods: A total of 25 healthy subjects were enrolled in the present study, and one eye of each subject was included. A detailed ophthalmic examination was performed in all cases following CCT measurements with OLCR, FD-OCT, and SC. The results were compared using an ANOVA test. Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between methods. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the results of the CCT measurements obtained using the three different devices (p=0.009). Significant correlations were found between OLCR and FD-OCT (r=0.97; p<0.0001), FD-OCT and SC (r=0.91; p<0.0001), and OLCR and SC (r=0.95; p<0.0001). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) obtained from Bland-Altman plots were from -7.2 μm to 28.7 μm for OLCR versus FD-OCT, from -19.2 μm to 30.4 μm for OLCR versus SC, and from -42.6 to 32.3 μm for FD-OCT versus SC. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for each method, with ICCs >0.98. Conclusion: Although the results of CCT measurements obtained from these three devices were highly correlated with one another and the mean differences between instruments were comparable with the reported diurnal CCT fluctuation, the measurements are not directly interchangeable in clinical practice because of the wide LOA values. .

Objetivo: Comparar os resultados de medições de espessura corneana central (CCT ) obtidos com reflectometria óptica de baixa coerência (OLCR), tomografia de coerência óptica de domínio Fourier (FD-OCT ), e uma câmera Scheimpflug (SC), combinada com topografia corneana de placido. Métodos: Um olho de cada de 25 indivíduos saudáveis foram incluídos neste estudo. Um exame oftalmológico detalhado foi realizado em todos os casos após as medidas de CCT com OLCR, FD-OCT, e SC. Os resultados foram comparados por meio do teste ANOVA. Análise de Bland-Altman foi utilizada para demonstrar concordância entre os métodos. A repetibilidade intra-examinador foi avaliada por meio de coeficientes de correlação intraclasse (ICCs). Resultados: Foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os resultados das medidas de CCT obtidas a partir de três dispositivos diferentes (p=0,009). Foram encontradas correlações significativas entre OLCR e FD-OCT (r=0,97, p<0,0001), FD-OCT e SC (r=0,91, p<0,0001), e OLCR e SC (r=0,95; p<0,0001). Os limites de 95% de confiança (LOA) obtidos a partir de gráficos de Bland-Altman foram de -7,2 a 28,7 μm para OLCR contra FD-OCT, de -19,2 a 30,4 μm para OLCR contra SC, e de -42,6 a 32,3 μm para FD-OCT contra SC. A repetibilidade intra-examinador foi excelente para cada método com ICCs>0,98. Conclusões: Apesar de os resultados das medições CCT obtidos a partir destes três dispositivos terem sido altamente correlacionados entre si e as diferenças médias entre os instrumentos serem comparáveis à flutuação relatado da CCT diurna, as medições não são diretamente intercambiáveis na prática clínica em razão da largura dos valores limites de confiança. .

Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate Pentacam ectasia detection indices in topographically normal patients and in subclinical keratoconus cases. DESIGN: Prospective, observational case series. METHODS: setting: Institutional. patients: Group 1 comprised 1 eye from 189 patients with unremarkable topography and Groups 2 and 3 included the better and worse eyes, respectively, of 55 keratoconic patients. Group 2 eyes with normal topography (n = 37) were considered subclinical keratoconus cases. observation procedure: Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography. main outcome measures: Eleven Pentacam ectasia detection indices. RESULTS: All Pentacam ectasia indices significantly differed between Groups 1 and 2 and were correlated with keratoconus grade. Only 99 eyes (52%) in Group 1 had normal values for every index, whereas 7 subclinical keratoconus eyes (19%) showed 2 or fewer abnormal indices. Standardized relational thickness and overall deviation indices had 73% and 89% sensitivity for subclinical keratoconus, respectively. Both average and maximum pachymetric progression indices offered 84% sensitivity while maximum relational thickness index showed 78% sensitivity for subclinical keratoconus. Optimized cutoff values for subclinical keratoconus increased the sensitivity of the standardized and maximum relational thickness indices. CONCLUSION: Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography can detect most subclinical keratoconus cases with unremarkable topography, but performance is not as good as reported and varies considerably for each index. The overall deviation, average and maximum pachymetric progression, and maximum relational thickness indices offer the highest sensitivity, which can be improved by using optimized cutoff values. Specificity constitutes an issue for some indices and up to 10% of subclinical keratoconus cases may go undetected by this technology.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and a Scheimpflug camera (SC), combined with Placido corneal topography. METHODS: A total of 25 healthy subjects were enrolled in the present study, and one eye of each subject was included. A detailed ophthalmic examination was performed in all cases following CCT measurements with OLCR, FD-OCT, and SC. The results were compared using an ANOVA test. Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between methods. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the results of the CCT measurements obtained using the three different devices (p=0.009). Significant correlations were found between OLCR and FD-OCT (r=0.97; p<0.0001), FD-OCT and SC (r=0.91; p<0.0001), and OLCR and SC (r=0.95; p<0.0001). The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) obtained from Bland-Altman plots were from -7.2 µm to 28.7 µm for OLCR versus FD-OCT, from -19.2 µm to 30.4 µm for OLCR versus SC, and from -42.6 to 32.3 µm for FD-OCT versus SC. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for each method, with ICCs >0.98. CONCLUSION: Although the results of CCT measurements obtained from these three devices were highly correlated with one another and the mean differences between instruments were comparable with the reported diurnal CCT fluctuation, the measurements are not directly interchangeable in clinical practice because of the wide LOA values.

Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To describe pachymetric progression indices (PPI) of the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) and the concept of relational thickness, and to test their accuracy for differentiating keratoconic and normal corneas compared with single-point thickness values. METHODS: One hundred thirteen individual eyes randomly selected from 113 normal patients and 44 eyes of 44 patients with keratoconus were studied using the Pentacam HR by acquiring central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest point (TP), position of the TP and PPI at minimal (PPI Min) and maximal (PPI Max) meridians, and the average (PPI Ave) of all meridians. Relational thickness parameters were calculated as the ratios of TP and CCT and PPI values. Mann-Whitney U test assessed differences in groups for each variable. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for all variables and pairwise comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were noted between normal and keratoconic eyes for all parameters (P<.001), except for horizontal position of TP (P=.79). The best parameters, named Ambrósio's Relational Thickness (ART), were ART-Ave (TP/PPI Ave) and ART-Max (TP/PPI Max) with areas under the ROC curves of 0.987 and 0.983, respectively. The best cutoffs were 424 µm and 339 µm for ART-Ave and ART-Max, respectively. Pachymetric progression indices and ART had a greater area under the curve than TP and CCT (P<.001); TP (0.955) had a greater area under the curve than CCT (0.909; P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Tomographic-derived pachymetric parameters were better able to differentiate normal and keratoconic corneas than single-point pachymetric measurements. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of tomography in identifying early forms of ectasia as well as ectasia risk among LASIK candidates.

Interchangeability between Placido disc and Scheimpflug system: quantitative and qualitative analysis.

PURPOSE: Many systems try to replace Placido disc-based topographers, such as those based in Scheimpflug principles. The purpose of this study is to check if they are interchangeable. METHODS: Quantitative analysis evaluated data obtained from EyeSys and Pentacam, i.e. simulated keratometric values, in addition to flattest and steepest keratometric values. Sixty-three maps from each device (EyeSys scale=0.5 D; Pentacam scale= 0.25 D) were used for the comparison. Qualitative analysis selected 10 EyeSys and 15 Pentacam topographies used in the quantitative evaluation. Aspheric, keratoconus suspects (KS) and established keratoconus corneas were included. Four groups (children [CH], non-physicians adults [AD], residents in ophthalmology [OP] and refractive surgeons [RS]) were asked to match the topographies belonging to the same eye. RESULTS: Analysis showed that the parameters are correlated; however they are not clinically similar. In the qualitative analysis, the percent of correct matches increased when KS was removed. CH group was statistically different from every group in these comparisons. When only KS was considered, CH vs. OP, CH vs. RS and AD vs. RS remained statistically different. AD vs. OP showed no relevant difference in any comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The systems are not fully interchangeable, yet they are correlated. Practitioners who are adapting to Pentacam should use the 0.25 D scale maps and transform formulas that use EyeSys parameters. Only with persistent training may the topographies be properly matched; KS corneas are more difficult to be correctly paired.

Interchangeability between Placido disc and Scheimpflug system: quantitative and qualitative analysis / Permutabilidade entre o disco de Plácido e o sistema Scheimpflug: análise quantitativa e qualitativa

PURPOSE: Many systems try to replace Placido disc-based topographers, such as those based in Scheimpflug principles. The purpose of this study is to check if they are interchangeable. METHODS: Quantitative analysis evaluated data obtained from EyeSys and Pentacam, i.e. simulated keratometric values, in addition to flattest and steepest keratometric values. Sixty-three maps from each device (EyeSys scale=0.5 D; Pentacam scale= 0.25 D) were used for the comparison. Qualitative analysis selected 10 EyeSys and 15 Pentacam topographies used in the quantitative evaluation. Aspheric, keratoconus suspects (KS) and established keratoconus corneas were included. Four groups (children [CH], non-physicians adults [AD], residents in ophthalmology [OP] and refractive surgeons [RS]) were asked to match the topographies belonging to the same eye. RESULTS: Analysis showed that the parameters are correlated; however they are not clinically similar. In the qualitative analysis, the percent of correct matches increased when KS was removed. CH group was statistically different from every group in these comparisons. When only KS was considered, CH vs. OP, CH vs. RS and AD vs. RS remained statistically different. AD vs. OP showed no relevant difference in any comparison. CONCLUSIONS: The systems are not fully interchangeable, yet they are correlated. Practitioners who are adapting to Pentacam should use the 0.25 D scale maps and transform formulas that use EyeSys parameters. Only with persistent training may the topographies be properly matched; KS corneas are more difficult to be correctly paired.

OBJETIVO: Muitos sistemas tentam substituir os topógrafos baseados no disco de Plácido, como aqueles baseados nos princípios de Scheimpflug. O objetivo deste estudo é verificar se eles são intercambiáveis. MÉTODOS: A análise quantitativa avaliou dados obtidos através do EyeSys e do Pentacam, os valores de ceratometria simulada, além dos menores e maiores valores ceratométricos observados. Sessenta e três mapas de cada dispositivo (escala do EyeSys=0,5D; escala do Pentacam=0,25D) foram utilizados na comparação. Para a análise qualitativa, foram selecionadas 10 topografias do Pentacam e 15 do EyeSys. Córneas asféricas, suspeitas de ceratocone (KS) e com diagnóstico de ceratocone foram incluídas. Quatro grupos (crianças [CH], os adultos não-médicos [AD], residentes em oftalmologia [OP] e cirurgiões refrativos [RS]) foram convidados a corresponder as topografias pertencentes ao mesmo olho. RESULTADOS: As análises mostraram que os parâmetros estão correlacionados, no entanto, não são clinicamente similares. Na análise qualitativa, o porcentual de acertos aumentou quando KS foram removidas. O grupo CH foi estatisticamente diferente de qualquer outro grupo, nestas comparações. Quando somente KS foram consideradas, CH vs. OP, CH vs. RS e AD vs. RS manteve-se estatisticamente diferente. AD vs. OP não mostrou nenhuma diferença relevante em qualquer comparação. CONCLUSÕES: Os sistemas não são totalmente intercambiáveis, porém são correlacionados. Os profissionais que estão se adaptando ao Pentacam devem utilizar os mapas de escala 0,25 D e transformar fórmulas que usem parâmetros do EyeSys. Somente com treinamento persistente as topografias podem ser devidamente relacionadas; córneas KS são mais difíceis de ser pareadas corretamente.

Evaluation of machine learning classifiers in keratoconus detection from orbscan II examinations.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of support vector machine, multi-layer perceptron and radial basis function neural network as auxiliary tools to identify keratoconus from Orbscan II maps. METHODS: A total of 318 maps were selected and classified into four categories: normal (n = 172), astigmatism (n = 89), keratoconus (n = 46) and photorefractive keratectomy (n = 11). For each map, 11 attributes were obtained or calculated from data provided by the Orbscan II. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to train and test the classifiers. Besides accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each classifier were generated, and the areas under the curves were calculated. RESULTS: The three selected classifiers provided a good performance, and there were no differences between their performances. The area under the ROC curve of the support vector machine, multi-layer perceptron and radial basis function neural network were significantly larger than those for all individual Orbscan II attributes evaluated (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, the results suggest that using a support vector machine, multi-layer perceptron classifiers and radial basis function neural network, these classifiers, trained on Orbscan II data, could represent useful techniques for keratoconus detection.