Prognostic Value of APACHE IV Score in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation on ECMO.

BACKGROUND: Methods for risk stratification of candidates for heart transplantation (HTx) supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are limited. We evaluated the reliability of the APACHE IV score to identify the risk of mortality in this patient subset in a multicenter study. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2022, 167 consecutive ECMO patients were bridged to HTx; they were divided into two groups, according to a cutoff value of APACHE IV score, obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for 90-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and compared through the log-Rank test. Cox regression model was used to estimate which factors were associated with survival. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality prediction of the APACHE IV score showed an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), with a cutoff value of 49 (specificity 91.7%-sensibility 69.6%). 125 patients (74.8%) showed an APACHE IV score value < 49 (Group A), and 42 (25.2%) ≥ 49 (Group B). 90-day mortality was 11.2% in Group A and 76.2% in Group B (p < 0.01). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 85.5%, 77% versus 23.4%, 23.4% (p < 0.01) in Groups A and B. Mortality correlated at univariable analysis with recipient age, body mass index, mechanical ventilation, APACHE IV score, and platelets number. At multivariable analysis only APACHE IV score (HR: 1.07 [1.05-1.09, 95% CI]) independently affected survival. CONCLUSIONS: The APACHE IV score represents a powerful predictor of survival in patients bridged to HTx on ECMO support, and could guide candidacy of patients on ECMO.

Veno-arterial ECMO ventricular assistance as a direct bridge to heart transplant: A single center experience in a low-middle income country.

INTRODUCTION: The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a direct bridge to heart transplantation (BTT) is not common in adults worldwide. BTT with ECMO is associated with increased early/mid-term mortality compared with other interventions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where no other type of short-term mechanical circulatory support is available, its use is widespread and increasingly used as rescue therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) as a direct bridge to heart transplantation (HT). OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of adult patients using VA-ECMO as a direct BTT in an LMIC and compare them with international registries. METHODS: We conducted a single-center study analyzing consecutive adult patients requiring VA-ECMO as BTT due to refractory CS or cardiac arrest (CA) in a cardiovascular center in Argentina between January 2014 and December 2022. Survival and adverse clinical events after VA-ECMO implantation were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 86 VA-ECMO, 22 (25.5%) were implanted as initial BTT strategy, and 52.1% of them underwent HT. Mean age was 46 years (SD 12); 59% were male. ECMO was indicated in 81% for CS, and the most common underlying condition was coronary artery disease (31.8%). Overall, in-hospital mortality for VA-ECMO as BTT was 50%. Survival to discharge was 83% in those who underwent HT and 10% in those who did not, p < .001. In those who did not undergo HT, the main cause of death was hemorrhagic complications (44%), followed by thrombotic complications (33%). The median duration of VA-ECMO was 6 days (IQR 3-16). There were no differences in the number of days on ECMO between those who received a transplant and those who did not. In the Spanish registry, in-hospital survival after HT was 66.7%; the United Network of Organ Sharing registry estimated post-transplant survival at 73.1% ± 4.4%, and in the French national registry 1-year posttransplant survival was 70% in the VA-ECMO group. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with cardiogenic shock, VA-ECMO as a direct BTT allowed successful HT in half of the patients. HT provided a survival benefit in listed patients on VA-ECMO. We present a single center experience with results comparable to those of international registries.

Examining a 12-year experience within Kazakhstan's national heart transplantation program.

Kazakhstan has one of the lowest heart transplantation (HTx) rates globally, but there are no studies evaluating the outcomes of HTx. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the national HTx program over a 12-year period (2012-2023). Survival analysis of the national HTx cohort was conducted using life tables, Kaplan‒Meier curves, and Cox regression methods. Time series analysis was applied to analyze historical trends in HTx per million population (pmp) and to make future projections until 2030. The number of patients awaiting HTx in Kazakhstan was evaluated with a regional breakdown. The pmp rates of HTx ranged from 0.06 to 1.08, with no discernible increasing trend. Survival analysis revealed a rapid decrease in the first year after HTx, reaching 77.0% at 379 days, with an overall survival rate of 58.1% at the end of the follow-up period. Among the various factors analyzed, recipient blood levels of creatinine and total bilirubin before surgery, as well as the presence of infection or sepsis and the use of ECMO after surgery, were found to be significant contributors to the survival of HTx patients. There is a need for public health action to improve the HTx programme.

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Complications and Mortality in the Early Postoperative Period After Heart Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak directly impacted heart transplantation (HT) surgery activity. Reallocating resources and converting surgical intensive care units to COVID-19 facilities led to reduced accessibility and quality of health care facilities to heart recipient patients. AIM: To study the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on heart transplantation activity and outcomes in the early postoperative period. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation in our institution from March 2018 to February 2022. The patient population (N = 281) included 223 (79.4%) men and 58 (20.6%) women. The perioperative data of the prepandemic group, March 2018 to February 2020 (N = 130), and the pandemic group, March 2020 to February 2022 (N = 151), were compared. RESULTS: We found differences in preoperative inotropic support between the groups (N = 43 (33.1%) vs N = 72 (47.7%), P < .05), respectively). The number of urgent HTs increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 51 (39.2%), vs N = 72 (47.7%), P = .155). Analyzed groups did not differ according to renal, pulmonary, or neurology complications. Intensive care unit (ICU) standing time was longer in the pandemic group (6 days [3-12] vs 11 days [5-12], P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of end-stage heart failure recipients requiring cardiac support increased. Extended time of ICU standing in the pandemic group may be related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although some efforts have been made to reduce the impact of the pandemic, more research is required.

Assessment of Selected Parameters of Heart Donors and Recipients and Their Impact on the Transplantation Result.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of heart donors and recipients parameters on the outcomes after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODOLOGY: Two hundred fifteen patients who underwent OHT from 2020 to 2023 were analyzed. RESULTS: Average donors age 36.3 (±13.1) years, 74 women (34.42%), BMI 25.3 (±4.99), Na+ concentration 153.7 (±11.8) mmol/L. Mean intraventricular septum thickness 10.0 (±2.2) mm, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter 44.3 (±6) mm, ejection fraction 60.3 (±7.92) %. Median procalcitonin was 0.6 ng/mL. Levonor was used in 75.8%, Empressin in 4.2%, Dopamine in 5.1%, Dobutamine in 3.7%, and Adrenaline in 3.7% of donors. The most common cause of death: intracranial injury (34.42%). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation occurred in 34%, alcoholism in 20.9%, nicotinism in 16.3%, and drug addiction in 7.4% of donors. Mean aortic cross-clamping time was 200.3 (±48.8) minutes. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) after OHT required 6.1%, extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 6.1%, and renal dialysis 36% of recipients. The 1-year mortality rate was 19.1%. Death after OHT correlated with: longer aortic cross-clamping time (207.6 vs 198.59 minutes, P = .292), longer extracorporeal circulation time (196.3 vs 186.47 minutes, P = .335), lower Empressin dose (median 0.01 vs 0.02 j.m/min, P = .03) in donors, longer postoperative mechanical ventilation (mean 101.46 vs 23.09 hours, P = .001), more frequent dialysis, IABP or ECMO (P = .001) and older age of the recipient (51.2 vs 44.8 years, P = .014). Previous cardiac surgery or any surgical intervention after transplantation significantly influenced mortality. The remaining donor factors had no impact on the OHT result. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of risk factors in the donor and recipient may improve treatment outcomes after OHT.

Differences in excess mortality by recipient sex after heart transplant: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Identification of differences in mortality risk between female and male heart transplant recipients may prompt sex-specific management strategies. Because worldwide, males of all ages have higher absolute mortality rates than females, we aimed to compare the excess risk of mortality (risk above the general population) in female vs male heart transplant recipients. METHODS: We used relative survival models conducted separately in SRTR and CTS cohorts from 1988-2019, and subsequently combined using 2-stage individual patient data meta-analysis, to compare the excess risk of mortality in female vs male first heart transplant recipients, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient current age. RESULTS: We analyzed 108,918 patients. When the donor was male, female recipients 0-12 years (Relative excess risk (RER) 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.26), 13-44 years (RER 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.25), and ≥45 years (RER 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27) showed higher excess mortality risks than male recipients of the same age. When the donor was female, only female recipients 13-44 years showed higher excess risks of mortality than males (RER 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.20), though not significantly (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of a male donor, female recipients of all ages had significantly higher excess mortality than males. When the donor was female, female recipients of reproductive age had higher excess risks of mortality than male recipients of the same age, though this was not statistically significant. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons underlying these differences.

Usage of older donors is associated with higher mortality after heart transplantation: A UNOS observational study.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of heart from older donors is variable across centers with uncertain outcomes of recipients. We sought to utilize a national registry to examine the usage and outcomes of heart transplant (HT) recipients from older donors. We also explored the impact of current donor heart allocation scheme on the outcomes of hearts from older donors. METHODS: This observational study utilized the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2015 and 2023 with donors categorized into age <45 years or ≥45 years and evaluated organ disposition and geographical variation. Thirty-day, 1-, and 3-year mortality, and graft failure rates were compared among recipients as per donor age group. We also evaluated annual trends in HT for each group over the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 24,966 adult donors were recovered: 3,742 (15.0%) were ≥45 years; 3,349 (15.6%) adults received heart from such donors with significant geographical variation, and a declining utilization in the transplantation rate in current donor allocation system. Donors with age ≥45 years had higher comorbidities and were allotted with a significantly shorter ischemic time to recipients who were significantly less likely to receive temporary mechanical circulatory support and more likely female. Unadjusted and adjusted, 30-day mortality were similar but 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure rates were significantly higher in recipients of such donors. Spline analysis suggested a higher 1-year mortality risk at older donor age with risk increasing after age 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: Older donor age was associated with worsened 1- and 3-year mortality and graft failure for heart transplant recipients.

Does Failure to Rescue Drive Race/Ethnicity-based Disparities in Survival After Heart Transplantation?

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess whether race/ethnicity is an independent predictor of failure to rescue (FTR) after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Outcomes following OHT vary by patient level factors; for example, non-White patients have worse outcomes than White patients after OHT. Failure to rescue is an important factor associated with cardiac surgery outcomes, but its relationship to demographic factors is unknown. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we included all adult patients who underwent primary isolated OHT between 1/1/2006 snd 6/30/2021. FTR was defined as the inability to prevent mortality after at least one of the UNOS-designated postoperative complications. Donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics, including complications and FTR, were compared across race/ethnicity. Logistic regression models were created to identify factors associated with complications and FTR. Kaplan Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association between race/ethnicity and posttransplant survival. RESULTS: There were 33,244 adult, isolated heart transplant recipients included: the distribution of race/ethnicity was 66% (n=21,937) White, 21.2% (7,062) Black, 8.3% (2,768) Hispanic, and 3.3% (1,096) Asian. The frequency of complications and FTR differed significantly by race/ethnicity. After adjustment, Hispanic recipients were more likely to experience FTR than White recipients (OR 1.327, 95% CI[1.075-1.639], P =0.02). Black recipients had lower 5-year survival compared with other races/ethnicities (HR 1.276, 95% CI[1.207-1.348], P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the US, Black recipients have an increased risk of mortality after OHT compared with White recipients, without associated differences in FTR. In contrast, Hispanic recipients have an increased likelihood of FTR, but no significant mortality difference compared with White recipients. These findings highlight the need for tailored approaches to addressing race/ethnicity-based health inequities in the practice of heart transplantation.

Status 2 upgrade indication impacts posttransplant mortality in patients bridged with intraaortic balloon pump in the new heart allocation system.

To evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing heart transplants (HTs) using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) under exception status. Adult patients supported by an IABP who underwent HT between November 18, 2018, and December 31, 2020, as documented in the United Network for Organ Sharing, were included. Patients were stratified according to requests for exception status. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to look for differences in survival between groups. A total of 1284 patients were included; 492 (38.3%) were transplanted with an IABP under exception status. Exception status patients had higher body mass index, were more likely to be Black, and had longer waitlist times. Exception status patients received organs from younger donors, had a shorter ischemic time, and had a higher frequency of sex mismatch. The 1-year posttransplant survival was 93% for the nonexception and 88% for the exception IABP patients (hazard ratio: 1.85 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.86, P = .006]). The most common reason for requesting an exception status was inability to meet blood pressure criteria for extension (37% of patients). The most common reason for an extension request for an exception status was right ventricular dysfunction (24%). IABP patients transplanted under exception status have an increased 1-year mortality rate posttransplant compared with those without exception status.

Registro español de trasplante cardiaco. XXXIV informe oficial de la Asociación de Insuficiencia Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología / Spanish heart transplant registry. 34th official report of the Heart Failure Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology

Introducción y objetivos: El Registro español de trasplante cardiaco actualiza sus datos anualmente. En este artículo se presentan los datos correspondientes al año 2022.Métodos: Se describen las principales características clínicas, del tratamiento recibido y de los resultados en términos de supervivencia de los procedimientos realizados en 2022, así como las tendencias de estos desde el año 2013.Resultados: En 2022 se han realizado 311 trasplantes cardiacos (un 3,0% más que el año anterior). No se han observado cambios relevantes en las características demográficas y clínicas en 2022 respecto a los años inmediatamente anteriores, lo que confirma las tendencias ya descritas en la última década a una disminución de los procedimientos urgentes y el uso de asistencia circulatoria, sobre todo de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular. En el último decenio, las supervivencias son del 81,4 y el 73,4% a 1 año y a los 3 años, con una mejoría numérica que no ha alcanzado significación estadística.Conclusiones: En la última década se observa una estabilización en las características de los procedimientos de trasplante cardiaco y de sus resultados. Registrado en ClinicalTrial.gov (Identificador: NCT03015311).(AU)

Introduction and objectives: The Spanish heart transplant registry updates its data annually. The current update presents the data for the year 2022.Methods: We describe the main clinical characteristics, treatments received, and survival outcomes including procedures performed in 2022, along with their trends since 2013.Results: In 2022, 311 cardiac transplants were performed, representing a 3.0% increase compared with 2021. Compared with previous years, no significant changes in demographic and clinical characteristics were observed in 2022, confirming the trends identified in the last decade. These trends indicate a decrease in urgent procedures and the use of circulatory support, particularly ventricular assist devices. In the last decade, survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 81.4% and 73.4% respectively, with a slight, nonsignificant improvement.Conclusions: In the last decade, there has been a stabilization in the characteristics of heart transplant procedures and their outcomes. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (Identifier: NCT03015311).(AU)

The impact of postoperative cognitive impairment on mid-term survival after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Antecedent studies reported that a substantial proportion of heart transplant recipients developed postoperative cognitive impairment in the long term. However, no studies have explored the association between postoperative cognitive impairment and survival after heart transplantation. METHODS: The data of 43 adult patients who underwent heart transplantation were consecutively enrolled and assessed using the MMSE and MoCA neuropsychological tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analyses. Primary component analysis was performed to integrate MoCA subtests into the "Attention factor," "Naming factor," and "Orientation factor." RESULTS: About 30% of the patients were diagnosed with short-term postoperative cognitive impairment. The impairment group was older and had lower baseline cognitive performances, larger LV diameter, worse MMSE decline and higher ratio of significant MoCA decline. Postoperative cognitive impairment was significantly associated with worse survival (P = .028). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that higher postoperative MoCA score was significantly associated with lower mid-term post-transplant mortality (HR = .744 [.584, .949], P = .017), in which "Attention factor" contributed to this association most (HR = .345 [.123, .970], P = .044) rather than "Naming factor" or "Orientation factor." Notably, preoperative cognitive impairment was closely related with postoperative cognitive impairment and also indicated the worse post-transplant survival (P = .015). CONCLUSION: Postoperative as well as preoperative cognitive impairments were associated with a worse mid-term survival after heart transplantation, indicating that neuropsychological assessments before and after heart transplantation should be routinely performed for heart transplant recipients for better risk stratification.

Hemodynamic markers of pulmonary vasculopathy for prediction of early right heart failure and mortality after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is broadly accepted as an imminent risk factor for mortality after heart transplantation (HTx). However, no current HTx recipient risk score includes PVR or other hemodynamic parameters. This study examined the utility of various hemodynamic parameters for risk stratification in a contemporary HTx population. METHODS: Patients from seven German HTx centers undergoing HTx between 2011 and 2015 were included retrospectively. Established risk factors and complete hemodynamic datasets before HTx were analyzed. Outcome measures were overall all-cause mortality, 12-month mortality, and right heart failure (RHF) after HTx. RESULTS: The final analysis included 333 patients (28% female) with a median age of 54 (IQR 46-60) years. The median mean pulmonary artery pressure was 30 (IQR 23-38) mm Hg, transpulmonary gradient 8 (IQR 5-10) mm Hg, and PVR 2.1 (IQR 1.5-2.9) Wood units. Overall mortality was 35.7%, 12-month mortality was 23.7%, and the incidence of early RHF was 22.8%, which was significantly associated with overall mortality (log-rank HR 4.11, 95% CI 2.47-6.84; log-rank p < .0001). Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) was associated with overall mortality (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.25-2.30; p < .001) independent of other non-hemodynamic risk factors. Ea values below a calculated cutoff represented a significantly reduced mortality risk (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.76; p < .0001). PVR with the established cutoff of 3.0 WU was not significant. Ea was also significantly associated with 12-month mortality and RHF. CONCLUSIONS: Ea showed a strong impact on post-transplant mortality and RHF and should become part of the routine hemodynamic evaluation in HTx candidates.

Association of Donors With US Public Health Service Risk Criteria and Outcomes After Adult vs Pediatric Cardiac Transplant.

Importance: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) evaluates donor risk for acute transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C based on US Public Health Services (PHS)-specific criteria. However, recent data regarding use and outcomes of those donors with PHS risk criteria among pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients are lacking. Objective: To compare use and outcomes of graft from donors with PHS risk criteria vs those with a standard-risk donor (SRD) in children vs adults in a contemporary cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort was a nationwide analysis of heart transplants in the US that used data from the UNOS database. Participants were children (<18 years old) and adults (≥18 years old) who received a heart transplant from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021. Exposures: UNOS-defined donor risk status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trend analysis compared changes in PHS risk criteria use among children and adults. Patient survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank and Cox proportional hazards to compare PHS risk-criteria outcomes vs SRD-criteria outcomes in children and adult heart transplant recipients. Additional analysis was performed among adults who received a PHS-risk criteria graft that was previously declined for pediatric recipients. Results: Of 5115 pediatric transplant recipients (donor without PHS risk median [IQR] age, 5 [0-13] years and donor with PHS risk median [IQR] age, 8 [0-14] years) and 30 289 adult heart transplant recipients (donor without PHS risk median [IQR] age, 56 [46-63] years and donor with PHS risk median [IQR] age, 57 [47-63] years), PHS risk criteria comprised 8% in children vs 25% in adults. PHS criteria are being increasingly used over the past decade with the proportion of recipients transplanted with PHS risk-criteria donors being approximately 3 times greater among adult recipients than children recipients. Pediatric recipients of a PHS risk-criteria donor had greater pretransplant ventilatory support, whereas adult recipients of a PHS risk-criteria donor had greater pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. Patient survival was similar between pediatric recipients of PHS risk-criteria grafts vs SRD-criteria grafts and slightly higher among adult recipients of PHS risk-criteria grafts vs SRD-criteria grafts. The 1778 adult recipients who received a PHS criteria-risk donor that was previously declined for pediatric recipients had similar patient survival recipients compared with SRD-criteria donors (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.03; P = .18). Conclusions and Relevance: In the current era, a 3-fold greater proportion of adult recipients receive a PHS risk-criteria graft compared with children despite similar posttransplant patient survival. The ongoing organ donor shortage underscores the need for consideration of PHS risk criteria where these donors remain underused.

Association of COVID-19 Vaccination With Risk of COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Importance: Orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination is lower in solid organ transplant recipients, there has been no study assessing the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in OHT recipients. Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination and associations with SARS-CoV-2 infection and clinical outcomes in a large population of adult OHT recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study examined data from a US heart transplant program at a single center for all adult recipients of OHT who were followed up from January 15, 2021, through January 31, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was number of SARS-CoV-2 infections and related hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and deaths between vaccinated vs unvaccinated adult recipients of OHT. Results: A total of 436 patients who received OHT were included in the study, of which 106 patients were infected with COVID-19. The mean (SD) age was 54 (17) years; 303 (69.5%) were men and 133 (30.5%) were women. There were 366 patients in the vaccinated cohort with 72 COVID-19 infections (19.7%), 15 hospitalizations (4.1%), 4 ICU admissions (1.1%), and 3 deaths (0.8%). There were 70 patients in the unvaccinated cohort with 34 COVID-19 infections (48.6%), 10 hospitalizations (14.3%), 3 ICU admissions (4.3%), and 3 deaths (4.3%). COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 infection (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.30-0.56), hospitalization (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.61), and death (RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.82). Among the 366 vaccinated OHT recipients, there was no echocardiographic evidence of graft dysfunction, clinically significant rejection, or allosensitization at 6 months after they received the COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with OHT who are infected with SARS-CoV-2 are at greater risk of severe infection and death compared with immunocompetent individuals. COVID-19 vaccination was associated with fewer COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths, with no heart transplant-specific adverse events. COVID-19 vaccination for all OHT recipients is of paramount importance.

Combined heart and liver transplantation: an updated systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT) is one of the most complex procedures of surgery that has been implemented in the last 35 years. The aim of our meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of CHLT. MATERIALS: The meta-analysis was designed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) recommendations. A literature search was conducted up to April 2020 using the MEDLINE,® SCOPUS,® ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase™, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar™ databases. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 16 studies with 860 patients. The mortality rate following CHLT was 14.1%. One and five-year survival rates were 85.3% and 71.4% while the heart and liver rejection rates were 6.1% and 9.1% respectively. The hospital stay was 25.8 days and the intensive care unit stay was 9.9 days. Pooled values were also calculated for cardiopulmonary bypass duration, units of transfused red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma, postoperative infection rate, mechanical ventilation rate and follow-up duration. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its complexity, CHLT is a safe and effective procedure for the management of lethal diseases that lead to progressive heart and/or liver failure. Nevertheless, there must be strict adherence to the indications for surgery, and future studies should compare CHLT with isolated cardiac and hepatic transplantations.

Effect of Moderate Hypothermia vs Normothermia on 30-Day Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The optimal approach to the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiogenic shock is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early use of moderate hypothermia (33-34 °C) compared with strict normothermia (36-37 °C) improves mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock receiving venoarterial ECMO. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial of patients (who were eligible if they had been endotracheally intubated and were receiving venoarterial ECMO for cardiogenic shock for <6 hours) conducted in the intensive care units at 20 French cardiac shock care centers between October 2016 and July 2019. Of 786 eligible patients, 374 were randomized. Final follow-up occurred in November 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Early moderate hypothermia (33-34 °C; n = 168) for 24 hours or strict normothermia (36-37 °C; n = 166). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days. There were 31 secondary outcomes including mortality at days 7, 60, and 180; a composite outcome of death, heart transplant, escalation to left ventricular assist device implantation, or stroke at days 30, 60, and 180; and days without requiring a ventilator or kidney replacement therapy at days 30, 60, and 180. Adverse events included rates of severe bleeding, sepsis, and number of units of packed red blood cells transfused during venoarterial ECMO. RESULTS: Among the 374 patients who were randomized, 334 completed the trial (mean age, 58 [SD, 12] years; 24% women) and were included in the primary analysis. At 30 days, 71 patients (42%) in the moderate hypothermia group had died vs 84 patients (51%) in the normothermia group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45 to 1.13], P = .15; risk difference, -8.3% [95% CI, -16.3% to -0.3%]). For the composite outcome of death, heart transplant, escalation to left ventricular assist device implantation, or stroke at day 30, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.96; P = .03) for the moderate hypothermia group compared with the normothermia group and the risk difference was -11.5% (95% CI, -23.2% to 0.2%). Of the 31 secondary outcomes, 30 were inconclusive. The incidence of moderate or severe bleeding was 41% in the moderate hypothermia group vs 42% in the normothermia group. The incidence of infections was 52% in both groups. The incidence of bacteremia was 20% in the moderate hypothermia group vs 30% in the normothermia group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial involving patients with refractory cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial ECMO, early application of moderate hypothermia for 24 hours did not significantly increase survival compared with normothermia. However, because the 95% CI was wide and included a potentially important effect size, these findings should be considered inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02754193.

Trends in Survival for Pediatric Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Progress in pediatric transplantation measured in the context of waitlist and posttransplant survival is well documented but falls short of providing a complete perspective for children and their families. An intent-to-treat analysis, in which we measure survival from listing to death regardless of whether a transplant is received, provides a more comprehensive perspective through which progress can be examined. METHODS: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze factors impacting intent-to-treat survival in 12 984 children listed for heart transplant, 17 519 children listed for liver transplant, and 16 699 children listed for kidney transplant. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess change in waitlist, posttransplant, and intent-to-treat survival. Wait times and transplant rates were compared by using χ2 tests. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat survival steadily improved from 1987 to 2017 in children listed for heart (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.97), liver (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97), and kidney (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99) transplant. Waitlist and posttransplant survival also improved steadily for all 3 organs. For heart transplant, the percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly increased from 1987 to 2017 (60.8% vs 68.7%); however, no significant increase was observed in liver (68.9% vs 72.5%) or kidney (59.2% vs 62.7%) transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Intent-to-treat survival, which is more representative of the patient perspective than individual metrics alone, steadily improved for heart, liver, and kidney transplant over the study period. Further efforts to maximize the donor pool, improve posttransplant outcomes, and optimize patient care while on the waitlist may contribute to future progress.