Driving pressure association with mortality in post-lung transplant patients: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between driving pressure (ΔP) and 90-day mortality in patients following lung transplantation (LTx) in patients who developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD). METHODS: This prospective, observational study involved consecutive patients who, following LTx, were admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2022 to January 2023. Patients were separated into two groups according to ΔP at time of admission (i.e., low, ≤15 cmH2O or high, >15 cmH2O). Postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients were involved in the study, and of these, 69 were included in the low ΔP group and 35 in the high ΔP group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 90-day mortality showed a statistically significant difference between groups with survival better in the low ΔP group compared with the high ΔP group. According to Cox proportional regression model, the variables independently associated with 90-day mortality were ΔP and pneumonia. Significantly more patients in the high ΔP group than the low ΔP group had PGD grade 3 (PGD3), pneumonia, required tracheostomy, and had prolonged postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) time, postoperative ventilator time, and ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Driving pressure appears to have the ability to predict PGD3 and 90-day mortality of patients following LTx. Further studies are required to confirm our results.

Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection and Mixed Infections Are Risk Factors for Poor Outcome After Lung Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we analyzed the effects of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and mixed infection on the perioperative prognosis of lung transplant recipients and studied statistics on antibiotic resistance in P aeruginosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective casecontrol study. We collected data on lung transplant recipients with combined lower respiratory tract P aeruginosa infection within 48 hours after lung transplant at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from August 2018 to April 2022. We grouped recipients according to P aeruginosa resistance to carbapenem antibiotics and summarized the clinical characteristics of carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infection. We analyzed the effects of carbapenemresistant P aeruginosa infection and mixed infections on all-cause mortality 30 days after lung transplant by Cox regression. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to plot survival curves. RESULTS: Patients in the carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa group had a higher all-cause mortality rate than those in the carbapenem-sensitive P aeruginosa group at both 7 days (6 patients [22.3%] vs 2 patients [4.5%]; P = .022) and 30 days (12 patients [44.4%] vs 7 patients [15.9%]; P = .003) after lung transplant. In multivariate analysis, both carbapenemresistant P aeruginosa infection and P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection were independent risk factors for death 30 days after transplant in lung transplant recipients (P < .05). In subgroup analysis, carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection increased the risk of death 30 days after transplant in lung transplant recipients compared with carbapenem-sensitive P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection (12 patients [60%] vs 6 patients [19.4%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Combined lower respiratory tract carbapenem-resistant P aeruginosa infection and P aeruginosa combined with bacterial infection early after lung transplant increased the risk of 30-day mortality after lung transplant.

Management of immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients and COVID-19 outcomes: an observational retrospective cohort-study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of immunosuppression management on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study in a cohort of 358 lung transplant recipients (LTx) over the period from March 2020 to April 2022. All included symptomatic patients had at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 rt-PCR. We used a composite primary outcome for COVID-19 including increased need for oxygen since the hospital admission, ICU transfer, and in-hospital mortality. We assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses the risk factors for poor outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, we included 91 LTx who contracted COVID-19. The COVID-19 in-hospital mortality rate reached 4.4%. By hierarchical clustering, we found a strong and independent association between the composite poor outcome and the discontinuation of at least one immunosuppressive molecule among tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and everolimus. Obesity (OR = 16, 95%CI (1.96; 167), p = 0.01) and chronic renal failure (OR = 4.6, 95%CI (1.4; 18), p = 0.01) were also independently associated with the composite poor outcome. Conversely, full vaccination was protective (OR = 0.23, 95%CI (0.046; 0.89), p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The administration of immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, cyclocporine or everolimus can have a protective effect in LTx with COVID-19, probably related to their intrinsic antiviral capacity.

Impact of Prolonged Cold Ischemia Time on Long-Term Survival in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cold ischemia time (CIT) influences short- and long-term outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Most studies proved that prolonged CIT causes increased mortality. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged CIT on patient survival time after lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: The retrospective study group consisted of 139 patients who underwent double LTx in a single center between January 2018 and August 2022. Prolonged ischemic time (PIT) was defined as total ischemic time >6 hours and divided into smaller time intervals according to increasing PIT (6-8, 8-10, 10-12, >12 hours). The assessed outcomes were 1- and 4-year survival. RESULTS: Among the study group, PIT was observed in 98% (n = 137), and its average value was 10.33 hours. The prolonged CIT of 6 to 8 hours occurred in 10% (n = 14), 8 to 10 hours in 34% (n = 47), 10 to 12 hours in 36% (n = 49), and >12 hours in 20% (n = 27). In a comparison of 1-year survival between the PIT 6- to 10-hour group and the >10-hour arm (88% vs 78%), the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION: PIT is a risk factor for reduced long-term survival in LTx recipients. Increasing PIT may be associated with higher mortality at 1 and 4 years. All efforts to reduce the duration of ischemic time can benefit patient survival after LTx.

Single lung transplantation using a lung graft from a donor whose contralateral lung is not suitable for lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the post-transplant survival of untwinned single lung transplantation (SLT) to twinned SLT. In untwinned SLT, the contralateral lung is judged unsuitable for transplantation and might affect the lung graft within the donor body and recipient survival after SLT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 SLT recipients at our center, divided into untwinned SLT and twinned SLT groups. The demographics of donors and recipients, surgical characteristics, complications, mortality, and survival rates were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in recipient and donor demographics between the two groups. Surgical characteristics showed no significant differences. Microbiological findings of the transplanted lungs indicated a low incidence of positive cultures in both groups. 3-month to 1-year mortality and overall survival rates were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: At our institution, both untwinned and twinned SLT procedures exhibited excellent survival rates without significant differences between the two procedures. The favorable outcomes observed may be associated with the strategic advantages of Japan's MC system and the diligent management of marginal donor lungs although this requires further investigation to elucidate the specific contributory factors.

Impact of Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Lung Transplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) are acute, significant respiratory deteriorations in patients with IPF and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. It remains unclear how AE-IPF impacts lung transplant (LTX) outcomes. METHODS: All adult patients who were listed for LTX between July 2005 and October 2020 at the Loyola University Medical Center with a diagnosis of IPF were included. Pretransplant characteristics and posttransplant outcomes were gathered via retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was short- and long-term survival for patients transplanted during stable IPF versus those with AE-IPF. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were included in this study, 17.6% of whom were transplanted during AE-IPF. AE-IPF patients were more likely to have higher oxygen needs pretransplant, have higher lung allocation score, and were more likely to be intubated or be on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as compared with stable IPF patients. Survival by AE status at transplant did not differ at 90 d or 1 y posttransplantation. There were also no significant differences in rates of severe primary graft dysfunction or acute rejection within 1 y. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AE-IPF were more likely to have higher oxygenation requirements and higher lung allocation score at the time of LTX than those with stable IPF. Despite this, there were no differences in survival at 90 d, 1 y, or 3 y, or differences in incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction or acute cellular rejection. Transplantation of patients with AE-IPF has clinical outcomes comparable with transplantation of patients with stable IPF. This contrasts with previous studies examining LTX in patients with AE-IPF.

Short-term outcomes after third-time lung transplantation: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Reoperative lung transplantation (LTx) survival has improved over time such that a growing number of patients may present for third-time LTx (L3Tx). To understand the safety of L3Tx, we evaluated perioperative outcomes and 3-year survival after L3Tx at a high-volume US LTx center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent bilateral L3Tx at our institution. Using an optimal matching technique, a primary LTx (L1Tx) cohort was matched 1:2 and a second-time LTx (L2Tx) cohort 1:1. Recipient, operative, and donor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and 3-year survival were compared among L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx groups. RESULTS: Eleven L3Tx, 11 L2Tx, and 22 L1Tx recipients were included. Among L3Tx recipients, median age at transplant was 37 years and most (73%) had cystic fibrosis. L3Tx was performed median 6.0 and 10.6 years after L2Tx and L1Tx, respectively. Compared to L1Tx and L2Tx recipients, L3Tx recipients had greater intraoperative transfusion requirements, a higher incidence of postoperative complications, and a higher rate of unplanned reoperation. Rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72 hours, reintubation, and in-hospital mortality were similar among groups. There were no differences in 3-year patient (log-rank p = 0.61) or rejection-free survival (log-rank p = 0.34) after L1Tx, L2Tx, and L3Tx. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, L3Tx was associated with similar perioperative outcomes and 3-year patient survival compared to L1Tx and L2Tx. L3Tx represents the only safe treatment option for patients with allograft failure after L2Tx; however, further investigation is needed to understand the long-term survival and durability of L3Tx.

Outcomes Following Lung Transplant for COVID-19-Related Complications in the US.

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the use of lung transplant as a lifesaving therapy for patients with irreversible lung injury. Limited information is currently available regarding the outcomes associated with this treatment modality. Objective: To describe the outcomes following lung transplant for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, lung transplant recipient and donor characteristics and outcomes following lung transplant for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis were extracted from the US United Network for Organ Sharing database from March 2020 to August 2022 with a median (IQR) follow-up period of 186 (64-359) days in the acute respiratory distress syndrome group and 181 (40-350) days in the pulmonary fibrosis group. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional regression models were used to examine the association of certain variables with overall survival. Exposures: Lung transplant following COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival and graft failure rates. Results: Among 385 included patients undergoing lung transplant, 195 had COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (142 male [72.8%]; median [IQR] age, 46 [38-54] years; median [IQR] allocation score, 88.3 [80.5-91.1]) and 190 had COVID-19-related pulmonary fibrosis (150 male [78.9%]; median [IQR] age, 54 [45-62]; median [IQR] allocation score, 78.5 [47.7-88.3]). There were 16 instances of acute rejection (8.7%) in the acute respiratory distress syndrome group and 15 (8.6%) in the pulmonary fibrosis group. The 1-, 6-, and 12- month overall survival rates were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.94) for the acute respiratory distress syndrome cohort and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90) for the pulmonary fibrosis cohort. Freedom from graft failure rates were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93) in the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up periods in the acute respiratory distress cohort and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74-0.91) in the pulmonary fibrosis cohort, respectively. Receiving a graft from a donor with a heavy and prolonged history of smoking was associated with worse overall survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome cohort, whereas the characteristics associated with worse overall survival in the pulmonary fibrosis cohort included female recipient, male donor, and high recipient body mass index. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, outcomes following lung transplant were similar in patients with irreversible respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and those with other pretransplant etiologies.

A Framework for Using Real-World Data and Health Outcomes Modeling to Evaluate Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models.

OBJECTIVES: We propose a framework of health outcomes modeling with dynamic decision making and real-world data (RWD) to evaluate the potential utility of novel risk prediction models in clinical practice. Lung transplant (LTx) referral decisions in cystic fibrosis offer a complex case study. METHODS: We used longitudinal RWD for a cohort of adults (n = 4247) from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry to compare outcomes of an LTx referral policy based on machine learning (ML) mortality risk predictions to referral based on (1) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) alone and (2) heterogenous usual care (UC). We then developed a patient-level simulation model to project number of patients referred for LTx and 5-year survival, accounting for transplant availability, organ allocation policy, and heterogenous treatment effects. RESULTS: Only 12% of patients (95% confidence interval 11%-13%) were referred for LTx over 5 years under UC, compared with 19% (18%-20%) under FEV1 and 20% (19%-22%) under ML. Of 309 patients who died before LTx referral under UC, 31% (27%-36%) would have been referred under FEV1 and 40% (35%-45%) would have been referred under ML. Given a fixed supply of organs, differences in referral time did not lead to significant differences in transplants, pretransplant or post-transplant deaths, or overall survival in 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Health outcomes modeling with RWD may help to identify novel ML risk prediction models with high potential real-world clinical utility and rule out further investment in models that are unlikely to offer meaningful real-world benefits.

Volatile organic compound profiling to explore primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Delineating basic mechanisms and molecular signatures of PGD remain a fundamental challenge. This pilot study examines if the pulmonary volatile organic compound (VOC) spectrum relate to PGD and postoperative outcomes. The VOC profiles of 58 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blind bronchial aspirate samples from 35 transplant patients were extracted using solid-phase-microextraction and analyzed with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The support vector machine algorithm was used to identify VOCs that could differentiate patients with severe from lower grade PGD. Using 20 statistically significant VOCs from the sample headspace collected immediately after transplantation (< 6 h), severe PGD was differentiable from low PGD with an AUROC of 0.90 and an accuracy of 0.83 on test set samples. The model was somewhat effective for later time points with an AUROC of 0.80. Three major chemical classes in the model were dominated by alkylated hydrocarbons, linear hydrocarbons, and aldehydes in severe PGD samples. These VOCs may have important clinical and mechanistic implications, therefore large-scale study and potential translation to breath analysis is recommended.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Underwent Lung Transplant.

Importance: Lung transplantation is a potentially lifesaving treatment for patients who are critically ill due to COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but there is limited information about the long-term outcome. Objective: To report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS and underwent a lung transplant at a single US hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant at Northwestern University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, including 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS. The date of final follow-up was November 15, 2021. Exposures: Lung transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were collected and analyzed. Outcomes of lung transplant, including postoperative complications, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and survival, were recorded. Results: Among the 102 lung transplant recipients, 30 patients (median age, 53 years [range, 27 to 62]; 13 women [43%]) had COVID-19-associated ARDS and 72 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 22 to 74]; 32 women [44%]) had chronic end-stage lung disease without COVID-19. For lung transplant recipients with COVID-19 compared with those without COVID-19, the median lung allocation scores were 85.8 vs 46.7, the median time on the lung transplant waitlist was 11.5 vs 15 days, and preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used in 56.7% vs 1.4%, respectively. During transplant, patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS received transfusion of a median of 6.5 units of packed red blood cells vs 0 in those without COVID-19, 96.7% vs 62.5% underwent intraoperative venoarterial ECMO, and the median operative time was 8.5 vs 7.4 hours, respectively. Postoperatively, the rates of primary graft dysfunction (grades 1 to 3) within 72 hours were 70% in the COVID-19 cohort vs 20.8% in those without COVID-19, the median time receiving invasive mechanical ventilation was 6.5 vs 2.0 days, the median duration of intensive care unit stay was 18 vs 9 days, the median post-lung transplant hospitalization duration was 28.5 vs 16 days, and 13.3% vs 5.5% required permanent hemodialysis, respectively. None of the lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS demonstrated antibody-mediated rejection compared with 12.5% in those without COVID-19. At follow-up, all 30 lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS were alive (median follow-up, 351 days [IQR, 176-555] after transplant) vs 60 patients (83%) who were alive in the non-COVID-19 cohort (median follow-up, 488 days [IQR, 368-570] after lung transplant). Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, survival was 100% in the 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS as of November 15, 2021.

Consequences of ICU Readmission After Lung Transplantation: Beyond the Early Postoperative Period / Consecuencias del reingreso en la UCI tras el trasplante de pulmón: más allá del periodo postoperatorio temprano

No disponible

Expanded indications for lung transplantation for pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are associated with poor survival and can be treated by lung transplantation (LT). However, the indications for LT in patients with pulmonary complications after HSCT remain unclear due to low number of cases. HSCT is frequently conducted for hematologic malignancies, which have different recurrence patterns from solid-organ malignancies. Some patients also experience ABO blood type changes post-HSCT. This study aimed to reassess the indication of LT for pulmonary complications post-HSCT, focusing on disease-free interval (DFI) and ABO-incompatibility. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were performed in patients who underwent LT for post-HSCT pulmonary complications. In patients with previous hematologic malignancy, indication was based on estimated recurrence rate instead of DFI. Donors were selected based on the recipient anti-A/B antibody profile rather than ABO type. Post-LT survival and complication rates were examined. RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients undergoing LT after HSCT (including 31 with previous hematologic malignancy) were analyzed. The median DFI between HSCT and LT was 64.5 months. Thirteen patients with previous hematologic malignancy had DFI <5 years but none experienced recurrence. There was no significant difference in 5-year post-LT survival between patients undergoing (74.7%) and not undergoing HSCT (68.4%). There was no significant difference in survival between patients with DFI ≥5 years (63.8%) and patients with DFI <5 years (83.3%). Five patients underwent LTs from major ABO-incompatible donors, but none developed incompatibility-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Indications based on estimated recurrence rates and recipients' anti-A/B antibody profiles may increase the use of LT for patients after HSCT.

Factors associated with short- versus long-term survival after lung transplant.

OBJECTIVE: A small but growing proportion of lung transplant recipients survive longer than a decade post-transplant. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with survival beyond a decade after lung transplant. METHODS: We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for adult (age ≥18 years) recipients undergoing first-time isolated lung transplantation between the introduction of the Lung Allocation Score in 2005 and 2009. Recipients were stratified into 3 cohorts: those who survived less than 1 year, 1 to 10 years, and greater than 10 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with early mortality (<1 year) and long-term (>10 years) survival. RESULTS: A total of 5171 lung transplant recipients and their associated donors met inclusion criteria, including 964 (18.6%) with early mortality, 2843 (55.0%) with intermediate survival, and 1364 (26.3%) long-term survivors. Factors independently associated with early mortality included donor Black race, cigarette use, arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen ratio, diabetes, recipient Lung Allocation Score, total bilirubin, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge requirement, single lung transplantation, and annual lung transplant center volume. The only factors independently associated with long-term survival among those who survived at least 1 year was donor age and single lung transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients undergoing lung transplantation after the implementation of the Lung Allocation Score, approximately one-quarter survived 10 years post-transplant. There was minimal overlap between the factors associated with 1-year and 10-year survival. Of note, the Lung Allocation Score was not associated with long-term survival. Further research is needed to better refine patient selection and optimize management strategies to increase the number of long-term survivors.

Assessing the accuracy of the lung allocation score.

BACKGROUND: The United States (US) Lung Allocation Score (LAS) relies on the performance of 2 survival models that estimate waitlist and post-transplant survival. These models were developed using data from 2005 to 2008, and it is unknown if they remain accurate. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of US lung transplantation candidates and recipients greater than 12 years of age between February 19, 2015 and February 19, 2019. We evaluated the LAS waitlist and post-transplant models with the concordance probability estimate and by comparing predicted vs observed 1-year restricted mean survival times by risk decile. We then compared a nonparametric estimate of the observed LAS with the predicted LAS for each percentile of recipients. RESULTS: The waitlist model ranked candidates (N = 11,539) in the correct risk order 72% of the time (95% CI 71%-73%), and underestimated candidate one-year survival by 136 days for the highest risk decile (p < 0.001). The post-transplant model ranked recipients (N = 9,377) in the correct risk order 57% of the time (95% CI 55-58%), and underestimated recipient one-year survival by 70 days for the highest risk decile (p < 0.001). Overall, the LAS at transplant explained only 56% of the variation in observed outcomes, and was increasingly inaccurate at higher predicted values. CONCLUSIONS: The waitlist and the post-transplant models that constitute the LAS are inaccurate, limiting the ability of the system to rank candidates on the waitlist in the correct order. The LAS should therefore be updated and the underlying models should be modernized.

A shifting landscape: Practice patterns and outcomes of cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis pediatric lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: New drugs may further decrease the need for lung transplant (LTx) in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), but few studies highlight pediatric non-CF LTx characteristics and outcomes. METHODS: The ISHLT registry was used to report morbidity, graft failure, and survival for primary pediatric (<18 years) LTx performed 1990-2017. Recipient/donor characteristics and long-term outcomes were analyzed for CF and non-CF recipients. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Of 2232 primary LTx, (43% in males), 918 (41%) were performed for non-CF indications; most commonly pulmonary hypertension (43%). Non-CF patients were younger (median age 11 vs. 15, p < .001), and more frequently on inotropes and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (15% vs. 2.4%, p < .001) at transplant, compared to CF recipients. In-hospital major complications more commonly affected CF LTx recipients (57% vs. 48%, p = .003), but 30-day mortality was higher in the non-CF group (9% non-CF vs. 5% CF, p < .001). One-, five-, and ten-year mortality was 18%, 50%, and 65% for CF recipients, respectively, and 21%, 45%, and 58% for non-CF recipients (p = .01 at 10 years). Five-year survival was significantly better for non-CF females versus CF females (56% vs. 48%, p = .013), but was similar between groups for males (55% vs. 54%, p = .305). While age was a late outcomes risk factor, pulmonary hypertension and later transplants eras were protective. CONCLUSIONS: Early mortality is higher and late mortality is lower in non-CF LTx. Current non-CF LTx outcomes leave room for improvement. Further study is needed to evaluate the effects of center volume and pediatric-specific experience on outcomes.

Effects of the duration of bridge to lung transplantation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Although bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly performed, the impact of BTT and its duration on post-transplant outcomes are unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of adult patients who underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation in our institution between January 2008 and December 2018. Data were compared in patients who did (n = 41; BTT) and did not (n = 36; non-BTT) require pre-transplant ECMO support. Data were also compared in patients who underwent short-term (<14 days; n = 21; ST-BTT) and long-term (≥14 days; n = 20; LT-BTT) BTTs. RESULTS: Among 77 patients included, 51 (66.2%) were male and median age was 53 years. The median bridging time in the BTT group was 13 days (interquartile range [IQR], 7-19 days). Although simplified acute physiologic score II was significantly higher in the BTT group (median, 35; IQR, 31-49 in BTT group vs. median, 12; IQR, 7-19 in non-BTT group; p<0.001), 1-year (73.2% vs. 80.6%; p = 0.361) and 5-year (61.5% vs. 61.5%; p = 0.765) post-transplant survival rates were comparable in both groups. Comparison of ST- and LT-BTT subgroups showed that 1-year (90.5% vs. 55.0%; p = 0.009) and 5-year (73.0% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.030) post-transplant survival rates were significantly higher in ST-BTT group. In age and sex adjusted model, the LT-BTT was an independent risk factor for 1-year post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 3.019; 95% confidence interval, 1.119-8.146; p = 0.029), whereas the ST-BTT was not. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the severe illness, the BTT group showed favorable post-transplantation outcomes, particularly those bridged for less than 14 days.