A lack of living donor renal transplantation for Asian children represents an opportunity to improve pediatric healthcare.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between pediatric primary care practitioners and families provides an early opportunity to address ethnic/racial pediatric subspecialty health care disparities. Living donor pediatric renal transplantation is safe and more effective than deceased donor renal transplantation. The purpose of this study is to identify groups of children who may be less likely to receive living donor renal transplantation, as the first step in assisting pediatric clinicians to increase living donor renal transplantation. METHOD: We employed a retrospective cohort design. We analyzed data from the medical records of 80 children receiving renal transplantation over 20 years in a large pediatric medical center. RESULTS: The proportions of children receiving a living donor renal allograft differed by ethnicity/race (P = .04). Specifically, children of Asian ethnicity/ race were significantly less likely than children of White ethnicity/race to receive a living donor renal allograft (P = .01). There were no significant differences in age at transplantation or wait time for deceased donor transplantation. DISCUSSION: We discuss the possible reasons for the discrepancy and potential directions for family-centered pediatric practice, policy, and research to address this potential pediatric healthcare disparity.

Racial and ethnic differences in pediatric access to preemptive kidney transplantation in the United States.

Preemptive kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for pediatric end stage renal disease patients to avoid increased morbidity and mortality associated with dialysis. It is unknown how race/ethnicity and poverty influence preemptive transplant access in pediatric. We examined the incidence of living donor or deceased donor preemptive transplantation among all black, white, and Hispanic children (<18 years) in the United States Renal Data System from 2000 to 2009. Adjusted risk ratios for preemptive transplant were calculated using multivariable-adjusted models and examined across health insurance and neighborhood poverty levels. Among 8,053 patients, 1117 (13.9%) received a preemptive transplant (66.9% from LD, 33.1% from DD). In multivariable analyses, there were significant racial/ethnic disparities in access to LD preemptive transplant where blacks were 66% (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.28-0.43) and Hispanics 52% (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.35-0.67) less likely to receive a LD preemptive transplant versus whites. Blacks were 22% less likely to receive a DD preemptive transplant versus whites (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57-1.05), although results were not statistically significant. Future efforts to promote equity in preemptive transplant should address the critical issues of improving access to pre-ESRD nephrology care and overcoming barriers in living donation, including obstacles partially driven by poverty.

Racial differences in determinants of live donor kidney transplantation in the United States.

Few studies have compared determinants of live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) across all major US racial-ethnic groups. We compared determinants of racial-ethnic differences in LDKT among 208 736 patients who initiated treatment for end-stage kidney disease during 2005-2008. We performed proportional hazards and bootstrap analyses to estimate differences in LDKT attributable to sociodemographic and clinical factors. Mean LDKT rates were lowest among blacks (1.19 per 100 person-years [95% CI: 1.12-1.26]), American Indians/Alaska Natives-AI/ANs (1.40 [1.06-1.84]) and Pacific Islanders (1.10 [0.78-1.84]), intermediate among Hispanics (2.53 [2.39-2.67]) and Asians (3.89 [3.51-4.32]), and highest among whites (6.46 [6.31-6.61]). Compared with whites, the largest proportion of the disparity among blacks (20%) and AI/ANs (29%) was attributed to measures of predialysis care, while the largest proportion among Hispanics (14%) was attributed to health insurance coverage. Contextual poverty accounted for 16%, 4%, 18%, and 6% of the disparity among blacks, Hispanics, AI/ANs and Pacific Islanders but none of the disparity among Asians. In the United States, significant disparities in rates of LDKT persist, but determinants of these disparities vary by race-ethnicity. Efforts to expand preESKD insurance coverage, to improve access to high-quality predialysis care and to overcome socioeconomic barriers are important targets for addressing disparities in LDKT.

Practice patterns and outcomes in retransplantation among pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: More than 25% of pediatric kidney transplants are lost within 7 years, necessitating dialysis or retransplantation. Retransplantation practices and the outcomes of repeat transplantations, particularly among those with early graft loss, are not clear. METHODS: We examined retransplantation practice patterns and outcomes in 14,799 pediatric (ages <18 years) patients between 1987 and 2010. Death-censored graft survival was analyzed using extended Cox models and retransplantation using competing risks regression. RESULTS: After the first graft failure, 50.4% underwent retransplantation and 12.1% died within 5 years; after the second graft failure, 36.1% underwent retransplantation and 15.4% died within 5 years. Prior preemptive transplantation and graft loss after 5 years were associated with increased rates of retransplantation. Graft loss before 5 years, older age, non-Caucasian race, public insurance, and increased panel-reactive antibody were associated with decreased rates of retransplantation. First transplants had lower risk of graft loss compared with second (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.80; P<0.001), third (aHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.78; P<0.001), and fourth (aHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.78; P=0.005) transplants. However, among patients receiving two or more transplants (conditioned on having lost a first transplant), second graft median survival was 8.5 years despite a median survival of 4.5 years for the first transplant. Among patients receiving three or more transplants, third graft median survival was 7.7 years despite median survivals of 2.1 and 3.1 years for the first and second transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Among pediatric kidney transplant recipients who experience graft loss, racial and socioeconomic disparities exist with regard to retransplantation, and excellent graft survival can be achieved with retransplantation despite poor survival of previous grafts.

The impact of diabetes on ethnic disparities seen in kidney transplantation.

Graft failure rates following kidney transplant is disproportionately higher in African American (AA) renal transplant recipients. The aim of our study was to measure the impact of diabetes and other known confounding risk factors on this disparity. This was a long-term cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients between 2000 and 2008 comparing AA transplant recipients to White recipients. 987 patients were included and patients were followed for up to 12 years post-transplant. Univariate analysis demonstrated AA recipients were more likely to have diabetes (35% vs 23%, P<.001), hypertension (97% vs 94%, P=.029), human leukocyte antigen mismatches (4 vs 3, P<.001), and receiving dialysis for a longer period prior to transplant (3.9 vs 2.0 yrs, P<.001). AA patients were also less likely to receive a living donor transplant (7% vs 31%, P<.001). Multivariable modeling established both AA ethnicity (HR 1.32 [95% CI 1.04-1.68]) and pre-existing diabetes (1.58 [95% CI 1.25-2.00]) as important predictors of graft failure. Diabetes was a significant modifier on the influence of AA ethnicity as a risk factor for graft loss (19% HR reduction); tight glycemic control, which was less common in AA recipients (35% vs 51%, P=.013), additionally attenuated the ethnic disparities seen in graft loss (28% risk reduction). In the final fully adjusted model, which included sociodemographic, immunologic, and cardiovascular risk factor as variables, the influence of AA ethnicity on graft failure was essentially nullified (HR 1.09 [.81-1.48]). In conclusion, AA ethnicity continues to be an important risk factor for graft loss, which can be significantly attenuated by controlling for pre-existing diabetes, glycemic control, and other transplant and cardiovascular variables.

Influence of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms (-786T/C, 4a4b, 894G/T) on Iranian kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Nitric oxide is a major mediator in vascular biology and regulator of regional blood flow. Its production is catalyzed by the enzyme endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Protective actions of nitric oxide in ischemia and reperfusion are due to its potential as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, along with its inhibitory effects on cell signaling pathways of nuclear proteins, such as NF-kB. The endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms affect endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and are associated with endothelial dysfunction. This study sought to examine the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene (rs 2070744, 27VNTR, and rs1799983) and the development of acute rejection in renal transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six renal transplant recipients (33 patients with an episode of acute rejection and 33 recipients an episode of acute rejection), between June 2010 and March 2011, were included. The polymorphism was determined by simple polymerase chain reaction and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: There was only a significant association of endothelial nitric oxide synthase -786T allele and acute rejection (P = .03). Recessive model of T-786C alleles (TT vs TC+CC) and acute rejection confirmed a significant association (odds ratio: 3.12; 95% CI: 0.01-9.83; P = .025). Haplotype CbG was higher in recipients without rejection as compared to rejection group (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.16-1.13; P < .05). Respecting the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene 894G/T single nucleotide polymorphisms and 27VNTR, no significant association between the allele/genotype and acute rejection was seen. CONCLUSION: Recipient endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms do not alter the risk of acute rejection after a renal transplant. Rejection is a complex immunologic event. Therefore, finding associated genetic variants demands a multicentric larger sample size.

Outcomes in African American kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: Prospective data regarding immunosuppression and rejection in African American patients receiving modern immunosuppressive regimens are sparse. METHODS: One-year data were analyzed from 901 tacrolimus-treated de novo kidney transplant patients in the prospective Mycophenolic Acid Observational Renal Transplant registry. RESULTS: Mean tacrolimus dose was significantly higher in African Americans (n=217) versus non-African Americans (n=684), but mean tacrolimus trough concentrations were similar. The proportion of patients receiving mycophenolic acid dose equal to or more than 2000 mg per day (mycophenolate mofetil equivalents) was significantly higher with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil at month 6 among African Americans and at month 3 in non-African Americans, but rates of acute rejection and adverse events (including gastrointestinal events) were similar. The 1-year incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was 14.1% in African Americans versus 7.5% in non-African Americans. On multivariate analysis, African American ethnicity was associated with a higher risk of BPAR (hazard ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.09; P=0.007). Mean (standard deviation) glomerular filtration rate at month 12 estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula was 59.2 (22.2) mL/min/1.73 m in African Americans versus 58.8 (19.9) mL/min/1.73 m in non-African Americans (confidence interval of the difference, -3.4 to 4.3; P=0.83). CONCLUSION: This observational study confirms that African Americans require higher doses of tacrolimus to achieve target trough concentrations and are more likely to experience BPAR during the first year after kidney transplantation despite modern immunosuppression regimens. In our 1-year study, this was not associated with significantly inferior graft survival.

Acute rejection characteristics from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of early corticosteroid withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: This report characterizes acute rejection and rejection outcomes in subjects randomized to continuous corticosteroid therapy (CCS) or early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD; 7 days after transplantation) in the Astellas Blinded CSWD Trial. METHODS: The Astellas Blinded CSWD Trial was a 5-year, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of early CCS withdrawal in 386 kidney transplant recipients (195 CCS and 191 CSWD). Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were required as well as either rabbit antithymocyte globulin or interleukin-2 receptor antibody induction. Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) was grade 1A or higher by Banff criteria. This report also provides borderline changes (BL) that did not meet Banff grade 1A included with BCAR (BCAR+BL). RESULTS: BCAR+BL was 25 (12.8%) in CCS group and 42 (22.0%) in CSWD group (P=0.022). Early BCAR+BL (first 90 days after transplantation) was less frequent in CCS (n=5 [2.6%]) than in CSWD (n=22 [11.5%]; P<0.001). Among non-African-American subjects, early BCAR+BL occurred more often in CSWD (n=20 [12.7%]) versus CCS (n=2 [1.3%]; P<0.001). Late acute rejection (>2 years) occurred more often in African-American subjects in CCS (n=5 [13.9%]) than in CSWD (n=0; P=0.056). Risk factors were CSWD (hazard ratio [HR], 4.72; P<0.002) and human leukocyte antigen mismatch (HR, 1.48; P<0.005) for early BCAR+BL and CSWD (HR, 1.9; P<0.02), human leukocyte antigen mismatch (HR, 1.2; P<0.01), and age (HR, 0.97; P<0.002) for 5-year rejection. The HR for graft loss associated with BCAR+BL was 8.8. CONCLUSIONS: BCAR+BL may occur more frequently during the early period after transplantation under an early CSWD regimen with tacrolimus plus induction compared with CCS, particularly among non-African-Americans.

Pediatric kidney transplant practice patterns and outcome benchmarks, 1987-2010: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies.

The NAPRTCS transplant registry has collected clinical information on children undergoing kidney transplantation since 1987 and now includes information on 11 603 kidney transplants in 10 632 patients. Since the first data analysis in 1989, NAPRTCS reports have documented marked improvements in outcome after kidney transplantation in addition to identifying factors associated with both favorable and poor outcomes. Patient demographics have changed over the course of the registry with a decrease in the percentage of white recipients from a high of 72% in 1987 to less than 43% in 2007. The percentage of living donors decreased to its lowest point in 2007 at 37%. Acute rejection rates continue to decline with improvements in short- and long-term graft survival. Recently, NAPRTCS data have been used as a source of benchmark data for pediatric kidney transplant centers.

Disparities among Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites in time from starting dialysis to kidney transplant waitlisting.

BACKGROUND: Although a longer time on dialysis before kidney transplant waitlisting has been shown for Blacks versus non-Blacks, relatively few studies have compared this outcome between Hispanics and Whites. METHODS: A multivariable analysis of 1910 (684 Black, 452 Hispanic, and 774 White) consecutive patients waitlisted at our center for a primary kidney transplant between 2005 and mid-2010 was performed for time from starting dialysis to waitlisting (months), the percentage who were preemptively waitlisted (waitlisted before starting dialysis), and time from starting dialysis to waitlisting after excluding the preemptively waitlisted patients. RESULTS: The variables associated with significantly longer median times from starting dialysis to waitlisting and less preemptive waitlisting included Medicare insurance for patients ages <65 years (by far, the most significant variable in each analysis), Black race, higher percentage of households in the patient's zip code living in poverty, being a non-U.S. citizen (for preemptive waitlisting), Medicaid insurance, waitlisted for kidney-alone (vs. kidney-pancreas) transplant, and higher body mass index (longer median times for the latter three variables). Although the effect of Black race was mostly explained by significant associations with lower socioeconomic status (Medicare insurance for patients ages <65 years and greater poverty in the patient's zip code), an unexplained component still remained. The univariable differences showing poorer outcomes for Hispanics versus Whites were smaller and completely explained in multivariable analysis by significant associations with lower socioeconomic status and non-U.S. citizenship. CONCLUSION: Black and Hispanic patients had significantly longer times from starting dialysis to waitlisting, in large part related to their lower socioeconomic status and less preemptive waitlisting. A greater focus on earlier nephrology care may help to erase much of these disparities.

Young aboriginals are less likely to receive a renal transplant: a Canadian national study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated Aboriginals are less likely to receive a renal transplant in comparison to Caucasians however whether this applies to the entire population or specific subsets remains unclear. We examined the effect of age on renal transplantation in Aboriginals. METHODS: Data on 30,688 dialysis (Aboriginal 2,361, Caucasian 28, 327) patients obtained between Jan. 2000 and Dec. 2009 were included in the final analysis. Racial status was self-reported. Cox proportional hazards, the Fine and Grey sub-distribution method and Poisson regression were used to determine the association between race, age and transplantation. RESULTS: In comparison to Caucasians, Aboriginals were less likely to receive a renal transplant (Adjusted HR 0.66 95% CI 0.57-0.77, P < 0.0001) however after stratification by age and treating death as a competing outcome, the effect was more predominant in younger Aboriginals (Age 18-40: 20.6% aboriginals vs. 48.3% Caucasians transplanted; aHR 0.50(0.39-0.61), p < 0.0001, Age 41-50: 10.2% aboriginals vs. 33.9% Caucasians transplanted; aHR 0.46(0.32-0.64), p = 0.005, Age 51-60: 8.2% aboriginals vs. 19.5% Caucasians transplanted; aHR0.65(0.49-0.88), p = 0.01, Age >60: 2.7% aboriginals vs. 2.6% Caucasians transplanted; aHR 1.21(0.76-1.91), P = 0.4, Age X race interaction p < 0.0001). Both living and deceased donor transplants were lower in Aboriginals under the age of 60 compared to Caucasians. CONCLUSION: Younger Aboriginals are less likely to receive a renal transplant compared to their Caucasian counterparts, even after adjustment for comorbidity. Determination of the reasons behind these discrepancies and interventions specifically targeting the Aboriginal population are warranted.

The impact of cardiovascular disease and risk factor treatment on ethnic disparities in kidney transplant.

There is limited data on the use of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor medications following renal transplant, especially when comparing use across ethnicities. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence, treatment, and impact of CVD between ethnicities in kidney transplant recipients. This was a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent transplant between 2000 and 2008 within our academic medical transplant center. Pediatrics, multiorgan transplants, and those lost to follow-up were excluded. Data collection included all transplant and sociodemographic characteristics, medication use, CVD risk factor management, and follow-up events, including acute rejection, graft loss, and death. A total of 987 patients were included and followed for a mean of 6.7 ± 3.0 years. The baseline demographics revealed black patients were equally likely to have preexisting CVD (24% vs 25%, P = .651), but more likely to have preexisting diabetes (35% vs 23%, P < .001) or hypertension (97% vs 94%, P = .029). Black patients had poorer treatment of CVD risk factors, with lower rates of control of diabetes (35% vs 51%, P < .05) and dyslipidemia (37% vs 42%, P < .05). Black renal transplant recipients who had preexisting CVD had reduced graft survival rates compared to white patients (10-year rate 50% vs 60%, P = .033), but similar rates of graft survival were found in those without CVD (10-year rate 70% vs 71% in white patients, P = .483). CVD is common in transplant recipients, with black patients having higher rates and poorer control of diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Living donor kidney transplantation among ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: a model for breaking the hurdles.

OBJECTIVE: Despite living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) being the optimal treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease, we observed a significant inequality in the number of LDKT performed between patients of Dutch versus non-Dutch descent. We conducted a focus group study to explore modifiable hurdles to LDKT. METHODS: Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted among 50 end-stage renal patients. Analyses were conducted according to 'grounded theory' using Atlas.ti. RESULTS: We found nearly all patients to be in favor of LDKT (96%). However, multiple factors played a role in considering LDKT. Four potentially modifiable hurdles were derived: (1) inadequate patient education, (2) impeding cognitions and emotions, (3) restrictive social influences, and (4) suboptimal communication. With regard to solutions, we found that our patients were open to home-based group education on renal replacement therapy options (88% in favor). CONCLUSION: The study highlights the need for sensitivity and awareness of the influence of cultural factors on decision-making when discussing living donation with culturally diverse populations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Since the majority of our patients were open to a tailored group education in their own homes, we see this as an opportunity to address factors that influence equality in access to LDKT.

Kidney graft survival in Europe and the United States: strikingly different long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Kidney graft survival has never been systematically compared between Europe and the United States. METHODS: Applying period analysis to first deceased-donor (DD) and living-donor kidney grafts from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for the United States and the Collaborative Transplant Study for Europe, we compared overall and age-specific 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival for Europeans and white, African, and Hispanic Americans for the 2005 to 2008 period. A Cox regression model was used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS: For the 2005 to 2008 period, 1-year survival for DD grafts was equal (91%) between Europeans and white and Hispanic Americans, whereas it was slightly lower for African Americans (89%). In contrast, overall 5- and 10-year graft survival rates were considerably higher for Europe (77 and 56%, respectively) than for any of the three U.S. populations (whites, 71 and 46%, Hispanic, 73 and 48%, and African American, 62 and 34%). Differences were largest for recipient ages 0 to 17 and 18 to 29 and generally increased beyond 3 to 4 years after transplantation. Survival patterns for living-donor grafts were similar as those seen for DD grafts. Adjusted hazard ratios for graft failure in United Network for Organ Sharing white Americans ranged between 1.5 and 2.3 (all P<0.001) for 2 to 5 years after transplantation, indicating that lower graft survival is not explained by differences in baseline patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term kidney graft survival rates are markedly lower in the United States compared with Europe. Identifying actionable factors explaining long-term graft survival differences between Europe and the United States is a high priority for improving long-term graft survival.

Factors influencing attitudes of relatives of renal failure patients toward living kidney donation: central China.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes and psychosocial factors that could influenced them toward living related kidney donation among the relatives of renal failure patients in a renal transplant center in central China. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A validated questionnaire was self-administered and completed anonymously. RESULTS: The questionnaire completion rate was 84.1% (301/358). A total of 65.5% (197/301) of respondents favored related living donation. The variables relevant to attitude included: age (P < .001); knowledge about living related kidney donation (P = .001); concern about mutilation after donation (P < .001); attitude towards deceased organ donation (P < .001); and participation in prosocial activity (P = .017). CONCLUSION: Many psychosocial factors influence attitudes toward living related kidney donation. To overcome the difficulties, the medical establishment, media, and related government departments must further publicize and popularize knowledge about end-stage organ failure and transplantation.

Weighing potential candidates for kidney transplant: the ethics of exclusion for elevated body mass index.

With more than 80 000 patients in the United States on waiting lists for a kidney-and more than 100 000 patients beginning treatment for end-stage renal disease each year-transplant programs must evaluate potential recipients in a fair and efficient manner. To this end, certain "absolute exclusion criteria" have been proposed to screen out candidates who will not sufficiently benefit from transplant. Some programs use elevated body mass index as such an exclusion criterion, given that some studies have reported an association with increased risk of delayed graft function and acute rejection, longer hospitalization, and decreased overall graft survival. Upon further examination, however, elevated body mass index turns out to be a poor evaluative criterion for transplant candidates, as it is only variably associated with negative transplant outcomes. Moreover, use of a body mass index cutoff is potentially discriminatory and may mask underlying prejudice against persons of size.

Evaluation of living kidney donors: variables that affect donation.

Approximately 10000 deceased donor organs are available yearly for 85 000 US patients awaiting kidney transplant. Living kidney donation is essential to close this gap and offers better survival rates. However, nationally, 80% of potential donors evaluated fail to donate. Nurse coordinators who perform predonation screening and education need additional insight into the large number of potential donors who fail to complete the donation process. Reasons for nondonation in donor candidates undergoing medical evaluation, and variables affecting nondonation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between 2004 and 2009 are examined. Multivariable logistic regression models are used to test the effects of age and race on donation status and reasons for nondonation. Summary data are frequencies, percentages, and means (SD). The sample included 706 candidates (63% female, 80% white; mean age, 40 [SD, 12] years). Almost half (46%) received clearance to donate. Undiagnosed hypertension (14%), abnormal glucose tolerance (10%), and protein-urea (9%) were the most prevalent medical reasons for nondonation. About 13% of candidates changed their minds during evaluation. Analyses demonstrated an increased likelihood of older candidates (P < .001) and a decreased likelihood of white candidates (P = .007) being excluded from donation. Within the nondonation group, increased age was associated with undiagnosed hypertension and abnormal glucose tolerance (both race-adjusted, P = .01). Younger candidates (race-adjusted, P = .003) and African Americans (age-adjusted, P = .04) were more likely to decide against donation. The most prevalent medical reasons for nondonation could be identified through enhanced prescreening, and improved preevaluation education could decrease nondonation rates.

Impact of posttransplantation glomerulonephritis on long-term outcome of kidney transplants: single-center 20-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Successful renal transplantation has been performed in patients with end-stage renal disease and has been routine in patients with end-stage renal failure for more than two decades. Despite advances in the use of immunosuppressants, there has been only modest improvement in long-term allograft survival. Accumulating data have demonstrated that chronic rejection and recurrent glomerulonephritis are major causes of long-term allograft loss. However, data regarding the long-term impact of posttransplantation glomerulonephritis (PTGN) on ethnic Chinese populations are still unavailable. METHODS: From 1984 to 2010, a total of 268 patients who underwent renal allograft biopsies were reviewed retrospectively. Renal outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk factors for renal survival and all-cause mortality were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In all, 85 patients (31.7%) had PTGN, and the mean time of disease onset was 5.32±5.18 years after transplantation. Among the 85 PTGN cases, 33 (39%) were immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, 24 (28%) were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and 8 (9.4%) were membranous GN. Significant risk was associated with posttransplant IgA GN in hepatitis B virus carriers (odds ratio 5.371, 95% confidence interval 1.68, 17.19; p=0.0064). A total of 45 PTGN patients had allograft loss, of whom 49% had IgA nephropathy. Patients with PTGN had inferior allograft survival rates compared to those with other pathologic findings (p<0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results indicate that PTGN had a strong negative impact on long-term kidney graft survival. Posttransplant IgA nephropathy is a leading cause of allograft loss in Chinese kidney transplant patients with PTGN.

Early corticosteroid withdrawal in recipients of renal allografts: a single-center report of ethnically diverse recipients and recipients of marginal deceased-donor kidneys.

BACKGROUND: Candidacy for kidney transplantation is being progressively liberalized, and the safety and efficacy of early withdrawal of corticosteroids in high-risk patients have not been fully characterized. METHODS: We analyzed the safety and efficacy of an early corticosteroid withdrawal regimen of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid withdrawal by day 5 after transplantation in our study cohort of 634 kidney transplant recipients that included 27% African American and 18% Hispanic recipients. Fifty-five percent of the recipients were recipients of deceased-donor kidneys, and 46% of deceased-donor kidneys were kidneys from expanded criteria donors. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplantation was 98.6%, 94.6%, and 90.2%, and death-censored graft survival was 96.2%, 91.9%, and 87.6%, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 57 months, 89.3% of patients remained off of corticosteroids, and the incidence of acute rejection including subclinical rejection identified by protocol biopsy was 12.0%. Multivariable analysis identified age older than 60 years as protective against (P=0.01) and the African American ethnicity as a risk factor for (P=0.03) rejection. Delayed graft function (P<0.0001), rejection (P<0.0001), and transplant panel reactive antibody 20% or more (P=0.03) were risk factors for graft loss. Opportunistic infections included viral in 15.3%, fungal in 1.6%, and parasitic in 0.6% of the patients. Posttransplantation malignancy occurred in 9.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: An early corticosteroid withdrawal regimen of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil is associated with excellent patient and kidney graft survival in an ethnically diverse population with risk factors for poor outcomes.