Fractured Metallic Tracheostomy Tube: A Rare Presentation of Bronchial Foreign Body.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy is an important life-saving surgical procedure that could be used to secure the lower airway. It can however serve as a source of airway compromise when fragments from it are deposited. This condition must be diagnosed early enough, and appropriate intervention should be done to forestall potential morbidity and mortality. CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old tracheostomized patient presented to the accident and emergency department with a 4-hour history of sudden onset choking cough and labored breathing. The shaft of his tracheostomy tube (TT) was fractured and subsequently aspirated while he was attempting to remove and clean the inner tube that morning. He has used the TT for about 6 years and lost to follow-up clinic visits. The chest radiograph showed the metallic foreign body lodged within the trachea. He had an emergency rigid bronchoscopy via the tracheostomy stoma, and the object was retrieved. All respiratory symptoms subsequently resolved, and a check radiograph showed normal findings. CONCLUSION: Tracheostomy tube fracture and aspiration should be ruled out in every tracheostomized patient with sudden onset acute respiratory symptoms. Otolaryngologists must always emphasize the need for proper handling of TT, regular follow-up, and tube replacement when due.

Stridor and severe subglottic stenosis: emergency tracheostomy for a neonate with a pinhole trachea.

Congenital subglottic stenosis is a rare but potentially catastrophic condition. In this report, we describe the management of a term neonate who was noted to have biphasic stridor during preassessment for correction of an imperforate anus at 26 hours of life. The neonate was found to have a pinhole trachea secondary to congenital subglottic stenosis. It was impossible to pass an endotracheal tube, so the neonate underwent an emergency surgical tracheostomy with a good outcome. A high index of suspicion led to appropriate steps being taken to safely anaesthetise the neonate.

Reducing Tracheostomy-Related Acquired Pressure Injury by Flipping the Ventilator Circuit Position Study.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy-related acquired pressure injuries (TRPIs) are one of the hospital-acquired conditions. We hypothesize that an uneven ventilator circuit load, leading to non-neutral tracheostomy tube positioning in the immediate post-tracheostomy period, leads to an increased incidence of TRPIs. Does switching the ventilator circuit load daily, in addition to standard post-tracheostomy care, lead to a decreased incidence of TRPIs? METHODS: This is a prospective quality improvement study. Study was conducted at two academic hospital sites within tertiary care hospitals at Emory University in different ICUs. Consecutive patients undergoing bedside percutaneous tracheostomy by the interventional pulmonary service were included. The flip the ventilator circuit (FLIC) protocol was designed and implemented in selected ICUs, with other ICUs as controls. RESULTS: Incidence of TRPI in intervention and control group were recorded at post-tracheostomy day 5. A total of 99 patients were included from October 22, 2019, to May 22, 2020. Overall, the total incidence of any TRPI was 23% at post-tracheostomy day 5. Incidence of stage I, stage II, and stages III-IV TRPIs at postoperative day 5 was 11%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. There was a decrease in the rate of skin breakdown in patients following the FLIC protocol when compared with standard of care (13% vs. 36%; p = 0.01). In a multivariable analysis, interventional group had decreased odds of developing TRPI (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.03) after adjusting for age, albumin, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and days in hospital before tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRPIs within the first week following percutaneous tracheostomy is high. Switching the side of the ventilator circuit to evenly distribute load, in addition to standard bundled tracheostomy care, may decrease the overall incidence of TRPIs.

Care of the Patient With an Artificial Airway.

BACKGROUND: Artificial airways are essential in various clinical settings to maintain a patient's airway and provide necessary support for ventilation and oxygenation. These devices are commonly temporary and come in several types, each serving specific purposes. Understanding the indications, types, and proper care of artificial airways is crucial for health care professionals to ensure patients receive optimal care and prevent complications. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to review the indications for using artificial airways and discuss the most commonly used types, including supraglottic airway devices, endotracheal tubes, tracheostomy tubes, and laryngectomy tubes. It also provides insights into the procedures involved in intubation and percutaneous tracheostomy and offers guidance on patient management, emphasizing assessment, oral care, suctioning, and humidification for patients with these airway devices. CONCLUSION: This article underscores the significance of understanding artificial airways, not just as a set of skills but as a commitment to patient welfare. Health care professionals who master the knowledge and care of these devices can significantly contribute to their patients' well-being and quality of life.

Cerebrocostomandibular syndrome: a diagnostic challenge.

A male infant born in a tertiary maternity facility was noted to have microretrognathia, a small mouth and macroglossia at delivery. He was born limp and apnoeic and required multiple attempts at intubation before a definitive airway was eventually sited. Chest X-rays, while in the paediatric intensive care unit, demonstrated dysplastic ribs with associated 'high-riding' clavicles. A later X-ray was reported as showing interrupted posterior ribs. A tracheostomy was formed on day of life 9 given the immediate risk to the baby's airway. Further imaging of the facial bones, skull and brain showed generous CSF spaces over the cerebral convexities and also marked hypoplasia of the mandible and mid-face. The baby's middle ear cavities were shown to be completely opacified. Genetic testing eventually went on to confirm a diagnosis of cerebrocostomandibular syndrome, with the detection of a pathogenic variant of the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide B gene.

Nursing care protocol for critical users with tracheostomy under mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: to develop and assess a nursing care protocol for critically ill users with tracheostomy under mechanical ventilation. METHODS: a methodological study, developed through two phases, guided by the 5W2H management tool: I) target audience characterization and II) technology development. RESULTS: thirty-four nursing professionals participated in this study, who presented educational demands in relation to care for critical users with tracheostomy, with an emphasis on standardizing care through a protocol and carrying out continuing education. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the creation and validity of new technologies aimed at this purpose enhanced the participation of nursing professionals and their empowerment in the health institution's microsectoral actions and in macrosectoral actions, highlighting the need for public policies that guarantee the conduct of a line of care for users with tracheostomy.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Tracheostomy Training using Mannequin-Based Simulation and Smartphone Application on Self-Efficacy and Anxiety of Caregivers.

Inefficient education is a cause of anxiety and low self-efficacy among caregivers, especially for those caring for patients with tracheostomy. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the outcomes of tracheostomy care education by mannequin-based simulation and smartphone application. The participants were 126 primary caregivers of tracheostomy patients being discharged home from hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The control group received routine care. Caregiver self-efficacy was assessed using the Caregiver Inventory and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale prior to the education and 1 month after. There were significant differences among the three groups regarding the mean scores of self-efficacy and anxiety. There was a significant increase in self-efficacy (P ≤ .0001) and a significant decrease in anxiety (P ≤ .0001) scores after the intervention. The intergroup comparison showed a significant difference between the intervention groups and the control group in terms of changes in the anxiety and self-efficacy scores of caregivers (P < .001).

The Safety of Pediatric Bedside Tracheostomy.

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, pediatric tracheostomy has been viewed as a technically demanding procedure with a high complication rate, requiring the routine use of a formal operating room. Pediatric bedside tracheostomy in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting has not been widely reported, in contrast to the widespread adult bedside ICU tracheostomy. Transport of these critically ill, multiple life support systems dependent patients can be technically difficult, labor intensive, and potentially risky for these patients. Our study aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of bedside tracheostomy in the pediatric ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients undergoing tracheostomy at a tertiary care center, between 1st of January 2013 and 31st of December 2019. RESULTS: During the study period, 117 pediatric patients underwent tracheostomy, 57 (48.7%) were performed bedside while 60 (51.3%) were performed in the operating room. Patients' ages ranged from 2 weeks to 17 years of age, with a median age of 16 months. No case of bedside tracheostomy necessitated a shift to the operating room. There was no difference in 30-day morbidity and mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pediatric open bedside tracheostomy in an ICU setting is a safe procedure, with similar complications and outcomes compared to tracheostomy performed in the operating room.

Cholesteatoma in the pediatric aerodigestive population.

OBJECTIVES: To report the prevalence of cholesteatoma and related comorbidities in pediatric aerodigestive patients requiring tracheostomy or airway reconstruction procedures. To use study findings to inform clinical management of these complex patients. METHODS: A repository of clinical data drawn from our institution's electronic medical records was queried to identify airway reconstruction (airway) and complex hospital control (control) patient cohorts. Retrospective chart review was then performed to investigate the occurrence of cholesteatoma and related pathologies in these patients, as well as clinical management. RESULTS: The prevalence of cholesteatoma in airway and control patients was 6/374 (1.60 %) and 35/30,565 (0.11 %), respectively. The relative risk of cholesteatoma diagnosis in airway patients was 14.01 (95 % CI 6.06-32.14). Airway patients were more likely than control patients to have pressure equalization tube history (relative risk 3.25, 95 % CI 2.73-3.82). Age at cholesteatoma diagnosis and first surgical intervention was younger in airway compared to control patients (5.43 vs. 8.33, p = 0.0182, and 6.07 vs. 8.82, p = 0.0236). However, time from diagnosis to intervention and extent of surgery were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate the prevalence of cholesteatoma in the pediatric aerodigestive population. The relative risk of cholesteatoma diagnosis was found to be 14 times higher in patients with tracheostomy or airway reconstruction history. Underlying eustachian tube and palatal dysfunction are likely contributing factors to the elevated risk. Additionally, cholesteatoma in this population was diagnosed and required surgical intervention at a younger age, which may suggest a more aggressive disease course. Providers should maintain a high degree of suspicion for cholesteatoma in this complex population.

Tracheal metallic hybrid stent removal via tracheostomy: an unconventional approach.

Increasing use of tracheal expandable metallic hybrid stents will lead to common encounters with these devices in emergency airway management. The presence of these stents qualifies any patient as a challenge when an emergency tracheostomy is needed. We report an unorthodox technique of tracheostomy with concomitant removal of tracheal stent, without any major complications. Although the combined approach with bronchoscopy and tracheostomy has been reported in similar cases, we present a safe procedure when rigid bronchoscopy is not available.

Impact of upper airway obstruction management in Robin Sequence on need for myringotomy tubes.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate an association between upper airway obstruction (UAO) management in Robin Sequence (RS) and need for bilateral myringotomy and tubes (BMT). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of RS patients treated at a tertiary free-standing pediatric hospital from 1995 to 2020 was performed. Patients were grouped based on airway management: conservative, tracheostomy, tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). Demographic data, cleft palate (CP) association, numbers of BMT and ear infections, and audiogram data including tympanograms were collected. One-way ANOVA and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical data, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis was used to compare BMT rates between treatment groups. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were included, 70.3 % of which had CP. Most patients (67.6 %) had at least one BMT; 29.1 % required two or more BMT. The rate of BMT was higher in patients with CP compared to those with intact palates (p = 0.003; 95 % CI 1.30-3.57) and those treated with tracheostomy (p = 0.043; 95 % CI 1.01, 2.27). Surgically managed patients were more likely to have hearing loss (67.5 % vs. 35.3 %, p = 0.017) and ear infections (42.1 % vs. 20.0 %, p = 0.014) pre-compared to post-procedure for airway management. CONCLUSION: Most RS patients require at least 1 set of BMT. Those with CP and/or treated with tracheostomy had a higher likelihood of needing BMT. Rate of hearing loss and ear infection was higher in surgically managed RS patients. Patients with RS and overt CP require a statistically higher number of BMTs compared to those with either submucous cleft palate or intact palate.

Acute Airway Obstruction: An Unusual Presentation of Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in a Renal Transplant Recipient.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is a life-threatening complication after solid-organ transplants. In adults, recipients of heart transplants have the highest risk, whereas renal transplant recipients have the lowest risk among all solid-organ transplants. The most common site for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders are gastrointestinal tract followed by the graft itself. Airway involvement in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is rarely encountered. We report a case of a 26-year-old renal allograft recipient who presented to the emergency room with airway obstruction necessitating an emergency tracheostomy. Imaging revealed a left tonsillar mass extending into the nasopharynx and retropharyngeal space causing complete oropharyngeal occlusion. Endoscopic biopsy from nasopharyngeal mass showed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and was Ebstein-Barr virus positive. Reduction in immunosuppression and treatment with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder-1 risk-stratified approach resulted in complete remission.

Can't intubate, can't oxygenate? What is the preferred surgical strategy? A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cricothyrotomy (CTM) is currently recommended as the preferred method due to its ease, speed, and safety in life-threatening airway emergencies where standard tracheal intubation and mask ventilation fail. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 33 cases of "can't intubate, can't oxygenate or ventilate" (CICOV): 12 of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and 21 of CTM. The CTM group was younger (median age 44) and mainly consisted of trauma patients. The PDT group was more diverse and procedures were performed by anesthesia and critical care consultants. RESULTS: Initial success rates were 100% for PDT (12/12) and 86% for CTM (18/21), with one conversion from CTM to PDT. No perioperative complications occurred in the PDT group, while the CTM group experienced two cases of false tracts requiring re-do and three cases of bleeding. Immediate mortality within 24 hours was reported in 5/19 CTM patients and none in the PDT group. Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation at hospital discharge was achieved in 6/12 PDT patients and 11/21 CTM patients. Among the 21 CTM cases, all 16 survivors underwent subsequent tracheostomy. Tracheal decannulation occurred in 4/12 PDT patients and 10/21 CTM patients. Favorable immediate neurological outcomes (GCS ≥ 11T) were observed in 8/12 PDT patients and 8/21 CTM patients, while 3 PDT patients remained anesthetized until death and 7 CTM patients died within the first 72 hours without recovery attempts. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, PDT could be a legitimate clinical option for the surgical airway in cases of CICOV. CTM may be more suitable for practitioners who encounter CICOV infrequently.

Effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on ventilator-free days in intensive care unit subjects with sputum retention; a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) facilitates extubation. However, its potential to reduce the duration of ventilator use remains unclear. Therefore, the present study investigated whether the use of MI-E shortened the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with high sputum retention. METHODS: A randomized open-label trial was conducted at a single intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan between November 2017 and June 2019. Ventilated subjects requiring suctioning at least once every hour due to sputum retention were randomly assigned to the MI-E group or conventional care group. The primary endpoint was the number of ventilator-free days on day 28. Secondary endpoints were ventilator days in surviving subjects, the length of ICU stay, and mortality and tracheostomy rates among survivors. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects (81% males) with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range [IQR], 65-85 years) were enrolled. There were 27 subjects in the MI-E group and 21 in the control group. The median number of ventilator-free days was 21 (IQR, 13-24) and 18, respectively (IQR, 0-23) (P = .38). No significant differences were observed in the ICU length of stay (median, 10 days (IQR, 7-12) vs 12 days (IQR, 6-15); P = .31), mortality rate (19% vs 15%; odds ratio [OR], 1.36 [0.28-6.50]; P = .69), or tracheostomy rate among survivors (14% vs 28%; OR, 0.40 [0.08-1.91]; P = .25). CONCLUSION: In ventilated subjects in the ICU with high sputum retention, the use of MI-E did not significantly increase the number of ventilator-free days over that with conventional care.

Prognostic Risks for Tracheostomy in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Cohort From a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Pierre Robin sequence (PRS), characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, cleft palate, and obstructed airways, is one of the craniofacial conditions challenging various approaches to managing compromised airways, ranging from conservative measures to invasive airway surgery. This study was conducted to identify predictive risk factors for tracheostomy in the PRS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Thailand. Children diagnosed with PRS from January 2010 to December 2021 were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analysis methods were used to identify the risk factors. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with PRS were identified in electronic medical records, but 6 were excluded. Thirteen of the remaining 59 patients underwent tracheostomy. There were no significant differences in sex, preterm gestational age, cleft palate, associated syndromes, chromosome abnormalities, or cardiac or neurological involvement between patients who received tracheostomy and those who did not. However, patients with oropharyngeal dysfunction who received tracheostomy tended to use a nasogastric tube or percutaneous gastrostomy 92.3% of the time ( P = 0.043). In addition, patients with abnormal airways from endoscopy were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-3.90). Interestingly, patients with a sum of Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes <15 were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (adjusted odds ratio, 9.91; 95% CI, 1.32-74.52). Furthermore, patients with at least 3 identified comorbidities were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (adjusted odds ratio, 11.34; 95% CI, 1.16-111.15). CONCLUSIONS: The need for tracheostomy depends on comorbidities, Apgar scores, and abnormal airway anatomy. Feeding methods can become more complex with tracheostomy. Prognostic risk factors can help guide treatment and counseling for health care workers and caregivers.

Traqueotomía versus traqueostomía, la necesidad de una aclaración lexicográfica / Tracheotomy versus tracheostomy, the need for lexicographical clarification

Con frecuencia se usan en el ámbito sanitario los términos traqueotomía y traqueostomía, pudiendo generar dudas entre los propios profesionales sobre qué definición corresponde a cada término o cuál de ellos debe considerarse más correcto en casos concretos. Se ha realizado una búsqueda de los términos «traqueotomía» y «traqueostomía» en los diccionarios generalistas en idioma español del Diccionario de la Real Academia Española (DRAE) y del Diccionario Histórico de la Lengua Española de la Real Academia Española (DHLE), y de los términos en inglés «tracheotomy» y «tracheostomy» en los diccionarios generalistas en idioma inglés del Oxford Dictionary, del Cambridge Dictionary y del Collins English Dictionary. Asimismo, se ha hecho una búsqueda en los diccionarios de términos médicos en español del Diccionario de Términos Médicos de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina (DTM) y en inglés del Farlex Dictionary. Los términos se buscaron también en el buscador generalista de Internet Google®. Se analizaron las definiciones desde el punto de vista lexicográfico y etimológico. Las definiciones que aparecen en los diccionarios generalistas, tanto en español como en inglés, son imprecisas, limitadas y adolecen de ambigüedad por mezclar indicaciones desactualizadas con criterios alejados de la etimología. Sin embargo, las definiciones en los diccionarios de términos médicos en ambos idiomas están más ajustadas a la etimología. La traqueotomía identifica estrictamente el procedimiento quirúrgico de realización de una apertura en la cara anterior de la tráquea. La traqueostomía identifica la realización de un orificio que comunica la tráquea con el exterior e implica una modificación del tracto aéreo superior al proporcionar una entrada adicional de la vía respiratoria. Solo en las laringectomías totales la traqueostomía es la única vía de entrada al tracto aéreo. Ambos términos pueden utilizarse sinónimamente cuando una traqueotomía culmina con una traqueostomía. No convendrá utilizar el término traqueostomía cuando se produce el cierre de los planos al final del procedimiento y este no resulta en la creación de un estoma. Los traqueostomas pueden ser cualificados con adjetivos de tiempo de permanencia (temporal/permanente), tamaño (grande/pequeño), forma (redondo/elíptico), o profundidad por sí mismos, sin vincularse a ningún tipo de enfermedad o de indicación quirúrgica. No todos los traqueostomas permanentes tienen lugar en laringectomías totales ni tienen sistemáticamente un carácter irreversible.(AU)

In the healthcare field, the terms “traqueotomía” and “traqueostomía” are frequently used, often leading to confusion among professionals regarding the appropriate definition for each term or which one should be considered more correct in specific cases. A search was conducted for the terms “traqueotomía” and “traqueostomía” in general Spanish-language dictionaries such as the Dictionary of the Royal Spanish Academy (DRAE) and the Historical Dictionary of the Spanish Language of the Royal Spanish Academy (DHLE), as well as for the English terms “tracheotomy” and “tracheostomy” in English general dictionaries like the Oxford Dictionary, the Cambridge Dictionary, and the Collins English Dictionary. Additionally, searches were performed in medical dictionaries in both Spanish, specifically the Dictionary of Medical Terms of the National Academy of Medicine (DTM), and English, including the Farlex Dictionary. The terms were also explored using the Google search engine. Definitions were analyzed from both lexicographical and etymological perspectives. Definitions found in general dictionaries, in both Spanish and English, were found to be imprecise, limited, and ambiguous, as they mixed outdated indications with criteria that deviated from etymology. In contrast, definitions in medical dictionaries in both languages were more aligned with etymology. “Traqueotomía” strictly identifies the surgical procedure of creating an opening in the anterior face of the trachea. “Traqueostomía” identifies the creation of an opening that connects the trachea to the exterior, involving a modification of the upper airway by providing an additional entry for the respiratory pathway. “Traqueostomía” becomes the sole means of entry to the airway in total laryngectomies. Both terms can be used synonymously when a traqueotomía culminates in a traqueostomía. However, it is not appropriate to use the term “traqueostomía” when the procedure concludes with the closure of the planes and does not result in the creation of a stoma. Traqueostomas can be qualified with adjectives indicating permanence (temporary/permanent), size (large/small), shape (round/elliptical), or depth, without being linked to any specific disease or surgical indication. Not all permanent traqueostomas are the result of total laryngectomies, and they do not necessarily have an irreversible character systematically.(AU)

Características de los pacientes traqueostomizados en seguimiento por un Servicio de Atención Paliativa y de Paciente Crónico Complejo (SAPPCC) / Characteristics of tracheostomized patients followed up by a Palliative Care and Complex Chronic Patient Service

Introducción y objetivos: En los últimos años se ha objetivado un incremento de niños portadores de traqueostomía. El objetivo del estudio es describir las características de los pacientes pediátricos traqueostomizados en seguimiento por el SAPPCC de un hospital de tercer nivel.MétodosEstudio unicéntrico, observacional y retrospectivo que incluyó pacientes ≤18años portadores de traqueostomía atendidos por el SAPPCC de un hospital de tercer nivel (noviembre de 2020-junio de 2022). Se analizaron datos epidemiológicos, clínicos, microbiológicos y sociales mediante la revisión de la historia clínica.ResultadosSe incluyeron 44 pacientes traqueostomizados. La patología de base más frecuente fue la patología de vía aérea superior adquirida (20,5%), siendo la obstrucción de vía aérea superior (66%) la indicación más frecuente de traqueostomía. El 84% presentaron aislamientos bacterianos en aspirado traqueal, y Pseudomonas aeruginosa (56,8%) fue el microorganismo más frecuentemente aislado. El antibiótico sistémico más prescrito fue ciprofloxacino (84%). El 18,1% de los pacientes recibieron como mínimo una tanda de antibioterapia intravenosa y el 29,5% recibieron más de tres pautas de antibiótico sistémico en los últimos 20meses. El 59% de los niños estaban escolarizados: el 38,6% en escuela ordinaria, el 15,9% en escuela de educación especial y el 4,5% en domicilio. Se identificó familia en crisis en el 53,7% de los pacientes, y el 22,7% de las familias disponían de la prestación por cuidado de menores con enfermedad grave.ConclusionesDada la complejidad de los niños traqueostomizados, es fundamental un manejo integral y coordinado. La escolarización es posible y segura si se capacita a sus cuidadores/enfermeras escolares. (AU)

Introduction and objectives: In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of children with tracheostomies. The objective was to describe the characteristics of paediatric patients with a tracheostomy followed up by the palliative care and complex chronic patient service (PCCCPS) of a tertiary care hospital.MethodsSingle-centre retrospective observational study in patients aged less than 18years with a tracheostomy manage by the PCCCPS of a tertiary care hospital (November 2020-June 2022). We analysed epidemiological, clinical, microbiological and social data by reviewing the health records.ResultsThe sample included 44 tracheostomized patients. The most frequent underlying disease was acquired upper airway disease (20.5%). The most common indication for tracheostomy was upper airway obstruction (66%). Bacterial isolates were detected in 84% of the tracheal aspirates, among which Pseudomonas aeruginosa was most frequent (56.8%). The most frequently prescribed antibiotic was ciprofloxacin (84%). In addition, 18.1% of the patients received at least one course of intravenous antibiotherapy and 29.5% received more than three systemic antibiotic regimens in the past 20months. Fifty-nine percent of the children were schooled: 38.6% attended a regular school, 15.9% a special needs school and 4.5% were home-schooled. We identified social difficulties in 53.7%. Also, 22.7% of the families received financial support to care for a child with severe illness.ConclusionsBecause of the complexity of caring for tracheostomized children, integral and coordinated management is essential. Schooling is possible and safe if caregivers are trained. (AU)