[Progress on application of hydrogels in the field of peripheral nerve injury repair].

As one of the common traumatic diseases in clinical practice, peripheral nerve injury (PIN) often causes nerve pain, abnormal reflexes, autonomic disorders, and even sensorimotor disorders due to the slow regeneration rate after injury, which seriously affects body function. Even as the gold standard of treatment, autologous nerve transplantation has limitations such as limited donor area and donor injury, which greatly limits its clinical application effect. Therefore, the preparation of artificial nerve grafts suitable for clinical practice has become the future development trend of peripheral nerve injury treatment, and the repair of injury defects and the promotion of nerve regeneration have also become research hotspots in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In recent years, extensive research has been carried out on nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) in the field of nerve regeneration and repair, in which scaffold materials and internal fillers have also become the focus of research as the core elements of neural catheters, and a series of achievements have been made in the application of new materials, embedding stem cells/precursor cells, and developing trophic factors and drug-loaded sustained-release systems. Therefore, this paper focuses on the application progress of hydrogel and its related derivative materials in the field of peripheral nerve injury repair, and provides new ideas for promoting the related research of tissue engineering and clinical medicine.

Upper Extremity Nerve Transfers for Treatment of Nerve Injury After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: Nerve transfers to restore or augment function after spinal cord injury is an expanding field. There is a paucity of information, however, on the use of nerve transfers for patients having undergone spine surgery. The incidence of neurologic deficit after spine surgery is rare but extremely debilitating. The purpose of this study was to describe the functional benefit after upper extremity nerve transfers in the setting of nerve injury after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent nerve transfers after cervical spine surgery was completed. Patient demographics, injury features, spine surgery procedure, nerve conduction and electromyography study results, time to referral to nerve surgeon, time to surgery, surgical technique and number of nerve transfers performed, complications, postoperative muscle testing, and subjective outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Fourteen nerve transfers were performed in 6 patients after cervical spine surgery. Nerve transfer procedures consisted of a transfer between a median nerve branch of flexor digitorum superficialis into a biceps nerve branch, an ulnar nerve branch of flexor carpi ulnaris into a brachialis nerve branch, a radial nerve branch of triceps muscle into the axillary nerve, and the anterior interosseous nerve into the ulnar motor nerve. Average patient age was 55 years; all patients were male and underwent surgery on their left upper extremity. Average referral time was 7 months, average time to nerve transfer was 9 months, and average follow-up was 21 months. Average preoperative muscle grading was 0.9 of 5, and average postoperative muscle grading was 4.1 of 5 ( P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity peripheral nerve transfers can significantly help patients regain muscle function from deficits secondary to cervical spine procedures. The morbidity of the nerve transfers is minimal with measurable improvements in muscle function.

Surgery for mononeuropathies.

Advancement in microsurgical techniques and innovative approaches including greater use of nerve and tendon transfers have resulted in better peripheral nerve injury (PNI) surgical outcomes. Clinical evaluation of the patient and their injury factors along with a shift toward earlier time frame for intervention remain key. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and biology involved in PNI and specifically mononeuropathies along with advances in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging allow us, nowadays, to provide our patients with a logical and sophisticated approach. While functional outcomes are constantly being refined through different surgical techniques, basic scientific concepts are being advanced and translated to clinical practice on a continuous basis. Finally, a combination of nerve transfers and technological advances in nerve/brain and machine interfaces are expanding the scope of nerve surgery to help patients with amputations, spinal cord, and brain lesions.

Muscle preservation in proximal nerve injuries: a current update.

Optimal recovery of muscle function after proximal nerve injuries remains a complex and challenging problem. After a nerve injury, alterations in the affected muscles lead to atrophy, and later degeneration and replacement by fat-fibrous tissues. At present, several different strategies for the preservation of skeletal muscle have been reported, including various sets of physical exercises, muscle massage, physical methods (e.g. electrical stimulation, magnetic field and laser stimulation, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound), medicines (e.g. nutrients, natural and chemical agents, anti-inflammatory and antioxidants, hormones, enzymes and enzyme inhibitors), regenerative medicine (e.g. growth factors, stem cells and microbiota) and surgical procedures (e.g. supercharge end-to-side neurotization). The present review will focus on methods that aimed to minimize the damage to muscles after denervation based on our present knowledge.

Current perspectives on peripheral nerve repair and management of the nerve gap.

From the first surgical repair of a nerve in the 6th century, progress in the field of peripheral nerve surgery has marched on; at first slowly but today at great pace. Whether performing primary neurorrhaphy or managing multiple large nerve defects, the modern nerve surgeon has an extensive range of tools, techniques and choices available to them. Continuous innovation in surgical equipment and technique has enabled the maturation of autografting as a gold standard for reconstruction and welcomed the era of nerve transfer techniques all while bioengineers have continued to add to our armamentarium with implantable devices, such as conduits and acellular allografts. We provide the reader a concise and up-to-date summary of the techniques available to them, and the evidence base for their use when managing nerve transection including current use and applicability of nerve transfer procedures.

Timing of surgery in peripheral nerve injury of the upper extremity.

Peripheral nerve injuries present a complex clinical challenge, requiring a nuanced approach in surgical management. The consequences of injury vary, with sometimes severe disability, and a risk of lifelong pain for the individual. For late management, the choice of surgical techniques available range from neurolysis and nerve grafting to tendon and nerve transfers. The choice of technique utilized demands an in-depth understanding of the anatomy, patient demographics and the time elapsed since injury for optimized outcomes. This paper focuses on injuries to the radial, median and ulnar nerves, outlining the authors' approach to these injuries.Level of evidence: IV.

Repair of Sciatic Nerve Defect in Rats With Acellular Nerve Allograft Carrying Vascular Endothelial Cells.

BACKGROUND: Acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) were developed to replace the autologous nerve grafts (ANGs) to fill the peripheral nerve defects. Poor vascularization relative to ANGs has been a limitation of application of ANAs. METHODS: A total of 60 female Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned 3 groups. The rats in A group received ANGs, the rats in B group received ANAs, and the rats in C group were transplanted with ANA carrying endothelial cells (ANA + ECs). In the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 12th postoperative weeks, 5 rats were selected from each group for evaluating sciatic function index (SFI), electrophysiology, maximum tetanic force recovery rate, tibialis anterior muscle weights recovery rate, and microvessel density. In the 12th postoperative week, the nerves were harvested and stained with toluidine blue and observed under an electron microscope to compare nerve fibers, myelin width, and G-ratio. RESULTS: All the rats survived. In the first and second postoperative weeks, more microvessels were found in the ANA + EC group. In the 12th postoperative week, the nerve fibers were more numerous, and G-ratio was smaller in the C group compared with the B group. The compound muscle action potential and maximum tetanic force recovery rate in the tibialis anterior muscle in the C group were better than those in the B group in the 12th postoperative week. The A group showed better performances in electrophysiology, maximum tetanic force, muscle wet weight, and nerve regeneration. CONCLUSION: ANA + ECs can promote early angiogenesis, promoting nerve regeneration and neurological function recovery.

[Functional Outcome of Peripheral Nerve Injury after Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture: Comparison of Surgical and Conservative Treatment]. / Funktionelle Ergebnisse peripherer Nervenverletzungen nach kindlichen suprakondylären Humerusfrakturen: Vergleich operativer und konservativer Behandlung.

Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children up to 10 years of age. The incidence of associated nerve injuries varies up to 15% depending on the data. Traumatic and iatrogenic lesions mainly affect the ulnar nerve. The regeneration of peripheral nerves is comparatively better in childhood. In the present study, the functional results after surgical and conservative treatment of nerve injuries in children after supracondylar fractures were compared and analyzed for influencing factors. In this retrospective comparative study, clinical data of pediatric nerve injuries following supracondylar humerus fractures treated over a period of 13 years (2008-2021) were analyzed. Children who were treated surgically (neurolysis, autologous reconstruction) due to insufficient clinical/neurophysiological improvement within 6 months after trauma or who were followed up conservatively in case of regression of symptoms within 6 months after trauma were included. All patients underwent multidisciplinary follow-up. 48 patients (26 female/22 male) with nerve injuries were included in this study. All patients had a history of surgical treatment with K- wire fixation due to severe dislocated fractures. The mean age was 7±2 years. The initial symptoms were severe motor deficits in all patients and sensory deficits in 87.5% (n=42). Isolated lesions of the ulnar nerve were most common (n=24, 50%). The nerve was neurolysed in 21 patients and additionally transferred to the volar side in 15. Nerve grafting was performed in 7 children and split repair in 2. Postoperatively, there was a significant improvement in motor function in all patients. Despite comparably severe motor deficits at initial presentation, further 20 children were treated conservatively due to the regression of neurological deficits. They showed comparably good functional results. No serious complications were recorded in either group. The average follow-up time was 377.25±524.87 days. The presented study shows excellent functional results after surgical treatment of pediatric nerve injuries without severe complications. Children with comparatively high-grade lesions at initial presentation have a good chance of complete spontaneous remission even without surgery. For this reason, the indication for surgery in children should be very carefully considered.

Socioeconomic factors and outcome after repair and reconstruction of digital and major nerve trunk injuries in the upper limb.

Peripheral nerve injuries in the upper limb can lead to substantial disability and pain. We aimed to assess how socioeconomic factors affect outcomes after repaired or reconstructed digital or major nerve trunk injuries in the upper limb. We identified 670 individuals, who underwent surgical nerve repair or reconstruction using sensory nerve autografts, in the Swedish National Quality Registry for Hand Surgery 2010-2018. Socioeconomic factors, including education, cohabitation, type of work, sick leave, immigrant status and income, were gathered from the Swedish statistical agency ( www.scb.se ) and National Diabetes Register (NDR). We calculated prevalence ratios (PR) to assess the relationship between socioeconomic factors and surgical outcomes for the nerve injuries. Individuals with a major nerve trunk injury had higher QuickDASH scores and lower income compared to those with digital nerve injury. Individuals with immigration background (adjusted PR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), history of > 4 weeks of sick leave the year before surgery (adjusted PR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1), or education level below tertiary (adjusted PR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.7) had significantly higher QuickDASH scores. Recognizing impact of non-biological factors, including immigration, prior sick leave, and education level, on outcome after nerve surgery is crucial for improving prognosis in socioeconomically deprived individuals.

Risk of suprascapular nerve injury in open Trillat procedure: an anatomical study.

PURPOSE: The open Trillat Procedure described to treat recurrent shoulder instability, has a renewed interest with the advent of arthroscopy. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is theoretically at risk during the drilling of the scapula near the spinoglenoid notch. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the screw securing the coracoid transfer and the SSN during open Trillat Procedure and define a safe zone for the SSN. METHODS: In this anatomical study, an open Trillat Procedure was performed on ten shoulders specimens. The coracoid was fixed by a screw after partial osteotomy and antero-posterior drilling of the scapular neck. The SSN was dissected with identification of the screw. We measured the distances SSN-screw (distance 1) and SSN-glenoid rim (distance 2). In axial plane, we measured the angles between the glenoid plane and the screw (α angle) and between the glenoid plane and the SSN (ß angle). RESULTS: The mean distance SSN-screw was 8.8 mm +/-5.4 (0-15). Mean α angle was 11°+/-2.4 (8-15). Mean ß angle was 22°+/-6.7 (12-30). No macroscopic lesion of the SSN was recorded but in 20% (2 cases), the screw was in contact with the nerve. In both cases, the ß angle was measured at 12°. CONCLUSION: During the open Trillat Procedure, the SSN can be injured due to its anatomical location. Placement of the screw should be within 10° of the glenoid plane to minimize the risk of SSN injury and could require the use of a specific guide or arthroscopic-assisted surgery.

A Systematic Review of Registered Clinical Trials for Peripheral Nerve Injuries.

ABSTRACT: Upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) significantly impact daily functionality and necessitate effective treatment strategies. Clinical trials play a crucial role in developing these strategies. However, challenges like retrospective data collection, reporting biases, inconsistent outcome measures, and inadequate data sharing practices hinder effective research and treatment advancements. This review aims to analyze the landscape of reporting, methodological design, outcome measures, and data sharing practices in registered clinical trials concerning upper extremity PNIs. It seeks to guide future research in this vital area by identifying current trends and gaps.A systematic search was conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform up to November 10, 2023, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords related to upper extremity nerve injury. The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed, and the studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis of findings was performed, with statistical analysis for associations and completion rates.Of 3051 identified studies, 96 met the inclusion criteria. These included 47 randomized controlled trials, 27 nonrandomized trials, and others. Sensory objective measures were the most common primary outcomes. Only 13 studies had a data sharing plan. The analysis revealed varied intervention methods and inconsistencies in outcome measures. There was a significant association between study funding, design, and completion status, but no association between enrollment numbers and completion.This review highlights the need for standardized outcome measures, patient-centered assessments, and improved data sharing in upper extremity PNI trials. The varied nature of interventions and inconsistency in outcome measures indicate the necessity for more rigorous and transparent research practices to strengthen the evidence base for managing these injuries.

Multichannel Conduits with Fascicular Complementation: Significance in Long Segmental Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Despite the advances in tissue engineering approaches, reconstruction of long segmental peripheral nerve defects remains unsatisfactory. Although autologous grafts with proper fascicular complementation have shown meaningful functional recovery according to the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC), the lack of donor nerve for such larger defect sizes (>30 mm) has been a serious clinical issue. Further clinical use of hollow nerve conduits is limited to bridging smaller segmental defects of denuded nerve ends (<30 mm). Recently, bioinspired multichannel nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) gained attention as autograft substitutes as they mimic the fascicular connective tissue microarchitecture in promoting aligned axonal outgrowth with desirable innervation for complete sensory and motor function restoration. This review outlines the hierarchical organization of nerve bundles and their significance in the sensory and motor functions of peripheral nerves. This review also emphasizes the major challenges in addressing the longer nerve defects with the role of fascicular arrangement in the multichannel nerve guidance conduits and the need for fascicular matching to accomplish complete functional restoration, especially in treating long segmental nerve defects. Further, currently available fabrication strategies in developing multichannel nerve conduits and their inconsistency in existing preclinical outcomes captured in this review would seed a new process in designing an ideal larger nerve conduit for peripheral nerve repair.

Beyond the limiting gap length: peripheral nerve regeneration through implantable nerve guidance conduits.

Peripheral nerve damage results in the loss of sensorimotor and autonomic functions, which is a significant burden to patients. Furthermore, nerve injuries greater than the limiting gap length require surgical repair. Although autografts are the preferred clinical choice, their usage is impeded by their limited availability, dimensional mismatch, and the sacrifice of another functional donor nerve. Accordingly, nerve guidance conduits, which are tubular scaffolds engineered to provide a biomimetic environment for nerve regeneration, have emerged as alternatives to autografts. Consequently, a few nerve guidance conduits have received clinical approval for the repair of short-mid nerve gaps but failed to regenerate limiting gap damage, which represents the bottleneck of this technology. Thus, it is still necessary to optimize the morphology and constituent materials of conduits. This review summarizes the recent advances in nerve conduit technology. Several manufacturing techniques and conduit designs are discussed, with emphasis on the structural improvement of simple hollow tubes, additive manufacturing techniques, and decellularized grafts. The main objective of this review is to provide a critical overview of nerve guidance conduit technology to support regeneration in long nerve defects, promote future developments, and speed up its clinical translation as a reliable alternative to autografts.

[Nerve Transfers in Peripheral Nerve Lesions]. / Nerventransfers bei peripheren Nervenläsionen.

BACKGROUND: Lesions of peripheral nerves of the upper extremities often lead to persistent, serious limitations in motor function and sensory perception. Affected patients suffer from both private and professional restrictions associated with long-term physical, psychological and socioeconomic consequences. INDICATION: An early indication for a nerve transfer shortens the reinnervation distance and improves the growing of motor and sensory axons into the target organ to facilitate early mobility and sensitivity. When planning the timepoint of the surgical procedure, the distance to be covered by reinnervation as well as the morbidities of donor nerves must be considered individually. RESULTS: Nerve transfers can achieve earlier and safer reinnervation to improve motor and sensory functions after nerve injuries in the upper extremity.

Does prophylactic decompression of distal nerves following nerve repair improve functional recovery? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injuries are burdensome on healthcare systems, individuals and society as a whole. The current standard of treatment for neurotmesis is primary neurorrhaphy or nerve grafting. However, several patients do not recover their full function. There has been a suggestion that primary distal neurolysis at common entrapment sites maximises surgical outcomes; however, no guidelines exist on this practice. This scoping review aims to ascertain the existing evidence on prophylactic distal decompression of peripheral nerves following repair. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published in the past 50 years. Studies were screened using a selection criteria and study quality was assessed using standardised tools. Furthermore, thematic content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Six studies were eligible for inclusion after screening; all studies were retrospective and at most level 3 evidence. No studies were designed specifically to assess the efficacy of distal neurolysis following proximal repair, thus no comparative data with control cohorts are available. All studies that recommended distal decompression of proximally repaired nerves based their conclusions on cases observed by the authors in practice or from theories on nerve regeneration. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that the evidence on the role of immediate distal neurolysis in primary neurorrhaphy is inadequate. Recommendations are limited by the lack of large-scale and generalisable data. Further research is needed with definitive objective outcomes and patient-related outcome measures.

Distal nerve transfers for peripheral nerve injuries: indications and outcomes.

Distal nerve transfer is a refined surgical technique involving the redirection of healthy sacrificable nerves from one part of the body to reinstate function in another area afflicted by paralysis or injury. This approach is particularly valuable when the original nerves are extensively damaged and standard repair methods, such as direct suturing or grafting, may be insufficient. As the nerve coaptation is close to the recipient muscles or skin, distal nerve transfers reduce the time to reinnervation. The harvesting of nerves for transfer should usually result in minimal or no donor morbidity, as any anticipated loss of function is compensated for by adjacent muscles or overlapping cutaneous territory. Recent years have witnessed notable progress in nerve transfer procedures, markedly enhancing the outcomes of upper limb reconstruction for conditions encompassing peripheral nerve, brachial plexus and spinal cord injuries.

Anatomical considerations for nerve transfer in axillary nerve injury.

This study investigated the anatomical details of the axillary and radial nerves in 50 upper limbs from 29 adult formalin-embalmed cadavers, and ten fresh upper limbs. The focus was on understanding the course, division, and ramifications of these nerves to improve treatment of shoulder dysfunction caused by axillary nerve damage. The axillary nerve divided anteriorly and posteriorly before passing the quadrangular space in all specimens, with specific distances to the first ramifications. It was found that the deltoid muscle's clavicular and acromial parts were always innervated by the anterior division of the axillary nerve, whereas the spinous part was variably innervated. The longest and thickest branches of the radial nerve to the triceps muscles were identified, with no statistically significant differences in fiber numbers among triceps branches. The study concludes that nerve transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve can restore the deltoid muscle in about 86% of shoulders, and the teres minor muscle can be restored by nerve transfer to the posterior division. The medial head branch and long head branch of radial nerve were identified as the best donor options.