Out-of-Hospital screening for HIV, HBV, HCV and Syphilis in a vulnerable population, a public health challenge.

We explored rates of Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis C virus and Syphilis in a vulnerable population (mostly intravenous drug users, sex workers and homeless people) and focused on factors associated with failure to return for results (FTR) and with having a false perception (FP) of Immunization against HBV. We performed a prospective multicenter observational study in nine mobile (Out-of-Hospital) areas of screening located in Paris from 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2014. A total of 341 patients were recruited. The proportion of FTR for results was 38.75%. In multivariate analysis, unemployment was significantly associated with FTR (OR = 4.29; IC = [1.12; 16.39]), as well as having been screened in the past (OR = 4.32, IC = [1.70; 10.97]); 18.03% of patients had a FP of an Immunization against HBV. In multivariate analysis, having one's own place of residence protected against FP (OR = 0.33, [0.12; 0.95]), while being screened in the past enhanced the risk of FP (OR = 3.28, IC = [1.06; 10.11]). The rate of FTR is a problem and use of currently available technologies, such as phone texting, might be a partial solution in conjunction with rapid tests for diagnosis. In addition, more information and comprehension of the results should be provided together with specific anti-HBV vaccination campaigns targeting these specific populations.

Understanding preventive health screening services use in persons with serious mental illness: how does integrated behavioral health primary care compare?

OBJECTIVE: People with serious mental illness have reduced life expectancy, in large part due to reduced access to medical services and underutilization of preventive health services. This is a cross-sectional study that compared preventive services use in an integrated behavioral health primary care clinic (IBHPC) with two existing community mental health programs. METHODS: Participants completed questionnaires about preventive health services use that contained 33 questions about demographic clinical information, and use of preventive health services, from October 2010 to December 2012. Services examined included mammogram, Papanicolaou Test, prostate specific antigen, digital rectal exam, fecal occult blood test, and flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy; blood pressure, height and weight, cholesterol, and blood sugar for diabetes; and influenza immunization, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) antibodies. A health service utilization score was developed and used as primary outcome for data analyses. RESULTS: In the multivariate analyses female gender (p < 0.05), race/ethnicity (p = 0.01 for Asian, p = 0.04 for Hispanic/Latino, both compared to White), program type (p < 0.001), and having a primary care provider (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of higher services use. IBHPC was associated with higher overall service utilization compared to one community mental health program (p < 0.001) but was similar when compared another (p = 0.34). There was high variability in use of individual services among the clinical programs. CONCLUSION: More studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of integrated care in improving use of health screening services. Characteristics of the clinic in relation to use of preventive services deserve further study.

You can't prevent everything anyway: a qualitative study of beliefs and attitudes about refusing health screening in general practice.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore beliefs and attitudes about refusing health screening in general practice. METHODS: In 1991, in Ebeltoft, Denmark people aged between 30 and 50 years were invited to participate in a 5-year randomized, controlled, population-based project testing the value of health screenings and health discussions in general practice. In 1994, non-participants who declined the offered health screening but expressed willingness to be contacted in the future were asked to participate in a qualitative interview. They were drawn by stratified purposeful sampling which reflected variation in perceived health, body mass index, age and sex. The sample comprised six men and 12 women RESULTS: Some had not participated because they were busy, felt healthy or had recently been examined. The non-participants emphasized the limitations of health screening and did not want possible risk factors to be revealed, or their feeling of good health to be disturbed. They stressed the individual's own responsibility for maintaining good health and believed that a positive attitude promoted health. They would contact their GP if they had symptoms. CONCLUSION: Non-participants have rational views on risk factor testing and on their own responsibility for maintaining health. Non-attendance was due to a conscious choice which included consulting their own GP.

[Retrospective analysis of chief complaints of patients with urogenital malignancies over the past decade at the Jikei University Hospital].

We analyzed the chief complaints of patients with four major urogenital malignancies (renal cancer, renal pelvis and ureter cancer, bladder cancer and prostatic cancer) over the past decade (1990-1999) at the Jikei University Hospital. Over the last 10 years, a high percentage of renal cancers were detected incidentally. By contrast, prostatic cancers were more likely (10.5%) than other cancers to be detected on the basis of symptoms of metastasis. However, since 1995 more prostatic cancers are being detected with prostatic-specific antigen screening at the health checkups. Gross hematuria is the chief complaint of most patients with uroepithelial cancers (cancers of the renal pelvis, ureter and bladder cancer). Additionally, renal pelvis and ureter cancers were diagnosed with screening in a few patients in the past five years.