Identifying hub genes in response to ustekinumab and the impact of ustekinumab treatment on fibrosis in Crohn's disease.

Introduction: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease. Approximately 50% of patients with CD progressed from inflammation to fibrosis. Currently, there are no effective drugs for treating intestinal fibrosis. Biologic therapies for CD such as ustekinumab have benefited patients; however, up to 30% of patients with CD have no response to initial treatment, and the effect of ustekinumab on intestinal fibrosis is still uncertain. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the predictive factors of ustekinumab treatment response and the effect of ustekinumab on intestinal fibrosis. Materials and methods: Public datasets-GSE207465 (blood samples) and GSE112366 and GSE207022 (intestinal samples)-were downloaded and analyzed individually (unmerged) based on the treatment response. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by the "limma" R package and changes in immune cell infiltration were determined by the "CIBERSORT" R package in both blood and intestinal samples at week 0 (before treatment). To find predictive factors of ustekinumab treatment response, the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) R package was used to identify hub genes in GSE112366. Hub genes were then verified in GSE207022, and a prediction model was built by random forest algorithm. Furthermore, fibrosis-related gene changes were analyzed in ileal samples before and after treatment with ustekinumab. Results: (1) Our analysis found that MUC1, DUOX2, LCN2, and PDZK1IP1 were hub genes in GSE112366. GSE207022 revealed that MUC1 (AUC:0.761), LCN2 (AUC:0.79), and PDZK1IP1 (AUC:0.731) were also lower in the response group. Moreover, the random forest model was shown to have strong predictive capabilities in identifying responders (AUC = 0.875). To explore the relationship between intestinal tissue and blood, we found that ITGA4 had lower expression in the intestinal and blood samples of responders. The expression of IL18R1 is also lower in responders' intestines. IL18, the ligand of IL18R1, was also found to have lower expression in the blood samples from responders vs. non-responders. (2) GSE112366 revealed a significant decrease in fibrosis-related module genes (COL4A1, TUBB6, IFITM2, SERPING1, DRAM1, NAMPT, MMP1, ZEB2, ICAM1, PFKFB3, and ACTA2) and fibrosis-related pathways (ECM-receptor interaction and PI3K-AKT pathways) after ustekinumab treatment. Conclusion: MUC1, LCN2, and PDZK1IP1 were identified as hub genes in intestinal samples, with lower expression indicating a positive prediction of ustekinumab treatment response. Moreover, ITGA4 and IL18/IL18R1 may be involved in the treatment response in blood and intestinal samples. Finally, ustekinumab treatment was shown to significantly alter fibrotic genes and pathways.

Unmet need for and impact of adopting immunobiological drugs for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a pediatric population.

Palhano et al. demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating secukinumab and ustekinumab into the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for moderate to severe psoriasis in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of secukinumab and ustekinumab against moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a Brazilian pediatric population with access to public healthcare. METHODS: A survey of immunobiological treatments registered for use against pediatric psoriasis at the National Health Surveillance Agency was conducted. These treatments were compared to the list available in the same treatment category in the public health system through the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for psoriasis. A quantitative analysis of the data of patients treated with immunobiological drugs the previous year in accordance with the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines was performed using data available in the DATASUS portal. RESULTS: The public budget impact scenarios analyzed were comparable to the investment already planned for acquiring the only available drug option. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of two therapeutic options in the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines list for moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis was feasible in a horizon of 5 years compared to the investment into the single option available to pediatric patients. These findings can facilitate the local analysis of budgetary impact and discussions on the feasibility of this therapeutic incorporation at the state level. Incorporation of secukinumab and ustekinumab was economically feasible. These drugs are options for those who do not respond to or have contraindications to etanercept.

Therapeutic sequencing in inflammatory bowel disease: Determining the optimal position of vedolizumab for long-term Crohn's disease control using real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Several biologics are available for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease, but data to optimize their use are scarce. Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking monoclonal antibody that was approved in 2014 for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Based on real-world evidence, a model was developed to examine the effect of VDZ's position in the treatment sequence on clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a model using real-world data to investigate how the positioning of VDZ in a sequence of biologic therapies for CD affects clinical effectiveness outcomes of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYS), patient-reported disease activity, and surgery rates. METHODS: A semi-Markov sequential model was developed to identify the optimal position of VDZ in a treatment sequence that included corticosteroids (CS), two biologics, and best supportive care (BSC). Using real-world data, three sequences were compared: VDZ as first (position), second, and last biologic (with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) and the anti-interleukin-12 and -23 agent ustekinumab (UST) as alternative biologic treatments). Published real-world evidence informed model inputs. Vedolizumab sequences were compared and ranked based on QALYS, patient-reported outcomes from Crohn's disease activity index scores, or proportion of patients undergoing surgery by the 10-year time horizon for model simulation. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of model input uncertainty. RESULTS: Vedolizumab as the first biologic was the optimal position for this treatment according to all criteria, including yielding the highest QALYs (5.09) versus VDZ in second (4.97) and third (4.96) biologic sequence positions in sequences containing CS, anti-TNFα (aggregated data), UST, and BSC; 1780/2000 (89%) probabilistic simulations. In sequences containing ADA, VDZ, and UST biologics, ADA and VDZ in the first-line biologic position yielded QALYs of 5.09 versus 5.07, respectively. Adalimumab as the first biologic was best for clinical remission. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation model using real-world evidence indicates that positioning VDZ or ADA as the first biologic is likely to lead to improved long-term patient outcomes when compared to administering these treatments later or starting with IFX monotherapy.

Fistulising skin metastases in Crohn's disease: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic Crohn's disease is a rare disorder characterized by various granulomatous skin lesions that occur independently of gastrointestinal tract involvement. However, currently there is no standardized care or specific treatment. Therapeutic approaches include immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, and monoclonal antibodies targeting inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor (TNF). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 29-year-old western European woman with significant blind ending abdominal subcutaneous fistulas and abscesses, who sought evaluation in the dermatology department. Histological examination revealed multiple epithelioid cell granulomas. There was no evidence of infectious or rheumatologic diseases such as sarcoidosis. The tentative diagnosis was metastatic Crohn's disease, which was not related to an intestinal manifestation of the disease. The patient responded to infliximab but had to discontinue it due to an allergic reaction. Subsequent adalimumab treatment failed to induce clinical remission; thus, therapy was switched to ustekinumab, resulting in a positive response. Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient. For our study more than 1600 publications were screened for cases of metastatic Crohn's disease on PubMed database. 59 case reports with 171 patients were included in the analysis and evaluated for localization, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and complications and were summarized in this review. CONCLUSION: The successful ustekinumab treatment of a patient with metastatic Crohn's disease underscores the potential of this minimally investigated therapeutic option, highlighting the need for future treatment guidelines given the increasing prevalence of such cases.

Insights into Therapeutic Response Prediction for Ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis Using an Ensemble Bioinformatics Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Optimizing treatment with biological agents is an ideal goal for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent data suggest that mucosal inflammation patterns and serum cytokine profiles differ between patients who respond and those who do not. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, has shown promise, but predicting treatment response remains a challenge. We aimed to identify prognostic markers of response to ustekinumab in patients with active UC, utilizing information from their mucosal transcriptome. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 36 UC patients initiating treatment with ustekinumab. Colonic mucosal biopsies were obtained before treatment initiation for a gene expression analysis using a microarray panel of 84 inflammatory genes. A differential gene expression analysis (DGEA), correlation analysis, and network centrality analysis on co-expression networks were performed to identify potential biomarkers. Additionally, machine learning (ML) models were employed to predict treatment response based on gene expression data. RESULTS: Seven genes, including BCL6, CXCL5, and FASLG, were significantly upregulated, while IL23A and IL23R were downregulated in non-responders compared to responders. The co-expression analysis revealed distinct patterns between responders and non-responders, with key genes like BCL6 and CRP highlighted in responders and CCL11 and CCL22 in non-responders. The ML algorithms demonstrated a high predictive power, emphasizing the significance of the IL23R, IL23A, and BCL6 genes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies potential biomarkers associated with ustekinumab response in UC patients, shedding light on its underlying mechanisms and variability in treatment outcomes. Integrating transcriptomic approaches, including gene expression analyses and ML, offers valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies and highlights avenues for further research to enhance therapeutic outcomes for patients with UC.

The Psoriasis Treatment Pipeline: An Overview and Update.

Significant research advances in our understanding of psoriatic disease have led to the development of several highly selective, effective, and safe topical and systemic treatments. These treatments have led to unprecedented levels of disease clearance and control for most patients with psoriasis with cutaneous disease. However, there remains a need for improved treatments for those patients with recalcitrant disease, psoriatic arthritis, or nonplaque disease variants. Recently approved therapies and investigational products in ongoing clinical development programs that target IL-17A/F, IL-23, TYK2, PDE4, AhR or IL-36 cytokine signaling are improving the clinician's ability to care for a broader range of patients affected by psoriasis.

Biologics for Psoriasis.

Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept), the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23 (ustekinumab), the p19 subunit of IL-23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL-17-RA (brodalumab) and both IL-17A and IL-17F (bimekizumab) have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. In both the short and long term, risankizumab had highest Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 scores compared to other oral and injectable biologics. IL-23 inhibitors had lowest rates of short-term and long-term adverse events and most favorable long-term risk-benefit profile compared to IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α inhibitors.

Evolving Landscape of Biologic Therapy for Pediatric Psoriasis.

Pediatric psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition. Current treatment modalities include topical medications, phototherapy, and systemic drugs, including biological agents. In cases of moderate-to-severe psoriasis recalcitrant to other therapies, biological therapies are often an attractive option given their dosing schedules, safety profiles, and need for less frequent laboratory monitoring, when compared with traditional systemic therapies. This article reviews biological treatment options approved for pediatric psoriasis and identifies others actively under investigation.

Dose escalation of biologic treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan.

Patients receiving interleukin (IL)-inhibiting biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) may be treated with escalated doses to optimize outcomes. This study evaluated escalation prevalence in a Japanese claims analysis of patients with PsO diagnosis preceding IL-inhibiting biologic treatment and ≥1 post-induction maintenance claim (index date) with sufficient data availability from January 2014 to May 2022. Patients with non-persistence were excluded. Expected daily dose (EDD) was calculated as the recommended maintenance dose divided by the treatment interval. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 claims showing a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose (ADD) over the EDD (with sensitivities requiring ≥1 claim and ≥30%). Significant differences were tested using multivariable regressions. The study included 982 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 104), guselkumab (GUS; n = 207), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 159), risankizumab (RIS; n = 135), secukinumab (SEC; n = 215) and ustekinumab (UST; n = 196). Within 12 months, dose escalation was observed for all IL-inhibiting biologics other than GUS and RIS: 44.4% for UST, 37.2% for IXE, 3.4% for SEC and 1.4% for BRO. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, odds of dose escalation were significantly lower for all products relative to UST. In sensitivities, escalation was observed for all products except RIS.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on ustekinumab.

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic drug monitoring is used clinically to guide anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its use for ustekinumab (UST) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine predictive variables of UST levels. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort of patients with IBD, UST trough levels were drawn at maintenance dosing. Relationships between UST trough levels and demographics, therapy, and outcomes were analyzed. Machine-learning models were used to infer combinatorial traits predictive of UST levels. RESULTS: Altogether 177 patients with IBD on UST had a mean UST trough level of 4.742 µg/mL. The injection schedule correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with UST levels. Naiveté to anti-TNFs correlated with higher UST levels (P = 0.048). Univariate analysis revealed that higher inflammatory biomarkers significantly correlated to lower UST levels and a lower Simple Endoscopic Score to Crohn's Disease to adequate UST levels (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis identified body mass index (BMI), previous anti-TNF failure, and laboratory flare as predictors of UST levels with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.72. The UST cut-off level of 5.77 µg/mL yielded a 0.79 AUROC, 80% sensitivity, and 81% specificity for predicting endoscopic remission of Crohn's disease. For the clinical remission end-point in ulcerative colitis, UST level of 4.73 µg/mL yielded a 0.69 AUROC, 53% sensitivity, and 86% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Higher UST levels correlated with less disease activity. BMI was an important consideration for UST response as well. Therefore, UST dose adjustments to reach target levels may optimize response.

Real-world clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in patients with Crohn's disease treated with vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To compare real-world treatment persistence, dose escalation, rates of opportunistic or serious infections, and healthcare costs in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving vedolizumab (VDZ) vs ustekinumab (UST) in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective observational study in adults with CD initiated on VDZ or UST on/after 26 September 2016, was performed using the IBM Truven Health MarketScan databases (1 January 2009-30 September 2018). Rates of treatment persistence, dose escalation, opportunistic or serious infection-related encounters, and healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) were evaluated. Entropy balancing was used to balance patient characteristics between cohorts. Event rates were assessed using weighted Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared between cohorts using log-rank tests. Healthcare costs were compared between cohorts using weighted 2-part models. RESULTS: 589 VDZ and 599 UST patients were included (172 [29.2%] and 117 [19.5%] were bio-naïve, respectively). After weighting, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. No significant difference in rates of treatment persistence (12-month: VDZ, 76.5%; UST, 82.1%; p = .17), dose escalation (12-month: VDZ, 29.3%; UST, 32.7%; p = .97), or opportunistic or serious infection-related encounters were observed between VDZ and UST. Total mean healthcare costs were significantly lower for patients treated with VDZ vs UST (mean cost difference = -$5051 PPPM; p < .01). Findings were consistent in bio-naïve patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, similar treatment persistence, dose escalation, and rates of opportunistic or serious infections were observed with VDZ- and UST-treated patients with CD. However, VDZ was associated with a significantly lower cost outlay for healthcare systems.

Crohn's disease (CD) causes inflammation in the digestive system. Vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are therapies for patients with CD. Little is known about the clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of VDZ versus UST in the real world in the United States. We used health claims data and found that VDZ and UST had comparable real-world clinical outcomes. After 12 months of treatment, the proportions of patients with CD who stayed on treatment and those who needed to increase therapy dose were similar with VDZ and UST. The rate of infection was also similar between the two groups of patients. However, the monthly healthcare costs were $5051 less for patients treated with VDZ than with UST. This was mainly due to the lower cost of VDZ, which was almost half of that of UST. The lower treatment costs with VDZ may provide substantial savings for the healthcare system and patients specifically. Future cost-effectiveness studies on VDZ and UST are needed to aid treatment selection for patients with CD.

Difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease: Effectiveness and safety of 4th and 5th lines of treatment.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have signs or symptoms of active disease despite multiple treatment attempts. This emerging concept is defined as difficult-to-treat IBD. AIM: The objective of this study was to investigate for the first time the treatment persistence, efficacy and safety of biologics or small molecules used in 4th or 5th line therapy. METHODS: We reviewed all consecutive patients with IBD treated at the Nancy University Hospital between July 2022 and April 2023 with the 4th or 5th line treatment for at least three months. The primary outcome was to assess the persistence rate of 4th and 5th line therapy. RESULTS: We enrolled 82 patients with IBD (4th line: 44; 5th line: 38). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the duration of risankizumab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab therapy did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) as 4th and 5th line treatment. The restricted mean survival time analysis showed that the persistence rate of risankizumab was the highest as 4th line therapy (risankizumab vs. vedolizumab: 36.0 and 29.4 weeks, respectively, p = 0.008; risankizumab vs. ustekinumab: 36.0 and 32.8 weeks, respectively, p = 0.035). In multivariate regression, Crohn's disease diagnosis (Odd ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.7-12.4) was significantly associated with treatment persistence. CONCLUSION: In this first real-world setting, risankizumab could have a longer persistence rate as 4th line treatment for IBD than other agents. Persistence of biological agents was greater in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis. More studies are needed to compare treatment efficacy in patients with difficult-to-treat IBD.

[Clinical remission and transmural healing of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease].

OBJECTIVE: To treat the Crohn's disease (CD) patients with ustekinumab (UST), to eva-luate their clinical and endoscopic remission, and to evaluate their transmural response (TR) and transmural healing (TH) condition using intestinal ultrasonography (IUS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was made on patients diagnosed with CD in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2020 to August 2022, who were treated with UST for remission induction and maintenance therapy. All the patients were evaluated on both week 8 and week 16/20 after treatment, including clinical, biochemical indicators, colonoscopy and IUS examination. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were enrolled in this study, including 11 males and 2 females. The minimum age was 23 years, the maximum age was 73 years and the mean age was 36.92 years. All the patients were in the active stage of disease before treatment, and the average Best Crohn's disease activity index (Best CDAI) score was 270.12±105.55. In week 8, the Best CDAI score of the patients decreased from 270.12±105.55 to 133.16±48.66 (t=4.977, P < 0.001). Eight patients achieved clinical remission while 5 patients remained in the active stage. Nine patients underwent colonoscopy evaluation. The average simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) score decreased from 10.71±7.14 before treatment to 6.00±7.81(t=2.483, P=0.048) in week 16/20. Four patients achieved endoscopic remission while 5 patients did not. In week 8, 5 patients achieved TR, 2 patients achieved TH, the other 6 patients did not get TR or TH. In week 16/20, 6 patients achieved TR, 3 patients achieved TH while the other 4 patients did not get TR or TH. There was no significant statistical difference in the TR effect of UST between small intestine and colon lesions (Fisher test, P > 0.999). The rate of UST transmural response in the patients who had had previous biological agent therapy was lower than those with no previous biological agent therapy, but there was no significant statistical difference (Fisher test, P=0.491). CONCLUSION: After treatment of UST, the clinical and endoscopic conditions of the CD patients had been improved, and some patients could achieve clinical remission and endoscopic remission. UST had good TR and TH effects on CD. TR might appear in week 8, and the TR effect increased in week 16/20. There was no significant statistical difference in the TR effect between small intestine and colon lesions. TR effect of UST was better in the patients who had no previous biological agent therapy than those who had had other biological agents, but the result had no significant statistical difference.

Ustekinumab effectiveness in Crohn's disease with lesions in the intestines.

Ustekinumab is prescribed for the treatment of patients with steroid-resistant moderate to severe Crohn's disease. We investigated its clinical outcome in patients with small and large intestinal lesions. Patients who were newly administered ustekinumab between March 2014 and December 2020 at Hamamatsu University Hospital were included in the study. The primary endpoint was Crohn's disease activity index score at baseline and weeks 8, 24, and 48 after the initiation of treatment, and secondary endpoints were albumin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein at these time points. Ustekinumab treatment retention was examined in both groups; the 2 groups were compared using the Friedman test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Fisher exact test. Overall, Crohn's disease activity index scores improved between baseline and 48 weeks, but the difference was not significant. However, there was a significant improvement between baseline and 48 weeks in patients with lesions in the small intestine only. Overall, patients showed significant improvement in albumin levels between baseline and 48 weeks but not in C-reactive protein or hemoglobin levels. When limited to patients with lesions in the small intestine, albumin and hemoglobin levels showed significant improvement. Both types showed high rates of treatment retention, although there was no significant difference. Ustekinumab appears to be a safe and effective treatment option that may be particularly effective in patients with lesions in the small intestine only.

[Pouchitis showed complete response to ustekinumab].

Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis. Although several agents, including probiotics, steroids, and immunomodulators, have been used, the treatment of pouchitis remains challenging. Owing to the proven efficacy of biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease, there is now growing evidence suggesting the potential benefits of biological therapy in refractory pouchitis. Here, we report the case of a 64-year-old woman with pouchitis due to ulcerative colitis who was successfully treated with ustekinumab (UST). The patient developed ulcerative pancolitis at the age of 35. Total colectomy and IPAA with J-pouch anastomosis were performed when the patient was 47 years old. Ileotomy closure was performed 6 months later. Postoperatively, the patient developed steroid-dependent pouchitis. Three years later, she developed steroid-induced diabetes. The patient has been taking 3mg of steroid for 20 years;therefore, her lifetime total steroid dose was 21g. The patient had over 20 episodes of bloody diarrhea a day. The last pouchoscopy in 20XX-9 revealed inflammatory stenosis with deep ulcerations of the afferent limb just before the ileoanal pouch junction. In July 20XX, when we took over her treatment, the policy of treatment was to withdraw her from steroids. Pouchoscopy revealed a widened but still tight afferent limb through which the scope could easily pass, and the ileoanal pouch still showed erosive ileitis without ulcers. Thiopurine administration and steroid tapering were initiated. Steroid tapering increased the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). As ESR increased, her arthritis exacerbated. Six months after the end of steroid administration, the patient consented to UST treatment. On April 20XX+1, the patient received her first 260-mg UST infusion. At this point, she experienced 14-15 episodes of muddy bloody stools. She had no abdominal pain;however, she experienced shoulder pain. Gradually, UST affected both pouchitis and arthritis. UST treatment was continued at 90mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks without abdominal pain recurrence. Eight months after the first UST infusion, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were no longer necessary for shoulder pain. Follow-up pouchoscopy performed 14 months after UST optimization revealed a normal afferent limb without ulcerations in either segment. Pouchitis remission was maintained for over 2 years.

Biological treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease is similar in academic and nonacademic centres - prime time for decentralisation of inflammatory bowel disease care?

BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, it is difficult to manage them within specialised IBD teams in academic medical centres: many are therefore treated in nonacademic IBD centres. It is unclear whether the time to introducing biologics is the same in both settings. AIM: We aimed to compare treatment approach with biologics in academic vs. nonacademic centres. METHODS: We analysed Slovenian national IBD registry data (UR-CARE Registry, supported by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation), which included 2 academic (2319 patients) and 4 nonacademic IBD (429 patients) centres. RESULTS: The disease phenotype was similar in both settings. In total, 1687 patients received 2782 treatment episodes with biologics. We observed no differences in treatment episodes with TNF-alpha inhibitors (60% vs. 61%), vedolizumab (24% vs. 23%), or ustekinumab (17% vs. 16%) in academic compared to nonacademic centres ( P  = 0.949). However, TNF inhibitors were less often the first biologic in academic centres (TNF inhibitors: 67.5% vs. 74.0%, vedolizumab: 20.3% vs. 17.9%, ustekinumab: 12.1% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.0096). Consequently, more patients received ustekinumab (29.8% vs. 18.3%) and vedolizumab (17.4% vs. 13.5%) and fewer TNF inhibitors (52.7% vs. 68.2%) for Crohn's disease in academic compared to nonacademic centres, with no such differences for ulcerative colitis. The time to initiation of the first biologic from diagnosis was short and similar in both settings (11.3 vs. 10.4 months, P  = 0.2). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide registry analysis, we observed that biological treatment choice was similar in academic and nonacademic settings. These findings support the decentralisation of IBD care.

Meta-analysis: Persistence of advanced therapies in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: The expanding options in advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) present challenges in treatment selection. Persistence analysis assesses drug durability in real-world settings, acting as a surrogate marker for medication efficacy and tolerance. Unlike traditional comparative studies, persistence analysis provides insights extending beyond the initial year of treatment. AIM: To provide real-world evidence on treatment effectiveness, tolerability and preferences of physicians and patients regarding various advanced therapies for IBD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies up to March 2023 assessing advanced therapies' persistence in UC and CD. Advanced therapies under examination included infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, golimumab, certolizumab and tofacitinib. We pooled the persistence of each agent and conducted a meta-analysis to compare the persistence of newer agents with traditional TNF inhibitors (TNFi)-specifically infliximab and adalimumab. RESULTS: Among 63 observational studies, vedolizumab had the highest 1-year persistence in UC (73.8%, 95% CI: 70.0%-77.6%) and ustekinumab in CD (77.5%, 95% CI: 72.9%-82.1%). Compared to TNFi, vedolizumab demonstrated increased persistence with a relative risk (RR) of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.19-1.41) for UC and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09-1.20) for CD at 1 year, while ustekinumab demonstrated a RR of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23) for CD at 1 year. Vedolizumab exhibited sustained increased persistence in UC over 2 years compared to TNFi (RR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.54). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights the superior persistence of ustekinumab and vedolizumab over TNFi, and offers valuable insights for clinicians navigating the challenging landscape of UC and CD therapeutic choices.