Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 105.975
Filtrar
1.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 154: 3734, 2024 Apr 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689545

RESUMO

AIMS OF THE STUDY: We aimed to assess the extent of SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity elicited by previous infections and/or vaccination among healthcare workers, and to identify reasons why healthcare workers decided against vaccination. METHODS: This nested cross-sectional study included volunteer healthcare workers from 14 healthcare institutions in German-speaking Switzerland. In January 2021, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were available for healthcare workers. In May and June 2022, participants answered electronic questionnaires regarding baseline characteristics including SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status (with one or more vaccine doses defined as vaccinated) and previous SARS-CoV-2 infections. Unvaccinated participants indicated their reasons for non-vaccination. Participants underwent testing for SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike (anti-S) and anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) antibodies. Antibody prevalence was described across age groups. In addition, we performed multivariable logistic regression to identify baseline characteristics independently associated with non-vaccination and described reasons for non-vaccination. RESULTS: Among 22,438 eligible employees, 3,436 (15%) participated; the median age was 43.7 years (range 16-73), 2,794 (81.3%) were female, and 1,407 (47.7%) identified as nurses; 3,414 (99.4%) underwent serology testing, among whom 3,383 (99.0%) had detectable anti-S (3,357, 98.3%) antibodies, anti-N (2,396, 70.1%) antibodies, or both (2,370, 69.4%). A total of 296 (8.6%) healthcare workers were unvaccinated, whereas 3,140 (91.4%) were vaccinated. In multivariable analysis, age (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), being a physician (aOR 3.22, 95% CI 1.75-5.92) or administrator (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.27-2.80), and having higher education (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.09-4.57) were positively associated with vaccine uptake, whereas working in non-acute care (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.97), active smoking (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91), and taking prophylactic home remedies against SARS-CoV-2 (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31-0.56) were negatively associated. Important reasons for non-vaccination were a belief that the vaccine might not have long-lasting immunity (267/291, 92.1%) and a preference for gaining naturally acquired instead of vaccine-induced immunity (241/289, 83.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Almost all healthcare workers in our cohort had specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 from natural infection and/or from vaccination. Young healthcare workers and those working in non-acute settings were less likely to be vaccinated, whereas physicians and administrative staff showed higher vaccination uptake. Presumed ineffectiveness of the vaccine is an important reason for non-vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Suíça , Estudos Transversais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Imunidade Humoral , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso
2.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29648, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727032

RESUMO

The effects of COVID-19 vaccination on short-term and long-term cerebrovascular risks among COVID-19 survivors remained unknown. We conducted a national multi-center retrospective cohort study with 151 597 vaccinated and 151 597 unvaccinated COVID-19 patients using the TriNetX database, from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023. Patients baseline characteristics were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM). The outcomes were incident cerebrovascular diseases occurred between 1st and 30th days (short-term) after COVID-19 diagnosis. Nine subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modifications. We performed six sensitivity analyses, including evaluation of outcomes between 1st to 180th days, accounting for competing risk, and incorporating different variant timeline to test the robustness of our results. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-Rank tests were performed to evaluate survival difference. Cox proportional hazards regressions were adopted to estimate the PSM-adjusted hazard ratios (HR). The overall short-term cerebrovascular risks were lower in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56-0.77), specifically cerebral infarction (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.79), occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98), other cerebrovascular diseases (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.77), and sequelae of cerebrovascular disease (HR: 0.39, 95% CI:0.23-0.68). Similarly, the overall cerebrovascular risks were lower in those vaccinated among most subgroups. The long-term outcomes, though slightly attenuated, were consistent (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.87). Full 2-dose vaccination was associated with a further reduced risk of cerebrovascular diseases (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.80) compared to unvaccinated patients. Unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors have significantly higher cerebrovascular risks than their vaccinated counterparts. Thus, clinicians are recommended to monitor this population closely for stroke events during postinfection follow-up.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares , Vacinação , Humanos , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/etiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
3.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303215, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739597

RESUMO

Despite improvement over recent decades, childhood vaccination uptake remains a concern across countries. The World Health Organization observed that over 25 million children missed out on one or more vaccines in 2021, with urban poor and other marginalized groups being the most affected. Given the higher risk of disease transmission and vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) outbreaks across densely populated urban slums, identifying effective interventions to improve childhood vaccination in this vulnerable population is crucial. This study explored the behavioral and social factors influencing childhood vaccination uptake in urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. A grounded theory approach was employed to develop a theoretical account of the socio-behavioral determinants of childhood vaccination. Five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with purposively sampled caregivers of children under five years of age residing in informal settlements. The Theory of Planned Behavior guided the structuring of the FGD questions. An iterative process was used to analyze and identify emerging themes. Thirty-nine caregivers (median age 29 years) participated in the FGDs. From the analysis, four main thematic categories were derived. These included attitude factors such as perceived vaccine benefits, cultural beliefs, and emotional factors including parental love. Additionally, subjective norms, like fear of social judgment, and perceived behavioral control factors, such as self-control and gender-based influences, were identified. Furthermore, a number of practical factors, including the cost of vaccines and healthcare providers attitude, also affected the uptake of vaccination. Various social, behavioral, cultural, and contextual factors influence caregiver vaccination decisions in urban poor settings. Community-derived and context-specific approaches that address the complex interaction between socio-behavioral and other contextual factors need to be tested and applied to improve the timely uptake of childhood vaccinations among marginalized populations.


Assuntos
População Urbana , Vacinação , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Quênia , Pré-Escolar , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Cuidadores/psicologia , Lactente , Grupos Focais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Áreas de Pobreza , Pobreza , Pais/psicologia
4.
Clin Exp Med ; 24(1): 103, 2024 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758248

RESUMO

COVID-19 vaccination has been shown to prevent and reduce the severity of COVID-19 disease. The aim of this study was to explore the cardioprotective effect of COVID-19 vaccination in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we included hospitalized COVID-19 patients with confirmed vaccination status from July 2021 to February 2022. We assessed outcomes such as acute cardiac events and cardiac biomarker levels through clinical and laboratory data. Our analysis covered 167 patients (69% male, mean age 58 years, 42% being fully vaccinated). After adjustment for confounders, vaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients displayed a reduced relative risk for acute cardiac events (RR: 0.33, 95% CI [0.07; 0.75]) and showed diminished troponin T levels (Cohen's d: - 0.52, 95% CI [- 1.01; - 0.14]), compared to their non-vaccinated peers. Type 2 diabetes (OR: 2.99, 95% CI [1.22; 7.35]) and existing cardiac diseases (OR: 4.31, 95% CI [1.83; 10.74]) were identified as significant risk factors for the emergence of acute cardiac events. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination may confer both direct and indirect cardioprotective effects in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalização , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Idoso , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinação , Cardiopatias/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Troponina T/sangue
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 467, 2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chile rapidly implemented an extensive COVID-19 vaccination campaign, deploying a diversity of vaccines with a strategy that prioritized the elderly and individuals with comorbidities. This study aims to assess the direct impact of vaccination on the number of COVID-19 related cases, hospital admissions, ICU admissions and deaths averted during the first year and a half of the campaign. METHODS: Via Chile's transparency law, we obtained access to weekly event counts categorized by vaccination status and age. Integrating this data with publicly available census and vaccination coverage information, we conducted a comparative analysis of weekly incidence rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups from December 20, 2020 to July 2, 2022 to estimate the direct impact of vaccination in terms of the number of cases, hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths averted, using an approach that avoids the need to explicitly specify the effectiveness of each vaccine deployed. RESULTS: We estimated that, from December 20, 2020 to July 2, 2022 the vaccination campaign directly prevented 1,030,648 (95% Confidence Interval: 1,016,975-1,044,321) cases, 268,784 (95% CI: 264,524-273,045) hospitalizations, 85,830 (95% CI: 83,466-88,194) ICU admissions and 75,968 (95% CI: 73,909-78,028) deaths related to COVID-19 among individuals aged 16 years and older. This corresponds to a reduction of 26% of cases, 66% of hospital admissions, 70% of ICU admissions and 67% of deaths compared to a scenario without vaccination. Individuals 55 years old or older represented 67% of hospitalizations, 73% of ICU admissions and 89% of deaths related to COVID-19 prevented. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the role of Chile's vaccination campaign in reducing COVID-19 disease burden, with the most substantial reductions observed in severe outcomes.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , Chile/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Masculino , Feminino , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Criança
6.
Euro Surveill ; 29(18)2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699900

RESUMO

BackgroundTick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a severe, vaccine-preventable viral infection of the central nervous system. Symptoms are generally milder in children and adolescents than in adults, though severe disease does occur. A better understanding of the disease burden and duration of vaccine-mediated protection is important for vaccination recommendations.AimTo estimate TBE vaccination coverage, disease severity and vaccine effectiveness (VE) among individuals aged 0-17 years in Switzerland.MethodsVaccination coverage between 2005 and 2022 was estimated using the Swiss National Vaccination Coverage Survey (SNVCS), a nationwide, repeated cross-sectional study assessing vaccine uptake. Incidence and severity of TBE between 2005 and 2022 were determined using data from the Swiss disease surveillance system and VE was calculated using a case-control analysis, matching TBE cases with SNVCS controls.ResultsOver the study period, vaccination coverage increased substantially, from 4.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.1-5.5%) to 50.1% (95% CI: 48.3-52.0%). Reported clinical symptoms in TBE cases were similar irrespective of age. Neurological involvement was less likely in incompletely (1-2 doses) and completely (≥ 3 doses) vaccinated cases compared with unvaccinated ones. For incomplete vaccination, VE was 66.2% (95% CI: 42.3-80.2), whereas VE for complete vaccination was 90.8% (95% CI: 87.7-96.4). Vaccine effectiveness remained high, 83.9% (95% CI: 69.0-91.7) up to 10 years since last vaccination.ConclusionsEven children younger than 5 years can experience severe TBE. Incomplete and complete vaccination protect against neurological manifestations of the disease. Complete vaccination offers durable protection up to 10 years against TBE.


Assuntos
Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos , Cobertura Vacinal , Vacinação , Vacinas Virais , Humanos , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/prevenção & controle , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Suíça/epidemiologia , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Incidência , Eficácia de Vacinas/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Encefalite Transmitidos por Carrapatos/imunologia , Recém-Nascido , Vigilância da População
7.
PeerJ ; 12: e17409, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784396

RESUMO

Background: The global health landscape is increasingly challenged by the rejection of childhood vaccines. This study investigates vaccination reservations and refusal among pregnant women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Kahramanmaras, Türkiye, spanning January to March 2019, entailing face to face interviews with 938 pregnant women. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic data and probed vaccination attitudes. The decision to vaccinate the baby was treated as the dependent variable, analyzed alongside sociodemographic factors and other variables. Data underwent evaluation via descriptive analysis, the Chi-square test, and binary logistic regression. Results: Participants had a mean age of 27.6 years. Among them 20 (2.1%) expressed intent to either abstain from or partially vaccinate their babies, with 70% citing apprehensions regarding potential vaccine-related harm. Statistical analysis unveiled that higher economic income, elevated parental education level, fewer than two children, reliance on the Internet for vaccination information, and a lack of trust in physicians significantly correlated with vaccine refusal among pregnant women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The study concludes that dissemination of vaccination information by the healthcare professionals, complemented by the enactment of pro-vaccine internet policies holds promise in shaping vaccination behavior.


Assuntos
Gestantes , Recusa de Vacinação , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Recusa de Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestantes/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem , Vacinação/psicologia
8.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1372525, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784571

RESUMO

Background: Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) have a high risk of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine effectiveness against infection and deaths in the South Korean population undergoing HD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the incidence of COVID-19 and post-diagnosis mortality between patients who were either never vaccinated or fully or partially vaccinated. The Korean nationwide COVID-19 registry and the Korean National Health Insurance Service databases were used. Adult patients without a history of COVID-19 were included between October 8, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The study outcomes were COVID-19 diagnosis, severe clinical COVID-19-related events, and post-diagnosis death. Results: Eighty-five thousand eighteen patients undergoing HD were included, of whom 69,601 were fully vaccinated, 2,213 were partially vaccinated and 13,204 were unvaccinated. Compared with the unvaccinated group, the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 in patients who were fully vaccinated decreased during the study period (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.147; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.135-0.159). There were 1,140 (1.3%) patients diagnosed with COVID-19. After diagnosis, fully vaccinated patients were significantly less likely to die than unvaccinated patients (aOR = 0.940; 95% CI = 0.901-0.980) and to experience severe clinical events (aOR = 0.952; 95% CI = 0.916-0.988). Conclusion: Full vaccination against COVID-19 was associated with a reduced risk of both infection and severe clinical outcomes in the South Korean population undergoing HD. These findings support the use of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 among patients undergoing HD.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Diálise Renal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Eficácia de Vacinas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência
9.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1375151, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784578

RESUMO

Introduction: Homeless individuals suffer a high burden of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. Moreover, they are particularly susceptible to adverse infection outcomes with limited access to the health care system. Data on the seroprevalence of measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella within this cohort are missing. Methods: The seroprevalence of measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella was determined within the homeless population in Germany. Predictors of lacking immune protection were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Homeless individuals in Germany (n = 611) showed a seroprevalence of 88.5% (95% CI: 85.8-91.0) for measles, 83.8% (95% CI: 80.6-86.6) for mumps, 86.1% (95% CI: 83.1-88.7) for rubella, and 95.7% (95% CI 93.8-97.2) for varicella. Measles seroprevalences declined from individuals born in 1965 to individuals born in 1993, with seroprevalences not compatible with a 95% threshold in individuals born after 1980. For mumps, seroprevalences declined from individuals born in 1950 to individuals born in 1984. Here, seroprevalences were not compatible with a 92% threshold for individuals born after 1975. Seronegativity for measles, mumps and rubella was associated with age but not with gender or country of origin. Discussion: Herd immunity for measles and mumps is not achieved in this homeless cohort, while there was sufficient immune protection for rubella and varicella. Declining immune protection rates in younger individuals warrant immunization campaigns also targeting marginalized groups such as homeless individuals. Given that herd immunity thresholds are not reached for individuals born after 1980 for measles, and after 1975 for mumps, vaccination campaigns should prioritize individuals within these age groups.


Assuntos
Varicela , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Caxumba/imunologia , Caxumba/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/imunologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/imunologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Idoso
10.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13284, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773753

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We report 2023/2024 season interim influenza vaccine effectiveness for three studies, namely, primary care in Great Britain, hospital settings in Scotland and hospital settings in England. METHODS: A test negative design was used to estimate vaccine effectiveness. RESULTS: Estimated vaccine effectiveness against all influenzas ranged from 63% (95% confidence interval 46 to 75%) to 65% (41 to 79%) among children aged 2-17, from 36% (20 to 49%) to 55% (43 to 65%) among adults 18-64 and from 40% (29 to 50%) to 55% (32 to 70%) among adults aged 65 and over. CONCLUSIONS: During a period of co-circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) in the United Kingdom, evidence for effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in both children and adults was found.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Atenção Secundária à Saúde , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Reino Unido , Idoso , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/genética , Masculino , Feminino , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Estações do Ano , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Nurs Open ; 11(5): e2171, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773765

RESUMO

AIM: The study assessed the knowledge, attitude, intentional practice and individualized factors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among adults in Tanzania. DESIGN: Hospital-based analytical cross-sectional study. METHODS: Quantitative approaches were adopted to study 312 randomly selected adults using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive analysis established frequencies and percentages of variables at a 95% confidence interval and a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Mean age was 24.66 ± 6.503 of which 61.5% were males. 86.9% of them were not vaccinated. 57.7% of respondents had inadequate knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine, and 61.5% had negative attitudes towards it. 63.8% of adults demonstrated an unwillingness to be vaccinated. Participants' sociodemographic characteristics profiles were significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine knowledge, attitude and willingness to uptake it (p < 0.05). Findings highlight the need for large-scale interventions to address the low uptake vaccine. Adults' willingness to get a coronavirus vaccine was comparatively low. Sociodemographic profiles, knowledge and attitude were associated significantly with low uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among adults in Tanzania.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Tanzânia , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem , SARS-CoV-2 , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 24(1): 71, 2024 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769570

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has several side effects, hypopituitarism due to hypophysitis has rarely been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: An 83-year-old healthy woman, who had received her fourth COVID-19 vaccine dose 2 days before admission, presented to the emergency department with difficulty moving. On examination, impaired consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale: 14) and fever were observed. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head revealed swelling from the sella turcica to the suprasellar region. Her morning serum cortisol level was low (4.4 µg/dL) and adrenocorticotropic hormone level was normal (21.6 pg/mL). Central hypothyroidism was also suspected (thyroid stimulating hormone, 0.46 µIU/mL; free triiodothyronine, 1.86 pg/mL; free thyroxine, 0.48 ng/dL). Secondary adrenocortical insufficiency, growth hormone deficiency, delayed gonadotropin response, and elevated prolactin levels were also observed. After administration of prednisolone and levothyroxine, her consciousness recovered. On the 7th day of admission, the patient developed polyuria, and arginine vasopressin deficiency was diagnosed using a hypertonic saline test. On the 15th day, the posterior pituitary gland showed a loss of high signal intensity and the polyuria resolved spontaneously. On the 134th day, the corticotropin-releasing hormone loading test showed a normal response; however, the thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test showed a low response. The patient's disease course was stable with continued thyroid and adrenal corticosteroid supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Herein, we report a rare case of anterior hypopituitarism and arginine vasopressin deficiency secondary to hypophysitis following COVID-19 vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hipopituitarismo , Humanos , Feminino , Hipopituitarismo/etiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/complicações , Hipofisite/induzido quimicamente , Hipofisite/etiologia , Arginina Vasopressina/deficiência , Insuficiência Adrenal/etiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Salud Colect ; 20: e4541, 2024 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733976

RESUMO

Following the authorization the use of COVID-19 vaccines in babies age six months through children four years old in the United States, some individuals (parents, pediatricians, and communicators) framed COVID-19 vaccination as an issue of access, while many others expressed hesitancy and some resisted recommendations from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In this context, this study aimed to explore: 1) divergent reactions to the authorization of COVID-19 vaccine use in children aged six months to four years; and 2) opposing logics underlying attitudes towards pro-vaccination, anti-vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccines. To achieve this, a digital ethnography was conducted, involving monitoring of 5,700 reactions to a series of eight infographics published on social media by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and participant observation in an online focus group over a one-year period, from December 2021 to December 2022, consisting of 18 mothers. The findings suggest that healthcare professionals should consider different notions of "risk" when interacting with patients, especially those who are hesitant to vaccinate.


Luego de que se autorizara en EEUU el uso de la vacuna contra el covid-19 en bebés de seis meses a niños y niñas de cuatro años, algunas personas (padres, madres, pediatras y comunicadores) plantearon la vacunación contra el covid-19 como una cuestión de acceso; sin embargo, muchas otras se mostraron reacias y otras se resistieron a las recomendaciones de los Centers for Disease Control and Prevention de EEUU. En este contexto, este estudio se propuso explorar: 1) reacciones divergentes ante la autorización de uso de la vacuna contra el covid-19 en niños y niñas de seis meses a cuatro años; y 2) lógicas contrapuestas que subyacen a las actitudes provacunación, antivacunación y vacilación ante las vacunas contra el covid-19. Para ello, se realizó una etnografía digital, con monitoreo de 5.700 reacciones a una serie de ocho infografías publicadas en las redes sociales por la John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, y observación participante en un grupo focal en línea a lo largo de un año, desde diciembre de 2021 hasta diciembre de 2022, conformado por 18 madres. Los resultados indican que el personal médico debe considerar diferentes nociones de "riesgo" al interactuar con los pacientes, especialmente aquellos que dudan en vacunarse.


Assuntos
Antropologia Cultural , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Hesitação Vacinal , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , Lactente , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Grupos Focais , Masculino , Vacinação , Adulto
14.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3856, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719852

RESUMO

The Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine developed by Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) was widely deployed to prevent mpox during the 2022 global outbreak. This vaccine was initially approved for mpox based on its reported immunogenicity (from phase I/II trials) and effectiveness in animal models, rather than evidence of clinical efficacy. However, no validated correlate of protection after vaccination has been identified. Here we performed a systematic search and meta-analysis of the available data to test whether vaccinia-binding ELISA endpoint titer is predictive of vaccine effectiveness against mpox. We observe a significant correlation between vaccine effectiveness and vaccinia-binding antibody titers, consistent with the existing assumption that antibody levels may be a correlate of protection. Combining this data with analysis of antibody kinetics after vaccination, we predict the durability of protection after vaccination and the impact of dose spacing. We find that delaying the second dose of MVA-BN vaccination will provide more durable protection and may be optimal in an outbreak with limited vaccine stock. Although further work is required to validate this correlate, this study provides a quantitative evidence-based approach for using antibody measurements to predict the effectiveness of mpox vaccination.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vaccinia virus , Humanos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vaccinia virus/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Vacínia/imunologia , Vacínia/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antivariólica/imunologia , Vacina Antivariólica/administração & dosagem , Animais
15.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1259, 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720278

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, it has been reported that fully vaccinated people still die of COVID-19-associated symptoms, generating public uncertainty about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Hence, this research is aimed at assessing the incidence of COVID-19 breakthrough infection among vaccinated Health Workers and the possible effect of changes in the practice of post-vaccination safety precautions. METHOD: This was a Health facility-based descriptive cross-sectional study. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires distributed at the participant's work unit across the selected health facilities. The nasopharyngeal specimen was also obtained from the participants and analysed using STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the detection of antigens to SARS-CoV-2. All data were input and analyzed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant relationship between the vaccination status of respondents and the post-vaccination test result (χ2 = 6.816, df = 1, p = 0.009). The incidence of COVID-19 infection among the vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs was 2% and 8% respectively. 5 of the 15 respondents who tested positive for COVID-19 had been fully vaccinated. However, all 5 of them did not practice safety measures after vaccination. None of the respondents who practised safety measures after vaccination tested positive for COVID-19. The remaining 10 respondents that tested positive for COVID-19 had not been vaccinated though they practised safety precautions. CONCLUSION: Vaccination and the practice of safety precautions will go a long way to preventing future COVID-19 breakthrough infections.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Nigéria , Estudos Transversais , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Incidência , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Irruptivas
16.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2347018, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708779

RESUMO

HPV vaccination coverage remains far below the national target of 80% among US adolescents, particularly in rural areas, which have vaccine uptake rates that are 10% points lower than non-rural areas on average. Primary care professionals (PCPs) can increase coverage by using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination in a way that assumes parents want to vaccinate. Through semi-structured interviews, we explored PCPs' experiences and perceptions of using presumptive recommendations in rural- and non-rural-serving primary care clinics in North Carolina. Thematic analysis revealed that most PCPs in rural and non-rural contexts used presumptive recommendations and felt the strategy was an effective and concise way to introduce the topic of HPV vaccination to parents. At the same time, some PCPs raised concerns about presumptive recommendations potentially straining relationships with certain parents, including those who had previously declined HPV vaccine or who distrust medical authority due to their past experiences with the healthcare system. PCPs dealt with these challenges by using a more open-ended approach when introducing HPV vaccination to parents. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCPs in both rural and non-rural settings see value in using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination, but to adequately address concerns and ensure increased HPV vaccine uptake, PCPs can use simple and culturally sensitive language to ensure fully informed consent and to maintain parental trust. And to further strengthen HPV vaccine discussions, PCPs can utilize other effective HPV communication techniques, like the Announcement Approach, in discussing HPV vaccinations with hesitant parents.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Pais , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , População Rural , Vacinação , Humanos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Pais/psicologia , North Carolina , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Entrevistas como Assunto
17.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e080370, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719292

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Identifying whether a country is ready to deploy a new vaccine or improve uptake of an existing vaccine requires knowledge of a diverse range of interdependent, context-specific factors. This scoping review aims to identify common themes that emerge across articles, which include tools or guidance that can be used to establish whether a country is ready to deploy a new vaccine or increase uptake of an underutilised vaccine. DESIGN: Scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for articles published until 9 September 2023. Relevant articles were also identified through expert opinion. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles published in any year or language that included tools or guidance to identify factors that influence a country's readiness to deploy a new or underutilised vaccine. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened records and performed data extraction. Findings were synthesised by conducting a thematic analysis. RESULTS: 38 articles met our inclusion criteria; these documents were created using methodologies including expert review panels and Delphi surveys and varied in terms of content and context-of-use. 12 common themes were identified relevant to a country's readiness to deploy a new or underutilised vaccine. These themes were as follows: (1) legal, political and professional consensus; (2) sociocultural factors and communication; (3) policy, guidelines and regulations; (4) financing; (5) vaccine characteristics and supply logistics; (6) programme planning; (7) programme monitoring and evaluation; (8) sustainable and integrated healthcare provision; (9) safety surveillance and reporting; (10) disease burden and characteristics; (11) vaccination equity and (12) human resources and training of professionals. CONCLUSIONS: This information has the potential to form the basis of a globally applicable evidence-based vaccine readiness assessment tool that can inform policy and immunisation programme decision-makers.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas
18.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2346966, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741240

RESUMO

This research examines the low rate of co-administration of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines among seniors aged 65 and older in Korea, despite recommendations from authorities and academia worldwide. The study aimed to understand the influence of general characteristics and health beliefs on the vaccination choices of seniors, who were categorized into four groups based on their vaccination status: influenza only, COVID-19 only, both, or neither. A total of 400 participants, aged 65 and above, were selected through proportional stratified random sampling from five major Korean regions for a survey conducted between November 24th and December 15th, 2023. The results indicated no significant differences in general characteristics across these groups. However, regarding the health beliefs showed significant differences in perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy between the influenza-only and co-administration groups. Higher levels of perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy were associated with choosing co-administration. Contrary to previous studies focusing on safety concerns as a primary factor in vaccine hesitancy, this study highlights the role of individual health-related beliefs, particularly perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy, as critical in influencing the decision for co-administration among the elderly in Korea.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Humanos , Idoso , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , República da Coreia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Autoeficácia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Tomada de Decisões
19.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2350093, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744302

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer (CRC) long-term survivor is a rapid enlarging group. However, the effectiveness of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) on this group is unknown. This nationwide population-based study in Taiwan was designed to examine the effect of PPSV23 on incidence rate ratio (IRR) of pneumonia hospitalization, cumulative incidence, and overall survival rate for these long-term CRC survivors. This cohort study was based on the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2000-2017. After individual exact matching to covariates with 1:1 ratio, there were a total of 1,355 vaccinated and 1,355 unvaccinated survivors. After adjusted by multivariate Poisson regression model, vaccinated group had a non-significantly lower pneumonia hospitalization risk than unvaccinated, with an adjusted IRR of 0.879 (p = .391). Besides, vaccinated group had both lower cumulative incidence rate and higher overall survival time than unvaccinated.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias Colorretais , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Humanos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Idoso , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Incidência , Estudos de Coortes , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Eficácia de Vacinas , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vacinação , Sistema de Registros
20.
Signal Transduct Target Ther ; 9(1): 129, 2024 May 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740763

RESUMO

The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly, a high-risk group for severe COVID-19 infection, have not been fully understood. To clarify these issues, this prospective study followed up 157 elderly and 73 young participants for 16 months and compared the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of two doses of the inactivated vaccine BBIBP-CorV followed by a booster dose of the recombinant protein vaccine ZF2001. The results showed that this vaccination protocol was safe and tolerable in the elderly. After administering two doses of the BBIBP-CorV, the positivity rates and titers of neutralizing and anti-RBD antibodies in the elderly were significantly lower than those in the young individuals. After the ZF2001 booster dose, the antibody-positive rates in the elderly were comparable to those in the young; however, the antibody titers remained lower. Gender, age, and underlying diseases were independently associated with vaccine immunogenicity in elderly individuals. The pseudovirus neutralization assay showed that, compared with those after receiving two doses of BBIBP-CorV priming, some participants obtained immunological protection against BA.5 and BF.7 after receiving the ZF2001 booster. Breakthrough infection symptoms last longer in the infected elderly and pre-infection antibody titers were negatively associated with the severity of post-infection symptoms. The antibody levels in the elderly increased significantly after breakthrough infection but were still lower than those in the young. Our data suggest that multiple booster vaccinations at short intervals to maintain high antibody levels may be an effective strategy for protecting the elderly against COVID-19.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto , Vacinação , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Imunização Secundária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...