Safety of pentavalent DTaP-IPV/Hib combination vaccine in post-marketing surveillance in Guangzhou, China, from 2011 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: The DTaP-IPV/Hib combination vaccine can replace the acellular tetanus vaccine, polio vaccine, and the Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine. Data on the safety of DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccines are required. We aimed to evaluate the safety of the vaccination program. METHODS: Using the National Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) surveillance system (CNAEFIS) in Guangzhou, China, a retrospective study was performed from May 11, 2011, to December 31, 2017. There were 376 cases of adverse events after vaccination with the DTaP IPV/Hib vaccine. The primary analysis indicators were the number of vaccines used, the number of AEFI reports received, and the reporting rate (per 100,000). RESULTS: From May 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017, 516,000 doses of vaccine were inoculated, and 376 cases of adverse reactions were reported; the reporting rate was 72.8 per 100,000 vaccines. There were eight cases of serious AEFIs (1.5 per 100,000), with four cases of thrombocytopenic purpura (0.8 per 100,000); three cases of cyanosis of the lips, stiffness, and flexion of limbs, and convulsions (0.6 per 100,000); and one case of a high fever (0.2 per 100,000). The highest incidence of AEFIs occurred after the fourth dose (n = 207, 55.0%, 40.1 per 100,000), followed by the first dose (n = 81, 21.5%, 15.7 per 100,000), second dose (n = 48, 12.8%, 9.3 per 100,000) and third dose (n = 40, 10.6%, 7.7 per 100,000). The AEFI incidence was higher after injection of the vaccine into the deltoid muscle of the upper arm (n = 276, 73.4%, 53.5 per 100,000) than after injection of the vaccine into the thigh (n = 100, 26.6%, 19.4 per 100,000). There was a significant difference between AEFIs after injection into the deltoid of the upper arm deltoid and the thigh (x2 = 164.8, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the reported AEFIs after DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccination are not serious. There were four cases of TP in this study; vaccination may be a rare cause of thrombocytopenic purpura.

DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib Vaccine (Hexyon®): An Updated Review of its Use in Primary and Booster Vaccination.

Hexyon® is a fully-liquid, ready-to-use, hexavalent vaccine approved in the EU since 2013 for primary and booster vaccination in infants and toddlers from age 6 weeks against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B (HB), poliomyelitis, and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). While the source of HB antigen in Hexyon® is different from other vaccines, the rest of its valences have been extensively used in other approved vaccines. Hexyon® is highly immunogenic for all its component toxoids/antigens when used as primary and booster vaccine in infants and toddlers, irrespective of vaccination schedule. It provides durable protection against hepatitis B. Hexyon® can be used for a mixed primary series of hexavalent-pentavalent-hexavalent vaccines or as a booster in infants primed with Infanrix hexa™ or pentavalent (whole-cell or acellular pertussis) vaccines. Coadministration of Hexyon® with other common childhood vaccines did not affect immune response to any vaccines. Hexyon® has a good reactogenicity/safety profile. The immunogenicity and safety profile of Hexyon® was similar to that of several approved vaccines, including Infanrix hexa™. However, Hexyon® offers the convenience of full-liquid, ready-to-use formulation, which may minimize vaccination errors and preparation time. Thus, Hexyon® is a convenient, useful option for vaccination against childhood diseases caused by six major pathogens.

Inactivated poliovirus type 2 vaccine delivered to rat skin via high density microprojection array elicits potent neutralising antibody responses.

Polio eradication is progressing rapidly, and the live attenuated Sabin strains in the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) are being removed sequentially, starting with type 2 in April 2016. For risk mitigation, countries are introducing inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) into routine vaccination programs. After April 2016, monovalent type 2 OPV will be available for type 2 outbreak control. Because the current IPV is not suitable for house-to-house vaccination campaigns (the intramuscular injections require health professionals), we developed a high-density microprojection array, the Nanopatch, delivered monovalent type 2 IPV (IPV2) vaccine to the skin. To assess the immunogenicity of the Nanopatch, we performed a dose-matched study in rats, comparing the immunogenicity of IPV2 delivered by intramuscular injection or Nanopatch immunisation. A single dose of 0.2 D-antigen units of IPV2 elicited protective levels of poliovirus antibodies in 100% of animals. However, animals receiving IPV2 by IM required at least 3 immunisations to reach the same neutralising antibody titres. This level of dose reduction (1/40th of a full dose) is unprecedented for poliovirus vaccine delivery. The ease of administration coupled with the dose reduction observed in this study points to the Nanopatch as a potential tool for facilitating inexpensive IPV for mass vaccination campaigns.

Next generation inactivated polio vaccine manufacturing to support post polio-eradication biosafety goals.

Worldwide efforts to eradicate polio caused a tipping point in polio vaccination strategies. A switch from the oral polio vaccine, which can cause circulating and virulent vaccine derived polioviruses, to inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) is scheduled. Moreover, a manufacturing process, using attenuated virus strains instead of wild-type polioviruses, is demanded to enhance worldwide production of IPV, especially in low- and middle income countries. Therefore, development of an IPV from attenuated (Sabin) poliovirus strains (sIPV) was pursued. Starting from the current IPV production process based on wild type Salk strains, adaptations, such as lower virus cultivation temperature, were implemented. sIPV was produced at industrial scale followed by formulation of both plain and aluminium adjuvanted sIPV. The final products met the quality criteria, were immunogenic in rats, showed no toxicity in rabbits and could be released for testing in the clinic. Concluding, sIPV was developed to manufacturing scale. The technology can be transferred worldwide to support post polio-eradication biosafety goals.

Systematic review of mucosal immunity induced by oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines against virus shedding following oral poliovirus challenge.

Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) may be used in mass vaccination campaigns during the final stages of polio eradication. It is also likely to be adopted by many countries following the coordinated global cessation of vaccination with oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) after eradication. The success of IPV in the control of poliomyelitis outbreaks will depend on the degree of nasopharyngeal and intestinal mucosal immunity induced against poliovirus infection. We performed a systematic review of studies published through May 2011 that recorded the prevalence of poliovirus shedding in stool samples or nasopharyngeal secretions collected 5-30 days after a "challenge" dose of OPV. Studies were combined in a meta-analysis of the odds of shedding among children vaccinated according to IPV, OPV, and combination schedules. We identified 31 studies of shedding in stool and four in nasopharyngeal samples that met the inclusion criteria. Individuals vaccinated with OPV were protected against infection and shedding of poliovirus in stool samples collected after challenge compared with unvaccinated individuals (summary odds ratio [OR] for shedding 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.24)). In contrast, IPV provided no protection against shedding compared with unvaccinated individuals (summary OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.59-1.11]) or when given in addition to OPV, compared with individuals given OPV alone (summary OR 1.14 [95% CI 0.82-1.58]). There were insufficient studies of nasopharyngeal shedding to draw a conclusion. IPV does not induce sufficient intestinal mucosal immunity to reduce the prevalence of fecal poliovirus shedding after challenge, although there was some evidence that it can reduce the quantity of virus shed. The impact of IPV on poliovirus transmission in countries where fecal-oral spread is common is unknown but is likely to be limited compared with OPV.

Spotlight on DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib Vaccine (Infanrix hexa).

Infanrix hexa, administered intramuscularly, is a diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B (HBV), inactivated poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine, indicated for primary and booster vaccination of infants. Infanrix hexa should be administered as a two- or three-dose primary vaccination course in infants aged < or =6 months, followed by booster vaccination between 11 and 18 months of age, with an interval of at least 6 months between the last dose of primary vaccination and the booster dose. This spotlight reviews the immunogenicity and protective effectiveness, as well as the reactogenicity and safety of Infanrix hexa. Infanrix hexa as primary and booster vaccination was safe and highly immunogenic for all its component toxoids/antigens in infants aged <2 years, regardless of vaccination schedules. Its immunogenicity and safety profiles were generally similar to those of currently available vaccines, the diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis-based pentavalent vaccines plus monovalent HBV or Hib vaccines. In large clinical studies, Infanrix hexa elicited a strong immune response against vaccine toxoids/antigens, as indicated by high seroprotection/seropositivity/vaccine response rates and geometric mean titers. Moreover, antibodies against vaccine toxoids/antigens persisted for up to a mean of approximately 6 years after booster vaccination, and the vaccine induced long-term immune memory against hepatitis B surface antigen and Hib antigen. A strong immune response against Infanrix hexa toxoids/antigens after primary vaccination was also induced in infants who had received a dose of HBV vaccine at birth and in pre-term infants, although the response in the latter group was somewhat lower than that in full-term infants. In addition, when coadministered with other childhood vaccines, the immunogenicity of Infanrix hexa or that of the concomitantly administered vaccine was generally not altered. Hexavalent vaccines, including Infanrix hexa, were protective against invasive Hib disease; Infanrix hexa is also expected to be protective against pertussis. Most solicited local and general symptoms with Infanrix hexa were mild to moderate in intensity and the vaccine was associated with few unsolicited adverse events. Available clinical data from more than 10 years' experience with the vaccine suggest that Infanrix hexa as primary and booster vaccination is a safe and useful option for providing protection against the common childhood diseases of diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis, pertussis, hepatitis B and invasive Hib disease.

2002: Momento de una nueva pauta vacunal antipolio / 2002: time for a new polio vaccine

La próxima erradicaciòn de la poliomielitis en España obliga a considerar la sustitución de la actual vacuna oral, elaborada con virus vivos atenuados (VPO), únicos virus vivos circulantes y posible causa de polio paralítica asociada a la vacuna (PPAV), por la vacuna antipolio inyectable, elaborada con virus inactivados (VPI). Las vacunas combinadas poliantigénicas (hexavalente, pentavalente) se proponen como vehículo idóneo para administrar la VPI (AU)

Inactivated poliovirus vaccine and the final stages of poliovirus eradication.

The use of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) will increase before and probably also after the global eradication of the wild type poliovirus. Before eradication, the switch from the use of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) to IPV has been due to the better safety record of IPV. Introduction of IPV in the regular immunisation schedules is made easier by the development of several combination vaccines, including IPV. Maternal antibodies and young age, often considered problematic for early initiation of IPV schedules, did not compromise optimal maintenance of seropositivity during infancy or long-term persisting antibody levels in our studies. OPV-derived, potentially pathogenic and transmissible poliovirus strains, excreted by some individuals for years, may present a problem for a blunt stopping of all polio immunisations after eradication. Our recent results suggest that locally excreted IgA might have a role in the elimination of poliovirus infection in the intestinal tissues.

Oral poliomyelitis vaccine: time to change?

For 3 decades, vaccination against poliomyelitis has rested mainly on the use of the oral attenuated vaccine (OPV). In countries where wild type poliomyelitis has been successfully controlled by OPV, the rare cases of poliomyelitis that can still be identified occur in vaccinees or their contacts and are caused by vaccine related strains. Over years, data indicating that the inactivated vaccine (IPV) also has the potential to control poliomyelitis and that there are no known risks associated with the use of this vaccine have accumulated. The reasons for changes in vaccine policy in industrialised countries and the situation of the global effort of poliomyelitis immunisation are described. Some of the issues and challenges for the future are reviewed.

Mutual interactions between DTaP-IPV and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-conjugated vaccines in laboratory animal models.

Potency and/or immunogenicity of three different Haemophilus influenzae type b-conjugated vaccines (Hib) and a DTaP-IPV vaccine alone, and their mutual interactions in DTaP-IPV-Hib combination was tested. In a mouse model, only combination of Act-Hib, in which tetanus toxoid (TT) was as active as non-conjugated TT, significantly increased the immunogenicity and potency of TT component of DTaP-IPV vaccine. Also, only combination of Hib-TITER, in which CRM197 was used as the carrier with DTaP-IPV, increased the potency of diphtheria toxoid (DT) component of DTaP-IPV vaccine significantly. It shows that the additive effect of tested Hib vaccines on immunogenicity and/or potency of TT and DT was mostly due to the existence of TT and CRM197, respectively, as the carrier in the mentioned Hib vaccines. No difference was shown in inoculation of DTaP-IPV and Hib conjugated vaccines in the same syringe or at separate sites. DTaP-IPV had dual effects on anti-Hib capsular polysaccharide (HibCP) responses to Hib vaccines in the mouse model. This duality was probably related to the carrier B-cell epitopes activity of Hib conjugated vaccines. The immunogenicity of TT component of Act-Hib and Amvax Hib-TT in the guinea pig model was shown and combination of mentioned Hib vaccines with DTaP-IPV, remarkably increased anti-TT antibody responses to the TT component of DTaP-IPV vaccine. These confirmed our results in the mouse model. Using two different protocols to evaluate the guinea pig model for induction of anti-HibCP immunity showed that a "long interval" protocol does not have any advantage over the "short interval" protocol. Also, combination of DTaP-IPV with Hib vaccines did not have any noticeable effect on anti-HibCP antibodies in the guinea pig model. Taken together, our observations in laboratory animal models may facilitate a better understanding of the mutual interactions between the different antigen components of a combined vaccine such as DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine.

Immune response to a booster dose of enhanced potency inactivated polio vaccine administered in association with HBV vaccine in adolescents.

The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a booster dose of enhanced potency inactivated polio vaccine (EIPV) were evaluated in 492 healthy 12 year old adolescents. The booster was administered at the same time as the HBV vaccine compulsory in Italy at this age. Blood samples and questionnaires on reactogenicity were collected over 9 months. Analysis of pre-vaccination immunity showed that 97.4% of the subjects were protected against all polio types, 1.9% were negative for two polio types and 0.6% for one. After vaccination 98.4% of the vaccinees showed a significant increase ( > or = 4 times) of antibody titre; the geometric mean titres (GMT) were markedly higher than before vaccination, particularly for poliovirus type 3. The polio booster dose did not affect HBV vaccination. An anti-HBs response > 10 mIU ml-1. (GMT = 2951 mIU ml-1) was observed in 781 (98.6%) of 792 vaccinees (492 given EIPV+HBV and 300 given only HBV) 9 months later. Only mild local and rare general reactions were noted for both the vaccines studied. These data confirm the suitability and efficacy of an EIPV booster dose and HBV vaccination in adolescents.

WHO activities towards the three Rs in the development and control of biological products.

WHO supports the concept of replacement, reduction and refinement of the use of in vivo methods for biologicals production and control, and regularly conducts reviews of its recommended procedures to allow reduction in the use of animals. The coordination of collaborative studies, publication of standardized methods, and holding of workshops on the use of these methods contributes to their use. The neurovirulence test for oral poliovaccine is probably the single most visible animal test for which alternative methods are sought. Collaborative studies on alternative methods for screening products are currently being sponsored by WHO. The use of Vero cells rather than primary monkey kidney cells for poliovaccine production can avoid the use of many monkeys. Cell banks of Vero and HEp-2 cells have been developed by WHO, tested for virus sensitivity and freedom from adventitious agents, and are available for vaccine production and control, replacing primary animal cells. For the future, final product testing will increasingly be directed towards establishment of consistency of production rather than potency. By supporting the validation and use of this approach, WHO can effectively influence more rational animal use in biological production and control.

Whole-body protein turnover and hepatic protein synthesis are increased by vaccination in man.

1. The ability of diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis-typhoid vaccination to induce modifications in protein metabolism was investigated in post-absorptive healthy humans. 2. Seven subjects were studied before and 2 days after vaccination. They underwent an intravenous primed constant infusion of L-[1-13C]leucine for 4h. Plasma protein concentrations, whole-body amino acid fluxes and acute-phase protein synthesis were determined. 3. Plasma concentrations of fibrinogen, alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, haptoglobin and alpha 1-antitrypsin were significantly elevated 2 days after vaccination (P < 0.05). Leucine oxidation was unaffected but whole-body protein synthesis and breakdown were both increased (P < 0.05), by 25 and 16% respectively, in subjects who had an elevated body temperature (n = 5). Albumin synthesis was unchanged, but hepatic synthesis of fibrinogen was 56% higher after vaccination. 4. The present investigation indicates that diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis-typhoid vaccination could induce a sustained acute-phase reaction. Moreover, protein metabolism appeared to be extremely sensitive to a mild stress since leucine kinetics and fibrinogen synthesis were affected. Therefore, diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis-typhoid vaccination might represent an attractive model for studying the inflammatory process in humans.

Deterministic models for the eradication of poliomyelitis: vaccination with the inactivated (IPV) and attenuated (OPV) polio virus vaccine.

Currently two polio vaccines, IPV and OPV, are in use which differ markedly in their epidemiological parameters. A simple epidemiological model in terms of ordinary differential equations is proposed to study the effects of vaccination campaigns using these vaccines. The numbers of interest are the reproduction number of the disease in the presence of vaccination and the critical vaccination coverage necessary to prevent an outbreak. For these numbers explicit representations are determined which can be used in comparing different vaccination strategies.

Antibody response and viral excretion after live polio vaccine or a combined schedule of live and inactivated polio vaccines.

A randomized controlled trial was performed in infants undergoing routine immunization in North Hertfordshire. Ninety-six children received a single dose of inactivated polio vaccine, followed by two doses of live attenuated oral polio vaccine and 97 children received three doses of live attenuated oral polio vaccine at 2, 3 and 4 months of age. Blood samples were taken by study nurses 6 weeks after vaccination and stool samples were collected by parents weekly for 4 weeks after each dose of vaccine. Follow-up was completed for 92 of 96 (96%) children in the combined schedule group and 92 of 97 (95%) in the control group. After vaccination the proportions of children with detectable antibody to poliovirus serotypes 1, 2 and 3 were high and similar between groups and geometric mean titers (95% confidence interval) to poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3 were 264 (200 to 347), 375 (311 to 450) and 189 (144 to 250) in the combined schedule group and 369 (290 to 469), 401 (321 to 498) and 206 (145 to 293) in the live vaccine group, respectively. The only significant difference between groups in rates of viral excretion was observed after the second dose of live attenuated oral polio vaccine, when excretion of type 3 poliovirus was reduced in those children who had received prior inactivated polio vaccine (P = 0.05). This study suggests that, compared with the current schedule, a combined schedule of inactivated and live poliovaccines is likely to produce equivalent individual protection against poliomyelitis and is unlikely to substantially alter circulation of poliovirus in the community.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effect of prophylaxis with chloroquine and proguanil on delayed-type hypersensitivity and antibody production following vaccination with diphtheria, tetanus, polio, and pneumococcal vaccines.

In vitro studies have shown that anti-malarial drugs suppress immunity. In this study, the effects of chloroquine and proguanil (Paludrine) on the cellular and humoral immune system were measured by two in vivo methods: 1) cell-mediated immunity (delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity) i.e., skin tests with seven delayed-type common antigens (Multitest) and 2) humoral immunity by measurement of specific antibody response to vaccination. Sixty healthy young individuals were randomized into four groups and given 1) no treatment (controls), 2) chloroquine diphosphate (500 mg/week), 3) chloroquine diphosphate (1,000 mg/week), or 4) proguanil hydrochloride (200 mg/day) for six weeks. Skin testing was performed on days 0 and 28. Vaccinations with diphtheria, tetanus, polio, and pneumococcal polysaccharide antigen vaccines were performed on day 28, and the presence of specific antibodies was determined on days 0, 28, and 42. The skin tests induced a significant increase in skin reactive areas from day 0 to day 28 in all groups. Furthermore, the skin test induced an increase in the level of specific IgG for diphtheria and tetanus, but had no effect on antibodies to antigens not included in the skin test. The results showed that there were no significant differences among the four groups regarding skin test areas and increases in antibody titers following vaccination. Therefore, it is concluded that in healthy persons, six weeks intake of chloroquine, even in double doses, or proguanil in chemoprophylactic dosages, does not induce any detectable suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity or vaccination responses to diphtheria, tetanus, polio, or pneumococcal polysaccharide antigens.