Interventional Radiology for Bleeding Ectopic Varices: Individualized Approach Based on Vascular Anatomy.

Ectopic varices are rare but potentially life-threatening conditions usually resulting from a combination of global portal hypertension and local occlusive components. As imaging, innovative devices, and interventional radiologic techniques evolve and are more widely adopted, interventional radiology is becoming essential in the management of ectopic varices. The interventional radiologist starts by diagnosing the underlying causes of portal hypertension and evaluating the afferent and efferent veins of ectopic varices with CT. If decompensated portal hypertension is causing ectopic varices, placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is considered the first-line treatment, although this treatment alone may not be effective in managing ectopic variceal bleeding because it may not sufficiently resolve focal mesenteric venous obstruction causing ectopic varices. Therefore, additional variceal embolization should be considered after placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Retrograde transvenous obliteration can serve as a definitive treatment when the efferent vein connected to the systemic vein is accessible. Antegrade transvenous obliteration is a vital component of interventional radiologic management of ectopic varices because ectopic varices often exhibit complex anatomy and commonly lack catheterizable portosystemic shunts. Superficial veins of the portal venous system such as recanalized umbilical veins may provide safe access for antegrade transvenous obliteration. Given the absence of consensus and guidelines, a multidisciplinary team approach is essential for the individualized management of ectopic varices. Interventional radiologists must be knowledgeable about the anatomy and hemodynamic characteristics of ectopic varices based on CT images and be prepared to consider appropriate options for each specific situation. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Utilización de escalas no invasivas en la detección de varices esofágicas en pacientes con trombosis venosa portal / Use of non-invasive scales for detecting esophageal varices in paediatric patients with portal vein thrombosis

Introducción La trombosis portal (TVP) es la causa más frecuente de hipertensión portal en población pediátrica. El Consenso de Baveno VI considera la ligadura endoscópica de varices como segunda opción terapéutica tras el meso-Rex-bypass (shunt quirúrgico). Objetivo Analizar la rentabilidad diagnóstica de escalas no invasivas para predecir el riesgo de varices esofágicas en niños con TVP. Material y métodos Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo donde se incluyeron endoscopias digestivas altas (EDA) en pacientes<15 años con TVP no cirróticos. Se dividieron según la presencia de varices esofágicas y se estudiaron sexo, etiología, edad, hemorragia digestiva o tratamientos previos, resultados de EDA y las escalas (Regla Predicción Clínica-CPR, Regla Predicción Varices-VPR, King's Variceal Prediction Score-K-VaPS y ratio plaquetas/bazo-RPB). Las variables cualitativas se expresaron mediante frecuencia absoluta y porcentaje, y las cuantitativas mediante mediana y rango intercuartílico. Para las comparaciones se emplearon los test U de Mann-Whitney y Hanley-McNeil. Resultados Se realizaron 45 EDA. Un 80%(n=36) presentaron varices esofágicas: mediana de 3(2 – 3) y un 33,3%(n=12) precisó ligadura endoscópica de varices. Se demostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos grupos: CPR (142,39 [132,22 - 166,53] vs. 122,75 [115,24 – 133,15] p=0,003), VPR (9,91 [9,36 – 11,75] vs. 5,6 [3,34 – 8,39] p=0,001), K-VaPS (117,86 [99,66 - 126,58] vs. 99,64 [94,88 - 110,18] p=0,019), RPB (2384,62 [1902,22 - 3201,63] vs. 1252,5 [579,6 - 2144,42] p=0,05), con un área bajo la curva>75%, sin demostrarse diferencias entre escalas. Conclusiones En pacientes pediátricos con TVP no cirróticos se pueden emplear escalas no invasivas como herramienta para predecir la presencia de VE y plantear con ello la indicación de EDA. (AU)

Introduction Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most frequent cause of portal hypertension in paediatric population. Baveno VI Consensus considers endoscopic variceal ligation as the second therapeutic option after meso-Rex bypass (surgical shunt). Aim Analyse the diagnostic profitability of non-invasive scales in order to predict the risk of oesophageal varices (OV) in children with PVT. Material and methods Descriptive retrospective study where every upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) carried on patients <15 years old with non-cirrhotic PVT were included. There were divided according to the presence of OV and sex, cause, age, previous gastrointestinal bleeding or treatments, results of UGE and scales (Clinical Prediction Rule – CPR), Varices Prediction Rule – VPR), King's Variceal Prediction Score – K-VaPS) and Platelet count/Spleen diameter Ratio – PSR). Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute frequency and percentage, and quantitative variables as median and interquartile range. U Mann–Whitney and Hanley–McNeil tests were used for comparisons. Results Forty-five UGE were analysed. 80% (n=36) presented OV: median of 3 (2–3) and 33.3% (n=12) required endoscopic variceal ligation. Statistical differences were demonstrated between both groups: CPR (142.39 [132.22-166.53] vs. 122.75 [115.24-133.15]; p=0.003), VPR (9.91 [9.36-11.75] vs. 5.6 [3.34-8.39]; p=0.001), K-VaPS (117.86 [99.66-126.58] vs. 99.64 [94.88-10.18]; p=0.019), PSR (2384.62 [1902.22-3201.63] vs. 1252.5 [579.6-2144.42]; p=0.05), with and area under the curve AUROC>75%, without statistical differences between scales. ConclusionsIn paediatric patients with non-cirrotic PVT non-invasive scales can be used as a tool to predict the presence of OV and raise the indication of UGE. (AU)

Screening for exclusion of high-risk bleeding features of esophageal varices in cirrhosis through CT and MRI.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Esophageal varices (EV) screening guidelines have evolved with improved risk stratification to avoid unnecessary esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in individuals with low bleeding risks. However, uncertainties persist in the recommendations for certain patient groups, particularly those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and/or receiving non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) without prior endoscopy. This study assessed the efficacy of imaging in ruling out EVs and their high-risk features associated with bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and with HCC. We also evaluated the impact of NSBB on the detection of these characteristics. METHODS: A total of 119 patients undergoing EGD with CT and/or MRI within 90 days of the procedure were included. 87 patients had HCC. A new imaging grading system was developed utilizing the size of EVs and the extent of their protrusion into the esophagus lumen. The negative predictive value (NPV) of EVimaging(-) versus EVimaging (+) (grades 1-3) in ruling out the presence of EV and/or high-risk features by EGD was calculated. The predictive performance of imaging was determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: The NPV of imaging for detecting EV and high-risk features was 81 % and 92 %, respectively. Among HCC patients, the NPV for EV and high-risk features was 80 % and 64 %, respectively. Being on NSBB didn't statistically impact the imaging detection of EV. Imaging was a better predictor of high-risk EGD findings than Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that imaging can effectively rule out the presence of EV and high-risk features during EGD, even in patients with HCC and/or receiving NSBB.

Evaluation of spleen stiffness by 2D shear wave elastography for ruling out high risk varices in patients with chronic advanced liver disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) by 2D- Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) in predicting high risk for bleeding varices (HRV) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to 31/05/2023 for all human studies using 2D-SWE to estimate SSM and endoscopy to detect HRV. Meta-analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model. Publication bias was evaluated using the funnel plot asymmetry test. The Area Under the Summarized Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUSROC) was estimated using the "mada" package. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 1970 patients were included. Of them, 27.8 % had HRV. The pooled sensitivity and polled specificity of SSM in detecting HRV were 90 % (95 %CI:87-92 %) and 68 % (95 %CI:58-77 %), respectively, with an AUSROC at 0.86 (95 %CI:0.82-0.90). The median cutoff value of SSM in detecting HRV was 34.2 kPa. In studies including exclusively HBV cirrhotic patients, SSM's polled sensitivity and specificity in predicting HRV was 88 % (95 %CI:82-92 %) and 73 % (95 %CI:68-78 %), respectively. The AUSROC was 0.84 (95 %CI:0.81-0.87). The number of repeated measurements per patient (<5 or ≥ 5) did not affect the method's capability. Using Aixplorer to evaluate SSM had a higher sensitivity in ruling out HRV than other 2D-SWE devices. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis supports that SSM by 2D-SWE has a good diagnostic performance for ruling out HRV in cirrhosis.

Combining Spleen Diameter and the Baveno VI Criteria Assessed by 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography to Rule Out High-Risk Varices.

ABSTRACT: Patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) can safely spared screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) when they meet the Baveno VI criteria as assessed by transient elastography. Recently, the cutoff values of the Baveno VI criteria assessed by 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) were proposed. We aimed to validate it to rule out high-risk varices (HRVs) in cACLD patients; combine spleen diameter (SPD) with the Baveno VI criteria and assess whether it can spare more screening EGD. A total of 173 cACLD patients with successful liver stiffness (LS) measurements and EGD examinations were included. We analyzed the risk factors that predicted HRVs and compared the performances of different models for ruling out HRVs. The platelet count, LS, and SPD were independent predictors of HRVs. The AUCs of platelet count, LS, spleen stiffness and SPD for diagnosing HRVs were 0.797, 0.757, 0.834, and 0.804, respectively. The Baveno VI criteria assessed by 2D-SWE spared 25.4% of EGD screenings and missed 2.4% of the HRV patients. Combining SPD ≤11.1 cm with the Baveno VI criteria could spare more EGD screenings than just applying the Baveno VI criteria (45.1% vs 25.4%, P < 0.001), and missed 4.9% of the HRV patients. The Baveno VI criteria assessed by 2D-SWE could be safely applied in cACLD patients to rule out HRV patients. The combined model Baveno VI/SPD could safely and significantly increase the rate of spared EGD.

Diagnostic value of liver stiffness measurement combined with risk scores for esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and three bleeding risk scoring systems for esophagogastric varices bleeding (EGVB) in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis during hospitalization. METHODS: In this study, 210 patients who had hepatitis B cirrhosis were selected as the subjects. They were categorized into two groups based on whether EGVB occurred during hospitalization: a bleeding group (70 cases) and a non-bleeding group (140 cases). Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors related to the occurrence of EGVB, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in systolic blood pressure, platelet count, albumin, urea nitrogen, LSM, pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PRS), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and AIMS65 score (P < 0.05). The correlation analysis showed that LSM had significant positive relationship with PRS, GBS and AIMS65 score. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LSM and GBS score were independent risk factors for EGVB occurrence during hospitalization. ROC curve analysis showed that the combined prediction model of LSM and GBS score had the best prediction performance for EGVB occurrence, with an ROC curve area of 0.811, which was significantly better than the three risk scoring systems (P < 0.05), but similar to the predicted value of LSM (P = 0.335). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of LSM and GBS score can significantly improve the predictive efficacy of EGVB occurrence in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis during hospitalization, which has important clinical significance for patients' prognosis.

Prognostic relevance of ARFI elastography in comparison to liver histology and the FIB-4 score.

PURPOSE: Liver histology has prognostic relevance and is used in surveillance and therapeutic strategies. This longitudinal study was designed to evaluate the prognostic relevance of ARFI elastography in comparison to liver histology and to the FIB-4 score in a 5-year observation interval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the hospital database, patients with an elastography examination of the liver between 2010-2012, a liver biopsy, and a follow-up of 5 years were included in the study. The AUROCs of the events liver-related death, HCC, and liver decompensation/variceal bleeding were calculated for ARFI elastography, liver histology, and FIB-4 and compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: In the final analysis 113 patients were included with 30 (26.5 %) patients having high-grade fibrosis and 19 (16.8 %) having liver cirrhosis in histology. The AUROC for liver-related death in the 5-year interval (9.7 %, n=11) was 0.80 [0.68-0.92] for ARFI elastography, 0.79 [0.66-0.92] for liver histology, and 0.66 [0.53-0.79] for FIB-4 with a p-value of 0.83 comparing ARFI to histology and a p-value of 0.02 comparing ARFI to FIB-4. The AUROC for liver decompensation/variceal bleeding (13.3 %, n=15) was 0.86 [0.76-0.94] for ARFI, which is significantly higher than the AUROC of liver histology with 0.71 [0.56-0.86] (p=0.02) and FIB-4 with 0.67 [0.54-0.80] (p=0.003). There was no significant difference for the event HCC when comparing ARFI to histology (p=0.33) or FIB-4 (p=0.14). CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of ARFI elastography seems to not be inferior to liver histology regarding liver-related survival and might even outperform histology and the FIB-4 score for predicting some liver-related complications.

Role of Interventional Radiology (IR) in vascular emergencies among cirrhotic patients.

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage remains one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis. Mostly, these patients bleed from the gastroesophageal varices. However, nonvariceal bleeding is also more likely to occur in these patients. Because of frequent co-existing coagulopathy, cirrhotics are more prone to bleed from a minor vascular injury while performing percutaneous interventions. Ultrasound-guided bedside vascular access is an essential procedure in liver critical care units. Transjugular portosystemic shunts (TIPS) with/without variceal embolization is a life-saving measure in patients with refractory variceal bleeding. Whenever feasible, balloon-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is an alternative to TIPS in managing gastric variceal bleeding, but without a risk of hepatic encephalopathy. In cases of failed or unfeasible endotherapy, transarterial embolization using various embolic agents remains the cornerstone therapy in patients with nonvariceal bleeding such as ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding, and procedure-related hemorrhagic complications. Among various embolic agents, N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) enables better vascular occlusion in cirrhotics, even in coagulopathy, making it a more suitable embolic agent in an expert hand. This article briefly entails the different interventional radiological procedures in vascular emergencies among patients with liver cirrhosis.

Simple Scoring System for Esophagogastric Varices Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients without Liver Stiffness Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: For predicting esophagogastric varices (EGVs), the Virtual Baveno VII Consensus Workshop has proposed a combination of liver stiffness determination and platelet count measurement using a FibroScan®. However, FibroScan® is not available at all institutions. The present study aimed to develop a simple method to predict development of EGV using only general blood examination results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,090 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were enrolled, after excluding 956 with major portal vein tumor thrombus (Vp3/Vp4) or without upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination results available. Those with EGV (≥ grade F2) or a history of treatment for the condition were defined as positive for significant EGV, and then clinical factors were retrospectively evaluated to determine indicators of occurrence. RESULTS: Logistic multivariate analysis showed platelet count (≤12 × 104/µL) (odds ratio [OR] 3.79, p < 0.001), mALBI grade 2a (OR 1.52, p = 0.036), and mALBI 2b or 3 (OR 3.46, p < 0.001) as significant predictive factors. Based on the OR values, platelet count (≤12 × 104/µL) and mALBI grade 2b/3 were each assigned 2 points and mALBI 2a was given 1 point, with the result termed recommendation for EGV screening (REGS) score. Significant EGV occurrence was noted in 2.9% (9/311) of the patients with a REGS score 0, 11.0% (13/118) with a score 1, 19.3% (53/274) with a score 2, 29.5% (39/132) with a score 3, and 38.0% (97/255) with a score 4 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that REGS score can provide useful predictive information for development of significant EGV without the need for special equipment such as a FibroScan®.

Application of Indian ink markers for locating gastric varices under endoscopic ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) combined with Indian ink in locating target vessels of gastric varices (GVs) compared with conventional endoscopic techniques. Additionally, the characteristics of GVs under conventional endoscopy were also explored. METHODS: All 50 cirrhotic patients with GVs between August 2021 and December 2022 were included in the study. Firstly, conventional endoscopy was employed to identify GVs and to record the expected injection sites. Subsequently, EUS was used to locate the perforated vessel and the injection site was them marked with India ink followed by injection with cyanoacrylate (CYA). Finally, conventional endoscopy was used to examine GVs, to identify the marker points of Indian ink and to compare whether the injection points under conventional endoscopy were consistent with those marked with Indian ink. Furthermore, patients with consistent and inconsistent distribution of endoscopic markers and injection sites were divided into two groups. RESULTS: EUS could detect the perforating vessels in real time and intuitively. The distribution of markers using EUS was significantly different compared with the injection points obtained by conventional endoscopy (P < 0.001). Therefore, 20 cases were allocated to the consistent group and 30 cases to the non-consistent group. 16 patients who showed red wale signs were obtained in the consistent group and 11 patients in the non-consistent group (P = 0.048). The diameter of the largest GVs was 13.5 (10-15) mm in the consistent group compared with 10 (7.5-10) mm in the non-consistent group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: EUS could provide the exact location of GVs, thus more accurately describing the endoscopic characteristics of the GVs. Furthermore, the red wale signs and diameter of the largest GVs obtained using conventional endoscopy were helpful in determining the location of target GVs.

Endovascular management of sinistral portal hypertension-related variceal hemorrhage: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endovascular managements, including splenic vein recanalization (SVR), partial splenic embolization (PSE), and percutaneous transsplenic gastric varices embolization combined with PSE (PSE+GVE), for management of SPH-related variceal hemorrhage (VH). METHODS: A total of 61 patients with SPH-related VH from three hospitals were enrolled and classified into three groups: the SVR group (Group 1, n=24), the PSE+GVE group (Group 2, n=17), and the PSE group (Group 3, n=20). Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The technical success rates for transhepatic and transsplenic SVR were 27.8% and 34.6%, respectively. No major complications were observed during any of the procedures. The median follow-up period was 53.2 months. The 2-year GI rebleeding rates for Group 1, 2, and 3 were 0%, 5.9%, and 35%, respectively. Groups 1 and 2 have a lower GI rebleeding rate (p = 0.002, p = 0.048, respectively) and better results of the degree of GV (p = 0.003, p = 0.044, respectively) compared to Group 3. No significant differences were found in 2-year GI rebleeding rates and the degree of GV between Group 1 and 2 (p = 0.415, p = 0.352, respectively). CONCLUSION: SVR, PSE+GVE, and PSE seem safe and effective for management of SPH-related VH. SVR appears to be the superior treatment option. Transsplenic access may further increase the SVR success rate. PSE+GVE seems to have comparable outcomes in GV control and GI rebleeding rates compared to SVR, while superior to PSE.

Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of left gastric vein in patients with gastroesophageal varices: morphology and blood supply analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (NCE-MRA) in evaluating the morphology and blood supply of left gastric vein (LGV) in patients with gastroesophageal varices. METHODS: Between March 2021 and October 2022, patients with gastroesophageal varices and who underwent NCE-MRA were retrospectively reviewed. In order to evaluate the blood supply of LGV, superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and splenic vein (SV) were visualized separately by using inflow-sensitive inversion recovery sequence. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality, determined the origination and the blood supply of LGV, and measured the diameter of LGV. The origination and diameter of LGV were compared between NCE-MRA and contrast-enhanced CT. Differences in blood supply were compared between LGVs with different originations. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in this study and the image quality was categorized as good or excellent in 52 patients. No significant differences were observed in visualizing the origination and the diameter of LGV between NCE-MRA and contrast-enhanced CT (p > .05). The blood supply of LGV was related to its origination (p < .001). Most LGVs with SV origination were supplied by SV. If LGV was originated from the portal vein (PV), about 70% of them were supplied by both SV and SMV. Compared with LGVs with SV origination, LGVs with PV origination showed more chance to receive blood from SMV (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography appears to be a reliable technique in evaluating the morphology and blood supply of LGV in patients with gastroesophageal varices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography provides valuable information for the management of gastroesophageal varices. Especially, it benefits patients with renal insufficiency. KEY POINTS: • Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using inflow-sensitive inversion recovery technique can be used for evaluating not only morphology as CT but also blood supply of left gastric vein. • The blood supply of left gastric vein is related to its origination and left gastric vein with portal vein origination shows more chance to receive blood from superior mesenteric vein.

Predicting the risk of early bleeding following endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients with computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Life-threatening bleeding following endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in patients with cirrhosis rarely can occur. The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of computed tomography (CT) in predicting the risk of early bleeding following EVL in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 285 cirrhotic patients who had undergone EVL. EVL was performed for prophylaxis or acute variceal bleeding. The patients were classified into 2 groups: early bleeding (< 14 days after EVL) and non-early bleeding. We compared baseline characteristics including CT findings between the patient groups. RESULTS: Among the 285 patients who underwent EVL treatment, 19 patients (6.7%) experienced early bleeding. On average, these bleeding occurred 9.3 ± 3.5 days after the EVL, with a range of 3 to 13 days. Patients who experience early bleeding had a higher six-week bleeding-related mortality rate compared to those in the non-early bleeding group (31.6% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.014). There was a correlation between the grade of esophageal varix observed during endoscopy and the diameter of esophageal varix observed on CT (p < 0.001). The diameter of esophageal varix on CT was identified as the only significant predictive factor for early bleeding (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: A larger esophageal varix diameter observed on CT is associated with an increased risk of early bleeding after EVL treatment. Early identification of this high-risk group can provide a change of treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Deep learning to predict esophageal variceal bleeding based on endoscopic images.

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal varix (EV) bleeding is a particularly serious complications of cirrhosis. Prediction of EV bleeding requires extensive endoscopy experience; it remains unreliable and inefficient. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the feasibility of using deep learning (DL) to predict the 12-month risk of EV bleeding based on endoscopic images. METHODS: Six DL models were trained to perform binary classification of endoscopic images of EV bleeding. The models were subsequently validated using an external test dataset, then compared with classifications performed by two endoscopists. RESULTS: In the validation dataset, EfficientNet had the highest accuracy (0.910), followed by ConvMixer (0.898) and Xception (0.875). In the test dataset, EfficientNet maintained the highest accuracy (0.893), which was better than the endoscopists (0.800 and 0.763). Notably, one endoscopist displayed higher recall (0.905), compared with EfficientNet (0.870). When their predictions were assisted by artificial intelligence, the accuracies of the two endoscopists increased by 17.3% and 19.0%. Moreover, statistical agreement among the models was dependent on model architecture. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of using DL to predict the 12-month risk of EV bleeding based on endoscopic images. The findings suggest that artificial intelligence-aided diagnosis will be a useful addition to cirrhosis management.