Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
ILAR J ; 54(1): 14-23, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23904528

RESUMO

The study of wildlife, whether in the field or in the lab, may start with a hypothesis, a literature search, or a grant proposal, but in many cases, the work will never happen unless the researcher successfully navigates a maze of permit requirements. A single project can involve multiple permits at the national and state levels, and it can take months to obtain any one permit. Therefore, permits may not have been issued at the time of protocol review, but Public Health Service Policy makes accommodations for this situation. Once in hand, however, the permits convey critical information to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC): one or more government agencies have determined that the activity will not be detrimental to the population or that any detriment is justified by the scientific knowledge that will be generated. This paper assumes that IACUCs are reviewing all wildlife protocols involving live vertebrates, regardless of the current, albeit temporary, distinction made by Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Care with regard to birds.


Assuntos
Animais Selvagens , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/legislação & jurisprudência , Ecologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Licenciamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa/legislação & jurisprudência , United States Public Health Service/legislação & jurisprudência , Zoologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Comitês de Cuidado Animal/tendências , Animais , Ecologia/métodos , Especificidade da Espécie , Estados Unidos , Zoologia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...