Does the Chronic Disease Assistance Program promote equity or increases the socioeconomic divide?

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess the extent to which the Chronic Disease Assistance Programme (CDAP)was able to meet the needs of different risk groups within the Trinidad and Tobago population. The study sought to answer the research question how does the healthcare strategy of risk group segmentation (RGS) interact with the country context to create legitimacy for CDAP. It was hypothesised that the implementation of a RGS strategy improves CDAP's legitimacy to allocate and manage resources. Design and Methodology: A sample of 161 pharmacists were surveyed via face to face interviews and telephone calls using a convenient sampling method. The instrument determined the extent to which the six dimensions of RGS were utilized in CDAP and three performance construct were assessed. Two pharmacists from each pharmacy were interviewed to reduce common method bias. Descriptive measures such as mean, standard deviation and Pearson bivariate correlations for the purpose of simple summaries of the dominant views and relationships were done and hypothesis testing was conducted using three-stage hierarchical regression analysis. Results: RSG was seen as an empowering tool for the patients and was needed, but not addressed. It was found to be desirable but not implemented. Its non implementation reduced the socio-political legitimacy of the program. Conclusions: CDAP in its current form does not address the risk faced by various groups in Trinidad and Tobago. This has led to the socio-political legitimacy of the program being reduced. It may be inferred its ability to create true health equality is compromised.