Randomized double-blinded study comparing medical treatment versus iliac vein stenting in chronic venous disease
J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord
; 6(2): 183-191, 2018. graf, tab
Article
in English
| Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP
| ID: biblio-1063785
Responsible library:
BR79.1
Localization: BR79.1
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
Iliac vein stenting has emerged as the procedure of choice in the treatment of iliac vein obstruction (IVO). However, clinical outcomes have never been studied by a randomized clinical trial. Our purpose was to compare medical and endovascular treatment results in symptomatic chronic venous disease (CVD) patients with significant IVO documented by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).METHODS:
Patients with Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology clinical class C3 to C6 and a visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain) score >3 were considered eligible. We randomly assigned limbs with ≥50% IVO on IVUS to undergo medical treatment alone or medical treatment plus iliac vein stenting. The patient and clinical physician were blinded. Primary outcomes included change from baseline in VAS pain score, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included stent integrity, migration, and patency rates at 6 months.
Search on Google
Collection:
National databases
/
Brazil
Database:
Sec. Est. Saúde SP
/
SESSP-IDPCPROD
Main subject:
Stents
/
Iliac Vein
Type of study:
Controlled clinical trial
Aspects:
Patient-preference
Language:
English
Journal:
J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord
Year:
2018
Document type:
Article
Institution/Affiliation country:
Instituto Dante Pazzanese/BR
/
Phoenix Heart Center at St. Luke's Medical Center/US