Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resolvendo o paradoxo da iconicidade: o caso dos sinais de Libras / Solving the Iconicity Paradox: the case of Libras signs
Capovilla, Fernando Cesar; Martins, Antonielle Cantarelli.
Affiliation
  • Capovilla, Fernando Cesar; Universidade de São Paulo.
  • Martins, Antonielle Cantarelli; s.af
Psicopedagogia ; 37(114): 269-285, set.-dez. 2020. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS, Index Psychology - journals | ID: biblio-1155196
Responsible library: BR85.1
RESUMO
Sinais icônicos têm significado admissível e adivinhável. Paradoxo na bibliografia embora admissíveis, 90% dos sinais não são adivinháveis. No estudo analisando relação entre admissibilidade e adivinhabilidade, 70 sujeitos ingênuos (Grupos 1 e 2) observaram 201 sinais (Conjuntos A e B). Grupo 1 julgava admissibilidade de sinais do Conjunto A (escala Likert -2, -1, +1, +2) e adivinhava significado dos do Conjunto B. Grupo 2 fazia oposto.

RESULTADOS:

Sujeitos julgaram 28 sinais como inadmissíveis (Adm m ≤-1), 77 como admissíveis (Adm m≥+1), 96 como neutros (-0,99≤ Adm m ≤+0,99). Dos 201 sinais, adivinharam somente 24, todos previamente considerados admissíveis pelo outro grupo. Nenhum sinal considerado inadmissível por um grupo foi adivinhado pelo outro. Só sinais com admissibilidade superior à faixa 1,5-1,75 foram adivinhados
ABSTRACT
Signs are iconic when their meaning is considered admissible and guessable. Paradoxically, 90% of signs are considered unguessable and, yet, admissible. In the study, 70 naive subjects (Groups 1 and 2) examined 201 signs (Sets A and B). Group 1 rated Set A admissibility (Likert scale -2, -1, +1, +2) and guessed Set B meaning. Group 2 did the opposite.

RESULTS:

Subjects rated 28 signs as unadmissible (average rating ≤-1), 77 signs as admissible (≥+1), and 96 signs as neutral (-.99≤ rating ≤+.99). Only 24 of 201 signs were guessed, all of which had been regarded as admissible by the other group. No sign considered unadmissible was guessed. Only signs with admissibility greater than 1.5-1.75 ended up being guessed.


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: Index Psychology - journals / LILACS Type of study: Diagnostic study Language: Portuguese Journal: Psicopedagogia Journal subject: Education / Psychology Year: 2020 Document type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: Index Psychology - journals / LILACS Type of study: Diagnostic study Language: Portuguese Journal: Psicopedagogia Journal subject: Education / Psychology Year: 2020 Document type: Article / Project document Affiliation country: Brazil
...