Carotid Intervention : Stent or Surgery? A Prospective Audit : Cardiovascular Topic

ABSTRACT

This study represents a prospective audit comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA); performed by a single surgical team. Between January 2005 and December 2008; 440 patients were referred; 177 had CAS and 263 CEA. Selection of procedure was individualised and contra-indications for CAS included internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis 85-90; intraluminal thrombus; ICA tortuosity; gross surface ulceration of plaque and excessive calcification. Type III aortic arch and arch calcification also precluded CAS. Standard techniques were used for both procedures with a protection device routinely used for CAS. Most CEAs were performed under general anaesthesia; with selective intraluminal shunting. One hundred and eighty-six patients were selected for CAS; nine (48) were converted to CEA for technical reasons. The operative risk profile was similar; but significantly more in the CAS group were hypertensive. Almost half (49) in the CAS group were asymptomatic vs 26in the CEA group. All asymptomatics had 70+stenosis on Duplex Doppler. Results were reported within one month of the procedure. The stroke rate was 2.3for CAS vs 1.9for CEA (p 0.05). Stroke and death plus one M1 was 4.5after CAS vs 3.4after CEA (p 0.05). Disabling stroke occurred in 1.1of CAS patients vs 0.4of CEA patients. These results are satisfactory and compare favourably with other similar series