Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costo-efectividad de una alternativa para la prestación de servicios de atención primaria en salud para los beneficiarios del Seguro Popular de México / Cost-effectiveness analysis of an alternative for the provision of primary health care for beneficiaries of Seguro Popular in Mexico
Figueroa-Lara, Alejandro; González-Block, Miguel A.
Affiliation
  • Figueroa-Lara, Alejandro; Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Coordinación de Investigación en Salud. División de Gestión Tecnológica e Innovación. Ciudad de México. MX
  • González-Block, Miguel A; Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Coordinación de Investigación en Salud. División de Gestión Tecnológica e Innovación. Ciudad de México. MX
Salud pública Méx ; 58(5): 569-576, sep.-oct. 2016. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-830831
Responsible library: BR1.1
RESUMEN
Resumen

Objetivo:

Calcular la razón costo-efectividad de servicios públicos y privados contratados por el Seguro Popular en primer nivel de atención. Material y

métodos:

Se evaluó una experiencia piloto de contratación de servicios de primer nivel de atención a la salud en el estado de Hidalgo, México, midiendo, con base en una encuesta poblacional, la calidad general y la detección de disminución de visión. Se analizó la sensibilidad mediante simulaciones de Monte Carlo.

Resultados:

El prestador privado es dominante en calidad y costo-efectivo para la detección de disminución de visión.

Conclusiones:

La compra estratégica de prestadores privados de atención primaria es promisoria para mejorar los servicios de salud y reducir los costos.
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Objective:

To estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of public and private health care providers funded by Seguro Popular. Materials and

methods:

A pilot contracting primary care health care scheme in the state of Hidalgo, Mexico, was evaluated through a population survey to assess quality of care and detection decreased of vision. Costs were assessed from the payer perspective using institutional sources.The alternatives analyzed were a private provider with capitated and performance-based payment modalities, and a public provider funded through budget subsidies. Sensitivity analysis was performed using Monte Carlo simulations.

Results:

The private provider is dominant in the quality and cost-effective detection of decreased vision.

Conclusions:

Strategic purchasing of private providers of primary care has shown promising results as an alternative to improving quality of health services and reducing costs.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: SDG3 - Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health / Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas / SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Financial Arrangements / Goal 4: Health financing / Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health Database: LILACS Main subject: Primary Health Care / Vision Disorders / Universal Health Insurance Type of study: Evaluation study / Health economic evaluation Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: Spanish Journal: Salud pública Méx Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social/MX

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Health context: SDG3 - Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health / Sustainable Health Agenda for the Americas / SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Financial Arrangements / Goal 4: Health financing / Target 3.8 Achieve universal access to health Database: LILACS Main subject: Primary Health Care / Vision Disorders / Universal Health Insurance Type of study: Evaluation study / Health economic evaluation Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: Spanish Journal: Salud pública Méx Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Mexico Institution/Affiliation country: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social/MX
...