Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
¿La cirugía endovascular de las lesiones de la aorta torácica reduce el riesgo de paraplejía postoperatoria? / Does endovascular surgery for lesions inthe thoracic aorta reduce the risk of post-operative paraplegia?
Porto-Rodríguez, J; Gesto-Castromil, R.
Affiliation
  • Porto-Rodríguez, J; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid. España
  • Gesto-Castromil, R; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid. España
Angiología ; 58(supl.1): S127-S139, 2006. ilus, tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-046283
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: ES1.1 - BNCS
RESUMEN
Objetivo. Analizar la incidencia de complicaciones isquémicas medulares tras cirugía convencional y endovascular en pacientes tratados por patología de la aorta torácica descendente (ATD). Desarrollo. Los artículos publicados (en su mayoría revisiones retrospectivas o prospectivas sin casos control) limitan la información disponible. No se han publicado estudios prospectivos aleatorizados que comparen cirugía convencional con endovascular en este grupo de enfermos. Parece existir menor riesgo de isquemia medular en pacientes tratados con técnicas endovasculares respecto a la cirugía convencional en la fase aguda de la disección aórtica de tipo B y en la rotura traumática de la aorta torácica. No existen diferencias a corto plazo (o son ligeramente superiores los resultados de la cirugía convencional) en el tratamiento de los aneurismas de la ATD degenerativos o disecantes. Conclusión. La reparación de las lesiones de la ATD con dispositivos endovasculares no evita la aparición de complicaciones isquémicas medulares
ABSTRACT
Aim. To analyse the incidence of ischaemic complications affecting the spinal cord following conventional and endovascular surgery in patients treated for a pathology involving the descending thoracic aorta (DTA). Development. The amount of information available in the articles published to date (mostly retrospective or prospective reviews with no control cases) is limited. No randomised prospective studies have appeared in the literature that compare conventional and endovascular surgery in this group of patients. There seems to be a lower risk of spinal cord ischaemia in patients treated with endovascular techniques compared to conventional surgery in the acute phase of type B aortic dissection and in traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta. There are no short-term differences (or the results of conventional surgery are slightly better) in the treatment of degenerative or dissecting aneurysms of the DTA. Conclusions. Repairing lesions in the DTA with endovascular devices does not prevent the appearance of ischaemic complications in the spinal cord
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Health context: SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Target 3.4: Reduce premature mortality due to noncommunicable diseases Database: IBECS Main subject: Aorta, Thoracic / Aortic Coarctation / Aortic Rupture / Paraplegia / Prostheses and Implants / Ischemia / Aortic Dissection Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study Language: Spanish Journal: Angiología Year: 2006 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre/España
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Health context: SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Target 3.4: Reduce premature mortality due to noncommunicable diseases Database: IBECS Main subject: Aorta, Thoracic / Aortic Coarctation / Aortic Rupture / Paraplegia / Prostheses and Implants / Ischemia / Aortic Dissection Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study Language: Spanish Journal: Angiología Year: 2006 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre/España
...