Correlacion clínico-gráfica entre la frecuencia cardiaca y la hipomotilidad fetal / Clinical-cardiotocographic correlation between fetal heart rate and hypomotility
Clín. investig. ginecol. obstet. (Ed. impr.)
; 39(6): 241-248, nov.-dic. 2012. ilus, tab
Article
in Spanish
| IBECS
| ID: ibc-106356
Responsible library:
ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
RESUMEN
Objetivo:
El objetivo de la investigación fue determinar la morfología y las alteraciones de la frecuencia cardiaca en fetos con hipomotilidad. Material y método La muestra la integraron 40 pacientes, que se dividió en 2 grupos grupo 1 (problema), 20 pacientes embarazadas con diagnóstico de hipomotilidad fetal; grupo 2 (testigo), 20 pacientes con embarazo normal. Se practicaron registros de frecuencia cardíaca fetal (FCF) y contractilidad uterina; la duración fue de 2h. Se utilizó un cardiotocógrafo Corometrics Modelo 0115JAA, Serie 0488301.ResultadosEl análisis de la FCF Basal entre los grupos problema y testigo reveló que en el primero la media y la desviación estándar fueron de 136,91±8,75 lat./min, al compararla con el segundo grupo la media (..) (AU)ABSTRACT
Objective:
To determine the morphological consequences and heart rate alterations in fetuses with hypomotility. Material andmethod:
A sample of 40 patients was divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (the problem group) consisted of 20 pregnant patients who had been diagnosed with fetal hypomotility. Group2 (the control group) consisted of 20 patients with a normal pregnancy. Fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contractility were measured for 2 hours. A Corometrics cardiotocograph model 0115JAA, series 0488301 was used.Results:
The baseline FHR of the two groups was compared. The mean and standard deviation (SD) were 136.91 ± 8.75 beats/min in group 1 and 135.5 ± 10.57 beats /min in group 2. The difference between the means was one beat and the t-value was 0.46. This difference was not significant. The mean and SD of the amplitude of the accelerations were calculated in both groups, obtaining values of 22.47 ± 7.76 in group 1 and 24.81 ± 7.41 in group 2. The difference between (..) (AU)
Search on Google
Collection:
National databases
/
Spain
Database:
IBECS
Main subject:
Uterine Contraction
/
Heart Rate, Fetal
/
Fetal Movement
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Limits:
Female
/
Humans
/
Pregnancy
Language:
Spanish
Journal:
Clín. investig. ginecol. obstet. (Ed. impr.)
Year:
2012
Document type:
Article
Institution/Affiliation country:
Escuela Superior de Medicina del IPN/s. p
/
Secretaría de Salud del D.D.F/s. p
/
Unidad Xochimilco/s. p