Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Validation study for Spanish patients
Arraras, J. I; Manterola, A; Hernández, B; Arias de la Vega, F; Martínez, M; Vila, M; Eito, C; Vera, R; Domínguez, M. Á.
Affiliation
  • Arraras, J. I; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Manterola, A; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Hernández, B; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Arias de la Vega, F; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Martínez, M; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Vila, M; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Eito, C; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Vera, R; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
  • Domínguez, M. Á; Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona. Spain
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 13(6): 401-410, jun. 2011. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-124680
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The EORTC QLQ-INFO25 evaluates the information received by cancer patients. This study assesses the psychometric properties of the QLQ-INFO25 when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 169 patients with different cancers and stages of disease completed the EORTC QLQINFO25, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the information scales of the inpatient satisfaction module EORTC IN-PATSAT32 on two occasions during the patients' treatment and follow- up period. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, validity and responsiveness to changes was conducted. Patient acceptability was assessed with a debriefing questionnaire.

RESULTS:

Multi-trait scaling confirmed the 4 multi-item scales (information about disease, medical tests, treatment and other services) and eight single items. All items met the standards for convergent validity and all except one met the standards of item discriminant validity. Internal consistency for all scales (α>0.70) and the whole questionnaire (α>0.90) was adequate in the three measurements, except information about the disease (0.67) and other services (0.68) in the first measurement, as was test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations >0.70). Correlations with related areas of IN-PATSAT32 (r>0.40) supported convergent validity. Divergent validity was confirmed through low correlations with EORTC QLQ-C30 scales (r<0.30). The EORTC QLQ-INFO-25 discriminated among groups based on gender, age, education, levels of anxiety and depression, treatment line, wish for information and satisfaction. One scale and an item showed changes over time.

CONCLUSIONS:

The EORTC QLQ-INFO 25 is a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish cancer patients. These results are in line with those of the EORTC validation study (AU)
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Health context: SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Target 3.4: Reduce premature mortality due to noncommunicable diseases Database: IBECS Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Patient Education as Topic / Patient Satisfaction / Neoplasms Type of study: Practice guideline / Qualitative research Aspects: Patient-preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2011 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Navarra/Spain
Search on Google
Collection: National databases / Spain Health context: SDG3 - Health and Well-Being Health problem: Target 3.4: Reduce premature mortality due to noncommunicable diseases Database: IBECS Main subject: Psychometrics / Quality of Life / Patient Education as Topic / Patient Satisfaction / Neoplasms Type of study: Practice guideline / Qualitative research Aspects: Patient-preference Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Year: 2011 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Hospital de Navarra/Spain
...