Utilización de los desfibriladores externos automáticos de uso público en el Principado de Asturias durante el periodo 2012-2014 / Bystander use of automated external defibrillators in the Spanish autonomous community of the Principality of Asturias in 2012-2014
Emergencias (Sant Vicenç dels Horts)
; 30(6): 415-418, dic. 2018. tab, graf
Article
in Spanish
| IBECS
| ID: ibc-179713
Responsible library:
ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
RESUMEN
Se analiza el uso de los desfibriladores externos automáticos (DEA) de uso público en caso de parada cardiaca en el Principado de Asturias desde enero del 2012 hasta diciembre del 2014, así como el manejo hospitalario y el estado neurológico al alta de los pacientes. Para ello se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo poblacional sobre la utilización de DEA de uso público en el Principado de Asturias en tres fases 1) cuestionario telefónico a todas las entidades con DEA; 2) análisis de las historias clínicas del SAMU-Asturias; y 3) análisis de las historias clínicas hospitalarias. Se han identificado 13 usos de un DEA público. En cuanto al ritmo inicial, 11 (84,5%) eran desfibrilables, 3 pacientes (23%) fallecieron a nivel prehospitalario, 1 (7,6%) en el hospital y 9 (69,2%) sobrevivieron, todos con un ritmo inicial desfibrilable y todos con una puntuación en la escala Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) al alta de 1. Ocho de los 10 pacientes que llegaron con vida al hospital fueron sometidos a angioplastia primaria y 3 a hipotermia. La estancia hospitalaria media de los supervivientes fue de 9,4 días (DE = 4,88). Se concluye que el uso de DEA público mejora notablemente la supervivencia de la parada cardiorrespiratoria extrahospitalaria, probablemente relacionado con la reducción del tiempo de espera hasta la desfibrilación
ABSTRACT
On-site bystander use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) was analized in Asturias, Spain, between January 2012 and December 2014. Hospital management and neurologic state on discharge were also studied. Our retrospective observational population-based design had 3 phases comrpising 1) a telephone survey of facilities with onsite public-access AEDsc, 2) analysis of relevant case records held by the Asturian emergency medical service, and 3) analysis of relevant hospital case records. Thirteen cases of AED use by bystanders were found. Eleven patients (84.5%) had initial shockable rhythms. Three patients (23%) died before reaching the hospital, 1 (7.6%) died in hospital, and 9 (69.2%) survived. All of the survivors had a shockable rhythm and all had a score of 1 on the Cerebral Performance Category scale on discharge. Eight of the 10 patients who were alive on arrival at the hospital were treated with primary angioplasty; therapeutic hypothermia was applied in 3 cases. The mean (SD) hospital stay of survivors was 9.4 (4.88) days. We conclude that bystander use of an AED notably improves survival in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest, probably related to shortening the delay in starting defibrillation
Full text:
Available
Collection:
National databases
/
Spain
Database:
IBECS
Main subject:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
/
Defibrillators
/
Emergency Service, Hospital
/
Heart Arrest
Limits:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Country/Region as subject:
Europa
Language:
Spanish
Journal:
Emergencias (Sant Vicenç dels Horts)
Year:
2018
Document type:
Article
Institution/Affiliation country:
Universidad de Oviedo/España