Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acreditación y resultados de la educación médica en México / Accreditation and results from medical education in Mexico
Vázquez Martínez, Francisco Domingo; Ortiz-León, María Cristina.
Affiliation
  • Vázquez Martínez, Francisco Domingo; Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa. México
  • Ortiz-León, María Cristina; Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa. México
Educ. med. (Ed. impr.) ; 19(6): 333-338, nov.-dic. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-194023
Responsible library: ES1.1
Localization: BNCS
RESUMEN

OBJETIVO:

Saber si los programas de educación médica reconocidos por su calidad tienen mejores resultados en el Examen Nacional de Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas. MATERIAL Y

MÉTODOS:

Se analizan los resultados del Consejo Mexicano para la Acreditación de la Educación Médica (programas acreditados, programas no acreditados y programas sin acreditación) y los de los Comités Interinstitucionales para la Evaluación de la Educación Superior (programas con y sin nivel 1) según el Examen Nacional de Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (2016).

RESULTADOS:

Tanto en el número de programas con promedio general aprobatorio, como en la probabilidad de ser seleccionado y en el promedio general del examen, los programas con reconocimiento tienen mejores resultados. Sin embargo, en el 37% de los programas hay contraposición entre reconocimiento y resultados.

CONCLUSIONES:

En general, los programas con reconocimiento tienen mejores resultados. Hay que justipreciar la importancia de estos para el otorgamiento de los reconocimientos a la calidad
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether the medical education programs recognised for their quality achieve better results in the National Medical Residency Examination. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

An analysis was performed on the results from the Mexican Council for Accrediting Medical Education (accredited programs, non-accredited programs and programs with no accreditation), as well as from the Inter-institutional Committee on Evaluating Higher Education (Level 1 or No Level 1 Programs) according to the National Medical Residency Examination for Candidates (2016).

RESULTS:

Recognised programs achieve better results as regards the possibility to be admitted, as well as the mean scores. However, there is an evident difference between the results and the recognition in 37% of the programs.

CONCLUSIONS:

In general, the recognised programs get better results. Thus, their importance has to be appraised in order to recognise quality
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Education, Medical / Educational Measurement / Accreditation / Internship and Residency Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: Spanish Journal: Educ. med. (Ed. impr.) Year: 2018 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad Veracruzana/México

Full text: Available Collection: National databases / Spain Database: IBECS Main subject: Education, Medical / Educational Measurement / Accreditation / Internship and Residency Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Mexico Language: Spanish Journal: Educ. med. (Ed. impr.) Year: 2018 Document type: Article Institution/Affiliation country: Universidad Veracruzana/México
...